Rapid and Selective Remodeling of a Positioned Nucleosome during the Induction of IL- 12 p40 Transcription  Amy S Weinmann, Scott E Plevy, Stephen T Smale 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Marcello Arsura, Min Wu, Gail E Sonenshein  Immunity 
Advertisements

Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol
UVB Increases Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor (uPAR) Expression1  Christoph Marschall, Toshiko Nobutoh, Evelyn Braungart, Kathrin Douwes,
Suneet Agarwal, Anjana Rao  Immunity 
Nonsense Mutations Inhibit RNA Splicing in a Cell-Free System: Recognition of Mutant Codon Is Independent of Protein Synthesis  Said Aoufouchi, José Yélamos,
The cyclin B1 promoter is accessible to restriction endonucleases in vivo. The cyclin B1 promoter is accessible to restriction endonucleases in vivo. Nuclei.
Skin-Specific Expression of ank-393, a Novel Ankyrin-3 Splice Variant
Nucleosome Sliding via TBP DNA Binding In Vivo
Volume 124, Issue 7, Pages (June 2003)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (December 1997)
by Guang Yang, Shu-Ching Huang, Jane Y. Wu, and Edward J. Benz
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (February 1997)
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2001)
IFN-γ Upregulates Expression of the Mouse Complement C1rA Gene in Keratinocytes via IFN-Regulatory Factor-1  Sung June Byun, Ik-Soo Jeon, Hyangkyu Lee,
Sp1 Is Required for Glucose-Induced Transcriptional Regulation of Mouse Vesicular Glutamate Transporter 2 Gene  Tao Li, Liqun Bai, Jing Li, Suzu Igarashi,
Silencing in Yeast rDNA Chromatin
Claire Soudais, Sylvie Boutin, Eric J. Kremer  Molecular Therapy 
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (October 1997)
I-Cheng Ho, Martin R Hodge, John W Rooney, Laurie H Glimcher  Cell 
A Specialized Nucleosome Modulates Transcription Factor Access to a C
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
James I Kim, I-Cheng Ho, Michael J Grusby, Laurie H Glimcher  Immunity 
Regulation of CSF1 Promoter by the SWI/SNF-like BAF Complex
A Rad51 Presynaptic Filament Is Sufficient to Capture Nucleosomal Homology during Recombinational Repair of a DNA Double-Strand Break  Manisha Sinha,
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (December 1998)
Andrew J Henderson, Ruth I Connor, Kathryn L Calame  Immunity 
Xinyang Zhao, P.Shannon Pendergrast, Nouria Hernandez  Molecular Cell 
Defective NK Cell Activity and Th1 Response in IL-18–Deficient Mice
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (July 2002)
Chromatin Remodeling In Vivo
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (April 1996)
The Basis for IL-2-Induced IL-2 Receptor α Chain Gene Regulation
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (August 2000)
IgH Class Switch Recombination to IgG1 in DNA-PKcs-Deficient B Cells
Barbara S Nikolajczyk, J.Aquiles Sanchez, Ranjan Sen  Immunity 
Hansen Du, Haruhiko Ishii, Michael J. Pazin, Ranjan Sen  Molecular Cell 
Resistance of Human Melanoma Cells Against the Death Ligand TRAIL Is Reversed by Ultraviolet-B Radiation via Downregulation of FLIP  Elke Zeise, Michael.
Andrew T Miller, Heather M Wilcox, Zhongbin Lai, Leslie J Berg 
Gaku Mizuguchi, Toshio Tsukiyama, Jan Wisniewski, Carl Wu 
Immune Response in Stat2 Knockout Mice
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Multiple Developmental Stage–Specific Enhancers Regulate CD8 Expression in Developing Thymocytes and in Thymus-Independent T Cells  Wilfried Ellmeier,
Nucleosomes Unfold Completely at a Transcriptionally Active Promoter
Targeted Stimulation of Meiotic Recombination
Th2 Lineage Commitment and Efficient IL-4 Production Involves Extended Demethylation of the IL-4 Gene  Dong U. Lee, Suneet Agarwal, Anjana Rao  Immunity 
Marcello Arsura, Min Wu, Gail E Sonenshein  Immunity 
IFN-γ Represses IL-4 Expression via IRF-1 and IRF-2
Rodney P. DeKoter, Hyun-Jun Lee, Harinder Singh  Immunity 
Chromatin Disassembly Mediated by the Histone Chaperone Asf1 Is Essential for Transcriptional Activation of the Yeast PHO5 and PHO8 Genes  Melissa W Adkins,
TNF Regulates the In Vivo Occupancy of Both Distal and Proximal Regulatory Regions of the MCP-1/JE Gene  Dongsheng Ping, Peter L. Jones, Jeremy M. Boss 
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Replication-Coupled Nucleosome Assembly and Positioning by ATP-Dependent Chromatin-Remodeling Enzymes  Tejas Yadav, Iestyn Whitehouse  Cell Reports  Volume.
Pantelis Hatzis, Iannis Talianidis  Molecular Cell 
An Early Developmental Transcription Factor Complex that Is More Stable on Nucleosome Core Particles Than on Free DNA  Lisa Ann Cirillo, Kenneth S Zaret 
Polycomb Silencing Blocks Transcription Initiation
PU.1 Expression Delineates Heterogeneity in Primary Th2 Cells
Evidence for Insertional RNA Editing in Humans
Mutation of the Ca2+ Channel β Subunit Gene Cchb4 Is Associated with Ataxia and Seizures in the Lethargic (lh) Mouse  Daniel L Burgess, Julie M Jones,
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 138, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
A Stage-Specific Enhancer of Immunoglobulin J Chain Gene Is Induced by Interleukin-2 in a Presecretor B Cell Stage  Chang-Joong Kang, Colleen Sheridan,
Meiotic DNA Breaks at the S. pombe Recombination Hot Spot M26
Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages (March 1998)
Presentation transcript:

Rapid and Selective Remodeling of a Positioned Nucleosome during the Induction of IL- 12 p40 Transcription  Amy S Weinmann, Scott E Plevy, Stephen T Smale  Immunity  Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages 665-675 (December 1999) DOI: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80141-7

Figure 1 MNase-Southern Blot Analysis of the Murine IL-12 p40 Promoter (A) Nuclei from RAW 264.7 cells were digested with MNase (16 units). Purified genomic DNA was undigested (lanes 7) or digested with Bsu36I (lanes 1 and 2), PstI (lanes 3 and 4), or XbaI (lanes 5 and 6). Southern blot analysis yielded the bands indicated to the left and right of the image. The term “1+” indicates, for example, that the fragment observed following digestion with a particular restriction enzyme is larger than a mononucleosome but smaller than a dinucleosome. (B) The nucleosomes revealed by Southern blot are depicted as solid ovals. Dashed ovals indicate nucleosomes that may exist on the basis of an extrapolation of the data. The locations of the MNase hypersensitive region, the DNA fragment used as the probe (−697 to −333), the restriction enzyme cleavage sites, and the transcription start site (+1) are indicated. A representation of the hybridization products is shown below the promoter schematic. Immunity 1999 11, 665-675DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80141-7)

Figure 2 MNase-LM-PCR Analysis of the IL-12 p40 Promoter (A) Purified genomic DNA (lane 1), RAW264.7 nuclei (lane 2), and J774 nuclei (lanes 3–5) were treated with MNase and analyzed by LM-PCR using primer A. Hypersensitive sites correspond to nucleotides −185 and −175. Radiolabeled pBR322 digested with MspI (New England Biolabs; lane 6) is shown as a size standard. (B) LM-PCR was performed on the same MNase-treated DNA preparations using primers A (lanes 2–5) and B (lanes 7–10). DNAs were from RAW264.7 macrophages (lanes 2 and 7 [8.3 units MNase], lanes 3 and 8 [16.7 units]), or VL3–3M2 T cells (lanes 4 and 9 [16.7 units], lanes 5 and 10 [50 units]). A p40-containing genomic clone digested in vitro and analyzed with primer B was used for lane 6. The markers (lane 1) were pBR322 cleaved with MspI. (C) MNase-LM-PCR was performed using primer C. DNAs were from RAW264.7 (lanes 3 [16.7 units MNase] and 4 [25 units]) or VL3–3M2 (lanes 5 [8.3 units] and 6 [25 units]) cells. In vitro-digested DNA was used for lane 2. Lane 1 contains radiolabeled size standards (pBR322 × MspI). (D) MNase-LM-PCR was performed with primer D. DNAs were from RAW264.7 (lanes 2–4 [0, 8.3, and 25 units MNase]) or VL3–3M2 (lanes 5–7 [0, 8.3, and 16.7 units]) cells. In vitro–digested p40 DNA was used for lane 8. Markers (pBR322 × MspI) are shown in lane 1. (E) Cell nuclei from RAW264.7 cells (lanes 1–3), VL3–3M2 T cells (lanes 4–7), or 3T3 fibroblasts (lanes 8–11) were treated with MNase. Purified DNAs were analyzed by Southern blot following digestion with Bsu36I (lanes 1, 4, and 9), PstI (lanes 2, 5, and 10), XbaI (lanes 3, 6, 11), or with no digestion (lanes 7 and 8). MNase hypersensitive products are indicated to the left, and the location of size standards are to the right. Immunity 1999 11, 665-675DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80141-7)

Figure 3 Summary of Nucleosome Organization of the IL-12 p40 Promoter The approximate positions of nucleosomes are indicated by open ovals. Also shown are the locations of the macrophage-specific hypersensitive region, the transcription start site (+1), and the LM-PCR primer binding sites. At the bottom, the position of nucleosome 1 is shown relative to the locations of the three important promoter elements defined by transient transfection (Murphy et al. 1995; Plevy et al. 1997). Three additional elements that appear to be of lesser importance are shown (Plevy et al. 1997). Immunity 1999 11, 665-675DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80141-7)

Figure 4 Characterization of IL-12 p40 Expression in the J774 Macrophage Cell Line (A) J774 cells were unstimulated or stimulated with HKLM or LPS for 24 hr. Culture supernatants were analyzed by ELISA. The results shown were from three separate experiments performed simultaneously. (B) Intracellular flow cytometry was performed with J774 cells that were unactivated or activated with HKLM for 24 hr. Cells were stained with a PE-conjugated IgG control antibody (light gray) or a PE-conjugated antibody specific for the p40 protein (black). The x-axis is a logarithmic representation of the PE fluorescence emission with the y-axis representing the number of cells with the given fluorescence level. (C) Total cytoplasmic RNA was isolated from J774 cells that were unstimulated (lane 1) or stimulated with LPS for 4 (lane 2), 8 (lane 3), or 10 (lane 4) hr. In addition, total RNA was isolated from J774 cells pretreated with CHX (lanes 6 and 8) or left untreated (lanes 5 and 7). These cells were then stimulated with LPS (lanes 7 and 8) or left unstimulated (lanes 5 and 6). Thirty micrograms of RNA was analyzed by primer extension. The arrows indicate the expected 59 bp product. Immunity 1999 11, 665-675DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80141-7)

Figure 5 Remodeling at the p40 Promoter as Measured by Restriction Enzyme Accessibility (A) The restriction enzyme sites analyzed are indicated by black ovals. The locations of the TATA, C/EBP, and Rel elements are indicated by rectangles, and primer binding sites are indicated at the bottom. The approximate positions of nucleosome 1 and upstream nucleosomes are indicated by open ovals. (B) J774 cells were untreated (lanes 2–7) or treated with HKLM for 8 hr (lanes 8–13). Nuclei were treated with SpeI (lanes 2, 3, 8, and 9), MseI (lanes 4, 5, 10, and 11), or DdeI (lanes 6, 7, 12, and 13) at 37°C for 10 (lanes 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12) or 20 (lanes 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13) min. Purified DNAs were digested with AatII (lanes 2, 3, 8, and 9) or PstI (lanes 4–7 and 10–13). Arrows to the left and right denote the fragments resulting from in vitro and in vivo digestion, respectively. Markers are pBR322 × MspI (lane 1). (C) J774 cells were pretreated for 15 min with CHX (lanes 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 12, and 14) or were left untreated (lanes 1, 4, 6, 8, 11, and 13). Cells were then activated with LPS for 1 (lanes 4, 5, 11, and 12) or 2 (lanes 6, 7, 13, and 14) hr or were left untreated (lanes 1–3 and 8–10). Nuclei were digested with SpeI (lanes 1–7) or MseI (lanes 8–14). Purified SpeI- and MseI-digested DNAs were digested in vitro with PstI. Arrows to the left and right indicate control and nuclear cleavage products, respectively. Immunity 1999 11, 665-675DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80141-7)

Figure 6 Remodeling Is Restricted to Nucleosome 1 Restriction enzyme accessibility was monitored in regions outside of nucleosome 1. Each of these experiments was performed with a parallel positive control, which was SpeI and/or MseI cleavage followed by LM-PCR with primer A (data not shown). J774 cells were untreated (lanes 2, 5, 8, 11, and 14) or treated with LPS for 4 (lane 9) or 8 (lane 15) hr or HKLM for 8 hr (lanes 3, 6, and 12). Nuclei were treated with AatII (lanes 2 and 3), PstI (lanes 5 and 6), HaeIII (lanes 8 and 9), AluI (lanes 11 and 12), or BstNI (lanes 14 and 15) for 10 min at 37°C. Purified DNAs were digested with PstI (lanes 2 and 3), HaeIII (lanes 5 and 6), KpnI (lanes 8 and 9), AflIII (lanes 11 and 12), or AatII (lanes 14 and 15). Markers are pBR322 × MspI (lanes 1, 4, 7, 10, and 13). Immunity 1999 11, 665-675DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80141-7)

Figure 7 Analysis of Peritoneal Macrophages Activated with LPS and IFNγ (A) ELISA results from the primary macrophage population used in (D) and (E) are shown. Cells were untreated, treated with IFNγ, LPS, or LPS and IFNγ. Culture supernatants were harvested after 6 hr. (B) Intracellular staining was performed with cells that were left untreated or were treated with IFNγ, LPS, or LPS and IFNγ. Profiles relative to the IgG control are shown. (C) Nuclei from primary macrophages were treated with increasing concentrations of MNase (lanes 2 and 3). Radiolabeled primer A was used for LM-PCR. pBR322 digested with MspI (lane 1) was used as a size standard. The MNase hypersensitive sites at −175 and −185 are indicated. (D) Primary macrophages were left untreated (lane 1), treated with IFNγ (lanes 2, 4, and 6), LPS for 1 (lanes 3 and 4) or 4 (lanes 5 and 6) hr. Nuclei were digested with SpeI at 37°C for 10 min. Purified DNA was digested with AatII as a control. Arrows to the right and left indicate nuclear and control cleavage products, respectively. (E) Primary macrophages were untreated (lane 2) or were treated with IFNγ (lane 5), LPS (lane 3), or LPS and IFNγ (lane 4) for 4 hr. Nuclei were digested with DNase I (0.15 μg) followed by LM-PCR with primer A. Radiolabeled pBR322 digested with MspI (lane 1) was the size standard. Immunity 1999 11, 665-675DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80141-7)