Gideon v. Wainwright Does the Sixth Amendment allow a defendant the right to a lawyer in all criminal cases?

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 1.7 SIXTH AMENDMENT. Sixth Amendment In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial,

Advertisements

Other Landmark Supreme Court Cases

Proposed by 2/3 vote in both houses of Congress. Or Proposed at national convention requested by 2/3 (34) of state legislatures.

Miranda v. Arizona. Facts of the Case Police arrest Ernesto Miranda after the victim identifies him in lineup Police interrogate Miranda for two hours.

BY:ANNA GRACE,LACEY,KATIE,CATE SUPREME COURT This is a picture of the Supreme Court. The judges work here.

Gideon Vs Wainwright Louis Jenkins And Jackson Joy.

G IDEON V W AINWRIGHT (1963) Vivian Lee. C ASE O VERVIEW On June 2, 1961, ten dollars and drinks were stolen from a Panama City, Florida, pool hall Clarence.

Rights of Criminal Defendants Are the due process rights and the procedural guarantees provided by the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments.

Gideon v. Wainwright Woll Group 2. Facts of the Case Defendant; Clarence Gideon broke in to a pool hall looking or “Kool Aide” money. Defendant; Clarence.

Landmark Supreme Court Cases MIRANDA V. ARIZONA GIDEON V. WAINWRIGHT BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION.

Miranda vs. Arizona Right to Remain Silent.

 What do lawyers do?  How can they be helpful?.

Right to Counsel, Due Process

Paper Preparation Title your paper “Famous Cases”. Fold your paper from the right edge to the red line. We will be answering five questions about Brewer.

Unit 4 Lesson 7: Gideon v. Wainwright

04.04 Civil Rights Exhibit Student Name Teacher Name Date Replace the information in red with your own work according to the assessment instructions create.

Chapter 14.  Sixth Amendment – right to a jury trial  All federal & state courts  Jury are not used very often  Most cases are settled by plea bargaining.

How have the decisions of the Supreme Court protected people accused of crimes? What rights are accused people guaranteed? Landmark Supreme Court Cases.

The Investigation Phase. An arrest takes place when a person is suspected of crime and taken into custody.

Constitution Day Quiz September 17, ????. Question 1 ____ 1. The Constitution of the United States is ?. a. the oldest document in world history b. the.

How have the decisions of the Supreme Court protected people accused of crimes? What rights are accused people guaranteed? Landmark Supreme Court Cases.

Supreme Court Case Study.  Analyze and discuss the system of the utilizing precedent in the American Court System.  Compare and Contrast how different.

Practical Law – Chapter 14 Trial. Due Process, which means having fair procedures, is guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. The rights of the accused are.

Biography of a Court Case A Short Project. The Basic Questions of the Project 1.When did the court case take place? (Specific Dates) 2.Where did the court.

Warren Court SWBAT: Analyze the decisions of the Supreme Court led by E. Warren. Skim pages Earl Warren (who?): -Reapportionment (definition):

Supreme Court Cases Vocabulary. Brown v. Board of Education U.S. Supreme Court case that determined that “separate but equal” segregation was not equal.

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963).

LECTURE 4: THE CONSTITUTION AND DUE PROCESS. The Constitution and Due Process The US Constitution set out how US laws are passed and enforced. – The legislative.

The American Legal System

Death Penalty Landmark Decisions: Folder project

Judges as Champions of the Constitutional Right to Counsel

Due Process Theme: Rights

Warm-up Has anyone tried to get you to confess to something you didn’t do? How did this happen? Have you ever confessed to something and then regretted.

Rights of Criminal Suspects

JUDICIAL BRANCH – CHARACTERISTICS OF COURTS

Supreme Court rulings that reshaped American politics and society

Example 13 Wendy Balmer Indiana U

AGENDA Turn in written assignment Quick Review Current News Finish up with Due Process Class exercise.

Assignment, Discussion & Activity with 8.3 & 8.4

The Supreme Court.

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court formed the basis for the exercise of judicial.

By Luke Wilson and Lucas Weaver

Landmark Supreme Court Cases

Presented By: Dashawn Currington & Adam Walker

Cody Lee | Reed Elenz | 1st period 1963

Looking into the Important Cases in the Past

Knights Charge Why did Kennedy win the Election of 1960?

Strict vs. Loose Interpretation

Do Now Go to the online classroom website and open Lesson 6: Discovery Education Constitution Video Write the Essential Question and Objective on.

Case Study: Important Supreme Court Cases

Supreme Court Oyez! Oyez! Oyez!.

Chapter 6 FRQ Take out a sheet of paper and answer the following prompt: The federal government, through executive action, congressional legislation, and.

Final Write-Up for Supreme Court Activity

Amendment___ By: ______.

5th, 6th, 7th Amendment Rights

Gideon v. Wainwright 1963 Eliseo Lugo III

Landmark Supreme Court Decisions Rights of the Accused

Supreme Court Decision and Reasoning

Gideon v. Cochran “Legal Brief”

Gideon v. Wainwright The Right to Legal Counsel

TİTLE SUBTİTLE.

TİTLE SUBTİTLE.

TİTLE SUBTİTLE.

TİTLE SUBTİTLE.

TİTLE SUBTİTLE.

TİTLE SUBTİTLE.

TİTLE SUBTİTLE.

TİTLE SUBTİTLE.

Presentation transcript:

Gideon v. Wainwright Does the Sixth Amendment allow a defendant the right to a lawyer in all criminal cases?

Gideon v. Wainwright 1963 Objectives: Determine which Supreme Court decision gives defendants the right to a lawyer in all criminal cases. Explain the reasoning the Supreme Court used when determining the right to a lawyer.

Instructions Research the Supreme Court decision Gideon v. Wainwright 1963 Oyez.org Open a word or powerpoint document Title: Gideon v Wainwright Questions to answer (subtitles) Facts of the Case Constitutional Question (Amendments?) What was the Supreme Courts decision and reasoning? Reflection 1 paragraph on what you learned, what you think of the decision etc.