Conformation-Selective ATP-Competitive Inhibitors Control Regulatory Interactions and Noncatalytic Functions of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases  Sanjay B.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pratistha Ranjitkar, Amanda M. Brock, Dustin J. Maly 
Advertisements

Plk1 Controls the Nek2A-PP1γ Antagonism in Centrosome Disjunction
SAICAR Induces Protein Kinase Activity of PKM2 that Is Necessary for Sustained Proliferative Signaling of Cancer Cells  Kirstie E. Keller, Zainab M. Doctor,
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 15, Issue 19, Pages (October 2005)
Arvin C. Dar, Michael S. Lopez, Kevan M. Shokat  Chemistry & Biology 
Crystal Structures of Sirt3 Complexes with 4′-Bromo-Resveratrol Reveal Binding Sites and Inhibition Mechanism  Giang Thi Tuyet Nguyen, Melanie Gertz,
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Ancestral Protein Reconstruction Yields Insights into Adaptive Evolution of Binding Specificity in Solute-Binding Proteins  Ben E. Clifton, Colin J. Jackson 
Volume 18, Issue 17, Pages (September 2008)
JAK3 Specific Kinase Inhibitors: When Specificity Is Not Enough
Structure-Based Design of Covalent Siah Inhibitors
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
MAP Kinase-Interacting Kinases—Emerging Targets against Cancer
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Plk1 Controls the Nek2A-PP1γ Antagonism in Centrosome Disjunction
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e5 (January 2019)
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Beena Krishnan, Lila M. Gierasch  Chemistry & Biology 
Ins and Outs of Kinase DFG Motifs
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
A Subdomain Swap Strategy for Reengineering Nonribosomal Peptides
Charlene Depry, Sohum Mehta, Ruojing Li, Jin Zhang  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Covalent Protein Labeling at Glutamic Acids
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2014)
Sanjay B. Hari, Ethan A. Merritt, Dustin J. Maly  Chemistry & Biology 
Sachin Surade, Tom L. Blundell  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages 9-22 (April 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Inhibitor Mediated Protein Degradation
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (November 2007)
A General Framework for Inhibitor Resistance in Protein Kinases
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Protein Kinase D Inhibitors Uncouple Phosphorylation from Activity by Promoting Agonist-Dependent Activation Loop Phosphorylation  Maya T. Kunkel, Alexandra C.
Pratistha Ranjitkar, Amanda M. Brock, Dustin J. Maly 
Geetanjali J. Jog, Jun Igarashi, Hiroaki Suga  Chemistry & Biology 
Ramon Hurtado-Guerrero, Daan M.F. van Aalten  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Jue Wang, Jia-Wei Wu, Zhi-Xin Wang  Structure 
Arvin C. Dar, Michael S. Lopez, Kevan M. Shokat  Chemistry & Biology 
Structural Basis of RIP1 Inhibition by Necrostatins
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Basis of Mutual Domain Inhibition in a Bacterial Response Regulator
Features of Selective Kinase Inhibitors
Binding Specificity of Retinal Analogs to Photoactivated Visual Pigments Suggest Mechanism for Fine-Tuning GPCR-Ligand Interactions  Sundaramoorthy Srinivasan,
Peter Man-Un Ung, Rayees Rahman, Avner Schlessinger 
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e4 (April 2018)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Presentation transcript:

Conformation-Selective ATP-Competitive Inhibitors Control Regulatory Interactions and Noncatalytic Functions of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases  Sanjay B. Hari, Ethan A. Merritt, Dustin J. Maly  Chemistry & Biology  Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages 628-635 (May 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.02.016 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Chemistry & Biology 2014 21, 628-635DOI: (10. 1016/j. chembiol. 2014 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Modulation of Kinase Regulation and Function by Stabilizing Alternative Active Site Conformations Protein kinases, such as Erk2, are regulated by multiple phosphorylation and dephosphorylation events. Furthermore, many kinases are known to have a number of noncatalytic functions, such as scaffolding and allosteric activation. Conformation-selective inhibitors can potentially be used to modulate the regulatory and noncatalytic interactions of protein kinases. Chemistry & Biology 2014 21, 628-635DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.02.016) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 MAPK Active Site Conformational Plasticity (A) Superimposed structures of Erk2 in the active DFG-in (blue; DFG motif in teal) (Protein Data Bank [PDB] ID code 1PME) and inactive DFG-out (yellow; DFG motif in magenta) (PDB ID code 4I5H) conformations. The DFG-motif phenylalanine residues for both structures are shown in stick form, and the distance between their α carbons is 9.6 Å. Portions of the p-loops are hidden for clarity. (B) Inhibitors used in this report that stabilize the active DFG-in (SB203580) and inactive DFG-out (1 and 2) conformations. Crystal structures of these ligands stabilizing specific kinase conformations can be found in the Protein Data Bank under ID codes 1A9U (SB203580), 2BAJ (1), and 4I5H (2). Chemistry & Biology 2014 21, 628-635DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.02.016) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The Effects of Conformation-Selective Ligands on MAPK Activation by Upstream MEKs (A) Schematic of the assay used to determine Erk2 inhibitory constants (Kis). (B) Inhibition of Erk2WT and Erk2DS1 by 2 and SB203580. Data for 2 were reported previously (Hari et al., 2013). (C) Schematic of the assay used to determine activation loop phosphorylation inhibition of Erk2. (D) Inhibition of Erk2WT and Erk2DS1 activation loop phosphorylation by 2 and SB203580. The amount of bis-phosphorylated Erk2 produced at each inhibitor concentration was determined by ELISA. (E) Enzymatic inhibition (Ki) and EC50 values for Erk2WT and Erk2DS1 against ligands 2 and SB203580. Ki values were reported previously (Hari et al., 2013). aPartial inhibition (20%–30%) at saturating inhibitor concentrations. Error bars represent SEM for three replicate measurements. See also Figure S1 and Tables S1A and S1B. Chemistry & Biology 2014 21, 628-635DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.02.016) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Cellular Inhibition of Erk2 Activation GFP-tagged Erk2WT or Erk2DS1 was transiently transfected into HEK293 cells. After serum starvation, the cells were incubated with DMSO (lanes 1 and 2), ligand 2 (lanes 3–6 [1,000, 500, 300, and 100 nM]), or SB203580 (lane 7 [1,000 nM]). EGF was then added (lanes 2–7), followed by cell lysis, SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotting (IB). Chemistry & Biology 2014 21, 628-635DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.02.016) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Erk2DS2 Stabilized in a Modified Helix αC-Out Conformation (A) Structure of ligand 3. (B) Overall topology of 3-bound Erk2DS2. Helix αC is shown in yellow, the activation loop is in magenta, and 3 is in green. (C) Superimposed structures of 3-bound Erk2DS2 (gray and yellow with magenta activation loop), SB203580-bound pentamutant Erk2 (cyan) (PDB ID code 1PME), and 2-bound Erk2DS2 (blue) (PDB ID code 4I5H). The DFG-motif phenylalanine residues for all three structures are represented in stick form. The distances from the α carbon of the phenylalanine residue in 2-bound Erk2DS2 from those of 3- and SB203580-bound Erk2 are 11.1 and 9.6 Å, respectively. (D) Superimposed structures of 3-bound Erk2DS2 (gray and yellow), SB203580-bound pentamutant Erk2 (cyan) (PDB ID code 1PME), and 2-bound Erk2DS2 (blue) (PDB ID code 4I5H). Glu-69 and Lys-52 for all three structures are represented in stick form. The distances between these residues for 3-, 2-, and SB203580-bound Erk2 are 7.6, 2.7, and 2.7 Å, respectively. See also Figure S2 and Table S2. Chemistry & Biology 2014 21, 628-635DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.02.016) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 The Effects of Conformation-Selective Inhibitors on MAPK Dephosphorylation (A) Schematic for MAPK dephosphorylation. (B) Effect of ligands 2, 3, and SB203580 on DUSP6-mediated dephosphorylation of phospho-Erk2WT and phospho-Erk2DS2. (C) Effect of ligand 1 or SB203580 on DUSP10-mediated phospho-p38α dephosphorylation. Error bars represent SEM for three replicate measurements. See also Table S3. Chemistry & Biology 2014 21, 628-635DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.02.016) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Conformation-Selective Inhibitors Affect MAPK Activation of DUSP6 (A) Schematic of Erk2-mediated activation of DUSP6. (B) Ligands 2, 3, or SB203580 were added to unphosphorylated Erk2WT or Erk2DS2. DUSP6 was then added to the reaction, followed by 4-MUP. The phosphatase reaction was measured by monitoring the fluorescence increase. Background subtraction was performed using samples without kinase. ∗∗∗p < 0.001. (C) Titration of Erk2-mediated DUSP6 activation. Kact[Erk2] values are 280 ± 20 nM and 500 ± 140 nM for apo Erk2DS1 and the 2-Erk2DS1 complex, respectively. Error bars represent SEM for three replicate measurements. See also Figure S3. Chemistry & Biology 2014 21, 628-635DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.02.016) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions