Karen Zito, Richard D. Fetter, Corey S. Goodman, Ehud Y. Isacoff 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Genetic Specification of Axonal Arbors
Advertisements

Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 1997)
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 92, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
Mutations in the Exocyst Component Sec5 Disrupt Neuronal Membrane Traffic, but Neurotransmitter Release Persists  Mala Murthy, Dan Garza, Richard H. Scheller,
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
The Drosophila tumor suppressor gene, dlg, is involved in structural plasticity at a glutamatergic synapse  Bo Guan, Beate Hartmann, Young-Ho Kho, Michael.
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (April 2002)
Asterless Reduction during Spermiogenesis Is Regulated by Plk4 and Is Essential for Zygote Development in Drosophila  Atul Khire, Alberto A. Vizuet, Enrique.
An Intersubunit Interaction Regulates Trafficking of Rod Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated Channels and Is Disrupted in an Inherited Form of Blindness  Matthew.
Neuropeptide Y Regulates Sleep by Modulating Noradrenergic Signaling
Volume 10, Issue 18, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 111, Issue 3, Pages (November 2002)
Circadian Pacemaker Neurons Transmit and Modulate Visual Information to Control a Rapid Behavioral Response  Esteban O. Mazzoni, Claude Desplan, Justin.
Drosophila Ankyrin 2 Is Required for Synaptic Stability
Structural Basis for Regulation of ESCRT-III Complexes by Lgd
Act up Controls Actin Polymerization to Alter Cell Shape and Restrict Hedgehog Signaling in the Drosophila Eye Disc  Aude Benlali, Irena Draskovic, Dennis.
Claudia D. Andl, John R. Stanley  Journal of Investigative Dermatology 
Sightless has homology to transmembrane acyltransferases and is required to generate active Hedgehog protein  Jeffrey D. Lee, Jessica E. Treisman  Current.
Disruption of Axonal Transport and Neuronal Viability by Amyloid Precursor Protein Mutations in Drosophila  Shermali Gunawardena, Lawrence S.B. Goldstein 
Volume 68, Issue 5, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 108, Issue 2, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
The Drosophila tumor suppressor gene, dlg, is involved in structural plasticity at a glutamatergic synapse  Bo Guan, Beate Hartmann, Young-Ho Kho, Michael.
Volume 66, Issue 5, Pages (June 2010)
Hts/Adducin Controls Synaptic Elaboration and Elimination
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages (February 2002)
Zijing Chen, Hsiang-Chin Chen, Craig Montell  Cell Reports 
BTB/POZ-Zinc Finger Protein Abrupt Suppresses Dendritic Branching in a Neuronal Subtype-Specific and Dosage-Dependent Manner  Wenjun Li, Fay Wang, Laurent.
Unrestricted Synaptic Growth in spinster—a Late Endosomal Protein Implicated in TGF- β-Mediated Synaptic Growth Regulation  Sean T Sweeney, Graeme W Davis 
Highwire Regulates Synaptic Growth in Drosophila
Dion K. Dickman, Zhiyuan Lu, Ian A. Meinertzhagen, Thomas L. Schwarz 
PAR-1 Kinase Phosphorylates Dlg and Regulates Its Postsynaptic Targeting at the Drosophila Neuromuscular Junction  Yali Zhang, Huifu Guo, Helen Kwan,
ELAV, a Drosophila neuron-specific protein, mediates the generation of an alternatively spliced neural protein isoform  Sandhya P. Koushika, Michael J.
A Genetic Analysis of Synaptic Development
Nancy Kaufmann, Jamin DeProto, Ravi Ranjan, Hong Wan, David Van Vactor 
Volume 119, Issue 5, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 55, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 78, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 82, Issue 3, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (December 1997)
Molecular Consequences of Deletion of the Cytoplasmic Domain of Bullous Pemphigoid 180 in a Patient with Predominant Features of Epidermolysis Bullosa.
A Hierarchy of Cell Intrinsic and Target-Derived Homeostatic Signaling
SMN Is Required for Sensory-Motor Circuit Function in Drosophila
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (September 2015)
Modes of Protein Movement that Lead to the Asymmetric Localization of Partner of Numb during Drosophila Neuroblast Division  Bingwei Lu, Larry Ackerman,
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (October 1997)
Volume 109, Issue 1, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (May 2003)
Fig. 3. Hts and Dlg are in a complex at the postsynaptic membrane of larval NMJs.(A–B″) PLA with HtsM and Dlg antibodies (green) performed on third instar.
Fig. 4. Phosphorylation of the MARCKS-homology domain partially inhibits Hts' ability to disrupt Dlg postsynaptic targeting to the larval NMJ.(A–D″) High.
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Volume 109, Issue 5, Pages (May 2002)
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (August 1999)
Volume 15, Issue 23, Pages (December 2005)
Suzanne Paradis, Sean T Sweeney, Graeme W Davis  Neuron 
Volume 9, Issue 23, Pages (December 1999)
Genetic Dissection of Structural and Functional Components of Synaptic Plasticity. III. CREB Is Necessary for Presynaptic Functional Plasticity  Graeme.
Volume 22, Issue 19, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 78, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Diaphanous is required presynaptically for normal synaptic growth.
Rab3 Dynamically Controls Protein Composition at Active Zones
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 1996)
Volume 9, Issue 21, (November 1999)
The LIN-2/LIN-7/LIN-10 Complex Mediates Basolateral Membrane Localization of the C. elegans EGF Receptor LET-23 in Vulval Epithelial Cells  Susan M Kaech,
Presentation transcript:

Synaptic Clustering of Fasciclin II and Shaker: Essential Targeting Sequences and Role of Dlg  Karen Zito, Richard D. Fetter, Corey S. Goodman, Ehud Y. Isacoff  Neuron  Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages 1007-1016 (November 1997) DOI: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80393-1

Figure 1 CD8–Shaker and CD8–Fas II Chimeric Proteins The extracellular and transmembrane domains of CD8 were used to make the chimeras. For the control CD8 (CD8), a stop codon was inserted directly following the AflIII site, creating a truncated CD8 protein that contains only the CD8 sequences present in the chimeras, terminating six amino acids into the cytoplasmic domain. CD8–Fas II and CD8–Shaker are fusions of CD8 to the full C-terminal sequences of the PEST+ isoform of Fas II or to the cytoplasmic C terminus of Shaker. CD8–Fas II 11aa and CD8–Shaker 11aa are fusions to the final 11 amino acids of Fas II (-SGEIIGKNSAV) or of Shaker (-NALAVSIETDV). CD8–Fas II AAE and CD8–Shaker VTD are almost identical to the full C-terminal CD8 chimeras, except that the final three amino acids are altered from SAV to AAE for CD8–Fas II AAE or from TDV to VTD for CD8–Shaker VTD. Neuron 1997 19, 1007-1016DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80393-1)

Figure 2 C-Terminal Sequences of Fas II and Shaker Direct Synaptic Localization Muscle expression of CD8 chimeras is driven in third instar larvae by MHC-GAL4, which expresses in all muscles. (A–C) Anti-CD8 immunocytochemistry at 1:500 dilution of the CD8 antibody. CD8–Fas II (A) and CD8–Shaker (B) are concentrated at the synaptic boutons, whereas CD8 (C) is not. (D–F) Electron micrographs using anti-CD8 antibodies and HRP immunocytochemistry of type Ib boutons of third instar larvae. CD8–Fas II (D) and CD8–Shaker (E) are concentrated in the subsynaptic reticulum, whereas CD8 (F) is not. Scale bar, 1 μm. Neuron 1997 19, 1007-1016DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80393-1)

Figure 2 C-Terminal Sequences of Fas II and Shaker Direct Synaptic Localization Muscle expression of CD8 chimeras is driven in third instar larvae by MHC-GAL4, which expresses in all muscles. (A–C) Anti-CD8 immunocytochemistry at 1:500 dilution of the CD8 antibody. CD8–Fas II (A) and CD8–Shaker (B) are concentrated at the synaptic boutons, whereas CD8 (C) is not. (D–F) Electron micrographs using anti-CD8 antibodies and HRP immunocytochemistry of type Ib boutons of third instar larvae. CD8–Fas II (D) and CD8–Shaker (E) are concentrated in the subsynaptic reticulum, whereas CD8 (F) is not. Scale bar, 1 μm. Neuron 1997 19, 1007-1016DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80393-1)

Figure 2a Neuron 1997 19, 1007-1016DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80393-1)

Figure 2d Neuron 1997 19, 1007-1016DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80393-1)

Figure 3 Synaptic Localization of CD8 Chimeras in First Instar Larvae Anti-CD8 immunocytochemistry at 1:500 dilution of the CD8 antibody. Muscle expression of CD8 chimeras is driven in first instar larvae by 24B-GAL4. (A) CD8–Shaker is concentrated at the synaptic boutons. (B) CD8 is not concentrated at the synaptic boutons. The slight background bouton staining seen in third instar larvae is not observed here, consistent with the undeveloped subsynaptic reticulum in first instar larvae. (C) Animals that do not express a transgene show no muscle-membrane staining with the CD8 antibody. Neuron 1997 19, 1007-1016DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80393-1)

Figure 6 Dlg Is Required for Synaptic Localization of CD8–Fas II and CD8–Shaker (A–E) Anti-CD8 immunocytochemistry at 1:100 antibody dilution. Muscle expression of CD8–Shaker and CD8–Fas II is driven in first instar larvae by 24B-GAL4, which expresses in all muscles. CD8–Shaker (A) and CD8–Fas II (C) are localized to the synaptic boutons of first instar dlg/+ heterozygotes. CD8–Shaker (B) and CD8–Fas II (D) are not localized to the synaptic boutons of first instar dlg/Y mutants; instead, they are uniformly expressed on the muscle membrane. Staining of the CD8 antibody in the absence of transgene expression (E) shows that the expression on the membrane in (B) and (D) is CD8 immunoreactivity and not background. Anti-synaptotagmin staining of synaptic boutons (F) shows that synapses appear normal in mutant dlg/Y first instar larvae, despite the absence of localization for CD8–Shaker and CD8–Fas II. Neuron 1997 19, 1007-1016DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80393-1)

Figure 4 C-Terminal 11 Amino Acids of Shaker and Fas II Are Sufficient to Direct Synaptic Localization Anti-CD8 immunocytochemistry at 1:500 dilution of the CD8 antibody. Muscle expression of the CD8 chimeras is driven in third instar larvae by MHC-GAL4. CD8–Sh 11aa (A) is concentrated at the synaptic boutons, whereas CD8 (B) is not. CD8–Fas II 11aa (C) is also concentrated at the synaptic boutons, though at a lower level than CD8–Shaker. Animals that do not express a transgene show no muscle-membrane staining with the CD8 antibody (D). Neuron 1997 19, 1007-1016DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80393-1)

Figure 5 C-Terminal Three Amino Acids of Fas II and Shaker Are Necessary for Synaptic Localization Muscle expression of the CD8 chimeras is driven in third instar larvae by MHC-GAL4. (A, C, E, and G) Anti-CD8 immunocytochemistry at 1:500 dilution of the CD8 antibody. (B, D, F, and H) Synaptic boutons of the same neuromuscular junctions as in (A), (C), (E), and (G) are visualized by immunostaining with anti-synaptotagmin. (A and B) CD8–Shaker with a wild-type C-terminal PDZ-interaction domain (TDV) is localized at the synaptic boutons. (C and D) CD8–Shaker with a disrupted PDZ-interaction domain (VTD) is not localized to the synaptic boutons; instead, it is distributed uniformly on the muscle membrane. (E and F) CD8–Fas II with a wild-type C-terminal PDZ-interaction domain (SAV) is localized to the synaptic boutons. (G and H) CD8–Fas II with a disrupted PDZ-interaction domain (AAE) is no longer localized to the synaptic boutons; instead, it is uniformly distributed on the muscle membrane. Neuron 1997 19, 1007-1016DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80393-1)

Figure 7 Uniform Muscle Membrane Expression Is Followed by Concentration at the Synapse A heat shock promoter driving GAL4 expression was used to promote a pulse of CD8–Shaker expression during different stages of larval development. Animals were heat shocked for a total of 4 hr at 37°C and then were allowed to develop at 18°C. The expression pattern in third instar larvae was monitored at specific time points after heat shock by CD8 immunocytochemistry at a 1:100 antibody dilution. (A) Control animals 7 hr after heat shock show no CD8 immunoreactivity. (B) Seven hours after heat shock, CD8–Shaker is uniformly distributed over the muscle membrane, and no bouton staining is observed. (C) Three days after heat shock, CD8–Shaker is present at high levels on the muscle membrane and at the synaptic boutons. (D) Six days after heat shock, membrane staining is much lower, whereas staining at the synaptic boutons remains at high levels. Neuron 1997 19, 1007-1016DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80393-1)