Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Protein-protein interactions Why study protein interactions? To infer function To understand regulatory networks Approach With given bait, discover target.
Advertisements

Figure 3. Kinetics effects of the C domain on ER–EREc binding
Structure of a Ternary Transcription Activation Complex
The RNA World of the Nucleolus: Two Major Families of Small RNAs Defined by Different Box Elements with Related Functions  Andrey G Balakin, Laurie Smith,
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
Cotranscriptionally Formed DNA:RNA Hybrids Mediate Transcription Elongation Impairment and Transcription-Associated Recombination  Pablo Huertas, Andrés.
Daniel Chi-Hong Lin, Alan D Grossman  Cell 
The Transcriptional Regulator RfaH Stimulates RNA Chain Synthesis after Recruitment to Elongation Complexes by the Exposed Nontemplate DNA Strand  Irina.
Phosphorylation of NF-κB p65 by PKA Stimulates Transcriptional Activity by Promoting a Novel Bivalent Interaction with the Coactivator CBP/p300  Haihong.
Stem-Loop Structures within mRNA Coding Sequences Activate Translation Initiation and Mediate Control by Small Regulatory RNAs  Jonathan Jagodnik, Claude.
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Smita Shankar, Asma Hatoum, Jeffrey W. Roberts  Molecular Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages (May 1998)
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Fátima Gebauer, Marica Grskovic, Matthias W Hentze  Molecular Cell 
Benjamin P Callen, Keith E Shearwin, J.Barry Egan  Molecular Cell 
Kåre L. Nielsen, Nicholas J. Cowan  Molecular Cell 
Shinobu Chiba, Koreaki Ito  Molecular Cell 
Interaction with PCNA Is Essential for Yeast DNA Polymerase η Function
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Hung-Ta Chen, Steven Hahn  Cell 
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
Tae Kook Kim, Tom Maniatis  Molecular Cell 
Brian Z Ring, William S Yarnell, Jeffrey W Roberts  Cell 
Jun Y. Fan, Danny Rangasamy, Karolin Luger, David J. Tremethick 
A Shared Surface of TBP Directs RNA Polymerase II and III Transcription via Association with Different TFIIB Family Members  Xuemei Zhao, Laura Schramm,
RNA Polymerase Pausing Regulates Translation Initiation by Providing Additional Time for TRAP-RNA Interaction  Alexander V. Yakhnin, Helen Yakhnin, Paul.
Jonathan P Staley, Christine Guthrie  Molecular Cell 
Mechanism of Transcription Termination by RNA Polymerase III Utilizes a Non-template Strand Sequence-Specific Signal Element  Aneeshkumar G. Arimbasseri,
Nature of the Nucleosomal Barrier to RNA Polymerase II
NanoRNAs Prime Transcription Initiation In Vivo
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Jesse Easter, James W Gober  Molecular Cell 
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (December 1997)
Jesse Easter, James W Gober  Molecular Cell 
MyoD Targets TAF3/TRF3 to Activate Myogenin Transcription
The Mammalian RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Interacts with RNA to Suppress Transcription-Coupled 3′ End Formation  Syuzo Kaneko, James L. Manley 
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 40, Issue 5, Pages (December 2010)
Claudia Schneider, James T. Anderson, David Tollervey  Molecular Cell 
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
RNA Helicase A Mediates Association of CBP with RNA Polymerase II
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Jin Mo Park, Janis Werner, Jung Mo Kim, John T Lis, Young-Joon Kim 
Modification of the Properties of Elongating RNA Polymerase by Persistent Association with Nascent Antiterminator RNA  Ranjan Sen, Rodney A King, Robert.
Beyond Homing: Competition between Intron Endonucleases Confers a Selective Advantage on Flanking Genetic Markers  Heidi Goodrich-Blair, David A Shub 
George Simos, Anke Sauer, Franco Fasiolo, Eduard C Hurt  Molecular Cell 
James Fishburn, Neeman Mohibullah, Steven Hahn  Molecular Cell 
Bacillus subtilis Glutamine Synthetase Controls Gene Expression through a Protein- Protein Interaction with Transcription Factor TnrA  Lewis V Wray, Jill.
Vytautas Naktinis, Jennifer Turner, Mike O'Donnell  Cell 
J.Russell Lipford, Stephen P Bell  Molecular Cell 
Peter B. Kim, James W. Nelson, Ronald R. Breaker  Molecular Cell 
Volume 105, Issue 7, Pages (June 2001)
An Activator Target in the RNA Polymerase II Holoenzyme
Michael T Marr, Jeffrey W Roberts  Molecular Cell 
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Transcriptional Termination Factors for RNA Polymerase II in Yeast
Rodney A King, Sarbani Banik-Maiti, Ding Jun Jin, Robert A Weisberg 
Structural Organization of the RNA Polymerase-Promoter Open Complex
Volume 40, Issue 5, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Chih-Yung S. Lee, Tzu-Lan Yeh, Bridget T. Hughes, Peter J. Espenshade 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages 611-622 (September 2002) The σ70 Subunit of RNA Polymerase Is Contacted by the λQ Antiterminator during Early Elongation  Bryce E Nickels, Christine W Roberts, Haitao Sun, Jeffrey W Roberts, Ann Hochschild  Molecular Cell  Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages 611-622 (September 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00648-2

Figure 1 λQ Function at PR′ (A) Presence of λQ allows RNAP that has initiated from PR′ to read through a transcription terminator. Blowups show functionally important elements at PR′ including the promoter −10 and −35 elements, the λQ binding element (QBE), and the pause-inducing −10-like element. Also indicated is a −35-like element positioned between the QBE and the pause-inducing −10-like element. (B) Sequence of events at PR′. Formation of the paused transcription complex at PR′ involves an interaction between σ70 region 2 and the pause-inducing −10-like element. λQ (shown as a dimer) then binds to the QBE and engages the paused transcription complex. Molecular Cell 2002 10, 611-622DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00648-2)

Figure 2 λQ Interacts with Region 4 of σ70 (A) Fragments encompassing region 4 of σ70 interact with λQ by yeast two-hybrid analysis and affinity chromatography. The β-galactosidase activities reflect the interaction strengths; active segments are shown in red. The inset shows that σ70 fragment 526–613, encompassing region 4, binds λQ in an affinity chromatography assay: ft, flowthrough; w1, initial wash; w2, final wash; el, proteins eluted with imidazole. (B) Effect of λQ on transcription in vivo from pQBE-49. Cartoon shows design of promoter pQBE-49. Strain BN296 cells harboring the pQBE-49-lacZ fusion on an F′ episome and containing a plasmid encoding λQ (closed diamonds) or no λQ (open circles) were grown in the presence of the indicated concentrations of IPTG and assayed for β-galactosidase activity. (C) Effect of λQ on transcription from pQBE-61 in the presence of the α-σ70 chimera. Cartoon shows design of promoter pQBE-61. Assays were performed with cells harboring F′ episomes carrying the pQBE-61-lacZ fusion (strain BN297) or either of two derivatives, the pQBE-61/TTGACA-lacZ fusion (strain BN298) or the pQBE-61/TTAACA-lacZ fusion (strain BN299). The reporter strain cells contained plasmids pACλQtac and pBRα-σ70. Molecular Cell 2002 10, 611-622DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00648-2)

Figure 3 Amino Acid Substitution A553D in Region 4 of σ70 Disrupts Interaction with λQ (A) Effects of substitution A553D in the σ moiety of the α-σ70 chimera on activator-dependent transcription from either pQBE-61/TTGACA (left panel) or placOR2-55/Cons-35 (right panel). β-galactosidase assays were performed with cells containing plasmids encoding the indicated proteins and grown in the presence of different concentrations of IPTG. (B) Effects of substitution A553D in chromosomally encoded σ70 on activator-dependent transcription from pQBE-49 (left panel) or λ promoter PRM (right panel). β-galactosidase assays were performed with cells encoding either wild-type σ70 or σ70 A553D and containing plasmids encoding the indicated activators. Molecular Cell 2002 10, 611-622DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00648-2)

Figure 4 A553D Substitution in σ70 or Alteration of the TTGACT Motif Disrupts λQ-Mediated Antitermination In Vitro For each experiment, the percent of transcripts reading through the terminator (readthrough/readthrough plus terminated) in single-round assays is plotted. (A) Effects of the A553D substitution in σ70 on λQ-mediated antitermination in the presence or absence of NusA. Assays were performed with RNAP reconstituted with either wild-type σ70 or σ70 A553D (as indicated) in the presence of λQ (200 nM). (B) Effects of the G to A substitution in the TTGACT motif on λQ-mediated antitermination in the presence or absence of NusA. Assays were performed with wild-type RNAP on a PR′ template bearing either the wild-type or mutant TTGACT motif (as indicated) in the presence of λQ (400 nM). (C) Effects of the A553D substitution in σ70 on λQ-mediated antitermination in the presence or absence of the α-CTD, and in the presence of NusA. Assays were performed with RNAP reconstituted with either wild-type α (α WT) or a truncated derivative (α ΔCTD) and either wild-type σ70 or σ70 A553D in the presence of various concentrations of λQ. The percentage of readthrough transcription after 5 min incubation is plotted as a function of λQ concentration. (D) Effects of the A553D substitution in σ70 or the G to A substitution in the TTGACT motif on λQ-mediated antitermination in the absence or presence of a mutation (G-25C) in the QBE. Assays were performed with RNAP reconstituted with either wild-type σ70 or σ70 A553D on a PR′ template bearing either the wild-type or mutant TTGACT motif and either the wild-type or mutant QBE. The reactions contained NusA as well as λQ (500 nM). (E) Effects of the R588H substitution in σ70 on λQ-mediated antitermination. Assays were performed with RNAP reconstituted with either wild-type σ70 or σ70 R588H on a PR′ template bearing the G-25C mutation in the QBE and either the wild-type or mutant TTGACT motif. The reactions contained NusA as well as λQ (500 nM). Molecular Cell 2002 10, 611-622DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00648-2)

Figure 5 A553D Substitution in σ70 or Alteration of the TTGACT Motif Disrupts λQ-Mediated Antitermination In Vivo (A) Schematic of PR′-lacZ fusion construct. Sequences extending from −109 to +232 of PR′ that include the natural terminator tR′ were fused to the lacZ gene. (B and C) Effects of the A553D substitution in chromosomally encoded σ70 or the G to A substitution in the TTGACT motif are revealed in the absence of NusA (B) or with a PR′ template bearing a weakened QBE (C). In (B), ΔnusA cells containing either wild-type σ70 or σ70 A553D and harboring a PR′-lacZ reporter with either the wild-type or mutant TTGACT motif were transformed with a plasmid that did or did not encode λQ as indicated. In (C), cells containing either wild-type σ70 or σ70 A553D and harboring a PR′-lacZ reporter with a mutation (G-25C) in the QBE and either the wild-type or mutant TTGACT motif were transformed with a plasmid encoding λQ. The cells were grown in the presence of no IPTG (B) or 5 μM IPTG (C) and assayed for β-galactosidase activity. In (C), the data are presented as percentages of the β-galactosidase activities measured in cells containing wild-type σ70 and the PR′ template with the wild-type TTGACT motif; the β-galactosidase values measured in the absence of λQ were roughly equivalent for all of the strains. Molecular Cell 2002 10, 611-622DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00648-2)

Figure 6 A553D Substitution in σ70 or Alteration of the TTGACT Motif Destabilizes the Association of λQ with the Paused Elongation Complex In Vitro (A) Schematic of template used for exonuclease III challenge assay. PR′ DNA is end labeled at the 5′ end of the template strand as indicated (the red star). Positions at which the progress of exonuclease III digestion is blocked by bound protein are indicated: −32 (λQ-dependent barrier), −21 and −11 (σ70-dependent barriers), and −4 (core-dependent barrier). The red DNA segment is the pause-inducing sequence, shown bound to σ70 region 2 on the nontemplate strand. (B) Effect of the A553D substitution in σ70 on the stability of λQ's association with the paused elongation complex. Stalled elongation complexes were formed with RNAP reconstituted with either wild-type σ70 or σ70 A553D on a wild-type PR′ template. These complexes were incubated in either the presence or absence of 500 nM λQ and challenged with exonuclease III for the indicated times. (C) Effect of the G to A substitution in the TTGACT motif on the stability of λQ's association with the paused elongation complex. Stalled elongation complexes were formed with wild-type RNAP on a PR′ template bearing either the wild-type or mutant TTGACT motif. These complexes were incubated in either the presence or absence of 500 nM λQ and challenged with exonuclease III for 1 to 8 min as in (B). Molecular Cell 2002 10, 611-622DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00648-2)

Figure 7 Model of the λQ-Engaged Paused Elongation Complex at PR′ The λQ-engaged paused elongation complex at PR′ is depicted. Regions 2 and 4 of σ70 are shown contacting the pause-inducing −10-like element and the −35-like element (TTGACT), which are separated by 1 bp. Molecular Cell 2002 10, 611-622DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00648-2)