Child Outcomes Data July 1, 2008 – June 30, 2009

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Indicator 7 Child Outcomes MAKING SENSE OF THE DATA June
Advertisements

Update on Child Outcomes for Early Childhood Special Education Lynne Kahn ECO at UNC The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center The National Association.
Early Childhood Outcomes ECO Institute Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Robin Rooney ECO at FPG Prepared for the Office of Early Learning and School Readiness.
State Activities in Measuring Child Outcomes Lynne Kahn, Donna Spiker, Melissa Raspa, & Kathleen Hebbeler ECO Center Presented at: International Society.
1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.
National Call on Public Reporting of Local Child Outcomes Data NECTAC/ECO June 11, 2010.
Highs and Lows on the Road to High Quality Data American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA November, 2011 Kathy Hebbeler and Lynne Kahn ECO at SRI International.
CHILD OUTCOMES BASELINE AND TARGETS FOR INDICATOR 7 ON THE STATE PERFORMANCE PLAN State Advisory Panel for Exceptional Children November 12, 2009 January.
The Results are In! Child Outcomes for OSEP EI and ECSE Programs Donna Spiker Early Childhood Outcomes Center at SRI International October 13, 2011 (CCSSO-SCASS.
Update on Part C Child Outcomes Lynne Kahn ECO at UNC The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center June 2011 Kathy Hebbeler ECO at SRI International.
The Results are In: Using Early Childhood Outcome Data Kathy Hebbeler Early Childhood Outcomes Center at SRI International August, 2011.
Presented at Division for Early Childhood National Harbor, Maryland November, Child Outcomes: What We Are Learning from National, State, and Local.
Updates on APR Reporting for Early Childhood Outcomes (Indicators C-3 and B-7) Western Regional Resource Center APR Clinic 2010 November 1-3, 2010 San.
Child Outcomes Data July 1, 2008 – June 30, 2009.
The Current Status of States' Early Childhood Outcome Measurement Systems Kathy Hebbeler, SRI International Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst October 17,
Partnering with Local Programs to Interpret and Use Outcomes Data Delaware’s Part B 619 Program September 20, 2011 Verna Thompson & Tony Ruggiero Delaware.
Target Setting For Indicator #7 Child Outcomes WDPI Stakeholder Group December 16, 2009 Ruth Chvojicek Statewide Child Outcomes Coordinator 1 OSEP Child.
Erin Arango-Escalante & Sandra Parker. EC Indicators At-a-Glance.
Preparing the Next Generation of Professionals to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education Lynne Kahn Kathy.
Child Outcomes: Understanding the Requirements in order to Set Targets Presentation to the Virginia Interagency Coordination Council Infant &
Module 5 Understanding the Age-Expected Child Development, Developmental Trajectories and Progress Every day, we are honored to take action that inspires.
1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013.
Overview to Measuring Early Childhood Outcomes Ruth Littlefield, NH Department of Education Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst November 16,
1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.
What can we learn from 5+ years of ISTAR-KR? Michael Conn-Powers Early Childhood Center IIDC/Indiana University.
2012 OSEP Leadership Conference Leading Together to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career Child Outcomes for Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education:
Delaware Child Outcomes Part C and 619 Collaboration Measuring Child and Family Outcomes July 30, 2010 Arlington, Virginia.
Understanding and Using Early Childhood Outcome (ECO) Data for Program Improvement Kansas Division for Early Childhood Annual Conference Feb. 23rd 2012.
Understanding and Using Early Childhood Outcome (ECO) Data for Program Improvement TASN – KITS Fall 2012 Webinar August 31 st, 2012 Tiffany Smith Phoebe.
Presented at ECEA-SCASS Meeting Savannah, Georgia October, 2010 OSEP Initiatives on Early Childhood Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
Summary Statements. The problem... Progress data included –5 progress categories –For each of 3 outcomes –Total of 15 numbers reported each year Too many.
Early Childhood Outcomes Workgroup Christina Kasprzak and Lynne Kahn ECO and NECTAC July 2009.
Building State Systems to Produce Quality Data on Child Outcomes Jim J. Lesko Director, Early Development and Learning Resources Delaware Department of.
Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010 Cornelia Taylor, ECO Christina Kasprzak, ECO/NECTAC Lisa Backer, MN DOE 1.
Child Outcomes Measurement Tools & Process A story of 3 conversions.
Approaches for Converting Assessment Data to the OSEP Outcome Categories Approaches for Converting Assessment Data to the OSEP Outcome Categories NECTAC.
Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, NECTAC and ECO at FPG
Child Outcomes Measurement: Getting to Quality Data
Incorporating Early Childhood into Longitudinal Data Systems:
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International AUCD Meeting Washington, DC
Child Outcomes Data: A Critical Lever for Systems Change
Review of Summary Statements for Target Setting on Indicators C3 and B7 Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC June 9,
Early Childhood Outcomes Data (Indicator C3 and B7)
Integrating Outcomes Learning Community Call February 8, 2012
OSEP Initiatives on Early Childhood Outcomes
Christina Kasprzak, ECTA/ECO/DaSy September 16, 2013
Update on the Online Conversion Process for CC.net and GOLD:
Building State Systems to Produce Quality Data on Child Outcomes
Webinar for the Massachusetts ICC Retreat October 3, 2012
Using outcomes data for program improvement
Lynne Kahn Kathy Hebbeler The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center
The Basics of Quality Data and Target Setting
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
Communicating to the Public about Child Outcomes Data
History of work between ODE and ECO
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Trends in Child Outcomes (C-3 / B-7) and Family Outcomes (C-4)
ECO Suggestions on Indicators C3 and B7 Kathy Hebbeler, ECO
Gathering Input for the Summary Statements
Target Setting for Child Outcomes
ECO Suggestions on Indicators C3 and B7 Kathy Hebbeler, ECO
Review of Summary Statements for Target Setting on Indicators C3 and B7 Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC June 9,
Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010
Measuring Part C and Early Childhood Special Education Child Outcomes
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
Early Childhood Outcomes Data (Indicator C3 and B7)
Presentation transcript:

Child Outcomes Data July 1, 2008 – June 30, 2009

Statewide Data Outcome 1 0% 9% 13% 29% 49% Outcome 2 1% 17% 43% 32% 8% 12% 45% 35%

Statewide Data Outcome 1 Outcome 2 Outcome 3 # % Category “a” 1 4 6 4 6 Category “b” 72 9 68 65 8 Category “c” 100 13 131 17 93 12 Category “d” 229 29 339 43 353 45 Category “e” 390 49 250 32 275 35 Total 792 100%

Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Identifying where improvement might be made

Comparing Entry and Exit Ratings

Outcome 1 Entry Exit 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 total 16 24 12 36 8 22 29 105 33 93 96 260 54 144 134 359 Review Total 10 40 64 82 189 253 154 792

Outcome 2 Entry Exit 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 total 10 20 13 14 51 9 36 44 31 128 22 52 108 56 249 17 93 109 78 340 Review Total 39 90 146 243 175 86 792

Outcome 3 Entry Exit 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 total 15 31 11 21 30 40 9 114 19 43 138 63 17 299 8 18 23 84 122 73 329 Review Total 47 78 103 264 197 92 792

Comparing by Eligibility Category

Summary Statements

Summary Statement 1 Of those children who entered the program below age expectations in the Outcome Area, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they exit the program. Progress categories (c + d) (a + b + c + d) The first summary statement is about children who made ‘more than expected’ progress while they were in the program. Children who make ‘more than expected’ progress are those who move up on the COSF 7-point rating scale. They include children who ‘catch up’ to age level (which is progress category d) and also children who do not catch up, but move closer to age level by the time they leave the program (which is progress category c). For this summary statement, states will set targets for the percentage of children who leave the program having caught up, or having moved closer, to age level.

Summary Statement 2 The percent of children who are functioning within age expectations in the Outcome Area by the time they exit the program. Progress categories (d + e) (a + b + c + d + e) The second summary statement is about children who leave the program at age level. Children who leave the program at age level are those who move up to a 6 or 7 on the COSF 7-point rating scale (which is progress category d) or who maintain a level of 6 or 7 for entry and exit COSF ratings (which is progress category e). For this summary statement, states will set targets for the percentage of children who leave the program having caught up to or maintained age level.

Statewide Data Outcome 1 Outcome 2 Outcome 3 Summary Statement 1: Of those children who entered the program below age expectations in the Outcome Area, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they exit the program. 82% 87% 86% Summary Statement 2: The percent of children who are functioning within age expectations in the Outcome Area by the time they exit the program. 78% 74% 79%

Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Summary Statement 1 Of those children who entered the program below age expectations in the Outcome Area, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they exit the program. Progress categories (c + d) (a + b + c + d) The first summary statement is about children who made ‘more than expected’ progress while they were in the program. Children who make ‘more than expected’ progress are those who move up on the COSF 7-point rating scale. They include children who ‘catch up’ to age level (which is progress category d) and also children who do not catch up, but move closer to age level by the time they leave the program (which is progress category c). For this summary statement, states will set targets for the percentage of children who leave the program having caught up, or having moved closer, to age level. 27 27

Summary Statement 2 The percent of children who are functioning within age expectations in the Outcome Area by the time they exit the program. Progress categories (d + e) (a + b + c + d + e) The second summary statement is about children who leave the program at age level. Children who leave the program at age level are those who move up to a 6 or 7 on the COSF 7-point rating scale (which is progress category d) or who maintain a level of 6 or 7 for entry and exit COSF ratings (which is progress category e). For this summary statement, states will set targets for the percentage of children who leave the program having caught up to or maintained age level.