Mnd1 Is Required for Meiotic Interhomolog Repair

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2 Mismatch Repair Protein Localizes to Recombination Intermediates In Vivo  Elizabeth Evans, Neal Sugawara, James E Haber,
Advertisements

Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Abdur Rahaman, Nels C. Elde, Aaron P. Turkewitz  Current Biology 
Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Laurel B. Bender, Ru Cao, Yi Zhang, Susan Strome  Current Biology 
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (May 2004)
Randy W. Hyppa, Gerald R. Smith  Cell 
Alexandra M. Penkner, Susanne Prinz, Stefan Ferscha, Franz Klein  Cell 
Yan Jiang, Mingyi Liu, Charlotte A. Spencer, David H. Price 
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
A DNA Damage Response Pathway Controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 Complex
Rapid De Novo Centromere Formation Occurs Independently of Heterochromatin Protein 1 in C. elegans Embryos  Karen W.Y. Yuen, Kentaro Nabeshima, Karen.
The Spindle Checkpoint Kinase Bub1 and Cyclin E/Cdk2 Both Contribute to the Establishment of Meiotic Metaphase Arrest by Cytostatic Factor  Brian J Tunquist,
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
The Mouse Spo11 Gene Is Required for Meiotic Chromosome Synapsis
Nikhila S. Tanneti, Kathryn Landy, Eric F. Joyce, Kim S. McKim 
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 19, Pages (October 2004)
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (September 2003)
Volume 119, Issue 7, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Cdk1 Modulation Ensures the Coordination of Cell-Cycle Events during the Switch from Meiotic Prophase to Mitosis  Dai Tsuchiya, Soni Lacefield  Current.
Mus81/Mms4 Endonuclease and Sgs1 Helicase Collaborate to Ensure Proper Recombination Intermediate Metabolism during Meiosis  Lea Jessop, Michael Lichten 
Hsin-Yen Wu, Hsuan-Chung Ho, Sean M. Burgess  Current Biology 
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages (June 2012)
Abdur Rahaman, Nels C. Elde, Aaron P. Turkewitz  Current Biology 
BRCA1-Independent Ubiquitination of FANCD2
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
A Component of C. elegans Meiotic Chromosome Axes at the Interface of Homolog Alignment, Synapsis, Nuclear Reorganization, and Recombination  Florence.
Volume 11, Issue 13, Pages (July 2001)
Hideo Tsubouchi, G.Shirleen Roeder  Developmental Cell 
CDC5 and CKII Control Adaptation to the Yeast DNA Damage Checkpoint
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
TRF2 Protects Human Telomeres from End-to-End Fusions
The Telomere Bouquet Controls the Meiotic Spindle
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Regulation of Sister Chromatid Cohesion between Chromosome Arms
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Shane M. Harding, Jonathan A. Boiarsky, Roger A. Greenberg 
Volume 17, Issue 22, Pages (November 2007)
Jill E. Falk, Andrew Chi-ho Chan, Eva Hoffmann, Andreas Hochwagen 
The Dual Mechanism of Separase Regulation by Securin
A Role for the FEAR Pathway in Nuclear Positioning during Anaphase
Volume 15, Issue 18, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Florence Couteau, Monique Zetka  Developmental Cell 
Hong-Guo Yu, Douglas Koshland  Cell 
Penelope R Chua, G.Shirleen Roeder  Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 103, Issue 3, Pages (October 2000)
The Meiosis-Specific Hop2 Protein of S
Yan Jiang, Mingyi Liu, Charlotte A. Spencer, David H. Price 
Imposition of Crossover Interference through the Nonrandom Distribution of Synapsis Initiation Complexes  Jennifer C Fung, Beth Rockmill, Michael Odell,
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Volume 125, Issue 7, Pages (June 2006)
Telomere Protection without a Telomerase
Transcriptional and Developmental Functions of the H3
Hsin-Yen Wu, Sean M. Burgess  Current Biology 
Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Brian H. Lee, Brendan M. Kiburz, Angelika Amon  Current Biology 
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Cdk1 Modulation Ensures the Coordination of Cell-Cycle Events during the Switch from Meiotic Prophase to Mitosis  Dai Tsuchiya, Soni Lacefield  Current.
Presentation transcript:

Mnd1 Is Required for Meiotic Interhomolog Repair Christian Zierhut, Marc Berlinger, Christian Rupp, Akira Shinohara, Franz Klein  Current Biology  Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages 752-762 (May 2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.04.030

Figure 1 DSB Repair and Synapsis Are Impaired in mnd1Δ Cells (A) Top: DSB assay from DNA extracted from wild-type (FKY1) and mnd1Δ (FKY1424) cells. DSBI and DSBII refer to the main sites of DSB formation at the HIS4LEU2 hotspot. The bottom shows analysis of recombination products at HIS4LEU2. Abbreviations: P1, parental 1; R1, recombinant 1; P2, parental 2; R2, recombinant 2; DSBI and DSBII as above. (B) Analysis of Zip1 staining. The panels on the upper right show maximal synapsis of a nucleus from wild-type (FKY1, left) and one of mnd1Δ (FKY1424, right) stained with α-Zip1 antiserum. Arrowheads point to brightly staining aggregates of Zip1 indicative of aberrant synapsis. The panels on the bottom show quantification of these data. 100 nuclei were scored per time point. Current Biology 2004 14, 752-762DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2004.04.030)

Figure 2 The Prophase Arrest of mnd1Δ Cells Is Bypassed by Mutation of MEC1, RED1, HOP1, and REC8 Nuclear divisions were scored after DAPI staining during meiotic time courses of the indicated strains (dmc1Δ, FKY1443; mnd1Δ, FKY1424; dmc1Δ mnd1Δ, FKY2054; mec1-1, FKY1484; mnd1Δ mec1-1, FKY2050; dmc1Δ mec1-1, FKY2049; dmc1Δ mnd1Δ mec1-1, FKY2051; red1 mnd1Δ, FKY2117; hop1 mnd1Δ FKY2118; rec8Δ PREC8::SCC1 FKY1889; mnd1Δ rec8Δ PREC8::SCC1 FKY2134). 100 cells were counted per time point. Current Biology 2004 14, 752-762DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2004.04.030)

Figure 3 Rad51 Foci Accumulate in Nuclei from mnd1Δ or mnd1Δ mec1-1 Cells, but Not in mnd1Δ red1 or mnd1Δ hop1 Double Mutants (A) Typical examples of nuclei of wild-type or different mutants, stained with α-Rad51 antiserum 4 hr after induction of meiosis. spo11Δ (negative control), wild-type (FKY1), mnd1Δ (FKY1424), red1 mnd1Δ (FKY2117), mnd1Δ rec8Δ PREC8::SCC1 (FKY2134), and hop1 mnd1Δ (FKY2118). In the third row, typical examples of anaphase I nuclei are depicted (mnd1Δ mec1-1 [FKY1890]). Zip1 was only labeled in the spo11Δ strain to demonstrate the absence of Rad51 foci in nuclei, which express a meiosis-specific protein normally. (B) Statistical analysis of the distribution of foci from these experiments is presented in the panels below. 100 nuclei were scored for each time point. Current Biology 2004 14, 752-762DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2004.04.030)

Figure 4 Mnd1 Localizes to Meiotic Chromosomes in the Form of Foci (A–D) Spread meiotic nuclei were prepared from an MND1::HA3 strain (FKY1800) and stained with antibodies against the HA epitope and Zip1. DAPI staining is only included in the merged panels of (A) and (B). Arrows in (C) indicate Zip1 polycomplex with Mnd1 aggregates attached. Arrows in (D) indicate nucleolar and rDNA region. (E) Quantification of Zip1 and Mnd1 stages. 50 nuclei were scored per time point. Current Biology 2004 14, 752-762DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2004.04.030)

Figure 5 Mnd1 Does Not Colocalize with Rad51 nor Does It Differentiate Strongly between DSB Hot and Cold Regions (A) Typical example of a spread nucleus of strain FKY1800 (MND1::HA3) stained with antibodies against the HA-epitope and Rad51. (B) Association of Mnd1 with meiotic chromatin is independent of DSB, AE, and SC formation. An example of a spread meiotic nucleus stained for Mnd1-HA is shown (A) for a spo11Δ MND1::HA3 (FKY2017), a red1 MND1::HA3 (FKY2001), a hop1 MND1::HA3 (FKY2002), and a zip2Δ MND1::HA3 strain (FKY2004). (C) Mnd1 associates with DSB hot and cold regions to a similar extent. Quantification of DNA from different strains by real-time PCR after coprecipitation with Mnd1-HA in two regions. The hot region is immediately adjacent to the YCR047c recombination hotspot, while the cold region is from YCR011c known for an absence of DSBs (for technical details see Experimental Procedures). Three different time points were analyzed. Current Biology 2004 14, 752-762DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2004.04.030)

Figure 6 Local Inhibition Model for IH Bias Two segments of chromatid pairs are shown, the right one displaying a DSB loaded with Dmc1. Mnd1 seems to antagonize structural constraints caused by Red1 and other axes components and thus keeps the chromosome available for Dmc1-dependent repair. Inhibition of Mnd1 (or a cooperating protein) on both chromatids close to a DSB would exclude the sister chromatid locally from serving as a repair template. Local signal transmission between the DSB and Mnd1 could, for instance, be explained by the segmented tension release model [55]. Current Biology 2004 14, 752-762DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2004.04.030)