A Transcription-Independent Role for TFIIB in Gene Looping

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Advertisements

Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 122, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Steven J. Petesch, John T. Lis  Cell 
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
SAGA Is a General Cofactor for RNA Polymerase II Transcription
Silencing in Yeast rDNA Chromatin
Eukaryotic transcription initiation
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages (May 2012)
Human Senataxin Resolves RNA/DNA Hybrids Formed at Transcriptional Pause Sites to Promote Xrn2-Dependent Termination  Konstantina Skourti-Stathaki, Nicholas J.
John T. Arigo, Kristina L. Carroll, Jessica M. Ames, Jeffry L. Corden 
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
Hung-Ta Chen, Steven Hahn  Cell 
RRNA Modifications in an Intersubunit Bridge of the Ribosome Strongly Affect Both Ribosome Biogenesis and Activity  Xue-hai Liang, Qing Liu, Maurille.
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
John T. Arigo, Daniel E. Eyler, Kristina L. Carroll, Jeffry L. Corden 
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages (August 2008)
Phosphorylation of Serine 2 within the RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Couples Transcription and 3′ End Processing  Seong Hoon Ahn, Minkyu Kim, Stephen.
Daniel F. Tardiff, Scott A. Lacadie, Michael Rosbash  Molecular Cell 
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Cdk1 Triggers Association of RNA Polymerase to Cell Cycle Promoters Only after Recruitment of the Mediator by SBF  Maria Pia Cosma, Silvia Panizza, Kim.
Jason N. Kuehner, David A. Brow  Molecular Cell 
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (December 1997)
Hyunsuk Suh, Dane Z. Hazelbaker, Luis M. Soares, Stephen Buratowski 
Joshua C. Black, Janet E. Choi, Sarah R. Lombardo, Michael Carey 
MyoD Targets TAF3/TRF3 to Activate Myogenin Transcription
The Mammalian RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Interacts with RNA to Suppress Transcription-Coupled 3′ End Formation  Syuzo Kaneko, James L. Manley 
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (November 2017)
Hansen Du, Haruhiko Ishii, Michael J. Pazin, Ranjan Sen  Molecular Cell 
Dimethylation of H3K4 by Set1 Recruits the Set3 Histone Deacetylase Complex to 5′ Transcribed Regions  TaeSoo Kim, Stephen Buratowski  Cell  Volume 137,
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Distinct Pathways for snoRNA and mRNA Termination
DNA Looping Facilitates Targeting of a Chromatin Remodeling Enzyme
Barrier Function at HMR
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Chromatin Disassembly Mediated by the Histone Chaperone Asf1 Is Essential for Transcriptional Activation of the Yeast PHO5 and PHO8 Genes  Melissa W Adkins,
Paul B. Mason, Kevin Struhl  Molecular Cell 
Uncoupling Promoter Opening from Start-Site Scanning
Sang-Hyun Song, Chunhui Hou, Ann Dean  Molecular Cell 
Ssu72 Is an RNA Polymerase II CTD Phosphatase
Enhancer RNA Facilitates NELF Release from Immediate Early Genes
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
H2B Ubiquitylation Controls the Formation of Export-Competent mRNP
Regulation of Yeast mRNA 3′ End Processing by Phosphorylation
Feng Xu, Qiongyi Zhang, Kangling Zhang, Wei Xie, Michael Grunstein 
James Fishburn, Neeman Mohibullah, Steven Hahn  Molecular Cell 
Multiple RNA Surveillance Pathways Limit Aberrant Expression of Iron Uptake mRNAs and Prevent Iron Toxicity in S. cerevisiae  Albert Lee, Anthony K. Henras,
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Figure 1. 3C analysis of HEM3, BLM10, and SEN1 genes in rpb4Δ and isogenic wild type cells. (A) Schematic ... Figure 1. 3C analysis of HEM3, BLM10, and.
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Exon Tethering in Transcription by RNA Polymerase II
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Selective Recruitment of TAFs by Yeast Upstream Activating Sequences
Volume 48, Issue 1, Pages (October 2012)
Regulation of TCRβ Gene Assembly by a Promoter/Enhancer Holocomplex
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (May 2005)
Chih-Yung S. Lee, Tzu-Lan Yeh, Bridget T. Hughes, Peter J. Espenshade 
Presentation transcript:

A Transcription-Independent Role for TFIIB in Gene Looping Badri Nath Singh, Michael Hampsey  Molecular Cell  Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages 806-816 (September 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.07.013 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Gene Looping Is Not Idiosyncratic to Long Genes but Occurs at Four Different Genes Ranging in Length from 1.0 to 6.4 kb (A–D) Panels depict the BLM10, SAC3, GAL10, and HEM3 genes, respectively. The restriction sites (H, HindIII; E, EcoRI) and the divergent P1 and T1 primer pairs used in 3C analysis are indicated, along with flanking genes, all drawn to scale. ORF lengths are indicated under each gene. PCR primer sequences and their corresponding Saccharomyces genome database coordinates are listed in Table S1. The polarity of transcription is denoted by arrows. Gene looping was assayed prior to or following a 1 hr shift from the permissive (24°C) to the restrictive (37°C) temperature using the wild-type strain FY23 (lanes 1 and 2), the rpb1-1 mutant RS420 (lanes 3 and 4), and the ssu72-td degron strain XH-24 (lanes 5 and 6). Control PCR represents an intergenic region of chromosome V, generated using convergent primers. P1-T1 PCR products were quantified by dividing P1-T1 PCR signals by control PCR signals for each sample; these ratios were then divided by the ratio of the WT 24°C sample for each gene to yield the number depicted beneath each lane. Molecular Cell 2007 27, 806-816DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.07.013) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Convergent PCR Confirms that the BLM10 and HEM3 Genes Are Extensively Digested by HindIII during 3C Analysis (A) Schematic depiction of the BLM10 gene, depicting the positions of the HindIII sites and the F2 and R1 convergent PCR primers. (B) BLM10 F2-R1 PCR products using 3C samples either immediately prior to (uncut) or following restriction digestion (HindIII) from the same strains depicted in Figure 1 that had been incubated at either permissive (24°C) or restrictive (37°C) temperature (lanes 1–8), or from the same strains depicted in Figure 4 that had been incubated at 30°C (lanes 9 and 10). (C) Schematic depiction of the HEM3 gene, depicting the positions of the HindIII sites and the F1 and R1 convergent PCR primers. (D) HEM3 F1-R1 PCR products using 3C samples, as described in (B). The BLM10 F2 and R1 and the HEM3 F1 and R1 primers are identical to those depicted in Figure 3 and are defined in Table S1. Molecular Cell 2007 27, 806-816DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.07.013) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Gene Looping Juxtaposes the Promoter and Terminator Regions of BLM10 and HEM3 (A) General strategy for mapping juxtaposed regions in gene loops. 3C primer pairs are designed to detect promoter-ORF and terminator-ORF interactions. (B) Schematic depiction of the BLM10 gene, showing the positions of the HindIII sites and the promoter (P), terminator (T), forward (F), and reverse (R) primers used in the 3C analysis. (C) PCR products derived from the indicated primer pairs by 3C analysis. As the number of HindIII restriction sites between the divergent primer pairs increase, the PCR signals decrease, except for the P1-T1 primer pair, which yields a strong signal despite the presence of seven intervening HindIII sites. (D) Schematic depiction of the HEM3 gene, labeled as described for the BLM10 gene in (B). (E) PCR products derived from the indicated primer pairs by 3C analysis. The presence of a single HindIII restriction site between the P1 and F2 or T1 and R2 primer pairs diminishes the PCR signal, yet the P1-T1 primer pairs yield a strong signal despite the presence of both ORF HindIII sites. PCR products were quantified by normalizing each signal to the P1-T1 PCR signal. Molecular Cell 2007 27, 806-816DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.07.013) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 TFIIB Is Required for DNA Looping (A–E) Gene loops detected by 3C analysis using P1 and T1 PCR primers specific to the SEN1, BLM10, SAC3, GAL10, and HEM3 genes. Isogenic wild-type (YMH14) and sua7-1 (YMH124) strains were grown in YPD medium to mid-log phase. The sua7-1 allele encodes the E62K replacement in TFIIB (Pinto et al., 1994). P1-T1 PCR products were quantified as described in the Figure 1 legend. (F) The sua7-1 allele does not affect SEN1, BLM10, SAC3, GAL10, and HEM3 transcript levels, as detected by RT-PCR analysis. Transcript levels of ACT1 and 18S rRNA are included as controls. Molecular Cell 2007 27, 806-816DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.07.013) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 TFIIB Crosslinks to the Terminator Regions of the PMA1 and BLM10 Genes, Independent of TBP (A) Schematic depiction of the PMA1 gene showing the positions of the promoter (black box) and the two 3′ end processing/polyadenylation sites. The regions probed by ChIP are denoted 1–4 and 6–9. (B) ChIP analysis of TFIIB crosslinking to PMA1 using isogenic strains YMH14 (WT) and YMH124 (sua7-1). Chromatin was immunoprecipitated using polyclonal α-TFIIB antibody. Lanes correspond to the regions depicted in (A); lane V denotes an intergenic region of chromosome V. All PCR primer pairs used in this analysis are identical to those described previously (Komarnitsky et al., 2000). The input signal represents DNA prior to immunoprecipitation. (C) Quantification of the data shown in (B). (D) Schematic depiction of the BLM10 gene. The regions probed by ChIP are denoted 1–6. The 3′ end processing and poly(A) sites have not been reported for BLM10. The BLM10 ChIP primers are defined in Table S1. (E) ChIP analysis of TFIIB crosslinking to BLM10 using the same strains and antibody as in (B). (F) Quantification of the data shown in (E). (G) Identical to (B), except chromatin was immunoprecipitated using polyclonal α-TBP antibody. (H) Quantification of the data shown in (G). (I) Identical to (E), except chromatin was immunoprecipitated using polyclonal α-TBP antibody. (J) Quantification of the data shown in (I). For all ChIP experiments, factor association was quantified by dividing the IP:input signal for each region by the IP:input signal for region V. Molecular Cell 2007 27, 806-816DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.07.013) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 TFIIB Crosslinking to the Terminator Region Is Ssu72 Dependent (A) Schematic depiction of the PMA1 gene. (B) ChIP analysis of TFIIB crosslinking to PMA1, as described in Figure 5A, except using isogenic strains FY23 (WT) and XH-24 (ssu72-td) that had been incubated at either the permissive (24°C) or restrictive (37°C) temperature for 1 hr prior to crosslinking. Incubation of XH-24 at 37°C results in depletion of the Ssu72 CTD phosphatase (Krishnamurthy et al., 2004). (C) Quantification of the data shown in (B). (D) Schematic depiction of the BLM10 gene. (E) ChIP analysis of TFIIB crosslinking to BLM10, as depicted in Figure 5D. (F) Quantification of the data shown in (E). Results indicate that depletion of Ssu72 (ssu72-td, 37°C) eliminates crosslinking of TFIIB to the terminator regions of PMA1 (region 8) and BLM10 (region 5), but not to the promoter regions (region 1) of either gene. Factor association was quantified as described in the Figure 5 legend. These effects of ssu72-td are essentially identical to those associated with the sua7-1 TFIIB E62K replacement (Figure 5). Molecular Cell 2007 27, 806-816DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.07.013) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Model for TFIIB-Dependent Gene Looping (1) Following PIC assembly, RNAP II initiates transcription. TFIIB and TFIIF (not shown) dissociate from the promoter, leaving behind the scaffold complex, which includes TFIIA, TFIID, TFIIE, TFIIH, and the Mediator (Yudkovsky et al., 2000). (2) Subsequent to transcription of the 3′ end processing signals, RNA is endonucleolytically cleaved (arrow) and polyadenylated, leaving behind a 3′ uncapped transcript in association with RNAP II. (3) We suggest that subsequent to mRNA processing, TFIIB can bind RNAP II at the terminator. RNAP II-TFIIB binding would be mediated, in part, by the B finger domain such that the sua7-1-encoded E62K replacement within the B finger precludes TFIIB binding. (4) The terminator-RNAP II-TFIIB complex (in association with TFIIF) binds the scaffold, thereby forming a gene loop that juxtaposes the promoter and terminator and potentially creating a functional transcription reinitiation complex (RIC). Molecular Cell 2007 27, 806-816DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.07.013) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions