Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nanoparticles as Fluorescence Labels: Is Size All that Matters?
Advertisements

Daichi Okuno, Masayoshi Nishiyama, Hiroyuki Noji  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 90, Issue 10, Pages (May 2006)
Michiko Tashiro, Hana Inoue, Masato Konishi  Biophysical Journal 
Temperature Control Methods in a Laser Tweezers System
A. Struk, F. Lehmann-Horn, W. Melzer  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 115, Issue 4, Pages (November 2003)
Marko Vendelin, Maris Lemba, Valdur A. Saks  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Joseph M. Johnson, William J. Betz  Biophysical Journal 
Platelet Adhesive Dynamics
Microviscoelasticity of the Apical Cell Surface of Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVEC) within Confluent Monolayers  Wolfgang Feneberg, Martin.
Unitary Conductance Variation in Kir2
Volume 100, Issue 8, Pages (April 2011)
DNA Hairpins: Fuel for Autonomous DNA Devices
DNA Translocation Governed by Interactions with Solid-State Nanopores
Laser-Assisted Single-Molecule Refolding (LASR)
Megan T. Valentine, Steven M. Block  Biophysical Journal 
Physiological Pathway of Magnesium Influx in Rat Ventricular Myocytes
Volume 86, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
Christopher Deufel, Michelle D. Wang  Biophysical Journal 
Qiaochu Li, Stephen J. King, Ajay Gopinathan, Jing Xu 
Predicting the Rupture Probabilities of Molecular Bonds in Series
Volume 79, Issue 2, Pages (August 2000)
Forward and Reverse Motion of Single RecBCD Molecules on DNA
Volume 100, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Kenneth Tran, Nicolas P. Smith, Denis S. Loiselle, Edmund J. Crampin 
Volume 111, Issue 7, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 74, Issue 6, Pages (June 1998)
Daichi Okuno, Masayoshi Nishiyama, Hiroyuki Noji  Biophysical Journal 
Shamik Sen, Shyamsundar Subramanian, Dennis E. Discher 
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Martin Clausen, Michael Koomey, Berenike Maier  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 90, Issue 8, Pages (April 2006)
Samuel T. Hess, Watt W. Webb  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 87, Issue 3, Pages (September 2004)
Volume 88, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 96, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
Comment to the Article by Michael J
Irina V. Dobrovolskaia, Gaurav Arya  Biophysical Journal 
B-S Transition in Short Oligonucleotides
Enhanced Tethered-Particle Motion Analysis Reveals Viscous Effects
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Dmitrii V. Vavilin, Esa Tyystjärvi, Eva-Mari Aro  Biophysical Journal 
Blockers of VacA Provide Insights into the Structure of the Pore
Volume 93, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Michael Schlierf, Felix Berkemeier, Matthias Rief  Biophysical Journal 
Rheological Analysis and Measurement of Neutrophil Indentation
A Kinetic Model for Type I and II IP3R Accounting for Mode Changes
L. Stirling Churchman, Henrik Flyvbjerg, James A. Spudich 
Satomi Matsuoka, Tatsuo Shibata, Masahiro Ueda  Biophysical Journal 
Aligning Paramecium caudatum with Static Magnetic Fields
Robust Driving Forces for Transmembrane Helix Packing
Sergi Garcia-Manyes, Gerard Oncins, Fausto Sanz  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Interaction of Oxazole Yellow Dyes with DNA Studied with Hybrid Optical Tweezers and Fluorescence Microscopy  C.U. Murade, V. Subramaniam, C. Otto, Martin.
Christina Karatzaferi, Marc K. Chinn, Roger Cooke  Biophysical Journal 
Mechanical Coupling between Myosin Molecules Causes Differences between Ensemble and Single-Molecule Measurements  Sam Walcott, David M. Warshaw, Edward P.
Yongli Zhang, Junyi Jiao, Aleksander A. Rebane  Biophysical Journal 
Main Phase Transitions in Supported Lipid Single-Bilayer
Single-Molecule Measurement of the Stiffness of the Rigor Myosin Head
Yufang Wang, Ling Guo, Ido Golding, Edward C. Cox, N.P. Ong 
Experimental Verification of the Behavioral Foundation of Bacterial Transport Parameters Using Microfluidics  Tanvir Ahmed, Roman Stocker  Biophysical.
Volume 98, Issue 7, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 93, Issue 8, Pages (October 2007)
The Effects of Force Inhibition by Sodium Vanadate on Cross-Bridge Binding, Force Redevelopment, and Ca2+ Activation in Cardiac Muscle  D.A. Martyn, L.
ATP Inhibition and Rectification of a Ca2+-Activated Anion Channel in Sarcoplasmic Reticulum of Skeletal Muscle  Gerard P. Ahern, Derek R. Laver  Biophysical.
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Preferential Hydration of DNA: The Magnitude and Distance Dependence of Alcohol and Polyol Interactions  Christopher Stanley, Donald C. Rau  Biophysical.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages 2423-2433 (September 2008) T7 RNA Polymerase Studied by Force Measurements Varying Cofactor Concentration  P. Thomen, P.J. Lopez, U. Bockelmann, J. Guillerez, M. Dreyfus, F. Heslot  Biophysical Journal  Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages 2423-2433 (September 2008) DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.125096 Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Experimental configuration. L, DNA length (L=number of bases×0.34nm); Ex, distance between the bead and the polymerase; z, distance between the surface and the trap; Y, distance between the polymerase and the bead, in the plane of the sample. Y and z are measured and Ex is deduced by Ex=(Y2+z2)1/2− d, where d is the radius of the bead. Biophysical Journal 2008 95, 2423-2433DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.125096) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Experimental recordings of the applied force (lower curve) and of the extension (upper curve) versus time, during elongation. Asterisks indicate a change in the voltage reference that imposes the load force. The “jumps” in extension curve correspond to the displacement change necessary for the molecule to reach the newly imposed stretching force (to increase the load force, the DNA molecule must be stretched, so that the extension is increased). Biophysical Journal 2008 95, 2423-2433DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.125096) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Example of experimental recording of extension versus time, with a load force of 5 pN ([NTP]=150μM each, [Mg2+]tot=8mM, T=27°C). This is an example of variability for a given enzyme: at t ≈ 40s, the velocity increases from 42 to 82 bp/s. Dotted lines represent linear fits on data. Biophysical Journal 2008 95, 2423-2433DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.125096) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Single measurements of elongation velocity versus force. Conditions: [NTP]=590μM each; [Mg2+]tot=8mM; T=27 C°. Each symbol corresponds to a given enzyme and each point corresponds to one measurement (see text); this shows variability 1), for a given enzyme, from ∼50 to ∼90 bp/s (crosses); and 2), from enzyme to enzyme, with mean velocity∼130 bp/s (black circles) and 60–100 bp/s (open circles). Biophysical Journal 2008 95, 2423-2433DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.125096) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Histogram of the normalized velocities ([Mg2+]tot=8mM). For each couple of conditions ([NTP], load force), each measured elongation velocity is normalized by the mean velocity calculated for this couple of conditions. The curve is a Gaussian fit with the mean imposed as 1 and leads to a standard deviation of 0.285 (χ2=4.86; r2=0.98). Biophysical Journal 2008 95, 2423-2433DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.125096) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Relative decrease in velocity (percentage) is plotted versus NTP concentration, when the load force is varied from 5 to 15 pN. The obtained data show a decreasing function, as expected in a competitive inhibition kinetic. Biophysical Journal 2008 95, 2423-2433DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.125096) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Equilibrium concentrations of [Mg2+]free, [MgATP2−], and [ATP4−]free versus [ATP4−]tot expected for a dissociation constant, KD, of 30μM between ATP4− and Mg2+, with the total concentration of magnesium ([Mg2+]tot) fixed at 8mM (the concentration used in Thomen et al. (18)). It shows that almost all ATP4− molecules react with one magnesium ion as long as [ATP4−]tot<[Mg2+]tot. Biophysical Journal 2008 95, 2423-2433DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.125096) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Mean elongation velocity versus [Mg2+]tot at fixed [NTP4−]tot. No transcription activity was observed in experiments performed at {[Mg2+]tot=8mM, [NTP4−]tot=15.6 mM}, the translocation being apparently inhibited. [Mg2+]tot and [NTP4−]tot are the total concentrations of magnesium and NTP, respectively, introduced in solution. The dotted line is the plot of Eq. 1 using the values of K and KNTP determined in Thomen et al. (18), and the value of KMg and kcat determined in this work (see text). Biophysical Journal 2008 95, 2423-2433DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.125096) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 Mean elongation velocity versus [NTP4−]tot at fixed [Mg2+]tot. No transcription activity was observed in experiments performed at {[Mg2+]tot=8mM, 3.9mM of each type of NTP, i.e., [NTP4−]tot=15.6 mM}, the translocation being apparently inhibited. The seven first points correspond to measurements from a previous study (18). [Mg2+]tot and [NTP4−]tot stand for the total concentrations of magnesium and NTP, respectively, introduced in the solution. The dotted line is the plot of Eq. 1 using the values of K and KNTP determined in Thomen et al. (18) and the values of KMg and kcat determined in this work (see text). Biophysical Journal 2008 95, 2423-2433DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.125096) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 10 Inverse of the mean elongation velocity versus the inverse of [Mg2+]free, for different levels of force. In all cases, the NTP concentration was not limiting (>600μM each); thus, the decrease in velocity is mainly due to limiting [Mg2+]free. The dotted line is a linear fit of the data, giving an estimate of KMg ≈ 3.2mM. [Mg2+]free stands for free magnesium ions and is calculated using [Mg2+]tot and [NTP4−]tot and assuming a dissociation constant of KD=30μM for the reaction ATP4−+Mg2+ ↔ MgATP2−. Squares, F ≈ 5 pN; open circles, F ≈ 11.5 pN; crosses, F ≈ 15.5 pN. Biophysical Journal 2008 95, 2423-2433DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.125096) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 11 (a) Comparison of mean elongation velocities relative to the mean value measured at 5 pN, for three different conditions: 1), [NTP] and [Mg2+]free are not limiting (cross-hatched bars); 2), [Mg2+]free is limiting, but not [NTP] (gray bars); 3), [NTP] is limiting, but not [Mg2+]free (hatched bars). (b) The same type of plot, but with absolute velocities. One can see that in the case where [Mg2+]free is limiting, but not [NTP], the velocity is decreased, but no effect of force is observed. The histograms show that the elongation velocity is dependent on force only when [NTP] is limiting. Biophysical Journal 2008 95, 2423-2433DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.125096) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions