The first step in sugar transport: crystal structure of the amino terminal domain of enzyme I of the E. coli PEP: sugar phosphotransferase system and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Advertisements

Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
The first step in sugar transport: crystal structure of the amino terminal domain of enzyme I of the E. coli PEP: sugar phosphotransferase system and.
Volume 5, Issue 11, Pages (November 1997)
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (March 2004)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Yu Luo, Su-Chen Li, Min-Yuan Chou, Yu-Teh Li, Ming Luo  Structure 
Volume 3, Issue 9, Pages (September 1995)
Crystal structure of mammalian purple acid phosphatase
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages (December 1995)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
UG Wagner, M Hasslacher, H Griengl, H Schwab, C Kratky  Structure 
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
The structure of enzyme IIAlactose from Lactococcus lactis reveals a new fold and points to possible interactions of a multicomponent system  Piotr Sliz,
Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages (November 1995)
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Crystal Structure of PMM/PGM
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages (October 1998)
The 2.2 Å Crystal Structure of Hsp33
Volume 5, Issue 7, Pages (July 1997)
Crystal Structure of Recombinant Human Interleukin-22
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 1998)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Crystal Structure of the Borna Disease Virus Nucleoprotein
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 3, Issue 8, Pages (August 1995)
Structural Basis for FGF Receptor Dimerization and Activation
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Crystal Structure of 4-Amino-5-Hydroxymethyl-2- Methylpyrimidine Phosphate Kinase from Salmonella typhimurium at 2.3 Å Resolution  Gong Cheng, Eric M.
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages (August 1999)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon.
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages (December 1995)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Structure of CD94 Reveals a Novel C-Type Lectin Fold
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
Rachelle Gaudet, Andrew Bohm, Paul B Sigler  Cell 
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Structural and Biochemical Analysis of the Obg GTP Binding Protein
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages (November 2000)
Luhua Lai, Hisao Yokota, Li-Wei Hung, Rosalind Kim, Sung-Hou Kim 
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Presentation transcript:

The first step in sugar transport: crystal structure of the amino terminal domain of enzyme I of the E. coli PEP: sugar phosphotransferase system and a model of the phosphotransfer complex with HPr  D-I Liao, E Silverton, Y-J Seok, BR Lee, A Peterkofsky, DR Davies  Structure  Volume 4, Issue 7, Pages 861-872 (July 1996) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00092-5

Figure 1 The structure of EIN. (a) Ribbon representation of the EIN structure. His189 (shown in red) is located at the interface between the two domains. Helices in the α domain are blue and those in the α/β domain are orange. The linker is shown in green and the β strands in yellow, α helices and β sheets are numbered accordingly. (b) Stereo drawing showing the Cα backbone of the EIN molecule. Every tenth Cα atom is highlighted and labeled. The N and C termini are marked. Structure 1996 4, 861-872DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00092-5)

Figure 1 The structure of EIN. (a) Ribbon representation of the EIN structure. His189 (shown in red) is located at the interface between the two domains. Helices in the α domain are blue and those in the α/β domain are orange. The linker is shown in green and the β strands in yellow, α helices and β sheets are numbered accordingly. (b) Stereo drawing showing the Cα backbone of the EIN molecule. Every tenth Cα atom is highlighted and labeled. The N and C termini are marked. Structure 1996 4, 861-872DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00092-5)

Figure 2 Alignment of the N-terminal regions of EI proteins from 13 different organisms: Escherichia coli (E. coli, Genbank M10425); Rhodobacter capsulatus (Rhod. capsul., SwissProt P23388); Xanthomonas campestris (Xanth. camp., Genbank Z37113); Salmonella typhimurium (Sal. typh., SwissProt P12654); Hemophilus influenzae (Hem. influ., Genbank L46341); Streptococcus salivarius(Strep. sal., Genbank M81756); Streptococcus mutans(Strep. mut., Genbank L15191); Bacillus subtilis (Bacill. sub., Genbank M98359); Bacillus stearothermophilus (Bacill. stear., Genbank U12340); Staphylococcus carnosus (Staph. carn., SwissProt P23533); Mycoplasma capricolum (Myc. capricol., Genbank U15110); Mycoplasma genitalium (Myc. genital., TIGR database MG429); Alcaligenes eutrophus (Alcal. eutr., SwissProt P23536). Protein sequences were aligned using the PILEUP program from the Wisconsin package [26]. The DNADRAW program (written by M Shapiro of the Division of Computer Research and Technology, NIH) was used for highlighting conserved residues. The numbering above the aligned sequences corresponds only to the residue in the alignment rather than to residues in any of the aligned protein sequences. Residues that are totally conserved are shown as white letters on a black background. Residues that are conservatively retained are shaded gray. The secondary structure assignments are shown above the sequence. Structure 1996 4, 861-872DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00092-5)

Figure 3 A GRASP representation of the surface of EIN. The charge potential is colored red for negative and blue for positive. The blue arrow shows the position of His189 and the yellow arrows point to the two depressions in the interdomain region of the protein. The arrow on the left indicates the position of the deep depression, the one on the right the shallow depression. Structure 1996 4, 861-872DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00092-5)

Figure 4 The active centers of EIN and EIIAglc. (a) The active-site region of EIN showing the high concentration of carboxylate side chains in the vicinity of His189. The two invariant aspartic acid residues (Asp129 and Asp162) are labeled in black. The orientation of His189 (ψ1=168° in one monomer and 166° in the other) permits the formation of a hydrogen bond with Thr168. Hydrogen bonds are represented by magenta dotted lines. (b) The active-site region of EIIAglc from B. subtilis showing the phosphorylation site His90 and the invariant aspartate residues (Asp38 and Asp94). In this structure, the Nϵ of His90 points outwards, making a hydrogen bond with a solvent molecule (labeled W). Structure 1996 4, 861-872DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00092-5)

Figure 4 The active centers of EIN and EIIAglc. (a) The active-site region of EIN showing the high concentration of carboxylate side chains in the vicinity of His189. The two invariant aspartic acid residues (Asp129 and Asp162) are labeled in black. The orientation of His189 (ψ1=168° in one monomer and 166° in the other) permits the formation of a hydrogen bond with Thr168. Hydrogen bonds are represented by magenta dotted lines. (b) The active-site region of EIIAglc from B. subtilis showing the phosphorylation site His90 and the invariant aspartate residues (Asp38 and Asp94). In this structure, the Nϵ of His90 points outwards, making a hydrogen bond with a solvent molecule (labeled W). Structure 1996 4, 861-872DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00092-5)

Figure 5 Comparison between EIN and the phosphohistidine domain of pyruvate phosphate dikinase (PPDK). (a) Schematic diagram of the topology of the two molecules. The helices containing the active-site histidine are shown in black. The regions of topology common to both proteins are in gray. (b) Ribbon drawing of EIN superimposed on the corresponding region of PPDK (red). The regions of EIN containing the residues used for the alignment are in yellow and the remainder of the structure is shown in blue. The red dashed line corresponds to the region in PPDK that does not have clearly defined electron density. The N and C terminus of the region of PPDK shown are indicated by N and C, respectively. Structure 1996 4, 861-872DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00092-5)

Figure 5 Comparison between EIN and the phosphohistidine domain of pyruvate phosphate dikinase (PPDK). (a) Schematic diagram of the topology of the two molecules. The helices containing the active-site histidine are shown in black. The regions of topology common to both proteins are in gray. (b) Ribbon drawing of EIN superimposed on the corresponding region of PPDK (red). The regions of EIN containing the residues used for the alignment are in yellow and the remainder of the structure is shown in blue. The red dashed line corresponds to the region in PPDK that does not have clearly defined electron density. The N and C terminus of the region of PPDK shown are indicated by N and C, respectively. Structure 1996 4, 861-872DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00092-5)

Figure 6 Model of EIN complexed with HPr. (a) The ribbon drawing shows EIN in blue complexed with HPr shown in red. A phosphoryl group linking the two histidine residues is depicted in yellow. (b) Stereo drawing of the active-site residues proposed to be involved in phosphoryl transfer between EIN (gray) and HPr (yellow). The figure illustrates the hydrogen bonds that may stabilize the transition state (shown as magenta dotted lines). Atoms are shown in standard colors with phosphorus in magenta. Structure 1996 4, 861-872DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00092-5)

Figure 6 Model of EIN complexed with HPr. (a) The ribbon drawing shows EIN in blue complexed with HPr shown in red. A phosphoryl group linking the two histidine residues is depicted in yellow. (b) Stereo drawing of the active-site residues proposed to be involved in phosphoryl transfer between EIN (gray) and HPr (yellow). The figure illustrates the hydrogen bonds that may stabilize the transition state (shown as magenta dotted lines). Atoms are shown in standard colors with phosphorus in magenta. Structure 1996 4, 861-872DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00092-5)

Figure 7 The surfaces of HPr that contact EIN and EIIAglc. The figure shows the interface of the (a) E. coli HPr–EIN complex and (b) the B. subtilis HPr–EIIAglc complex; the interface is shown as red dots. The ribbon structure of the HPrs are shown in blue. Arg17 and His15, are depicted as black stick models. Structure 1996 4, 861-872DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00092-5)

Figure 7 The surfaces of HPr that contact EIN and EIIAglc. The figure shows the interface of the (a) E. coli HPr–EIN complex and (b) the B. subtilis HPr–EIIAglc complex; the interface is shown as red dots. The ribbon structure of the HPrs are shown in blue. Arg17 and His15, are depicted as black stick models. Structure 1996 4, 861-872DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00092-5)

Figure 8 Superposition of the Cα backbone of molecule A, shown in blue, and molecule B, shown in red, of EIN in the asymmetric unit. Structure 1996 4, 861-872DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00092-5)

Figure 9 Stereo drawing of a representative region of electron density shown in a 2Fo–Fc map. The figure shows a superposed model of the end of helix α3 and the beginning of helix α4. Structure 1996 4, 861-872DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00092-5)