Karen E.S. Tang, Victor A. Bloomfield  Biophysical Journal 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Advertisements

Maria A. Kiskowski, Anne K. Kenworthy  Biophysical Journal 
Protein Diffusion in Living Skeletal Muscle Fibers: Dependence on Protein Size, Fiber Type, and Contraction  Simon Papadopoulos, Klaus D. Jürgens, Gerolf.
pH Corrections and Protein Ionization in Water/Guanidinium Chloride
Comparing Experimental and Simulated Pressure-Area Isotherms for DPPC
Investigation of Domain Formation in Sphingomyelin/Cholesterol/POPC Mixtures by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer and Monte Carlo Simulations  Monica.
Role of Hydration Water in Protein Unfolding
Heat Capacity Effects on the Melting of DNA. 1. General Aspects
Hydration Force in the Atomic Force Microscope: A Computational Study
Volume 99, Issue 11, Pages (December 2010)
Refolding of a High Molecular Weight Protein: Salt Effect on Collapse
Molecular Basis of the Apparent Near Ideality of Urea Solutions
Jörg Rösgen, B. Montgomery Pettitt, David Wayne Bolen 
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Partially Assembled Nucleosome Structures at Atomic Detail
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Sangwook Wu, Pavel I. Zhuravlev, Garegin A. Papoian 
Apparent Subdiffusion Inherent to Single Particle Tracking
Volume 97, Issue 9, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 104, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
An Equilibrium Model for the Combined Effect of Macromolecular Crowding and Surface Adsorption on the Formation of Linear Protein Fibrils  Travis Hoppe,
Christopher B. Stanley, Tatiana Perevozchikova, Valerie Berthelier 
Static Light Scattering From Concentrated Protein Solutions II: Experimental Test of Theory for Protein Mixtures and Weakly Self-Associating Proteins 
Volume 86, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
A Comparison of Genotype-Phenotype Maps for RNA and Proteins
Ion Specificity and Nonmonotonic Protein Solubility from Salt Entropy
Volume 107, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
Christopher Deufel, Michelle D. Wang  Biophysical Journal 
Influence of Protein Scaffold on Side-Chain Transfer Free Energies
Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Phase Transitions in Mixed Lipid Systems Containing LPA, DOPA, and DOPE Lipids  Eric R. May, Dmitry I.
Coarse-Grained Peptide Modeling Using a Systematic Multiscale Approach
Wolfgang Nonner, Duan P. Chen, Bob Eisenberg  Biophysical Journal 
Michael Katzer, William Stillwell  Biophysical Journal 
Electrostatic Free Energy Landscapes for DNA Helix Bending
Volume 89, Issue 3, Pages (September 2005)
Yuno Lee, Philip A. Pincus, Changbong Hyeon  Biophysical Journal 
Using Atomic Force Microscopy to Study Nucleosome Remodeling on Individual Nucleosomal Arrays in Situ  H. Wang, R. Bash, J.G. Yodh, G. Hager, S.M. Lindsay,
Volume 111, Issue 7, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 95, Issue 12, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
Ligand Binding to the Voltage-Gated Kv1
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Samuel T. Hess, Watt W. Webb  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Pritam Chanda, Aidong Zhang, Daniel Brazeau, Lara Sucheston, Jo L
Validating Solution Ensembles from Molecular Dynamics Simulation by Wide-Angle X- ray Scattering Data  Po-chia Chen, Jochen S. Hub  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 85, Issue 4, Pages (October 2003)
Jason K. Cheung, Thomas M. Truskett  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 100, Issue 11, Pages (June 2011)
An Effective Solvent Theory Connecting the Underlying Mechanisms of Osmolytes and Denaturants for Protein Stability  Apichart Linhananta, Shirin Hadizadeh,
Volume 98, Issue 9, Pages (May 2010)
Dirk Gillespie, Le Xu, Gerhard Meissner  Biophysical Journal 
Dynamics of the BH3-Only Protein Binding Interface of Bcl-xL
M. Müller, K. Katsov, M. Schick  Biophysical Journal 
Dielectric Properties of Proteins from Simulation: The Effects of Solvent, Ligands, pH, and Temperature  Jed W. Pitera, Michael Falta, Wilfred F. van.
Open-State Models of a Potassium Channel
Robust Driving Forces for Transmembrane Helix Packing
Comparing Experimental and Simulated Pressure-Area Isotherms for DPPC
Volume 88, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Partially Assembled Nucleosome Structures at Atomic Detail
Dependence of Protein Folding Stability and Dynamics on the Density and Composition of Macromolecular Crowders  Jeetain Mittal, Robert B. Best  Biophysical.
Chze Ling Wee, David Gavaghan, Mark S.P. Sansom  Biophysical Journal 
Xiao-Bo Wang, Jody Vykoukal, Frederick F. Becker, Peter R.C. Gascoyne 
Maxwell Henderson, Brigita Urbanc, Luis Cruz  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 112, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Brian M. Baynes, Bernhardt L. Trout  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Partition and Permeation of Dextran in Polyacrylamide Gel
Volume 99, Issue 5, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Excluded Volume in Solvation: Sensitivity of Scaled-Particle Theory to Solvent Size and Density  Karen E.S. Tang, Victor A. Bloomfield  Biophysical Journal  Volume 79, Issue 5, Pages 2222-2234 (November 2000) DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76470-8 Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 ΔGtr and ΔGtrev values for the transfer of amino-acid solutes from water to 30% ethylene glycol. For any solute, the overall spread/uncertainty in ΔGtrev (several kcal/mol) due to variation in solvent radii is as large or larger than the ΔGtrev value itself, and much larger than ΔGtr. For each solute (along the x-axis) there are plotted one experimental apparent ΔGtr (●) (Nozaki and Tanford, 1965) (converted to the molarity scale), and nine (for 3×3 water/cosolvent radius pairs) SPT-calculated ΔGtrev values (three open symbols, □, △, and ♢, for Rc=2.2, 2.3, and 2.4Å, respectively, with rectangular bars through them). The rectangular bars indicate how ΔGtrev varies as water’s radius is changed but the cosolvent radius is kept fixed. The open symbol is located at the ΔGtrev value with Rw=1.38Å; the ends of the rectangular bars are at the ΔGtrev values with Rw=1.35 and 1.40Å. Whether ΔGtrev with Rw=1.35Å is at the upper or lower end of the rectangular bar (the value with Rw=1.40Å being at the opposite end) is independent of the solute and is only a function of cosolvent size. The water radii are marked on the figure only for the first solute (in this case 3gly) for clarity. Therefore, for any particular solute and choice of Rc, if Δtrev with Rw=1.35Å and the same Rc is at the top (bottom) of the bar for 3gly, then it is also at the top (bottom) for that solute. For example, for the transfer of tyrosine, if Rc=2.2Å (□), ΔGtrev with Rw=1.35Å is at the top of the rectangular bar, as it is for 3gly with Rc=2.2Å, and is equal to 0.039 kcal/mol; with Rw=1.38Å and 1.40Å, the values are, from the locations of □ and the bottom of the corresponding bar, −0.26 and −0.51kcal/mol, respectively. It turns out that for the three cosolvent radii considered here, increasing water’s radius always increases favorability of transfer (ΔGtrev with Rw=1.40Å is always at the bottom of the bar). This is not the case for all cosolvent radii. See for example, the data for transfer to aqueous sucrose and urea (Figs. 3 and 4). (The experimental ΔGtr were measured at 25°C, whereas our calculations were at 20°C, the temperature at which solution density data were available (Wolf et al., 1985). However, the qualitative conclusions we make should not be affected by a 5° temperature change.) Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2222-2234DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76470-8) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 ΔGtr and ΔGtrev values for the transfer of amino acid solutes from water to 60% ethanol. Experimental apparent ΔGtr values (●) (Nozaki and Tanford, 1971) were again converted to the molarity scale. SPT-calculated ΔGtrev (p=patm) were obtained with Rc=2.00 (□), 2.15 (△), and 2.30Å (♢). ΔGtr values were measured at 25°C, whereas ΔGtrev were calculated at 20°C, the temperature at which density data were available (Wolf et al., 1985). See caption of Fig. 1 for more details on interpreting the figure. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2222-2234DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76470-8) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 ΔGtr and ΔGtrev values for the transfer of amino-acid solutes from water to 1M sucrose. Experimental apparent ΔGtr values (●) are from Liu and Bolen (1995). SPT-calculated ΔGtrev (p=patm) with Rc=3.85 (□), 4.00 (△), and 4.15Å (♢) are indicated by open symbols. Both ΔGtr and ΔGtrev were obtained at 25°C. See caption of Fig. 1 for more details on interpreting the figure. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2222-2234DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76470-8) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 ΔGtr and ΔGtrev values for the transfer of amino acid solutes from water to 2M urea. Experimental apparent ΔGtr values (●) are from Wang and Bolen (1997). SPT-calculated ΔGtrev (p=patm) were obtained with Rc=2.15 (□), 2.25 (△), and 2.35Å (♢). Both ΔGtr and ΔGtrev were obtained at 25°C. See caption of Fig. 1 for more details on interpreting the figure. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2222-2234DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76470-8) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 The volume available for cavity insertion is significantly smaller than the free volume. This is a random snapshot of a two-dimensional binary fluid of hard disks, indicated by black circles, with a total fractional occupancy (packing fraction) of 0.40. The smaller disks have a radius of 1, the larger a radius of 2. The gray regions are areas that are unoccupied, yet unavailable for the insertion of a cavity with a radius of 1.5. The volume available for insertion (white regions) is significantly smaller than the “free” but unavailable (gray) regions. If one attempts to insert a cavity the same size as the larger disks (radius 2), there is no region in this configuration available for insertion. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2222-2234DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76470-8) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 ΔGtrev is also sensitive to ρ. Plotted are data for the transfer of amino acids to 30vol.percnt; ethylene glycol, with Rw=1.38Å and Rc=2.3Å. ΔGtrev was calculated with ρ set to the experimental density (△, same as in Fig. 1) and to the experimental density plus 1% (+) and minus 1% (×). The solid circles (●) are the experimental apparent ΔGtr values (Nozaki and Tanford, 1965) converted to the molarity scale. A change of density of ±1% yields a change in ΔGtrev of 0.2 (gly) to 0.4 (trp) kcal/mol. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2222-2234DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76470-8) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 ΔGtr and ΔGtrev values for the transfer of amino-acid solutes from water to 30% ethylene glycol. Same as Fig. 1 except that p was set to phs. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2222-2234DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76470-8) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 ΔGtr and ΔGtrev values for the transfer of amino acid solutes from water to 30% ethylene glycol. Same as Fig. 1 except that nwmix was not obtained from the experimental ρ but rather by fixing the hard-sphere pressure of the aqueous ethylene glycol solution to that of water, phsmix=phswat. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2222-2234DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76470-8) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 ΔGtr and ΔGtrev values for the transfer of amino acid solutes from water to 60% ethanol. Same as Fig. 2 except that nwmix was not obtained from the experimental ρ but rather by fixing the hard-sphere pressure of the aqueous ethylene glycol solution to that of water, phsmix=phswat. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2222-2234DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76470-8) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 10 ΔGtr and ΔGtrev values for the transfer of amino acid solutes from water to 1M sucrose. Same as Fig. 3 except that nwmix was not obtained from the experimental ρ but rather by fixing the hard-sphere pressure of the aqueous ethylene glycol solution to that of water, phsmix=phswat. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2222-2234DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76470-8) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 11 ΔGtr and ΔGtrev values for the transfer of amino acid solutes from water to 2M urea. Same as Fig. 4 except that nwmix was not obtained from the experimental ρ but rather by fixing the hard-sphere pressure of the aqueous ethylene glycol solution to that of water, phsmix=phswat. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2222-2234DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76470-8) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions