Balanced life for individuals

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden INTERREG III B General Introduction BSR INTERREG III B Joint Secretariat.
Advertisements

Inter-regional co-operation The territorial dimension Ian Hill EU Policy and Development Officer Cumbria County Council.
Some implications…. Competitiveness is not dependent upon physical connectivity Disparities in regional growth and competitiveness continue to widen Competitive.
RUnUP Thematic Network Closing Conference Added Value of Being Involved in an URBACT project Andrew Tate, Economic Development Manager, Gateshead Council.
Andrew Morris facilitator Introduction to the day.
Healthcare System in Scotland David R Steel Senior Research Fellow, University of Aberdeen Former Chief Executive, NHS Quality Improvement Scotland.
MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND FINANCE SEC. GEN. OF INVESTMENTS AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGING AUTHORITY CIP Interreg Interregioanal Cooperation in INTERREG III Programmes.
INTERREG –Experiences and Challenges -Sverre Mauritzen -Norway’s role in transnational and interregional programmes (B and C) -NIBR – report 2010:22, English.
Territorial Cooperation – adding value to the Danube Region Ivana Lazic, INTERACT Point Vienna 9 July 2010 | Novi Sad.
Contribution of the Territorial Cooperation Programmes to the EU Strategy for the Danube Region Kiril Geratliev, Director General “Territorial Cooperation.
EUROPEAN STUCTURAL FUNDS Esben Poulsen, European Commission Head of the INTERREG Unit Directorate General for Regional Policy INTERREG IIIB Partner Search.
│ 1│ 1 What are we talking about?… Culture: Visual Arts, Performing Arts, Heritage Literature Cultural Industries: Film and Video, Television and radio,
EU Structural Funds Presentation to Chief Executives 9 May 2006 Hillgrove Hotel Monaghan.
EPSIPlus Thematic meeting, April 11, 2007 Irina Zalisova, EPMA/Czech PSI Watch Public Sector culture and PSI re-use ePSIPlus Thematic meeting Prague, April.
Local Partnerships development Jela Tvrdonova Cordoba, 2009.
First activities of the ESPON EGTC out for tender ESPON Seminar A world without borders.
European Territorial Co-Operation Programmes 2014 – 2020 (NI, Border Region of Ireland and Western Scotland) Lorraine McCourt Director, Joint Technical.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
1 Groundwork London in Europe. 2  Interreg IIC   Understand NUL  Identify development potential of NUL  How to integrate social & cultural.
111 Future of Cohesion Policy. Principles and assumptions Cohesion policy:  Is not “a Chapter Two“ of the Europe 2020 Strategy.  Should reflect specific.
Transport Integration of cross-border transport infrastructure TEN-T strategy on large cross- border cooperation projects Gudrun Schulze, Team leader,
Filippo Compagni - UK Contact Point – Atlantic Area
Green ICT Development.  General objective:  The project’s general objective is to build up strategic cluster partnership in the field of green smart.
unep fi & energy efficiency Finance
Interreg Europe Elena Ferrario
Regional Framework operations in INTERREG III C
INTERREG-IIIB CADSES Neighbourhood Program: a general overview
Inter-regional Schemes across the Mediterranean
University Strategic Plan
PRIORITIES FOR THE FUTURE
Call for Action & International Initiative
Follow up to ex post evaluation of INTERREG III
Rudolf Niessler Smart & Sustainable Growth and Southern Europe
TERRITORIAL COOPERATION PROGRAMMES FOR EUSDR - PA 8
C O N V E N E S P R E S E N T S C O O R D I N A T E S
ESF - State of the Art in Romania
Nick Brookes Director for Cohesion Policy
The FARNET Support Unit. Who we are, what we do and how we do it
New „Partnership“ on Functional Regions
Mattia Agnetti – INTERACT Programme Secretariat
Informal Water Directors Meeting Dublin, 22nd June 2004
Green Climate Fund Update on activitities Jose Delgado
Euroregions and Black Sea Basin
Promoting European Excellence Rooted in Regions and Cities: Territorial Connections Anna Lisa Boni Secretary General EUROCITIES @EUROCITIEStweet.
Effective Partnerships: What’s Involved, Who’s Involved?
Together for an integrated, innovative and sustainable Alpine region
MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND FINANCE
Starting implementation Embedding Macro-regional strategies
Conclusions and Main messages of the day
progress of the water reform in bulgaria
Cross-border Cooperation Programmes: Lessons Learned
Connecting Territories: the Role of European Regions and Cities
ENI CBC Joint Operational Programme Black Sea Basin
Future of Cohesion Policy
Eurostat Management Plan for Regional and Urban statistics
An increasingly turbulent world – some megatrends
European Business and Biodiversity Platform Information point
Sustainable Mobility & Tourism as Drivers for Economic Development on European Islands Clemens Rosenmayr Policy Advisor, EUROCHAMBRES.
Veľký Meder / Nagymegyer 6th November 2014
Territorial Cooperation and Territorial Cohesion Results of the consultation on the consultation Input to TCUM seminar 25 September 2009 | Brussels.
Expert Group on Natura 2000 Management
EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Objective 3 Territorial Co-operation Workshop 4:Trans-national co-operation DG Regional Policy Brussels, 22.
Romania-Bulgaria border. Perspectives for
Cohesion Forum Brussels, May 2001
Strategic Guidelines for EU Territorial Cooperation Programmes Post-2020 Introductory notes. Malta: 26 April Eduardo medeiros 2017.
Communicating your project
Outline Background: development of the Commission’s position
SMATH project kick-off meeting
European collaboration for knowledge exchange & Innovation
Presentation transcript:

Balanced life for individuals How would you see your region by 2040? Mobility Connection Sustainability Solidarity Balanced life for individuals Accessibility

How would you like to see Europe by 2040?

Do you see a role for Interreg in this? If so, which one?

Interreg, what would you keep? 1) Its current architecture: Financial resources Three strands Shared management Geographical coverage

Interreg, what would you keep? 2) Its partnership culture: People to people projects Practices exchanges Shared effort in overcoming obstacles

Interreg, what would you keep? 3) Being an opportunity-provider: Territorial approach Innovation driven mindset

Interreg, what would you change? 1) The Policy objectives: Interreg as a driver for an European Identity 2) Simplification of procedures: less bureaucracy 3) Communication: focus on beneficiaries on the ground 4) Geography: re-focus the cross-border strand to a more limited territory closer to the border 5) Focus on the private sector