CONSIDER Neelam Soundarajan Swaroop Joshi Jeremy Morris

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SEVEN PRINCIPLES ABOUT MARKING 6 th Annual TA Day Friday, September 22, 2000 Elsie Chan Department of Sociology University of Victoria Mike Zastre Department.
Advertisements

 How many?  5-7 members  What about big classes?  Survey, instructor forms teams.
Welcome to Turnitin.com’s Peer Review! This tour will take you through the basics of Turnitin.com’s Peer Review. The goal of this tour is to give you.
Experience in Applying Online Learning Techniques in Computer Science & Engineering Dr. Aiman H. El-Maleh Computer Engineering Department King Fahd University.
Brainstorming. Brainstorming Sequence One team member should review the topic of the brainstorm using "why", "how", or "what" questions. Example: The.
CMSC 491/691 A Web of Data Administrivia Spring
Selected Responses How deep does the question dig?????
Physics 1B3-summer Lecture 11 Welcome to Physics 1B03 !
CS480 Computer Science Seminar Group Facilitation Skills.
CONSIDER: An on-line system for flipped classes Neelam Soundarajan, Rajiv Ramnath, Swaroop Joshi Computer Sc. and Engineering Department Ohio State University.
CMSC 491/691 A Web of Data Administrivia Spring
Administrative Preliminaries Computer Architecture.
Medical Law and Bioethics Unit 1. WELCOME Kaplan School Week  Kaplan’s school week runs from Wednesday to Tuesday  You will begin a new unit on Wednesday.
I know you have a lot of responsibilities to juggle. Balancing a job, education, and family can sometimes feel overwhelming.
Shouldn’t we have started with this?!?
Computer Network Fundamentals CNT4007C
Course Overview - Database Systems
PeerWise Student Instructions
ENGL 1302: Welcome! Leah Heilig.
Course Information and Introductions
Working with Scholarly Articles
Introduction to Computing
Computer Networks CNT5106C
COSC 1200 Best Practices: homework
COMP 523 Diane pozefsky 24 August 2016.
CONSIDER Neelam Soundarajan Swaroop Joshi Jeremy Morris
WebQuest: Where you design your own Space Exploration Mission
YOUR NAME Team Members Names Here: assigned by Table
How to use By Zainab Muman
Table of Contents SECTION SLIDE # 5 8 ABOUT YOU 3 OUT-OF-CLASS SEGMENT
Development History Granularity Transformations
CONSIDER Neelam Soundarajan Swaroop Joshi Jeremy Morris
Business Communication Dr. Aravind Banakar –
Business Communication
Teacher Pension Crisis in your State?
Introduction Math 075.
Online Composition with Georgie Ziff
Research participation program
Computer Networks CNT5106C
Office of Education Improvement and Innovation
Reflections on the Meaningful Product
HAVE YOUR SAY… UCL Staff Survey 31 October – 18 November 2011
PSYC 2308 Human Growth & Development/Childhood & Adolescence
CDA 3100 Summer 2013.
The Project Development Process:
Action Research Workshop July 2018 – Newcastle College
Welcome to Physics 1D03.
The Minute Paper Short, in-class writing activity (NMT 2-3 minutes)
Critical Thinking with Georgie Ziff
Good morning! As you settle in….
Discussion of Assignments
PHYS 202 Intro Physics II Catalog description: A continuation of PHYS 201 covering the topics of electricity and magnetism, light, and modern physics.
* 2000/08/1307/16/96 This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items. Use PowerPoint to keep track of these.
Signals and systems ELEC 305
Welcome to Physics 1D03 !.
Goals.
Welcome to Physics 5305!!.
What is peerScholar? Online peer evaluation tool that helps develop your creative and critical thinking skills peerScholar is an online pedagogical tool.
The Minute Paper Short, in-class writing activity (NMT 2-3 minutes)
Computer Networks CNT5106C
Starter: Percentage of amounts Starter: Percentage of amounts
Blackboard Learn By: Casey Jore.
Evaluation Measures, Ongoing Improvements and Enhancement
Introduction to Programming Environments for Elementary Education
Introduction To CPSC 233 James Tam Event driven software
Course Overview CS 4640 Programming Languages for Web Applications
SACS Working Group Continual Commitment to Accreditation and Educational Improvement April 18, 2012.
Wrt 205: critical research
Student Success ALEKS Training Series Instructors.
Presentation transcript:

CONSIDER Neelam Soundarajan Swaroop Joshi Jeremy Morris Computer Sc. and Engineering Department Ohio State University

Motivation Fact: People learn best when they discuss their ideas rather than hear a presentation Fact: The most effective discussions are those among peers, not between students and instructors! Fact: The most effective discussions are among small groups of peers who disagree with each other (about the topic) Fact: Even if all the peers in the group start out with misconceptions, by the end of the discussion, many have them may have the correct conception! CONSIDER

But … Classtime is limited so it is difficult to have serious, extended discussions in small groups in class; discussions outside class are difficult to organize … Some students may dominate face-to-face discussions; other students, possibly ones with good ideas, may remain silent … The discussions are ephemeral with no long- term record of how they evolved … CONSIDER

CONSIDER ... a web app in which Conflicting Student Ideas are Discussed, Evaluated, and Resolved (or Refuted!) Phase 1: Individual students answer a question on the app Phase 2: The instructor/app assigns students to anonymous groups of 4-5 students each, ensuring that each group is made up of students with conflicting ideas Anonymity: Students in each group will be named S1, S2, S3, S4, … CONSIDER

Phase 3: Heart of CONSIDER … Phase 3: Students in each group, via anonymous posts, discuss their positions, trying to persuade the others in the group of the correctness of their own positions and pointing out relations between their own position and that of others Phase 3 is organized as a series of rounds Each round lasts 24 hours CONSIDER

Phase 3 Rounds During each round, each student can only see the posts from the previous (and earlier) rounds … posts from the current round, even if they have already been made, will not be visible until the round ends In each round, each student is required to make one post in which he/she responds to the posts of each student from the previous round CONSIDER

Phase 3 Rounds (contd) The student may freely edit his/her post until the end of the round (since no one else will see it until that point) In the response, the student must not only state his/her current position but also state whether he/he agrees with, disagrees with, or is neutral (or unsure) about each of the previous round's posts, and why CONSIDER

… *including* his/her own post! That is the whole point of the discussion! … when the student realizes why his/her previous position was flawed and accepts the position presented by one (or more) of the other students or arrives at a position that is a combination of his/her previous position and the other students' positions, chances are deep learning is taking place … But won’t I lose points if I change my position? No! Really! CONSIDER

Phase 4: Summary Round In the final round, each student makes a final submission consisting of: His/her final answer to the original problem A summary of how his/her answer changed over the course of the discussion and how the discussion helped (or not, as the case may be) arrive at his/her final answer No penalty for changing your answer! … indeed, that is the whole point of the activity: developing deep understanding by discussing your idea with others who have different conceptions CONSIDER

After the discussion After the final round, students will/should have access to all of the posts in the group including from the final (summary) round Important: Arriving at a common, group answer is not a goal. That may happen but the goal is for each student to arrive at the best answer based on that student’s understanding In other words, this is not a “team activity” in the normal sense … CONSIDER

More Information CONSIDER tutorial: http://go.osu.edu/consider-tutorial More details: http://web.cse.ohio-state.edu/~neelam/courses/onlineCollabLearning.html CONSIDER

More broadly … But does it really work? That is, do students who use CONSIDER really develop deeper understanding? We are studying this question; and want to use data from our course. So you will get a "consent form" on your Carmen/Canvas account to allow us to use data from your classwork in this research Important: The data will be completely anonymized before we use it in our research CONSIDER

Logistics We will have a practice activity worth 10 points to familiarize you with the CONSIDER app The practice activity will be a (hopefully) interesting question unrelated to our class If have not yet completed the Google form providing me your Google id etc., do so immediately after class CONSIDER

Timeline for CONSIDER practice activity Practice activity assigned (on CONSIDER app): Monday, 3/19, by 5:00 pm Individual submissions due: Tuesday, 3/20, by 5:00 pm First round of discussion starts: Tuesday,3/20, at 6:00 pm First round discussion ends: Wed.,3/21, 6:00 pm Final submission due: Fri., 3/23, 5:00 pm CONSIDER