Continuous Assessment Establishing Checkpoints

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rigorous Science Content and Instructional Practice Ms. Katrina Slone, Knott County Public Schools Dr. Kent Price, Morehead State University GEAR UP Alliance.
Advertisements

Arts in Basic Curriculum 20-Year Anniversary Evaluation the Improve Group.
Research and Impact The WaterBotics ® evaluation and research studies include two synergistic, but distinct, domains: educational impact and scale-up/sustainability.
Providing On-going Support for STEM Teachers Joan D. Pasley Horizon Research, Inc.
Comprehensive Literacy Program Louisiana Department of Education
Barbara Miller Education Development Center Implementing a Teacher Leadership Program with Sustainability as a Goal: Lessons from Math/Science Partnerships.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Title IIB Information Session April 10, 2006.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
Sharon Walpole University of Delaware Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia Literacy Coaches in Action: Strategies for Crafting Building- Level Support.
Virginia’s State Improvement Grant and State Personnel Development Grant The Content Literacy Continuum & Response to Intervention.
Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Education.
What is Effective Professional Development? Dr. Robert Mayes Science and Mathematics Teaching Center University of Wyoming.
Concrete Steps for Broadening Participation 1.  Developing a Systems Integration Approach  What does this suggest about what we do not do now?  What.
1 Developing an Evaluation Plan _____________________ The Mathematically- Connected Communities MSP Developed for the February, MSP Conference Dr.
Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Florida Secondary School Redesign Initiative: Eventually, Change Turns into Work ! Presented by: Barbara McClamma Christine Crocco Senior Program Associates.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Texas Regional Collaboratives for Excellence in Science and Mathematics Teaching*: An Exemplary Texas MSP Program Gina S. Day Deputy Associate Commissioner,
Enhancing Education Through Technology (Ed Tech) Title IID Competitive Grants Michigan Department of Education Information Briefing July 17 and.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.
Successful Practices Network CTE Technical Assistance Center Work Plan 1.Improve CTE data collection to create an accurate picture.
Professional Development is aligned to your district’s initiatives and tailored to your districts current needs. Our modules are designed to  Deepen.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
Professional Development for High-Poverty Schools Joseph F. Johnson, Jr., Ph.D. MSP Conference January 10, 2007 Phoenix, AZ.
The New York State School Improvement Grant Initiative Five Years On Office of Professional Research & Development, Syracuse University, NY.
S AN D IEGO AND I MPERIAL V ALLEY B ASIC S KILLS N ETWORK Dr. Lisa Brewster.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
SD Math Partnership Project An Overview Marcia Torgrude and Karen Taylor.
UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.
Lenoir STEM Learning Community. Just the facts, ma’am… 0 What is Lenoir STEM? A program funded by MSP grant with additional financial support from industry.
Pennsylvania’s State Personnel Development Grant “Improving Student Results: A Focus on Highly Qualified Special Education Personnel” An Overview PDE Conference.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
Learning in Physical Science (LeaPs) Administrator Session Kim Zeidler-Watters – UK PIMSER 1/21/2010.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships Grant RFP Informational Session April 5, 2010.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
Asking the Right K-12 Questions How to Answer Them to Evaluate K-12 STEM Outreach and Engagement Carlos Rodriguez, Ph.D., Principal Research Scientist.
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
TAP Math: Teachers and Administrators Partnering for Mathematics Learning Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant (DPI)
TAP Math: Teachers and Administrators Partnering for Mathematics Learning Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Department of Education funded through.
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
STEM Connect A STEM Initiative funded by Golden Leaf.
Home Base Partnership Team
2016 NC Teacher Working Conditions Survey Results
Teachers Teach Teachers:
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
December 11, 2015 Varnville Elementary School, Varnville, SC
Professional Development Update
Professional Learning Update & Scorecard
Project Outcomes (separate handout)
Report on SEC Data Analysis
Team Goal Setting Karen Meyers, Director and
Presentation transcript:

Continuous Assessment Establishing Checkpoints Reviewing Our Progress Reflecting on Our Progress Celebrating Our Progress Sharing Our Progress Evaluating Our Progress

Reviewing Our Progress Checkpoint: MMSTLC Grant Goals The MMSTLC Grant sets long and short term goals for: Mathematics and Science Centers Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Faculty Local School Districts Teachers Students

