Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages e5 (December 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Advertisements

The 1.4 Å Crystal Structure of Kumamolysin
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Hierarchical Binding of Cofactors to the AAA ATPase p97
Atomic Model of CPV Reveals the Mechanism Used by This Single-Shelled Virus to Economically Carry Out Functions Conserved in Multishelled Reoviruses 
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Peter Chien, Robert A. Grant, Robert T. Sauer, Tania A. Baker 
Volume 115, Issue 2, Pages (October 2003)
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
The Gemin6-Gemin7 Heterodimer from the Survival of Motor Neurons Complex Has an Sm Protein-like Structure  Yingli Ma, Josée Dostie, Gideon Dreyfuss, Gregory.
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Structure of the TPR Domain of p67phox in Complex with Rac·GTP
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Phage Pierces the Host Cell Membrane with the Iron-Loaded Spike
The C. elegans SYS-1 Protein Is a Bona Fide β-Catenin
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Volume 6, Issue 12, Pages (December 1998)
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Crystal Structure of the Human High-Affinity IgE Receptor
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
The Ribosomal Exit Tunnel Functions as a Discriminating Gate
Elif Eren, Megan Murphy, Jon Goguen, Bert van den Berg  Structure 
N Khazanovich, KS Bateman, M Chernaia, M Michalak, MNG James  Structure 
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Danny N.P Doan, Terje Dokland  Structure 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Crystal Structure of the TAO2 Kinase Domain
Crystal Structure of a SIR2 Homolog–NAD Complex
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Crystal Structure of Carnitine Acetyltransferase and Implications for the Catalytic Mechanism and Fatty Acid Transport  Gerwald Jogl, Liang Tong  Cell 
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (July 2004)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (September 2016)
Crystal Structure of a Phosphoinositide Phosphatase, MTMR2
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Crystal Structures of the BAR-PH and PTB Domains of Human APPL1
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Tianjun Zhou, Liguang Sun, John Humphreys, Elizabeth J. Goldsmith 
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Structural Determinants of Integrin Recognition by Talin
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Peter Chien, Robert A. Grant, Robert T. Sauer, Tania A. Baker 
Ulp1-SUMO Crystal Structure and Genetic Analysis Reveal Conserved Interactions and a Regulatory Element Essential for Cell Growth in Yeast  Elena Mossessova,
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
A YidC-like Protein in the Archaeal Plasma Membrane
Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon.
Structural and Mechanistic Analysis of the Slx1-Slx4 Endonuclease
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
The Structure of the GGA1-GAT Domain Reveals the Molecular Basis for ARF Binding and Membrane Association of GGAs  Brett M. Collins, Peter J. Watson,
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (February 2014)
The 1.4 Å Crystal Structure of Kumamolysin
The Structure of the MAP2K MEK6 Reveals an Autoinhibitory Dimer
Presentation transcript:

Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages 1898-1906.e5 (December 2017) The Structure of a Conserved Domain of TamB Reveals a Hydrophobic β Taco Fold  Inokentijs Josts, Christopher James Stubenrauch, Grishma Vadlamani, Khedidja Mosbahi, Daniel Walker, Trevor Lithgow, Rhys Grinter  Structure  Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages 1898-1906.e5 (December 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2017.10.002 Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Structure 2017 25, 1898-1906.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.10.002) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Schematic and Secondary Structure of TamB963-1138 (A) Schematic of TamB showing domains, structural elements, and secondary structure. (B) Sequence and secondary structure of TamB963-1138, secondary structure from crystal structure is shown: blue arrows represent β sheets; broken red lines represent residues not resolved in the crystal structure. Residues discussed in text are colored red, and those subjected to mutagenesis are colored green. Structure 2017 25, 1898-1906.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.10.002) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The Crystal Structure of TamB963-1138 (A) Cross-eye stereo view of the TamB963-1138 dimer; molecule A is colored blue and molecule B is colored yellow. (B) Jones's Rainbow of TamB963-1138, colored from blue (N terminus) to red (C terminus). (C) TamB963-1138 showing disordered region connectivity option one between Asp995 and Pro1025 of molecule A. (D) TamB963-1138 showing connectivity option two between Asp995 of molecule A and Ile1026 of molecule B. (E) The kink at the base of the TamB963-1138 β taco is created by Pro987 and Pro1071 and Gly1035. (F) A large conformational difference is observed in the loop between β strands 6 and 7 of TamB963-1138 molecule A and B. Structure 2017 25, 1898-1906.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.10.002) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The Interior of the TamB963-1138 β Taco Is Hydrophobic (A) Cross-eye stereo view of TamB963-1138 showing as sticks the sidechains facing the interior of the β taco, all sidechains are hydrophobic. (B) Electrostatic surface model of TamB963-1138 molecules A and B, showing the hydrophobic groove. (C) Electron density present in the TamB963-1138 hydrophobic groove attributable to LDAO present in the crystallization buffer. The map presented in a feature-enhanced map generated using the Phenix package, contoured to 1.5 σ (Afonine et al., 2015). (D) An amphipathic β strand docked into the TamB963-1138 hydrophobic groove. Structure 2017 25, 1898-1906.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.10.002) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The Effect on the Function of TamB of the Introduction of Charged Residues into the Hydrophobic β Taco of TamB963-1138 (A) Positions of substitution of hydrophobic residues in the TamB963-1138 β taco (shown as red sticks). Glycine at position 1,073 is conserved with SSG4. (B) The local environment of the hydrophobic amino acid changed (panel 1) and their corresponding charged residue substitutions (panel 2). (C and D) The effect of the mutations shown in (A and B) on the ability of a plasmid-encoded copy of the tamB allele to complement a ΔtamB null-phenotype. (C) Pulse-chase assessment of 35S-FimD assembly was monitored over time in wild-type, ΔtamA, or ΔtamB cells. Each strain carried pKS02 (for fimD expression) and either the control pACYCDuet-1 plasmid, or the indicated complementing tamB plasmid. Aliquots were taken at the indicated timepoints and treated with or without 50 μg/mL proteinase K (PK). Total protein was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and storage phosphor imaging. The presence of the 45 kDa fragment B (labeled in red), is indicative of improperly folded FimD due to impaired functioning of the TAM. The defect observed in the complementation of ΔtamB with pTamB-I1102R is highlighted with a dashed rectangle. (D) Membrane extract of wild-type, ΔtamA, or ΔtamB cells harboring either the control pACYCDuet-1 plasmid, or the indicated complementing tamB plasmid, were prepared. Membrane protein (100 μg) was analyzed by blue native (BN)-PAGE and immunoblotting, using an antibody raised to the N-terminal POTRA domains of TamA (Selkrig et al., 2012). The TAM does not form in ΔtamA or ΔtamB mutants. All alleles of tamB restore a wild-type phenotype to the TAM behavior on BN-PAGE. Structure 2017 25, 1898-1906.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.10.002) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions