8X 10-20-2015 Tuesday Objective: Describe political developments in the US that led to Civil War. Agenda: Do Now: Explain the rise of the Republican Party.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Ch 18 sec 3-4 I. Dred Scott decision Biggest Supreme Court ruling before the Civil War. Chief Justice Roger Taney ruled that Scott was –Was not a citizen,

Advertisements

CHAPTER 16.3: THE DREDD SCOTT DECISION. FACTS 1.Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri. (MO) 2. Scott and his owner moved to Wisconsin for four years. 3.

leading to the Civil War Lincoln/Douglas Debates

Objectives:. Bellringer: What was the Missouri Compromise?

A Nation Divided Political Divisions Chapter 15, Section 3 Pages

THE UNION IN PERIL CHAPTER 10 Review When voters in a territory vote on whether or not to have slavery.

Objective: To examine the importance of the Lincoln – Douglas debates and the Dred Scott decision. Dred Scott Abraham Lincoln Stephen Douglas.

Griffin Honeycutt Block 2 October 29,  Official Name- Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandford  The defendant’s name was actually Sanford, but was misspelled.

Bell Work In your notebooks, respond to the prompt: How can differences among students affect the school? What kinds of differences could lead to problems.

Chapter 15, Section 3 Challenges to Slavery.

APUSH – Spiconardi.   In the 1830s, Dred Scott, a slave, accompanied his owner from Missouri to Illinois and later the territory of Wisconsin  Scott.

Bell Ringer  Who was Stephen Douglas?  Why was he important to the politics of slavery?  Take out your homework (#3 on page 331) to be checked in.

Objective: To examine the importance of the Lincoln – Douglas debates and the Dred Scott decision.

Chapter 18, Section 3. Political Divisions. The Republican Party became the party dedicated to stopping the spread of slavery.

Slavery in the 1850s: Changing National Politics Chapter 10 Section 3.

Lesson 18: The Union in Peril part 7

APUSH Review: Dred Scott v. Sanford Everything You Need to Know About Dred Scott v. Sanford To Succeed In APUSH

Review What were the 3 parts of the Missouri Compromise?

By: Mireina Barrios. Dred Scott and Roger B. Taney Dred Scott, a slave who had his freedom at Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving.

Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) 1854 Law that allowed for popular sovereignty in the Kansas and Nebraska Territories Devised by the “Little Giant” Stephen Douglas.

Dred Scott.  I can explain how the Dred Scott Court decision impacted African Americans during the time before the Civil War.

Factors Leading to Sectional Division. Compromise of 1850 Proposed by Senator Henry Clay of Kentucky California admitted to the Union as a free state.

October 21,  Congress attempts to keep a balance of power between slave and free states  Missouri Compromise  Henry Clay proposed this plan.

Political Divisions Chapter 15, Section 3.

Causes of the Civil War.

Uncle Tom’s Cabin and Dred Scott

Chapter 14 The Nation Divided Section 3: The Crisis Deepens

Dred Scott Decision 1857.

13-17 April 2015 Mon: Presentation on The 1850’s : Crisis of Union, “Political Divisions”. Answer focus questions. Homework: Make flashcards for highlighted.

Ch:14 The Nation Divided

Pre-Civil War Events Ms.Bean.

Challenges to Slavery Section Two.

Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)

Dred Scott Presentation created by Robert Martinez

Opener – Copy into Notebook pp. 84

Chapter 14 Section 3 Objectives

Chapter 14 Section 3 Objectives

Chapter 14 section 3 The Crisis Deepens.

Ch. 15 Sec. 3, 4 “Political Divisions & Nation Divides” P

Background: Who was Dred Scott?

Challenges to Slavery 15-3

FOA 2/29/16 1. What did the Kansas-Nebraska Act actually do?

1850s - Key events leading to war

To do this, Congress repealed (ended) the Missouri Compromise line at 36˚30’ in the western territories.

Review from last week Kansas-Nebraska Act: Kansas is almost ready to be a state- To slave or not? Stephan Douglas looked to avoid more issues so he proposes.

AP US History Exam - Review

What causes of sectional conflict led to the Civil War?

Political Realignment Deepens the Crisis

What makes you an “American” citizen?

Dred Scot Decision.

Dred Scot Decision.

The Compromise Missouri Compromise (1820)

Dred Scott Decision Scott was not a citizen, could not sue

The Dred Scott Decision

Objective: To examine the importance of the Lincoln – Douglas debates and the Dred Scott decision. Abraham Lincoln Stephen Douglas Dred Scott.

Civil War Jeopardy Q $100 Q $100 Q $100 Q $100 Q $100 Q $200 Q $200

Dred Scot Decision.

Political Divisions Chapter 18 - Section 3.

APUSH Review: Video #32: Attempts To Resolve Slavery In The Territories (Key Concept 5.2, II, B) Everything You Need To Know About Attempts To Resolve.

SSUSH9 The student will identify key events, issues, and individuals relating to the causes, course, and consequences of the Civil War. a. Explain the.

Ch. 15 Sec. 3, 4 “Political Divisions & Nation Divides” P

Dred Scott Decision (1857).

The Road to Civil War A Nation Divided Aim: What were the social

Chapter 14: The Nation Divided

POLITICS OF SLAVERY COMPROMISE OF 1850

Presentation transcript:

8X 10-20-2015 Tuesday Objective: Describe political developments in the US that led to Civil War. Agenda: Do Now: Explain the rise of the Republican Party. Review and Discuss Chapter 15 Section 3 Homework: Study notes - Test is planned for 10/30/2015 Friday

Discussion and Review What were some of the results of the intense division in Kansas? What did Stephen Douglas and the railroad have to do with the Kansas-Nebraska Act? Where did the Republican party come from?

Dredd Scott Decision BG: Dredd Scott was a slave of Dr. John Emerson They traveled to the free states of Illinois and Wisconsin for Dr. Emerson’s work. They went back to Missouri (a slave state) and the dr. died. Dredd Scott sues for his freedom: He spent time in a free state where slavery is not allowed so that made him a free citizen. Decision: Chief Justice Robert B. Taney African Americans, whether free or slave, were not considered citizens of the United States. Constitution does not give them rights. “Founding Fathers did not intend to give them rights.” Dred Scott couldn’t sue in federal court because he is not a citizen. Dred Scott’s residence in the North doesn’t matter because he went back to Missouri, so he has to go by Missouri’s laws. The Missouri Compromise is unconstitutional. Congress didn’t have the right to ban slavery. Constitution guarantees : “life, liberty, and property”. Slaves are property. You should be able to take your property anywhere without it being taken away.

Lincoln v. Douglas