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES INTERMEDIATE OUTCOMES ASSUMPTIONS/RATIONALE: The Federal MSP program supports improved student achievement in mathematics and science through enhanced training for math / science teachers, with major involvement of STEM faculty in the improvement effort. The Michigan MSP program has identified a need for teacher leaders to provide sustainable site-based professional development. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES INTERMEDIATE OUTCOMES LONG-TERM GOALS RESOURCES - SVSU-GVSU Teacher Leader Projects - UM Instructional Resources - Statewide STEM Faculty Expertise - M/S Centers Infrastructure - MSP Grant Professional development for math / science center staff on recruiting, supporting, training, and sustaining TSLs Teacher Leaders . . . - Increased math / science content / pedagogical skills / knowledge - Improved PD facilitation skills - Increased knowledge of connections between curriculum, instruction, assessment, and data use - Work jointly with administrator to improve math / science - Recognized as leaders in math / science - Provide instructional leadership through PD Math/Science Centers… - Recruited as planned - Statewide network of TSLs operating as intended 1. Cadre of TSLs w/skills / knowledge to help improve teaching / learning of math / science in targeted high needs schools Individualized, data-driven needs assessments for participating high-needs buildings, districts, and TSLs. M/S Center staff / teams -Have knowledge / skills to recruit, develop, support, and sustain TSLs and administrators - Increased / enhanced MSC partnerships with IHE, LEAs, business, non-profits, etc. 2. Working relationships between TSLs and building administrators, w/support of M/S Centers & STEM Faculty Development of learning communities at statewide (TSLs), regional (MSCs), and local (building / district) levels. NEEDS - Capacity in M/S Centers to support teacher leaders and high needs schools inadequate - Current PD is inadequate to significantly impact teaching & learning - School-based capacity to serve high needs schools inadequate Development of instructional resources based on content and effective pedagogy. Students . . . -Increased opportunities to learn -Improved learning and deepened understanding of math / science -Improved attitudes towards, interest in mathematics / science Immersion in leadership, inquiry, and professional community during summer academy and school year programming. 3. Improve math / science learning of students in targeted high needs schools Administrators . . . - Improved ability to recognize / support high quality math/science education - Develop working relationship with TL to improve math / science On-going training in leadership and inquiry teaching / learning through released time (sabbatical) options for PD implementation. STEM Faculty - Seek to increase their knowledge and insights in content, pedagogy, and LEA needs by collaborating with middle grades’ colleagues. - Sharing content / pedagogical knowledge with TSLs, LEAs, and M/S Centers - IHE STEM adapting instructional practices in their own classrooms 4. M/S Centers with increased capacity to sustain support for high needs schools Intentional inclusion of STEM faculty at all levels of TSL professional development. Extended Teams . . . - Increased content / pedagogical knowledge / skills; facilitation skills in selected topics / practices - Increased understanding of personal instructional practices Online PD, coaching, networking, conferencing, and resource dissemination. Technical assistance (consulting, advising, tutoring, etc.) by Collaborative Team to sites. PROGRAM LOGIC MODEL MICHIGAN STATE-WIDE MSP—TEACHER LEADERS FOR HIGH NEEDS SCHOOLS OUTPUTS - Instructional Resources - Toolkits - Needs assessments - Electronic connections / network

Reviewing Our Progress Checkpoint: Personal Professional Development Plan Creation of a plan to address: Short Term and Long Term Professional Goals Goals for Content Issues, Process Skills, and Technical Skills Professional Development Log Creation of Curriculum Vita

Reviewing Our Progress Checkpoint: School Level Goals STEPS to SUCCESS Guidelines: Articulated Curriculum Aligned Instructional Materials Consistent Instructional Practices Adequate Professional Development Effective Assessment System Supportive Policies and Procedures

Reviewing Our Progress Checkpoint: Team Action Plan Aligned to support: MMSTLC Grant Goals School Level Goals Teacher Leader Goals

Reviewing Our Progress Review your team action plan in light of the MMSTLC Logic Model. Does your action plan support the grant goals for all partners? What adjustments do you need to make for your action plan to ensure all partners benefit from this project? At the Summer Academy, your team identified potential needs in your school as they relate to the Steps for Success. How have you addressed, or plan to address these issues? In reviewing the professional development plan for your teacher leaders, reflect on the steps taken so far toward implementing this plan? How has the team supported the teacher leader? Are there additional actions that need to be taken?

Celebrating Our Progress Using insights from the reflection exercise above: Define six (6) successes that you and/or your team has had since the beginning of the program. Define six (6) goals that you and/or your team would like to accomplish between now and this summer. Write these successes and goals on the dodecahedron, illustrating as desired. Cut out and construct the dodecahedron.

Sharing Our Progress “Applause is a celebration, not only of the actors, but also of the audience. It constitutes a shared moment of delight.” - John Charles Polanyi

Evaluating Our Progress Think back to the beginning of this program in terms of the Leadership Components and thoughtfully complete the assessment.