Break Out 5: AP-929 Revision Facilitator: Mike Stout - SPESCOM May 11, 2019 Cleveland 2005

Revision 1 Reaction Room Survey: 9/12 participants use AP in some fashion, such as basis for: MOD process (Reference and non-reference) Product and Procedure Development CM program (Site and Fleet) Access/Validate other Processes Training May 11, 2019 Cleveland 2005

Response to Summary of Changes Item 1 May 11, 2019 Cleveland 2005

New Material Performance Indicators: Caution: What is measured is perceived to be important, choose PI’s carefully KPI for Margin desired May 11, 2019 Cleveland 2005

Level of Detail Discussion Feedback Should Show Links to Other Processes Operation Guidance Docs Maintenance Guidance Docs Confusion on Process Flow Chart regardings “Shoulds” and “Shalls” on Feedback Legs Include Reference to ANSI std for definition of “Critical” Docs Awareness on CM Can/Needs to be Raised Through Training on AP-929 May 11, 2019 Cleveland 2005

Links to NEI & NIRMA Discussion Topics Item 1 May 11, 2019 Cleveland 2005

Feedback to INPO Increase acknowledgement/Awareness of Relationship Between CM and Other Processes Through Training and Actual Links Within The Guidance Documents May 11, 2019 Cleveland 2005

Take Away Points Group Insights Item 1 May 11, 2019 Cleveland 2005