Competition in the Telecommunications Industry

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Telecommunications and Natural Gas Industry. Telecommunications Voice (landline, wireless) Video (cable, satellite) Data (cable, wireless) Convergence.
Advertisements

Emerging telecom industry lanscape Has the 96 Act failed? –Confused political assurances w/ economic motivations –Misunderstood difficulty, thus lacked.
Wireline Competition Bureau 2004 Promoting Real Consumer Choice and Investment in Broadband Facilities.
STATE OF ISRAEL MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS Fixed-Mobile Convergence Regulatory Point of View Daniel Rosenne Director General, Ministry of Communications,
” Lit” Multi-Tenant Building Modeling February 2009.
Bundling, Differentiation, Alliances, and Mergers Johannes M. Bauer Michigan State University First Transatlantic Telecom Industry Forum Montpellier, November.
U.S. Wireless Broadband: LMDS, MMDS and Unlicensed Spectrum February 17, 2000 Presented By: Peter Jarich & James Mendelson.
ECO 436 Industry Seminar Dr. David G. Loomis Illinois State University
Should Broadband Internet Services To The Home Offer Choice of ISP? Group E: *Brian Bohan *John Musacchio *Randi Thomas *Wanyu Tsai YES!
Net Neutrality Questions. What if? Customer Lamps for Less Luxurious Lumination Telephone Company Welcome to lamps [click] [dial tone] Welcome to Luxurious.
Telecommunications Introduction to telecommunication issues.
1 End of Regulation? Jerry Hausman Professor of Economics MIT July 2005
A framework for analyzing strategies of Internet Service Providers Authors: Erik Wiersta, Gabriele Kulenkampff and Hans Schaffers Article #: 15 Presented.
Chp. 3 – Industry Overview Traditional Telephone Companies & Cable TV Providers Mobile Providers Smaller Competitors Internet Based Competitors Why Governments.
Telecommunications The Transition to Competition.
The Effects of Network-Sharing Regulation in Telecommunications in the EU and the United States Robert W. Crandall The Brookings Institution PFF/CEPS Conference.
Manish, William, & Sarah. CURRENT HOLDINGSSUGGESTED HOLDINGS  AT&T0%  Verizon0%  China Mobile Ltd.2.41%  NII Holdings0.98% Buy:  AT&T2.14%  NII.
1 * 1998 figures are estimates from the the 1998 Multimedia Telecom Market Review and from IAD. Sources: Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract of the U.S.
Luiz Pinto, Matthias Sigrist, Daniel Packard.  Decrease SIM portfolio by 43 basis points to come in line with S&P 500  Reallocate funds within the Telecommunication.
International Telecommunication Union Committed to Connecting the World The World in 2009: ICT Facts and Figures Jaroslaw K. PONDER Strategy and Policy.
Wireless Communication Sprint Nextel Team members' name omitted on purpose New Horizons Wireless Communication Sprint Nextel.
The FCC and the Internet Robert Cannon Senior Counsel for Internet Issues FCC Office of Plans and Policy.
Carriers Carriers carry traffic for a fee Must have rights of way to lay wire Given some monopoly protection Regulated but being deregulated.
Network Economics “We know how to route packets, what we don’t know how to do is route dollars.” -- David C. Clark IS250 Spring 2010
U.S. Telecommunications Regulation and Market Developments September 2008.
Econ 100 Mar Increasing Market Competition: Deregulation & Incentive Regulation.
GROUP # 3 曾冠瑋 H 陸凱拉 H 李星諭 H PROFESSOR KUANG-CHIU HUANG 11/5/2013.
ITS 302 Purposes of the course –Review the history of US telecommunications as a case study –Examine the basics of regulation, especially as they apply.
COMT 220 The Telecommunications Act of 96 Based on Information from: Phyllis Bernt Trevor Roycroft America’s NETWORK, March 1, 1996.
Telephony & Satellite Technologies. Telecommunications Act of 1996 Removed entry barriers between local, long distance, and cable service providers Designed.
Some questions to consider Do we need regulation? Does history matter? Why is one-stop shopping important? Why didn’t the U.S. Telecom Act of 1996 work?
Company Presentation June 1, 2010 Jiying Wang YongHui Wu.
Telecom Industry: History of the Future –RBOCs are big early winners gaining upto 20% market share in long distance while losing only 3-5% share in the.
Access Charges The major questions –What services did IXC’s require in order to provide their interLATA toll and private line services? –What to do about.
Proposal for Reforming the Intercarrier Compensation and Universal Service Systems CTIA – The Wireless Association™ May 18, 2005.
1 Managing the Transition to IP-Based Public Phone Networks in the United States Joe Gillan CRNI November 22, 2013 Gillan Associates.
REGULATORYAND COMPETION POLICY ISSUES IN THE PRIVATIZATION OF PUBLIC UTILITIES: THE CHILEAN EXPERIENCE.
Internet Policy Day 3 - Workshop Session No. 5 The impact of telecomms regulation Prepared for CTO by Link Centre, Witwatersrand University, South Africa.
Covad Confidential Broadband Technology and Policy – A Service Provider Perspective Anjali Joshi EVP, Engineering July 2002.
Convergence Technology. Ch 01 Telecom Overview  Define communications and telecommunications  Components of a communications system  Difference between.
The Regulation of Network Industries Simon Wilkie. Caltech Lecture for May 7, 2004.
1 1084_06F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc. The Current State Of Telecommunications Dan Barker TNT Consulting Group.
Thomas J. Sugrue Opening Remarks June 20, 2001 Sixth Annual CMRS Competition Report.
Monopoly Pros –Easier to effect social policy (universal service for example) –Economies of scale and scope Cons –Lack of incentive for innovation –Inefficiencies.
Net Neutrality Tim Scott MIS 304 October 11, 2011.
Competitive Universal Service TC 310 June 5, 2008.
Industry Overview AT&T and the Bell System Post Divestiture Factors in the Emergence of Competition to the Bells The Vision of the Telecommunications Act.
State of Kansas Senate Bill 350 Telecom Reform Bill Overview David Kerr AT&T Kansas.
Briefing on New Franchise Ordinances for Telecommunications & Video Services Applicant: Verizon.
Competition Policy for the new U.S. Telecoms Market: Background and Outline Howard A. Shelanski, U.C. Berkeley Nanterre, Paris X November 9, 2006.
Introduction to Information Networks COMT 625 Hans Kruse.
ITS 602 Purposes of the course
Market structures: contestability
Daniel F. Spulber Northwestern University
American Multinational Telecommunications Corporation
Monopolies Vs Perfect Competition
Industry Analysis Class 6.
39th Annual National Conference of Regulatory Attorneys
Gerard Lavery Lederer Partner
CenturyLink Prospective: The Future for CWA-represented Employees
Monopolies and Anti-Trust Regulation
Darren Entwistle Member of the TELUS Team February 18, 2005
Chapter 6 Internet Service Providers— Hosting Your Web Site
The University of Chicago
CTIA – The Wireless Association™ May 18, 2005
Merrill Lynch Communications Forum 2005
Circular Flow of Economic Activity
Wireline Post 1996 TC 310 May 20, 2008.
Telecom History.
Chapter 2 – Networks and how they link
Presentation transcript:

Competition in the Telecommunications Industry * 07/16/96 Competition in the Telecommunications Industry Gregory L. Rosston Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research grosston@stanford.edu *

Outline of Talk History Overview of Telecom Act Implementation * 07/16/96 Outline of Talk History Overview of Telecom Act Implementation what were we thinking? Competition how it is affected by all of this. If there is time, so may be a bit rushed. *

Why Do We Care About Competition? * 07/16/96 Why Do We Care About Competition? Long Distance $50 Billion (net of access) Local $100 billion Internet $10 billion (and growing!) Inefficiencies and innovation 1. Big numbers. 2. Important Sector of the Economy alone 3. Key input into lots of other industries and changing the way we do business. E-Loan 4. *

Simplified Version of the Network * 07/16/96 Simplified Version of the Network IXC POPs End Office End Office CPE CPE *

Network of Networks Nirvana * 07/16/96 Network of Networks Nirvana Unbiased technology choice Unbiased service choices Meeting consumer demand Interconnection is the key *

Triple Play Facilities-based Unbundled elements Resale * 07/16/96 Triple Play Facilities-based Depends on customer, area Local Exchange Unbundled elements 40% discount Platform approach Resale Immediate 15-25% discount *

Telecom Act Nirvana Universal Service Access Reform Interconnection Long Distance Entry

Symmetric vs. Asymmetric Termination Rates * 07/16/96 Symmetric vs. Asymmetric Termination Rates Asymmetric cellular termination Assume 1000 local minutes per month, 10% share. Net termination payments of $27 per month per customer. $0.00/min Wireline Cellular $0.03/min *

Interconnection--What were we thinking? * 07/16/96 Interconnection--What were we thinking? Leveling the playing field upwards Dominant network vs. competing to garner network effects Forward-looking economic costs *

What has happened? Moving with all due speed Jurisdictional fights or * 07/16/96 What has happened? Moving with all due speed Jurisdictional fights or ? Act discusses negotiation. Sets up framework for what to do if negotiations fail. That should have been completed a long time ago. (9 months from date of Act). Just now getting some permanent rates. Court challenges on a variety of fronts GTE challenging (almost) every state hearing in court. Others have been somewhat more circumspect because of need for future state cooperation. Bill of attainder and 8th Circuit cases/ *

Local Rate Structure -- Kentucky

InterLATA Entry Economies of scope through bundling * 07/16/96 InterLATA Entry Economies of scope through bundling Incentive to open local market Incentive to increase number of access minutes Tauzin-Dingell Value of one stop shopping Cost savings through better use of networks. Opening local competition. If no carrot, then harder to do. Look at differences with GTE “Double marginalization” problem. B/c of imperfect competition *

RBOCs IXC – IP Companies AT&T MCI/Worldcom Sprint Level 3 Others Wireless Co.s Verizon Sprint AT&T Nextel Cingular Voicestream Nextwave CLECs Covad Northpoint Rhythms XO Winstar Others Cable Co.s AT&T AOL-TimeWarner Comcast Charter Others