Evidence for a fractional fractal quantum Hall effect in graphene superlattices by Lei Wang, Yuanda Gao, Bo Wen, Zheng Han, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Andreev Reflection in Quantum Hall Effect Regime H. Takayanagi 髙柳 英明 Tokyo University of Science,Tokyo International Center for Materials NanoArchitechtonics.
Advertisements

James McDaniel Physics 3500 Nanochemistry Quantum Dots: Science and Applications.
Fractional topological insulators
Optics on Graphene. Gate-Variable Optical Transitions in Graphene Feng Wang, Yuanbo Zhang, Chuanshan Tian, Caglar Girit, Alex Zettl, Michael Crommie,
Physics of Graphene A. M. Tsvelik. Graphene – a sheet of carbon atoms The spectrum is well described by the tight- binding Hamiltonian on a hexagonal.
Hofstadter’s Butterfly in the strongly interacting regime
Observation of neutral modes in the fractional quantum hall effect regime Aveek Bid Nature (2010) Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Science,
Theory of Intersubband Antipolaritons Mauro F
Graphene at High Magnetic Fields I kyky E kxkx Recently, a new form of carbon has become a laboratory for new physics: a single sheet of graphite, known.
2D Topological insulator in HgTe quantum wells Z.D. Kvon Institute of Semiconductor Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia 1. Introduction. HgTe quantum wells. 2.
University of Washington
Energy Bands and Charge Carriers in Semiconductors
Figure 1. Left – a small region of a typical polarized spectrum acquired with the ESPaDOnS instrument during the MiMeS project. This figure illustrates.
From: Discovery of carbon-rich Miras in the Galactic bulge
QHE discovered by Von Klitzing in 1980
2D materials and van der Waals heterostructures
Jie Zheng, William N. Zagotta  Neuron 
Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys
Correlations of Electrons in Magnetic Fields
Discovery of a Weyl fermion semimetal and topological Fermi arcs
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
by Max Hirschberger, Jason W. Krizan, R. J. Cava, and N. P. Ong
Volume 112, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Mechanics and Buckling of Biopolymeric Shells and Cell Nuclei
DNA Hairpins: Fuel for Autonomous DNA Devices
Quantum squeezing of motion in a mechanical resonator
Responses of Collicular Fixation Neurons to Gaze Shift Perturbations in Head- Unrestrained Monkey Reveal Gaze Feedback Control  Woo Young Choi, Daniel.
Evidence for the chiral anomaly in the Dirac semimetal Na3Bi
Christopher Deufel, Michelle D. Wang  Biophysical Journal 
Direct imaging discovery of a Jovian exoplanet within a triple-star system by Kevin Wagner, Dániel Apai, Markus Kasper, Kaitlin Kratter, Melissa McClure,
Mechanics and Buckling of Biopolymeric Shells and Cell Nuclei
Nanonet Force Microscopy for Measuring Cell Forces
Michael Fuhrer Director, FLEET Monash University
The Information Content of Receptive Fields
by Jungwon Park, Hans Elmlund, Peter Ercius, Jong Min Yuk, David T
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
by W. R. Binns, M. H. Israel, E. R. Christian, A. C. Cummings, G. A
FSU Physics Department
Volume 111, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Stephen V. David, Benjamin Y. Hayden, James A. Mazer, Jack L. Gallant 
Teuta Pilizota, Joshua W. Shaevitz  Biophysical Journal 
by Yang Wang, Aishwarya Kumar, Tsung-Yao Wu, and David S. Weiss
Ady Stern (Weizmann) The quantum Hall effects – introduction
Quantum phase magnification
by I. Lovchinsky, A. O. Sushkov, E. Urbach, N. P. de Leon, S. Choi, K
Ballistic miniband conduction in a graphene superlattice
Peering through Jupiter’s clouds with radio spectral imaging
Fig. 2 Time-resolved THz reflectivity from MAPI after band-edge optical excitation. Time-resolved THz reflectivity from MAPI after band-edge optical excitation.
Fig. 2 Zeeman splitting of the plateau and associated Kondo feature.
Reproduction of reentrant supercurrent data in a closed quantum dot
Tuning of the conductance plateau of device 1 and quantum dot model
Scattering and Interference in Epitaxial Graphene
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Fig. 1 Phase diagram and FS topologies.
Fig. 3 Transport characterization of dry-assembled devices.
Fig. 2 Gate and magnetic field dependence of the edge conduction.
Ultrahigh mobility and efficient charge injection in monolayer organic thin-film transistors on boron nitride by Daowei He, Jingsi Qiao, Linglong Zhang,
Fig. 4 Giant optical chirality.
Fig. 3 Characterization of the current-induced effective fields.
by Yoshifumi Tokiwa, Boy Piening, Hirale S. Jeevan, Sergey L
by Toan Trong Tran, Blake Regan, Evgeny A
Superconducting topological surface states in the noncentrosymmetric bulk superconductor PbTaSe2 by Syu-You Guan, Peng-Jen Chen, Ming-Wen Chu, Raman Sankar,
Volume 112, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Fig. 1 Schematic view and characterizations of FGT/Pt bilayer.
Superconducting cavity electro-optics: A platform for coherent photon conversion between superconducting and photonic circuits by Linran Fan, Chang-Ling.
Fig. 2 Asymmetric MR of LMO within the ac plane.
by Ye Yang, Jing Gu, James L. Young, Elisa M. Miller, John A
Fig. 1 MIR photovoltaic detector based on b-AsP.
Van der Waals engineering of ferromagnetic semiconductor heterostructures for spin and valleytronics by Ding Zhong, Kyle L. Seyler, Xiayu Linpeng, Ran.
George D. Dickinson, Ian Parker  Biophysical Journal 
Presentation transcript:

Evidence for a fractional fractal quantum Hall effect in graphene superlattices by Lei Wang, Yuanda Gao, Bo Wen, Zheng Han, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Mikito Koshino, James Hone, and Cory R. Dean Science Volume 350(6265):1231-1234 December 4, 2015 Published by AAAS

Fig. 1 Transport measurements in a BN-encapsulated graphene device with a ~10-nm moiré superlattice. Transport measurements in a BN-encapsulated graphene device with a ~10-nm moiré superlattice. (A) Zero-field resistance versus gate bias. Left inset: False-colored optical image showing macroscopic motion of the graphene (G) after heating; scale bar, 15 μm. Right inset: Gap measured by thermal activation at the CNP and hole satellite peak positions, across four different devices (20). (Note that the satellite peak does not exhibit activated behavior, within the resolution of our measurement, for superlattice wavelengths less than ~10 nm.) Both gaps are observed to vary continuously with rotation angle. Error bars indicate the uncertainty in the gap deduced from a linear fit to the activated temperature response (20). (B) Hall conductivity plotted versus magnetic field and gate bias (top) and longitudinal resistance versus normalized field and density (bottom) for the same device as in (A). (C) Simplified Wannier diagram labeling the QHE states identified in (B). Light gray lines indicate all possible gap trajectories according to the Diophantine equation, where we have assumed that both spin and valley degeneracy may be lifted such that s and t are allowed to take any integer value (for clarity, the range is restricted to |s, t| = 0 … 10). Families of states are identified by color as follows: Black lines indicate fractal IQHE states within the conventional Hofstadter spectrum, including complete lifting of spin and valley degrees of freedom. Blue lines indicate conventional FQHE states. Red lines indicate anomalous QHE states that do not fit either of these descriptions, exhibiting integer Hall quantization but corresponding to a fractional Bloch index (see text). Lei Wang et al. Science 2015;350:1231-1234 Published by AAAS

Fig. 2 Fractional quantum Hall effect in the Hofstadter spectrum. Fractional quantum Hall effect in the Hofstadter spectrum. (A) Longitudinal resistance versus Landau filling fraction corresponding to a high-field region of data from Fig. 1B. (B) Hall conductivity (top) and longitudinal resistance (bottom) corresponding to horizontal line cuts within the dashed region in (A). Conductivity plateaus identified at 30 T and 40 T are labeled blue and red, respectively. (C) Hall conductivity versus magnetic field at fixed filling fraction, showing evolution from FQHE plateaus to integer-valued plateaus. Lei Wang et al. Science 2015;350:1231-1234 Published by AAAS

Fig. 3 The FBQHE states. The FBQHE states. (A) Wannier diagram showing only the anomalous features from Fig. 1. Brackets label the corresponding Bloch band (s) and Landau band (t) numbers; dashed lines show linear projections to the n/n0 axis. (B) Hall conductivity and longitudinal resistance versus normalized density, measured at fixed magnetic field B = 40 T, showing transport signatures of selected gap states from (A). The s and t numbers, determined respectively from the n/n0 intercept and the Hall quantization value, are labeled for each QHE plateau. (C) Summary illustration of the energy band structure evolution with magnetic field in the case of no superlattice (left) and with a superlattice (right), and in the limit of no interactions (top) and strong interactions (bottom): (i) With no superlattice, the density of states is continuous at zero magnetic field. A cyclotron gap develops with finite magnetic field, indicated by white against a colored background. (ii) In the presence of a large-wavelength superlattice, the Bloch band edge is accessible by field effect gating. Hofstadter minigaps evolve from this band edge, intersecting the conventional Landau levels at large magnetic field. (iii) With no superlattice present, interactions give rise to the fractional quantum Hall effect, appearing also as subgaps within the Landau level but projecting to zero energy. (iv) In the regime of both strong interactions and large-wavelength superlattice, we observe a set of gaps that do not correspond to either the IQHE of single-particle gaps or the conventional many-body FQHE gaps. These are defined by integer-valued Hall quantization, but they project to fractional Bloch band-filling indices. Lei Wang et al. Science 2015;350:1231-1234 Published by AAAS