Lisa Connell-Crowley, Maude Le Gall, Duc J. Vo, Edward Giniger 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bifocal Is a Downstream Target of the Ste20-like Serine/Threonine Kinase Misshapen in Regulating Photoreceptor Growth Cone Targeting in Drosophila  Wenjing.
Advertisements

Genetic Specification of Axonal Arbors
Federico Dajas-Bailador, Emma V. Jones, Alan J. Whitmarsh 
Daniel Crowner, Maude Le Gall, Michael A. Gates, Edward Giniger 
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 11, Issue 17, Pages (September 2001)
The Drosophila tumor suppressor gene, dlg, is involved in structural plasticity at a glutamatergic synapse  Bo Guan, Beate Hartmann, Young-Ho Kho, Michael.
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages (September 2002)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (April 2002)
Drosophila fushi tarazu
Stefan Thor, John B. Thomas  Neuron 
Volume 10, Issue 18, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (June 2006)
Partner of Numb Colocalizes with Numb during Mitosis and Directs Numb Asymmetric Localization in Drosophila Neural and Muscle Progenitors  Bingwei Lu,
The Conserved Immunoglobulin Superfamily Member SAX-3/Robo Directs Multiple Aspects of Axon Guidance in C. elegans  Jennifer A Zallen, B.Alexander Yi,
Repulsive Axon Guidance
Distinct Protein Domains and Expression Patterns Confer Divergent Axon Guidance Functions for Drosophila Robo Receptors  Bettina Spitzweck, Marko Brankatschk,
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (October 1996)
Plexin B Mediates Axon Guidance in Drosophila by Simultaneously Inhibiting Active Rac and Enhancing RhoA Signaling  Hailan Hu, Tobias F. Marton, Corey.
Ras Induces Mediator Complex Exchange on C/EBPβ
The Intracellular Domain of the Frazzled/DCC Receptor Is a Transcription Factor Required for Commissural Axon Guidance  Alexandra Neuhaus-Follini, Greg J.
Volume 81, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 84, Issue 4, Pages (February 1996)
The Drosophila tumor suppressor gene, dlg, is involved in structural plasticity at a glutamatergic synapse  Bo Guan, Beate Hartmann, Young-Ho Kho, Michael.
Genetic Analysis of the Mechanisms Controlling Target Selection: Complementary and Combinatorial Functions of Netrins, Semaphorins, and IgCAMs  Margaret.
Volume 52, Issue 4, Pages (November 2006)
Joanna Chen, Esther M. Verheyen  Current Biology 
Increased Ezrin Expression and Activation by CDK5 Coincident with Acquisition of the Senescent Phenotype  Hai-Su Yang, Philip W Hinds  Molecular Cell 
A Role for Abl in Notch Signaling
Volume 15, Issue 15, Pages (August 2005)
Interactions between a Receptor Tyrosine Phosphatase and a Cell Surface Ligand Regulate Axon Guidance and Glial-Neuronal Communication  Hyung-Kook (Peter)
Dendrites of Distinct Classes of Drosophila Sensory Neurons Show Different Capacities for Homotypic Repulsion  Wesley B. Grueber, Bing Ye, Adrian W. Moore,
Volume 15, Issue 19, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Jakub M. Swiercz, Rohini Kuner, Jürgen Behrens, Stefan Offermanns 
B.K. Müller, D.G. Jay, F. Bonhoeffer  Current Biology 
Control of Dendritic Field Formation in Drosophila
Engrailed Negatively Regulates the Expression of Cell Adhesion Molecules Connectin and Neuroglian in Embryonic Drosophila Nervous System  Melody V.S Siegler,
Benjamin J. Matthews, Wesley B. Grueber  Current Biology 
Drosophila ASPP Regulates C-Terminal Src Kinase Activity
Drosophila atonal Fully Rescues the Phenotype of Math1 Null Mice
EphB/Syndecan-2 Signaling in Dendritic Spine Morphogenesis
Yi-Ping Hsueh, Eunjoon Kim, Morgan Sheng  Neuron 
MAX-1, a Novel PH/MyTH4/FERM Domain Cytoplasmic Protein Implicated in Netrin- Mediated Axon Repulsion  Xun Huang, Hwai-Jong Cheng, Marc Tessier-Lavigne,
PHYL Acts to Down-Regulate TTK88, a Transcriptional Repressor of Neuronal Cell Fates, by a SINA-Dependent Mechanism  Amy H Tang, Thomas P Neufeld, Elaine.
Volume 15, Issue 15, Pages (August 2005)
Guidance Cues at the Drosophila CNS Midline: Identification and Characterization of Two Drosophila Netrin/UNC-6 Homologs  Robin Harris, Laura Moore Sabatelli,
Magalie Lecourtois, François Schweisguth  Current Biology 
Volume 105, Issue 1, Pages (April 2001)
Volume 93, Issue 6, Pages (June 1998)
Specific Disruption of a Schwann Cell Dystrophin-Related Protein Complex in a Demyelinating Neuropathy  Diane L Sherman, Cinzia Fabrizi, C.Stewart Gillespie,
even-skipped Determines the Dorsal Growth of Motor Axons in Drosophila
Islet Coordinately Regulates Motor Axon Guidance and Dendrite Targeting through the Frazzled/DCC Receptor  Celine Santiago, Greg J. Bashaw  Cell Reports 
Short-Range and Long-Range Guidance by Slit and Its Robo Receptors
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Inscuteable and Staufen Mediate Asymmetric Localization and Segregation of prosperoRNA during Drosophila Neuroblast Cell Divisions  Peng Li, Xiaohang.
Numb Antagonizes Notch Signaling to Specify Sibling Neuron Cell Fates
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 1996)
A Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor, Dacapo, Is Necessary for Timely Exit from the Cell Cycle during Drosophila Embryogenesis  Joriene C de Nooij, Mary.
Control of Dendritic Field Formation in Drosophila
Fig. 1. Expression of a Ror-eGFP fusion protein under control of the endogenous Ror promoter in Drosophila embryos. Expression of a Ror-eGFP fusion protein.
Volume 16, Issue 16, Pages (August 2006)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 16, Pages (August 2006)
The Transmembrane Semaphorin Sema I Is Required in Drosophila for Embryonic Motor and CNS Axon Guidance  Hung-Hsiang Yu, Houmam H Araj, Sherry A Ralls,
Volume 9, Issue 21, (November 1999)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (November 1996)
Presentation transcript:

The cyclin-dependent kinase Cdk5 controls multiple aspects of axon patterning in vivo  Lisa Connell-Crowley, Maude Le Gall, Duc J. Vo, Edward Giniger  Current Biology  Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages 599-603 (May 2000) DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00487-5

Figure 1 Dp35 binds and activates Cdk5. (a) Diagrammatic representation of Dp35. The numbers indicate amino-acid positions. (b) GST pull-down assay. Lanes 1 and 2, bacterially expressed GST–Dp35, or GST alone; lanes 3 and 4, in vitro translated [35S]methionine-labeled Cdk5 or Cdk5K33A; lanes 5–8, Cdk5 or Cdk5K33A precipitated after incubation with GST–Dp35 or GST beads. All molecular weights are indicated in kDa. (c) Human 293T cells transiently expressing UAS–Dp35–Myc or UAS–β-galactosidase (β-gal) and GAL4–VP16 were lysed and subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti-Myc antibody. Samples were analyzed by western blotting using antibodies to Myc, human Cdk5 (hCdk5), or human Cdk1 (hCdk1) and assayed for histone H1 kinase activity. (d) Human 293T cells transiently expressing GAL4–VP16 plus combinations of UAS–Dp35–Myc, UAS–Cdk5–FLAG, UAS–Cdk5K33A–FLAG and UAS–β-galactosidase were lysed, subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-FLAG antibodies, and kinase activity analyzed as in (c). Current Biology 2000 10, 599-603DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00487-5)

Figure 2 Cdk5 and Dp35 interact genetically. Scanning electron micrograph of adult eyes expressing combinations of Cdk5, Cdk5K33A , and Dp35 with the eye-specific driver GMR–GAL4. (a) GMR–GAL4 alone. (b) One copy of UAS–Dp35–Myc. (c) One copy of UAS–Cdk5–FLAG. (d) One copy each of UAS–Dp35–Myc and UAS–Cdk5–FLAG. Note the severe disorganization of eye morphology. (e) Two copies of UAS–Dp35–Myc. Note the irregular rows of facets (arrow in the inset). (f) Two copies of UAS–Cdk5K33A–FLAG. (g) Two copies each of UAS–Dp35–Myc and UAS–Cdk5K33A–FLAG. The regular eye structure here contrasts with the irregular morphology in (d,e). Current Biology 2000 10, 599-603DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00487-5)

Figure 3 Dp35 is expressed in neurons and localizes to growth cones. (a–c)In situ hybridization with a Dp35 probe. (a) Stage 17 embryo; b, brain; vnc, ventral nerve cord. Expression was also observed in anterior and posterior sensillae. Left, anterior; top, dorsal. (b) Lateral view of lateral (l) and ventral′ (v′) clusters of sensory neurons in three abdominal hemisegments. (c) CNS, stage 12.4 embryo. (d) Immunostaining of a stage 12.4 embryo with antibody against horseradish peroxidase (HRP) to reveal CNS neurons, neuroblasts and ganglion mother cells. Dp35 expression and HRP immunoreactivity were localized to the same regions of the CNS, but Dp35 was restricted to the dorsal surface of the CNS, where the first neurons are beginning to extend axons (posterior commissure; the dark dot indicated by the arrow). (e–g) Embryonic neurons expressing UAS–Dp35–Myc under the control of 15J2–GAL4 and detected with anti-Myc antibodies. (e) A dMP2 neuron, stage 12 CNS. (f) Chordotonal neurons, stage 16 PNS. (g) dMP2 neurons from four hemisegments, stage 14 CNS. Arrowheads, axons; arrow, dendrites; gc, growth cone. Current Biology 2000 10, 599-603DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00487-5)

Figure 4 Altering Cdk5 function causes axon patterning defects. (a) Diagram of an abdominal hemisegment depicting the three nerves examined in this study. LBD, lateral bipolar dendritic neuron. (b–i) Peripheral motor nerves of stage 17 (b,f) wild-type embryos, or embryos expressing (c,d,g–i) Cdk5–FLAG with Dp35–Myc, or (e) Cdk5dn–FLAG alone, visualized with anti-fasciclin 2 antibody. Arrowheads denote defective nerves. (b) Wild-type SNa. (c) SNa lacking the dorsal branch. (d,e) SNas with ectopic muscle contacts. (f) Wild-type dorsal terminations of ISN and TN. (g) An overextended TN. (h) A stalled ISN. (i) A misrouted TN that has extended towards the ISN in the next segment. (j–m) Percentage of embryos exhibiting one or more nerve defects when neuronal Cdk5 activity was altered by expression of the indicated proteins. Control embryos expressed elav–GAL4 alone. Letters in parentheses indicate independent UAS construct insertions into the genome; each letter represents one insertion. Each bar represents an average of two independent experiments; the results of each experimental pair never differed by more than 14%, with an average difference of less than 10%. For example, in four independent trials with Cdk5dn, 31, 32, 33 and 33% of the embryos exhibited defects. (n) Percentage of stalled, overextended, or misrouted nerves in response to increased or decreased Cdk5 activity. Increased activity includes defects seen with expression of Dp35 or Dp35 plus Cdk5; decreased activity refers to defects seen with expression of Cdk5dn. Expression of UAS–Cdk5, UAS–Cdk5dn, and UAS–Dp35 did not alter neuron cell fate as assayed by staining with anti-eve antibody and monoclonal antibody 22C10 (data not shown). Current Biology 2000 10, 599-603DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00487-5)