Jared R. Kohler, David J. Cutler 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Previous Estimates of Mitochondrial DNA Mutation Level Variance Did Not Account for Sampling Error: Comparing the mtDNA Genetic Bottleneck in Mice and.
Advertisements

Connexin Mutations in Skin Disease and Hearing Loss David P. Kelsell, Wei-Li Di, Mark J. Houseman The American Journal of Human Genetics Volume 68, Issue.
Functional Analysis of the Neurofibromatosis Type 2 Protein by Means of Disease- Causing Point Mutations Renee P. Stokowski, David R. Cox The American.
Gene Preference in Maple Syrup Urine Disease Mary M. Nellis, Dean J. Danner The American Journal of Human Genetics Volume 68, Issue 1, Pages (January.
Katarzyna Bryc, Eric Y. Durand, J
Extensive Linkage Disequilibrium in Small Human Populations in Eurasia
Michael Dannemann, Janet Kelso  The American Journal of Human Genetics 
Volume 139, Issue 5, Pages e8 (November 2010)
Hendrikus J. Dubbink, Peggy N. Atmodimedjo, Ronald van Marion, Niels M
Performance of Common Analysis Methods for Detecting Low-Frequency Single Nucleotide Variants in Targeted Next-Generation Sequence Data  David H. Spencer,
CYP3A Variation and the Evolution of Salt-Sensitivity Variants
Chromosomal Haplotypes by Genetic Phasing of Human Families
Katarzyna Bryc, Eric Y. Durand, J
Human Diallelic Insertion/Deletion Polymorphisms
Optimized Group Sequential Study Designs for Tests of Genetic Linkage and Association in Complex Diseases  Inke R. König, Helmut Schäfer, Hans-Helge Müller,
Comparing Algorithms for Genotype Imputation
Henry R. Johnston, David J. Cutler 
Ren-Hua Chung, Richard W. Morris, Li Zhang, Yi-Ju Li, Eden R. Martin 
Haplotype Estimation Using Sequencing Reads
Detecting and Estimating Contamination of Human DNA Samples in Sequencing and Array-Based Genotype Data  Goo Jun, Matthew Flickinger, Kurt N. Hetrick,
A Combined Linkage-Physical Map of the Human Genome
Estimating Kinship in Admixed Populations
So Many Correlated Tests, So Little Time
The Genetic Legacy of the Indian Ocean Slave Trade: Recent Admixture and Post- admixture Selection in the Makranis of Pakistan  Romuald Laso-Jadart, Christine.
Improved Heritability Estimation from Genome-wide SNPs
Gene-Expression Variation Within and Among Human Populations
Biased Gene Conversion Skews Allele Frequencies in Human Populations, Increasing the Disease Burden of Recessive Alleles  Joseph Lachance, Sarah A. Tishkoff 
10 Years of GWAS Discovery: Biology, Function, and Translation
Michael Dannemann, Janet Kelso  The American Journal of Human Genetics 
XMCPDT Does Have Correct Type I Error Rates
PADRE: Pedigree-Aware Distant-Relationship Estimation
A Flexible Bayesian Framework for Modeling Haplotype Association with Disease, Allowing for Dominance Effects of the Underlying Causative Variants  Andrew.
Transethnic Genetic-Correlation Estimates from Summary Statistics
CYP3A Variation and the Evolution of Salt-Sensitivity Variants
An Excess of Risk-Increasing Low-Frequency Variants Can Be a Signal of Polygenic Inheritance in Complex Diseases  Yingleong Chan, Elaine T. Lim, Niina.
Matching Strategies for Genetic Association Studies in Structured Populations  David A. Hinds, Renee P. Stokowski, Nila Patil, Karel Konvicka, David Kershenobich,
Ivan P. Gorlov, Olga Y. Gorlova, Shamil R. Sunyaev, Margaret R
Wei Zhang, Shiwei Duan, Emily O. Kistner, Wasim K. Bleibel, R
Characteristics of Neutral and Deleterious Protein-Coding Variation among Individuals and Populations  Wenqing Fu, Rachel M. Gittelman, Michael J. Bamshad,
Mamoru Kato, Yusuke Nakamura, Tatsuhiko Tsunoda 
Christoph Lange, Nan M. Laird  The American Journal of Human Genetics 
10 Years of GWAS Discovery: Biology, Function, and Translation
Jon Wakefield  The American Journal of Human Genetics 
Iuliana Ionita, Raoul-Sam Daruwala, Bud Mishra 
Highly Punctuated Patterns of Population Structure on the X Chromosome and Implications for African Evolutionary History  Charla A. Lambert, Caitlin F.
Erratum The American Journal of Human Genetics
Benjamin A. Rybicki, Robert C. Elston 
A Unified Approach to Genotype Imputation and Haplotype-Phase Inference for Large Data Sets of Trios and Unrelated Individuals  Brian L. Browning, Sharon.
Extensive Linkage Disequilibrium in Small Human Populations in Eurasia
Increasing the Power and Efficiency of Disease-Marker Case-Control Association Studies through Use of Allele-Sharing Information  Tasha E. Fingerlin,
Wei Pan, Il-Youp Kwak, Peng Wei  The American Journal of Human Genetics 
L-GATOR: Genetic Association Testing for a Longitudinally Measured Quantitative Trait in Samples with Related Individuals  Xiaowei Wu, Mary Sara McPeek 
Trevor J. Pemberton, Chaolong Wang, Jun Z. Li, Noah A. Rosenberg 
KLOTHO Allele Status and the Risk of Early-Onset Occult Coronary Artery Disease  Dan E. Arking, Diane M. Becker, Lisa R. Yanek, Daniele Fallin, Daniel.
Matthew J. Loza, PhD, Bao-Li Chang, PhD 
Are Variants in the CAPN10 Gene Related to Risk of Type 2 Diabetes
Yu Zhang, Tianhua Niu, Jun S. Liu 
Jung-Ying Tzeng, Chih-Hao Wang, Jau-Tsuen Kao, Chuhsing Kate Hsiao 
Tao Wang, Robert C. Elston  The American Journal of Human Genetics 
Evaluating the Effects of Imputation on the Power, Coverage, and Cost Efficiency of Genome-wide SNP Platforms  Carl A. Anderson, Fredrik H. Pettersson,
Detection and Integration of Genotyping Errors in Statistical Genetics
Genotype-Imputation Accuracy across Worldwide Human Populations
Disease and Polygenic Architecture: Avoid Trio Design and Appropriately Account for Unscreened Control Subjects for Common Disease  Wouter J. Peyrot,
Alice S. Whittemore, Jerry Halpern 
Leveraging Multi-ethnic Evidence for Mapping Complex Traits in Minority Populations: An Empirical Bayes Approach  Marc A. Coram, Sophie I. Candille, Qing.
Zuoheng Wang, Mary Sara McPeek  The American Journal of Human Genetics 
A Chromosomal Deletion Map of Human Malformations
Kung-Yee Liang, Fang-Chi Hsu, Terri H. Beaty, Kathleen C. Barnes 
Genomewide Comparison of DNA Sequences between Humans and Chimpanzees
The Size Distribution of Homozygous Segments in the Human Genome
Presentation transcript:

Simultaneous Discovery and Testing of Deletions for Disease Association in SNP Genotyping Studies  Jared R. Kohler, David J. Cutler  The American Journal of Human Genetics  Volume 81, Issue 4, Pages 684-699 (October 2007) DOI: 10.1086/520823 Copyright © 2007 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 1. Observing Mendelian inconsistencies in trios. True genotypes α1 and α2 are observed as A1 and A2, respectively, where α0 is the null allele and N is missing data. A heterozygous deletion in a parent with no genotyping error (A) leads to the same observations as genotyping error in a parent with no deletion (B). Homozygous deletions are observed as missing data (C). The American Journal of Human Genetics 2007 81, 684-699DOI: (10.1086/520823) Copyright © 2007 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 2. Power to detect deletions of 5 kb (A), 10 kb (B), 20 kb (C), and 100 kb (D). SNP density is one SNP per 6 kb. Each bar represents an average with SD of 800 deletion simulations conducted for a particular trio size (i.e., 30, 100, 500, or 1,000). The American Journal of Human Genetics 2007 81, 684-699DOI: (10.1086/520823) Copyright © 2007 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 3. Mean error number of deleted SNPs with the use of 1,000 trios, given a deletion of 5 kb (A), 10 kb (B), 20 kb (C), and 100 kb (D). Each point represents an average with SD of 800 deletion simulations. The American Journal of Human Genetics 2007 81, 684-699DOI: (10.1086/520823) Copyright © 2007 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 4. Estimated frequencies versus true frequencies for deletions of 5 kb (A), 10 kb (B), 20 kb (C), and 100 kb (D). SNP density is one SNP per 6 kb. Each bar represents an average with SE of 800 deletion simulations conducted for a particular trio size (i.e., 30, 100, 500, or 1,000). The American Journal of Human Genetics 2007 81, 684-699DOI: (10.1086/520823) Copyright © 2007 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 5. Sensitivity given a deletion of 5 kb (A), 10 kb (B), 20 kb (C), and 100 kb (D). SNP density is one SNP per 6 kb. Each bar represents an average with SE of 800 deletion simulations conducted for a particular trio size (i.e., 30, 100, 500, or 1,000). The American Journal of Human Genetics 2007 81, 684-699DOI: (10.1086/520823) Copyright © 2007 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 6. Power to detect association with use of the TDT (P<.05), given a deletion of 20 kb with GRR of 1 (A), 2 (B), 3 (C), and 4 (D). GRR of 1 represents a deletion with no association. SNP density is one SNP per 6 kb. Each bar represents an average with SD of 800 deletion simulations conducted for a particular trio size (i.e., 30, 100, 500, or 1,000). The American Journal of Human Genetics 2007 81, 684-699DOI: (10.1086/520823) Copyright © 2007 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 7. Power to detect association with the use of case-control analysis (P<.05), given a deletion of 20 kb with GRR of 1 (A), 2 (B), 3 (C), and 4 (D). GRR of 1 represents a deletion with no association. SNP density is one SNP per 6 kb. Each bar represents an average with SD of 800 deletion simulations conducted for a particular trio size (i.e., 30, 100, 500, or 1,000). The American Journal of Human Genetics 2007 81, 684-699DOI: (10.1086/520823) Copyright © 2007 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 8. Distribution of deletion size in HapMap individuals. Red indicates the number of deletions observed in YRI individuals. Blue indicates the number of deletions observed in CEU individuals. The first bin represents the number of single-SNP deletions. Every bin after that represents a distance of 5 kb. The second bin shows the number of deletions <5 kb (excluding all single-SNP deletions). The last bin shows the number of deletions >100 kb. The American Journal of Human Genetics 2007 81, 684-699DOI: (10.1086/520823) Copyright © 2007 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 9. Distribution of frequency for 90 CEU individuals (30 trios) (A) and for 90 YRI individuals (30 trios) (B). Full color indicates the contribution from deletions of two or more SNPs. Half-shading indicates the contribution from single-SNP deletions. Every bin represents a frequency difference of 1%. The last bin shows the number of deletions with frequency >50%. The American Journal of Human Genetics 2007 81, 684-699DOI: (10.1086/520823) Copyright © 2007 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions