Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Advertisements

Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages (November 2005)
YidC and Oxa1 Form Dimeric Insertion Pores on the Translating Ribosome
A Detailed View of a Ribosomal Active Site
Andrei Korostelev, Sergei Trakhanov, Martin Laurberg, Harry F. Noller 
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Interaction of Era with the 30S Ribosomal Subunit
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
A Corkscrew Model for Dynamin Constriction
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 118, Issue 4, Pages (August 2004)
Fulvia Bono, Judith Ebert, Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Cell 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Crystal Structure of Archaeal Recombinase RadA
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (July 2001)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages e3 (December 2017)
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Crystal Structure of Archaeal Recombinase RadA
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages (August 2014)
Shaun K. Olsen, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Structural Basis of Prion Inhibition by Phenothiazine Compounds
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 129, Issue 5, Pages (June 2007)
Jinzhong Lin, Matthieu G. Gagnon, David Bulkley, Thomas A. Steitz  Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 58, Issue 5, Pages (June 2015)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
A Corkscrew Model for Dynamin Constriction
Mark Del Campo, Alan M. Lambowitz  Molecular Cell 
Volume 56, Issue 3, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages (November 2005)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 123, Issue 7, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 121, Issue 5, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Molecular Basis for the Ribosome Functioning as an L-Tryptophan Sensor
NSF N-Terminal Domain Crystal Structure
Structural Basis for the Major Role of O-Phosphoseryl-tRNA Kinase in the UGA-Specific Encoding of Selenocysteine  Shiho Chiba, Yuzuru Itoh, Shun-ichi.
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages e3 (March 2018)
Solution Structure of the E. coli 70S Ribosome at 11.5 Å Resolution
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Jason M. Winget, Thibault Mayor  Molecular Cell 
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Structure of the Mtb CarD/RNAP β-Lobes Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis of Interaction and Presents a Distinct DNA-Binding Domain for Mtb CarD  Gulcin.
Species-Dependent Ensembles of Conserved Conformational States Define the Hsp90 Chaperone ATPase Cycle  Daniel R. Southworth, David A. Agard  Molecular.
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 26-38 (April 2008) Translational Regulation via L11: Molecular Switches on the Ribosome Turned On and Off by Thiostrepton and Micrococcin  Joerg M. Harms, Daniel N. Wilson, Frank Schluenzen, Sean R. Connell, Torsten Stachelhaus, Zaneta Zaborowska, Christian M.T. Spahn, Paola Fucini  Molecular Cell  Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 26-38 (April 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.01.009 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Chemical Structures of Thiopeptide Antibiotics (A) Chemical structure of Thio separated into loop1 (cyan), loop2 (green), and the dehydroalanine (DHA) tail (magenta) linked together by a tetrahydro-pyridin-3-ylamine (TPY; orange) moiety. The 16 distinct chemical moieties are separated by black bars and are abbreviated as follows: THZ, thiazole-2-carbaldehyde; THR, threonine; DHB, dehydrobutyrine; THF, thiostreptine fragment; THA, thiostreptoic acid; QA, quinaldic acid; ILE, isoleucine; ALA, alanine; PA, pyruvic acid; and DHA, dehydroalanine. The boxed inset shows the dehydropiperidine (DHP) core of Thio. Schematic modified from Bond et al. (2001). (B) Chemical structure of Nosi, highlighting the loop1 (cyan), loop2 (green), and tail (magenta). (C) Chemical structure of Micro P1 with loop1 (cyan) and tail (magenta). Molecular Cell 2008 30, 26-38DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.01.009) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Binding Position of Thio and Nosi on the 50S Subunit (A) Overview of thiopeptide binding site on the D. radiodurans 50S subunit. Interface view of the 50S subunit (rRNA and r-proteins colored light and dark blue, respectively) with the thiopeptide binding site boxed. Enlargement of boxed region reveals that the thiopeptides Thio (cyan) and Nosi (green) bind within a cleft between the N-terminal domain (NTD) of r-protein L11 (yellow) and the 23S rRNA H43 and H44 (orange). (B and C) 2mFo − DFc σA-weighted difference electron density maps (meshed) contoured to 2σ with (B) Thio, (C) Nosi, L11-NTD, and H44 colored as in (A). Molecular Cell 2008 30, 26-38DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.01.009) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Interaction of Thio with the Ribosome (A) Stacking and hydrophobic interactions of thiazole (THZ) and quinaldic acid (QA) moieties Thio (cyan) with bases A1095 (H44) and A1067 (H43) of the 23S rRNA (orange) and proline residues (Pro22 and Pro26) in L11 (yellow). (B) Thio resistance derives from 2′-O-methylation of ribose of A1067 as well as mutations of Pro residues in L11-NTD. The 2′O of A1067 is within 3 to 4 Å of THZ4 and THF5, whereas Pro23 is >7 Å from any part of the Thio molecule. (C) Comparison of the free and bound forms of Thio. Docking the small-molecule structure of Thio (PDB 1E9W; Bond et al., 2001) to the Thio-D50S structure on the basis of aligning loop1 reveals that the tail shifts (as indicated by the arrow) from solvent exposed in the free form (magenta) to contacting L11 in the bound form (cyan). (D) Conformational change in L11 upon Thio binding. A shift (arrowed) in the distal portion of L11 is seen when comparing the native L11 (Nat-L11; yellow) and Thio-bound form of L11 (Thio-L11; cyan). (E) Comparison of L11 in Thio- and Nosi-bound D50S structures. Similar conformations of the L11-NTD are induced by the binding of Nosi (green) and Thio (cyan). Molecular Cell 2008 30, 26-38DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.01.009) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Inhibition of L11-EFG Interaction by Thio (A) The cryo-EM reconstruction of the 70S•EF-G•GDPNP complex viewed from solvent side of the 30S subunit (Connell et al., 2007), with fitted crystal structures for EF-G (green; PDB 1FMN), L7-CTD (magenta), and D50S L11 (yellow). The cryo-EM density (gray surface) has been low-pass filtered to 12 Å to strengthen features, such as the stalk and the L11-NTD, which are disordered in the cryo-EM map at 7.3 Å. However, the shown molecular models were docked into the cryo-EM map at full resolution (7.3 Å). (B) Cryo-EM density as in (A) but with 30S, 50S, and EF-G colored yellow, blue, and green, respectively. (C) Enlargement of (A) showing the interaction of EF-G (green; PDB 1FMN) with the SB (L11, yellow; H43/44, orange). (D) Steric clash between Thio and EF-G. Aligning the Thio-D50S and 70S•EF-G•GDPNP structures on the basis of H43 and H44 reveals that Thio (cyan) overlaps significantly with the position of EF-G domain V. Furthermore, the position of the L11-NTD is much more open in the EF-G structure (EFG-L11; yellow) compared to the Thio-D50S position (Thio-L11; cyan). (E) Model for interaction of dehydropiperidine (DHP) with the ribosome based on the alignment of the analogous moieties of Thio. The thiazole THZ1 and THZ14 moieties are predicted to interact with the base of A1095 in H44 of the 23S rRNA (orange) and with proline 26 (Pro26) in the L11-NTD (yellow). (F) Thio allows initial binding of EF-G. The position of Thio (cyan) modeled on the 70S•EF-G•GDPNP structure with the SB in the “out” position reveals only a modest overlap with domain V of EF-G (green). The SB “in” position (transparent) is also included for reference. The SB out position was obtained by aligning the appropriate Escherichia coli 70S structure (PDB 2AWB; Schuwirth et al., 2005). Molecular Cell 2008 30, 26-38DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.01.009) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Interplay between L11, L7/L12, and EF-G on the Ribosome (A) 2mFo − DFc σA-weighted difference electron density maps (meshed) contoured to 2σ with Micro, L11-NTD (yellow), and nucleotides A1067, A1068 (H43), and A1095 (H44) of the 23S rRNA (orange) is shown. A tentative model for Micro was generated with CORINNA and is shown in blue. (B) Comparison of the overall positions of Micro and Thio. Micro (blue) is displaced away from A1067 in H43 compared to Thio (cyan). In addition, the tail of Micro does not appear to approach the N terminus of L11, unlike the tail of Thio. (C) Micro stabilizes the interaction between L11-NTD and L7-CTD. A 2mFo − DFc σA-weighted difference electron density map (meshed) contoured to 2σ, reveals that in the presence of Micro (blue), additional density adjacent and interacting with L11 (yellow) can be modeled with the L7-CTD (magenta; PDB 1DD3; Wahl et al., 2000). In particular, the density allows accurate placement of α4, α5, and α6 of L7-CTD. (D) Comparison of the conformations of L11 bound to different thiopeptides with respect to L7-CTD. The L11-NTD bound with Thio (Thio-L11; cyan), Nosi (Nosi-L11; green) and Micro (Micro-L11; yellow) was aligned on the basis of H43 and H44. Unlike Micro, Thio and Nosi induce conformational change in L11-NTD that leads to steric clashing between the N terminus of L11 and α4 of L7-CTD. (E) The relative positions of the L11-L7 complex with respect to EF-G. The L7-L11 (L7, magenta; L11, yellow) complex from the Micro-D50S structure was aligned to the cryo-EM reconstruction of the 70S•EF-G•GDPNP map (Connell et al., 2007) using the L11-NTD. L11-NTD, L7-CTD, and EF-G from the cryo-EM structure are shown in orange, blue, and green, respectively, with cryo-EM density in gray filtered to 14 Å. (F and G) The L7-CTD interacts with the G′ subdomain of EF-G. The orientation and position of L7-CTD are consistent with (F) NMR studies implicating many conserved residues in helix α4 and α5 (green sticks) of L7-CTD as interaction partners for EF-G (Helgstrand et al., 2007), as well as (G) mutations of residues in helix α4 (pink sticks) that strongly inhibit Pi release without affecting single turnover GTPase or translocation functions of EF-G (Savelsbergh et al., 2005). Molecular Cell 2008 30, 26-38DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.01.009) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Schematic for EF-G and Thiopeptide Action during Translation (A–D) Model for events leading to EF-G accommodation on the ribosome and Pi release as described in the text. Effect of (E) Thio (purple) and (F) Micro (brown) are also shown schematically. Individual domains of EF-G (orange) are labeled with II-V and G/G′, and the stalk base (SB) components are indicated with L11 (green) divided into with N- and C-terminal domains (NTD, CTD) and rRNA helices H43 and H44 (blue). The C-terminal domain of L7 (L7-CTD) is shown in red. Note that for simplicity, the switching mechanism has been divided into two distinct steps; however, it is unclear as to whether they are sequential, as shown here, or occur simultaneously. Molecular Cell 2008 30, 26-38DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.01.009) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions