Volume 58, Issue 5, Pages (June 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (November 2016)
Advertisements

Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Histone Demethylase LSD2 Acts as an E3 Ubiquitin Ligase and Inhibits Cancer Cell Growth through Promoting Proteasomal Degradation of OGT  Yi Yang, Xiaotong.
LincRNA-p21 Suppresses Target mRNA Translation
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
SAGA Is a General Cofactor for RNA Polymerase II Transcription
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
NRF2 Is a Major Target of ARF in p53-Independent Tumor Suppression
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Eun-Joo Kim, Jeong-Hoon Kho, Moo-Rim Kang, Soo-Jong Um  Molecular Cell 
Feng Wang, Larissa A. Durfee, Jon M. Huibregtse  Molecular Cell 
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 130, Issue 4, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages (September 2011)
LincRNA-p21 Suppresses Target mRNA Translation
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
PARP1 Represses PAP and Inhibits Polyadenylation during Heat Shock
Glucose-Induced β-Catenin Acetylation Enhances Wnt Signaling in Cancer
Volume 55, Issue 4, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 54, Issue 4, Pages (May 2014)
Vanessa Brès, Tomonori Yoshida, Loni Pickle, Katherine A. Jones 
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (August 2008)
HBL1 Is a Human Long Noncoding RNA that Modulates Cardiomyocyte Development from Pluripotent Stem Cells by Counteracting MIR1  Juli Liu, Yang Li, Bo Lin,
14-3-3σ Regulates Keratinocyte Proliferation and Differentiation by Modulating Yap1 Cellular Localization  Sumitha A.T. Sambandam, Ramesh B. Kasetti,
Volume 136, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (May 2010)
Andrew W Snowden, Philip D Gregory, Casey C Case, Carl O Pabo 
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
HBL1 Is a Human Long Noncoding RNA that Modulates Cardiomyocyte Development from Pluripotent Stem Cells by Counteracting MIR1  Juli Liu, Yang Li, Bo Lin,
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages (August 2010)
MyoD Targets TAF3/TRF3 to Activate Myogenin Transcription
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (November 2016)
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Xudong Wu, Jens Vilstrup Johansen, Kristian Helin  Molecular Cell 
Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 49, Issue 4, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Inhibition of PAX3 by TGF-β Modulates Melanocyte Viability
Volume 52, Issue 5, Pages (December 2013)
Emma Abernathy, Sarah Gilbertson, Ravi Alla, Britt Glaunsinger 
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (May 2007)
Dan Yu, Rongdiao Liu, Geng Yang, Qiang Zhou  Cell Reports 
Transcriptional Repression of miR-34 Family Contributes to p63-Mediated Cell Cycle Progression in Epidermal Cells  Dario Antonini, Monia T. Russo, Laura.
Yap1 Phosphorylation by c-Abl Is a Critical Step in Selective Activation of Proapoptotic Genes in Response to DNA Damage  Dan Levy, Yaarit Adamovich,
Short Telomeres in ESCs Lead to Unstable Differentiation
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 64, Issue 5, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
A Direct HDAC4-MAP Kinase Crosstalk Activates Muscle Atrophy Program
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Jörg Hartkamp, Brian Carpenter, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Molecular Cell 
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Chih-Yung S. Lee, Tzu-Lan Yeh, Bridget T. Hughes, Peter J. Espenshade 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 58, Issue 5, Pages 755-766 (June 2015) LOXL2 Oxidizes Methylated TAF10 and Controls TFIID-Dependent Genes during Neural Progenitor Differentiation  Ane Iturbide, Laura Pascual-Reguant, Laura Fargas, Joan Pau Cebrià, Berta Alsina, Antonio García de Herreros, Sandra Peiró  Molecular Cell  Volume 58, Issue 5, Pages 755-766 (June 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.04.012 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2015 58, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.04.012) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 LOXL2 Interacts With and Oxidizes an Extensively Modified TAF10 (A) Proteins were coimmunoprecipated from HEK293T cells transfected with LOXL2-FLAG or/and TAF10-HA with anti-FLAG antibodies, and precipitates were analyzed by western blot for LOXL2-FLAG, TAF10-HA, and TAF10. (B) Cell lysates from HEK293T cells transfected with LOXL2-FLAG or/and TAF10-HA or TAF10K189Q-HA were incubated with biotin hydrazide (an activated biotin that reacts with oxidized proteins), and biotin-labeled proteins were pulled down with streptavidin beads. The oxidation levels of TAF10 were checked by western blot with an anti-HA antibody (oxTAF10). (C) Cell lysates from HEK293T cells transfected with LOXL2 WT-FLAG or LOXL2 mut-FLAG and TAF10-HA. Methylated levels of TAF10 were analyzed by protein immunoprecipitation with anti-HA antibodies and then reimmunoprecipitated with an anti-trimethyl lysine antibody. The levels of trimethylated TAF10 were analyzed by western blot against HA (TAF10-HA-Kme3). (D) Immunoprecipitated TAF10-HA was incubated with purified recombinant LOXL2 wild-type (rLOXL2 WT) or catalytically inactive LOXL2 (rLOXL2 mut). After the LOXL2 reaction, samples were incubated with biotin hydrazide, and biotin-labeled proteins were pulled down with streptavidin magnetic beads. In parallel, after the LOXL2 reaction, samples were immunoprecipitated with antitrimethylated beads. oxTAF10 and TAF10-HA-Kme3 levels were checked by western blot with an anti-HA antibody. (E) Nuclear extracts of HEK293T cells infected with GFP or LOXL2 WT-FLAG or LOXL2 mut-FLAG were immunoprecipitated with anti-TBP antibodies or irrelevant IgGs and analyzed by western blot with the indicated antibodies. (F) Nuclear extracts of HEK293T cells infected with GFP or LOXL2 WT-FLAG or LOXL2 mut-FLAG were incubated with biotin hydrazide and biotin-labeled proteins were pulled down with streptavidin beads. TAF10 was then reimmunoprecipitated with an anti-TAF10 antibody, and the interactors were analyzed by western blot analysis with the indicated antibodies. Molecular Cell 2015 58, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.04.012) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 LOXL2 Represses TFIID (meTAF10) Transcription-Dependent Genes in HEK293T Cells (A) Real-time quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) shows the changes in expression of PLK1, ERF1, HOXA1, CCNE1, and HPRT mRNA levels in HEK293T cells infected with GFP, LOXL2 WT-FLAG. Gene expression was normalized against an endogenous control (Pumilio) and presented as RNA levels over those obtained in GFP transfected cells, which was set to 1. (B) LOXL2 WT-FLAG and endogenous TAF10 binding to those promoters was determined by ChIP assay in GFP-infected cells as compared to LOXL2 WT-FLAG infected cells. Data from real-time PCR (qPCR) amplifications of PLK1, ERF1, HOXA1, CCNE1, and HPRT promoters were normalized to the input and expressed as fold change relative to the data obtained in GFP-infected cells, which was set to 1. Error bars indicate standard deviation in at least three experiments. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01. Molecular Cell 2015 58, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.04.012) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 LOXL2 Oxidizes TAF10 and Represses Oct4, Nanog, Klf4, and Sox2 Transcription in ESCs in a Catalytic-Dependent Manner (A) TAF10 from ESCs was analyzed by immunoprecipitation with two different antibodies and then reimmunoprecipitated with an anti-trimethyl lysine antibody. The levels of trimethylated TAF10 were analyzed by western blot against TAF10. (B) qRT-PCR shows the changes in expression of Oct4, Nanog, Klf4, and Sox2 mRNA levels in ESCs infected with GFP, LOXL2 WT-FLAG, or LOXL2 mut-FLAG. Gene expression was normalized against an endogenous control (RPO) and presented as RNA levels over those obtained in GFP-infected cells, which was set to 1. RPO is the housekeeping gene ribosomal protein large, RPLP0. (C) Cell lysates of ESCs infected with GFP, LOXL2 WT-FLAG, or LOXL2 mut-FLAG were incubated with biotin hydrazide, and oxidized proteins were precipitated with streptavidin beads. The oxidation levels of endogenous TAF10 were checked by western blot with an anti-TAF10 antibody. (D) Percentage of alkaline phosphatase staining-positive ESC colonies that had been infected with GFP or LOXL2 WT-FLAG or LOXL2 mut-FLAG. (E) LOXL2 WT-FLAG or mut-FLAG and endogenous TAF10 binding to pluripotency gene promoters was determined by ChIP assay in GFP-infected cells compared to cells infected with either LOXL2 WT-FLAG or LOXL2 mut-FLAG. Data from qPCR amplifications of Oct4, Nanog, Klf4, Sox2, and Rps28 promoters were normalized to the input and expressed as fold change relative to the data obtained in GFP-infected cells, which was set to 1. (F) TAF10 oxidation in the selected promoters was determined by Re-ChIP in ESCs infected with either GFP, LOXL2 WT-FLAG, or LOXL2 mut-FLAG. The lysate was incubated with biotin hydrazide (an activated biotin that reacts with oxidized TAF10) before Re-ChIP. Extracts were sequentially immunoprecipitated with anti-TAF10 and streptavidin beads. DNA binding was quantified by qPCR. Data were normalized to the total amount of TAF10 immunoprecipitated and to the input, and expressed as fold enrichment over the data obtained with GFP-infected cells. The value given for the GFP sample was set to 1. Rps28 stands for Ribosomal subunit 28. Error bars indicate standard deviation in at least three experiments. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01. Molecular Cell 2015 58, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.04.012) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 RA Treatment Induces LOXL2-Dependent TAF10 Oxidation and Degradation and Pluripotency Gene Repression (A) ESCs were treated with RA, and cell lysates were obtained at different time points, incubated with biotin hydrazide, and pulled down with streptavidin beads. The total and oxidized levels of TAF10 were checked by western blot with an anti-TAF10 antibody. LOXL2 levels were analyzed in the same cell lysates by western blot with an anti-LOXL2 antibody. (B) Western blot for TAF10 and LOXL2 after 2 days of RA treatment revealed the LOXL2-dependent degradation of TAF10 in ESCs infected with short-hairpin RNA control (shControl) or specific for LOXL2 (shLoxl2) (LOXL2 levels are also shown in Figure 5A by qRT-PCR). (C) Endogenous LOXL2 and TAF10 binding to Oct4, Nanog, Klf4, and Sox2 promoters were analyzed by ChIP after 1 day of RA treatment. Data from qPCR were normalized to the input and expressed as fold change relative to the data obtained with irrelevant IgG, which was set to 1. Error bars indicate standard deviation in at least three experiments. (D) TAF10 oxidation in the selected promoters was determined by Re-ChIP in ESCs that were untreated or after 1 day of RA treatment. The lysate was incubated with biotin hydrazide (an activated biotin that reacts with oxidized TAF10) before Re-ChIP. Extracts were sequentially immunoprecipitated with anti-TAF10 and streptavidin beads. DNA binding was quantified by qPCR. Data were normalized to the total amount of TAF10 immunoprecipitated and to the input, and expressed as fold enrichment over the data obtained in nontreated cells. The value given for the nontreated cells sample was set to 1. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01. Molecular Cell 2015 58, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.04.012) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Pluripotency Gene Repression after RA Treatment Is Impaired in the Absence of LOXL2 (A) Changes in expression of Loxl2, Oct4, Nanog, Klf4, and Sox2 mRNA levels in ESCs infected with shControl or shLoxl2 and treated with RA were determined by qRT-PCR. Gene expression was normalized against an endogenous control (RPO) and presented as RNA levels over those obtained in shControl-infected cells at day 0, which was set to 1. (B) qRT-PCR shows the changes in expression of Nestin, NeuroG1, HoxA1, HoxA5, and HoxA7 mRNA levels in ESCs treated with RA. Gene expression was normalized against an endogenous control (RPO) and presented as RNA levels over those obtained in shControl-infected cells at day 0, which was set to 1. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01. Molecular Cell 2015 58, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.04.012) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Global Transcriptome Analysis Confirms that LOXL2 Has a Role in Embryonic and Neural System Development (A) Venn diagram representing data obtained from the microarray analysis of gene expression profiles in ESCs shControl and shLoxl2 treated 1 day with RA. Gene ontology (GO) analysis of genes only deregulated in shControl (purple) and shLoxl2 (pink) treated 1 day with RA, using the gene annotation tool from the Ingenuity database, is shown. (B) Validation by RT-qPCR of selected LOXL2-dependent genes, in three independent experiments. (C) Left, Venn diagram representing gene expression profile data from the knockdown of TAF5 in ESCs (obtained from the GEO under accession number GSE33644), and the gene expression profile in ESCs shControl treated with RA for 1 day. Genes shown in green are those that are TAF5 dependent and downregulated upon RA treatment. Right, Venn diagram representing gene expression profile of TAF5-dependent genes downregulated after RA (green), and gene expression profiles of genes deregulated in shControl upon RA but not in shLoxl2 conditions (purple). Red genes represent those TAF5-dependent genes that are downregulated upon RA in shControl but not in shLoxl2 conditions. GO analysis of this set of genes. (D) Validation by RT-qPCR of selected genes, in three independent experiments ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01. Molecular Cell 2015 58, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.04.012) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 LOXL2 Regulates Sox2 Expression and Neural Fate Specification in Zebrafish In loxl2ab-morpholino (MO)-injected embryos, Sox2 expression increased (B) (n = 9/12) as compared with controls (A) (n = 16/16), in particular in the eye, hindbrain, and spinal cord (B; arrows); see insets of eyes (A′ and B′) and spinal cord (A″ and B″). NeuroD expression was reduced in the same domains in loxl2ab-MO-injected embryos (D and F) (n = 12/16; arrows) as compared to the controls (C and E) (n = 10/10); see insets of eyes (C′–F′) and spinal cord (C″–F″). Molecular Cell 2015 58, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.04.012) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions