An Allosteric Inhibitor of Protein Arginine Methyltransferase 3

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 13, Pages (November 2016)
Advertisements

Javed A. Khan, Ben M. Dunn, Liang Tong  Structure 
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Structural Basis of Substrate Methylation and Inhibition of SMYD2
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Crystal Structures of Sirt3 Complexes with 4′-Bromo-Resveratrol Reveal Binding Sites and Inhibition Mechanism  Giang Thi Tuyet Nguyen, Melanie Gertz,
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Peter Chien, Robert A. Grant, Robert T. Sauer, Tania A. Baker 
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Allosteric Activation of DegS, a Stress Sensor PDZ Protease
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Rong Shi, Laura McDonald, Miroslaw Cygler, Irena Ekiel  Structure 
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Kevin G. Hoff, José L. Avalos, Kristin Sens, Cynthia Wolberger 
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e3 (February 2018)
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Structural Basis of Prion Inhibition by Phenothiazine Compounds
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Crystal Structure of 12-Lipoxygenase Catalytic-Domain-Inhibitor Complex Identifies a Substrate-Binding Channel for Catalysis  Shu Xu, Timothy C. Mueser,
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (July 2013)
Structural Basis of Caspase-7 Inhibition by XIAP
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Crystal Structures of Mycobacterium tuberculosis KasA Show Mode of Action within Cell Wall Biosynthesis and its Inhibition by Thiolactomycin  Sylvia R.
A Role for Intersubunit Interactions in Maintaining SAGA Deubiquitinating Module Structure and Activity  Nadine L. Samara, Alison E. Ringel, Cynthia Wolberger 
Crystal Structures of Mycobacterium tuberculosis KasA Show Mode of Action within Cell Wall Biosynthesis and its Inhibition by Thiolactomycin  Sylvia R.
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Reduced Curvature of Ligand-Binding Domain Free-Energy Surface Underlies Partial Agonism at NMDA Receptors  Jian Dai, Huan-Xiang Zhou  Structure  Volume.
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e3 (February 2018)
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Crystal Structure of the Carboxyltransferase Domain of Acetyl-Coenzyme A Carboxylase in Complex with CP   Hailong Zhang, Benjamin Tweel, Jiang Li,
Jue Wang, Jia-Wei Wu, Zhi-Xin Wang  Structure 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
A Mimivirus Enzyme that Participates in Viral Entry
Crystal Structure of a Procaspase-7 Zymogen
Structural Basis of RIP1 Inhibition by Necrostatins
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Structural Basis for Kinase-Mediated Macrolide Antibiotic Resistance
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages e5 (February 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
The Human Cytomegalovirus UL44 C Clamp Wraps around DNA
Presentation transcript:

An Allosteric Inhibitor of Protein Arginine Methyltransferase 3 Alena Siarheyeva, Guillermo Senisterra, Abdellah Allali-Hassani, Aiping Dong, Elena Dobrovetsky, Gregory A. Wasney, Irene Chau, Richard Marcellus, Taraneh Hajian, Feng Liu, Ilia Korboukh, David Smil, Yuri Bolshan, Jinrong Min, Hong Wu, Hong Zeng, Peter Loppnau, Gennadiy Poda, Carly Griffin, Ahmed Aman, Peter J. Brown, Jian Jin, Rima Al-awar, Cheryl H. Arrowsmith, Matthieu Schapira, Masoud Vedadi  Structure  Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages 1425-1435 (August 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2012.06.001 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Compound 1 Is a Potent Inhibitor of PRMT3 Activity (A) Crystal structure of compound 1 was determined and indicated that the compound is 1-(benzo[d][1,2,3]thiadiazol-6-yl)-3-(2-cyclohexenylethyl)urea. (B) Compound 1 inhibits the activity of PRMT3 at a balanced condition with IC50 of 2.5 ± 0.1 μM as determined by SAHH-coupled assay. See also Figures S1 and S2 and Table S2. Data points are presented as mean values ± SD from three experiments. Structure 2012 20, 1425-1435DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2012.06.001) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Binding of Compound 1 Was Confirmed by SPR (A) The subtracted sensorgram (fc3-fc1) of the duplicate compound 1 samples showing blanks and compound cycles from a Biacore T200 single cycle kinetic run. The compound concentrations are 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, and 20 μM, with 60 s on and off times. (B) The duplicate binding curves that were used to calculate the KD and RMax values for the compound 1-PRMT3 interaction are shown. Structure 2012 20, 1425-1435DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2012.06.001) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Kinetic Analysis of Compound 1 Inhibition of PRMT3 Activity Lineweaver-Burk plots for kinetic analysis of compound 1 inhibition by SAHH-coupled assay at varying concentrations of (A) SAM and (B) H4 (1–24) peptide are shown at 0 (●), 1.5 (○), 3 (▾), and 6 (▿) μM of compound 1. Structure 2012 20, 1425-1435DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2012.06.001) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 PRMT3 Activity Using rpS2 as a Substrate Km values were determined for (A) rpS2 (1 ± 0.5 μM) and (B) SAM (34 ± 1 μM) with a kcat value of 0.1 min−1 using a radioactivity based assay as described in the material and method. (C) Activity of PRMT3 was linear at Km of both substrates and (D) was inhibited by compound 1 with an IC50 value of 2 ± 0.5 μM. Data points are presented as mean values ± SD from three experiments. Structure 2012 20, 1425-1435DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2012.06.001) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Structural Analysis of Compound 1 Binding (A) Overall structure. The PRMT3 catalytic core adopts a canonical PRMT dimeric structure. The inhibitor (magenta) binds a pocket at the base of the dimerization arm (cyan) of one chain and contacts the alpha-Y segment of the activation helix of the other monomer (red). The alpha-X segment of the activation helix is disordered (dashed line), and the cofactor is absent (blue star: expected position). (B) Inhibitor binding. In the absence of inhibitor, R396 occupies the binding pocket. Helix alpha-X: cyan; helix alpha-Y: green (left). Inhibitor binding induces consecutive conformational rearrangements of residues at the N-terminus of helix alpha-Y, accompanied by destabilization of helix alpha-X (disordered, right). The thiadiazole end of the compound is deeply buried in the pocket and is hydrogen bonded to the hydroxyl group of T466; the urea linker is positioned at the entrance of the pocket and forms hydrogen bonds with the side chains of R396 and E422; the cyclohexyl moiety extends out of the pocket, toward the alpha-Y helix of the second monomer (red). (C) Proposed inhibition mechanism. Compound 1 binding (magenta) induces a conformational rearrangement at the N-terminus of helix alpha-Y (inhibitor present: red, inhibitor absent: green), which destabilizes the active form of helix alpha-X (cyan), critical for enzymatic activity. (D) Mapping of critical residues at the allosteric site. See also Figure S3 and Table S1. Structure 2012 20, 1425-1435DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2012.06.001) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Effect of Compound 1 on Activity of PRMT3 Variants IC50 values were determined at balanced conditions using SAHH-coupled assay for wild-type PRMT3 (●), K392R (○), E422A (▾), V420W (▵), and K392A (■). E422A was only active when freshly made and lost activity quickly, making it difficult to determine its kinetic parameters reproducibly. Therefore the experiments for this mutant were performed at estimated Km of substrates (3 μM of peptide and 50 μM of SAM) for comparison. Data points are presented as mean values ± SD from three experiments. Structure 2012 20, 1425-1435DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2012.06.001) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions