SUMO-1 Modification Represses Sp3 Transcriptional Activation and Modulates Its Subnuclear Localization  Sarah Ross, Jennifer L Best, Leonard I Zon, Grace.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CREB Binding Protein Recruitment to the Transcription Complex Requires Growth Factor–Dependent Phosphorylation of Its GF Box  Kerstin Zanger, Sally Radovick,
Advertisements

Constitutive NF-κB activation by the t(11;18)(q21;q21) product in MALT lymphoma is linked to deregulated ubiquitin ligase activity  Honglin Zhou, Ming-Qing.
Implications of somatic mutations in the AML1 gene in radiation-associated and therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia by Hironori.
by Toshibumi Shimokawa, and Chisei Ra
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
A Novel Cofactor for p300 that Regulates the p53 Response
Large Hepatitis Delta Antigen Modulates Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling Cascades: Implication of Hepatitis Delta Virus–Induced Liver Fibrosis 
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
Tax ubiquitylation and sumoylation control critical cytoplasmic and nuclear steps of NF-κB activation by Rihab Nasr, Estelle Chiari, Marwan El-Sabban,
Interactions between Aiolos and Ikaros proteins are detected within the cell nucleus. Interactions between Aiolos and Ikaros proteins are detected within.
by Wu-Guo Deng, Ying Zhu, and Kenneth K. Wu
Volume 129, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Autoinhibition of c-Abl
Phosphorylation of NF-κB p65 by PKA Stimulates Transcriptional Activity by Promoting a Novel Bivalent Interaction with the Coactivator CBP/p300  Haihong.
Histone deacetylase 3 associates with and represses the transcription factor GATA-2 by Yukiyasu Ozawa, Masayuki Towatari, Shinobu Tsuzuki, Fumihiko Hayakawa,
Volume 124, Issue 7, Pages (June 2003)
Volume 142, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
ROG, Repressor of GATA, Regulates the Expression of Cytokine Genes
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Rose-Anne Romano, Barbara Birkaya, Satrajit Sinha 
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
A Mechanism for Inhibiting the SUMO Pathway
Jin Yang, Hal P. Bogerd, P.Jeremy Wang, David C. Page, Bryan R. Cullen 
Fátima Gebauer, Marica Grskovic, Matthias W Hentze  Molecular Cell 
Phosphorylation of PML by mitogen-activated protein kinases plays a key role in arsenic trioxide-mediated apoptosis  Fumihiko Hayakawa, Martin L Privalsky 
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Yongli Bai, Chun Yang, Kathrin Hu, Chris Elly, Yun-Cai Liu 
Acquisition of Oncogenic Potential by RAR Chimeras in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia through Formation of Homodimers  Richard J Lin, Ronald M Evans  Molecular.
The Polycomb Protein Pc2 Is a SUMO E3
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Ras Induces Mediator Complex Exchange on C/EBPβ
Robert L.S Perry, Maura H Parker, Michael A Rudnicki  Molecular Cell 
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
Volume 115, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
Transcription Factor MIZ-1 Is Regulated via Microtubule Association
Colin Kwok, Bernd B. Zeisig, Shuo Dong, Chi Wai Eric So  Cancer Cell 
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Transcriptional Regulation of ATP2C1 Gene by Sp1 and YY1 and Reduced Function of its Promoter in Hailey–Hailey Disease Keratinocytes  Hiroshi Kawada,
Mutations in Human ARF Exon 2 Disrupt Its Nucleolar Localization and Impair Its Ability to Block Nuclear Export of MDM2 and p53  Yanping Zhang, Yue Xiong 
Volume 118, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
WNK1 Phosphorylates Synaptotagmin 2 and Modulates Its Membrane Binding
Melissa L. Ehlers, Barbara Celona, Brian L. Black  Cell Reports 
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
ROG, Repressor of GATA, Regulates the Expression of Cytokine Genes
p300 Transcriptional Repression Is Mediated by SUMO Modification
Volume 142, Issue 4, Pages e4 (April 2012)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Andrei Kuzmichev, Thomas Jenuwein, Paul Tempst, Danny Reinberg 
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
TBX22 Missense Mutations Found in Patients with X-Linked Cleft Palate Affect DNA Binding, Sumoylation, and Transcriptional Repression  Artemisia M. Andreou,
Involvement of PIAS1 in the Sumoylation of Tumor Suppressor p53
Hua Gao, Yue Sun, Yalan Wu, Bing Luan, Yaya Wang, Bin Qu, Gang Pei 
Coilin Methylation Regulates Nuclear Body Formation
In Vitro Analysis of Huntingtin-Mediated Transcriptional Repression Reveals Multiple Transcription Factor Targets  Weiguo Zhai, Hyunkyung Jeong, Libin.
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Spatial Regulation of Developmental Signaling by a Serpin
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Constitutive NF-κB activation by the t(11;18)(q21;q21) product in MALT lymphoma is linked to deregulated ubiquitin ligase activity  Honglin Zhou, Ming-Qing.
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
SUMO-1 Protease-1 Regulates Gene Transcription through PML
A Smad Transcriptional Corepressor
A Splicing-Independent Function of SF2/ASF in MicroRNA Processing
Volume 13, Issue 14, Pages (July 2003)
Jörg Hartkamp, Brian Carpenter, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Molecular Cell 
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Presentation transcript:

SUMO-1 Modification Represses Sp3 Transcriptional Activation and Modulates Its Subnuclear Localization  Sarah Ross, Jennifer L Best, Leonard I Zon, Grace Gill  Molecular Cell  Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 831-842 (October 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00682-2

Figure 1 Endogenous Sp3 Is Modified by SUMO-1 (A) Modification of Sp3 by HA-SUMO-1. Protein extracts from control P19 cells or cells transfected with a plasmid expressing HA-SUMO-1 were analyzed by Western blotting with anti-Sp3 antibody. The three major isoforms of Sp3, generated by translation initiation at different positions, are indicated by arrows. An asterisk indicates a major additional Sp3 isoform in the HA-SUMO-1-transfected extracts. (B) Sp3 is modified by HA-SUMO-1. Protein extracts from P19 cells either untransfected (Control) or transfected with a plasmid expressing HA-SUMO-1 were immunoprecipitated with anti-Sp3, anti-HA, or control IgG beads as indicated. Immunoprecipitated material was analyzed by Western blotting with anti-Sp3 (top panel) or anti-HA antibodies (bottom panel). The asterisks indicate HA-SUMO-1-modified forms of Sp3. (C) Endogenous Sp3 is modified by SUMO-1. Proteins were immunoprecipitated from untransfected cell extracts with anti-Sp3 antibody or control IgG beads. The immunoprecipitated material was analyzed by Western blotting with anti-Sp3 (left panel) or anti-SUMO-1 antibodies (right panel). The major SUMO-1-modified forms of Sp3 are indicated by asterisks, and a minor form is indicated by a closed circle. Extracts in (B) and (C) but not (A) were prepared in the presence of N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) to inhibit de-sumoylating enzymes. Molecular Cell 2002 10, 831-842DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00682-2)

Figure 2 K539 Is the Major SUMO-1 Acceptor Site in Sp3 and Mutation of K539 Relieves Inhibition of Sp3 (A) Schematic representation of Sp3. The transcriptional activation domains (AD), inhibitory domain (ID), Zinc finger DNA binding domain (Zn fingers), and putative SUMO acceptor sites (K108 and K539) are shown. The two smaller forms of Sp3 arise from translation initiation at internal methionines indicated by the arrows. (B) K539 is the major SUMO-1 acceptor site in Sp3. P19 cells were cotransfected with the indicated Gal4-Sp3 fusions or a control plasmid expressing the Gal4 DNA binding domain (G4) and a plasmid expressing HA-SUMO-1. KR dbl refers to the double mutant K108R, K539R. Proteins were immunoprecipitated with anti-Gal4 agarose or control IgG beads. The immunoprecipitated material was analyzed by Western blotting with anti-SUMO-1 (top panel) or anti-Gal4 antibodies (bottom panel). The major SUMO-1-modified form of Gal4-Sp3 is indicated by an asterisk, and a minor form is indicated by a closed circle. The Gal4 DNA binding alone, G4, is much smaller than Gal4-Sp3 and was run off these gels. (C) K539 is critical for inhibition of Sp3 transcriptional activity. P19 cells were cotransfected with a Gal4-luciferase reporter plasmid (G5-luc) and the indicated Gal4-Sp3 fusions. The luciferase activity is shown relative to the WT Gal4-Sp3 fusion which was set at 1. Molecular Cell 2002 10, 831-842DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00682-2)

Figure 3 The SUMO-1 Protease SuPr-1 Specifically Stimulates the Transcriptional Activity of Gal4-Sp3 (A) Dose-dependent stimulation of Gal4-Sp3 activity by the SUMO-1 protease SuPr-1. P19 cells were cotransfected with G5-luc, wild-type Gal4-Sp3, and the indicated amounts of either vector or a plasmid expressing SuPr-1. Shown is luciferase activity relative to Gal4-Sp3 with 10 ng of vector, which was set at 1. (B) SuPr-3 and SuPr-4 do not increase G4-Sp3 activity. P19 cells were cotransfected with G5-luc, wild-type Gal4-Sp3, and either vector or plasmids expressing the SUMO-1 proteases SuPr-1, SuPr-3, or SuPr-4. G4-fusion activity represents luciferase activity relative to Gal4-Sp3 with vector, which was set at 1. (C) Gal4-Sp1 activity is not affected by SuPr-1. P19 cells were cotransfected with G5-luc, either G4-Sp3 or G4-Sp1, and either vector or the SuPr-1 expression plasmid as indicated. Shown is the luciferase activity relative to Gal4-Sp3 cotransfected with vector which was set at 1. Molecular Cell 2002 10, 831-842DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00682-2)

Figure 4 The SUMO-1 Protease Activity of SuPr-1 Is Required to Stimulate Transcription by Gal4-Sp3 (A) SuPr-1 hydrolyzes SUMO-1 from Gal4-Sp3. Protein extracts from cells cotransfected with wild-type Gal4-Sp3 and either vector or HA-SuPr-1 were immunoprecipitated with anti-Gal4 agarose or IgG beads alone. Immunoprecipitates were analyzed by Western blot analysis with anti-SUMO-1 (top), anti-Gal4 (middle), or anti-HA antibodies (bottom). The major sumoylated form of Gal4-Sp3 is indicated by an asterisk. (B) Stimulation of Gal4-Sp3 by SuPr-1 requires the Sp3 SUMO-1 acceptor sites. P19 cells were cotransfected with G5-luc, either the wild-type (WT) or a SUMO-1 acceptor mutant (KR dbl) of Gal4-Sp3, and the indicated amounts of the SuPr-1 expression plasmid. Shown is the luciferase activity relative to WT Gal4-Sp3 with 0 ng of SuPr-1, which was set at 1. (C) The catalytic activity of SuPr-1 is required to activate Gal4-Sp3. P19 cells were cotransfected with G5-luc, wild-type Gal4-Sp3, and the indicated amounts of plasmids expressing either wild-type (HA-SuPr-1) or a catalytic mutant (HA-C466S) of SuPr-1. Shown is the luciferase activity relative to Gal4-Sp3 with 0 ng of SuPr-1, which was set at 1. Molecular Cell 2002 10, 831-842DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00682-2)

Figure 5 N-Terminal Fusion of SUMO-1 Represses Sp3 Transcriptional Activity SUMO-1 (1–96), lacking the C-terminal Gly-Gly characteristic of mature SUMO-1, was fused in frame to the Gal4 DNA binding domain alone, G4, Gal4-Sp3, or Gal4-Sp3 K539R as indicated in the schematic drawing. Cells were cotransfected with the indicated Gal4 fusions and a Gal4-dependent luciferase reporter gene. The luciferase activity relative to Gal4-Sp3 wild-type, which was set at 1, is shown. The activity of Gal4, Gal4-Sp3, and Gal4-Sp3 K539R is indicated by open bars, and the activity of the corresponding SUMO-1 fusions is indicated by shaded bars. Molecular Cell 2002 10, 831-842DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00682-2)

Figure 6 Endogenous Sp3 Localizes to the Nuclear Periphery and to Discrete Nuclear Dots (A) Sp3 localizes to the nuclear periphery. Immunofluorescence of P19 cells with anti-Sp3 antibodies (red). Nuclei were visualized by Hoechst staining for DNA (blue). (B) A fraction of Sp3 in nuclear dots colocalizes with PML. Immunofluorescence of P19 cells with anti-Sp3 (red) and anti-PML (green) antibodies. Colocalization of Sp3 and PML is indicated in the merge (yellow). (C) Nuclear localization of Sp3 and Sp1 is different. Immunofluorescence of P19 cells with anti-Sp1 antibodies (red) is shown. Molecular Cell 2002 10, 831-842DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00682-2)

Figure 7 Localization of Gal4-Sp3 Is Regulated by SUMO-1 and Correlates with Activity (A) SUMO-1-modified, repressed forms of Gal4-Sp3 localize to the nuclear periphery and nuclear dots. P19 cells were transfected with constructs expressing wild-type Gal4-Sp3 (left) and Gal4-SUMO-1-K539R (right) and the subcellular localization of the fusions determined by indirect immunofluorescence using anti-Gal4 antibody (red). Nuclei were visualized by Hoechst staining for DNA (blue). (B) Transcriptionally active forms of Gal4-Sp3, lacking SUMO-1, are diffusely localized in the nucleus. P19 cells were transfected with Gal4-Sp3 K539R (left) or wild-type Gal4-Sp3 together with a plasmid expressing HA-SuPr-1 (right). Cells expressing Gal4 fusions (red) and HA-SuPr-1 (green) were visualized by indirect immunofluorescence using anti-Gal4 and anti-HA antibodies. Nuclei were visualized by Hoechst staining for DNA (blue). Although SuPr-1 has been reported to localize to PML nuclear bodies (Best et al., 2002), in these studies SuPr-1 was not exclusively found in nuclear dots, perhaps due to higher levels of expression. Four representative transfected cells are shown for each Gal4-fusion. Molecular Cell 2002 10, 831-842DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00682-2)