Technical Meeting English Debate Competition Mechanical Language Club

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Debaters briefing.
Advertisements

LANCASTER UNIVERSITY DEBATING SOCIETY luds Advanced debating.
Debaters briefing.
Adjudication briefing. format of tournament rules practicalities.
Adjudication briefing. adjudication team andy hume john paul toner meg osullivan rob silver.
Introduction to British Parliamentary debate 07/10/2011.
BP Style With Cameronnnn. What is BP? Not Australian-style (3 on 3) Also known as Worlds-style 4 teams Each team has two speakers.
Topic 1. Getting Started 8/10/13. Outline  Introduction to “speaker development” sessions  Introduction British Parliamentary Debating  Role fulfilment.
Introduction to British Parliamentary Debate China Debate Education Network:
1. 2 Topics  The Debate  The teams  Structuring Arguments  Speaker Roles & duties  The Tournament  The Competition  The Motions  The Rules  The.
Role Fulfilment Training, 17/10/2012. Opening Government (OG) Closing Government (CG) Opening Opposition (OO) Closing Opposition (CO) 1.Prime Minister.
1. 2 Thank you!! We can’t do this without you You are performing a teaching role in the lives of our students YOU make it possible for young people to.
Social Choice Session 20 Carmen Pasca and John Hey.
THE BASICS COACHING SESSION. WHAT DO YOU NEED TO KNOW? What happens in a debate? What do you say in your speech? How do you give a good speech? How do.
ADJUDICATORS’ FUNCTIONS Decide which team has won. Decide the best speaker. State the reasons for the decision (oral adjudication). Provide constructive.
Prepared by Jason Hong, David Miko and the University of Calgary Debate Society.
Basic Debating Skills.
An introduction to Asian Parliamentary and Australs-Style Debating
Basic Training. What is debating? LUDS practice British parliamentary debate that is: A structured argument about a certain topic (motion) Between two.
Debater Orientation 제 1 회 알바트로스 + 영어토론대회 설명회. What do you learn today? Structure & Logistics Basics of debate Adjudication Rules.
Introduction to BP Debate
Teaching BP Lessons, Practices, and Drills China Debate Education Network.
Role Fulfilment. “Rules” of Britisth Parliamentary Formally all speakers in a debate are meant to do certain things In real terms these are guides to.
ALWAYS REMEMBER Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM.
Adjudication Briefing AdjCore of Japan BP Table of Contents ●Basic Rule ●Role of Adjudicator ●Process of Adjudication ●Criteria of Adjudication.
Debate Pointers A debate Exhibition. Case case: set of arguments supported by evidences anatomy of a case: definition: clarifies the motion/limits debate.
2 Thank you!! We can’t do this without you You are making an investment You are performing a teaching role in the lives of our students YOU make it possible.
A Guide for Teachers and Schools
Debate What, Why, How?. What do you think debating is?
Listen Think Debate. Why formal debating? Develops on the spot critical thinking skills Huge amounts of speaking practice, building confidence & presentation.
BP DEBATING: STRUCTURE & ROLE FULFILMENT Speaker’s Development, Week 2 Karolien Michiels.
An introduction to Asian Parliamentary and Australs-Style Debating Brett Frazer October 15, 2014 Cheongna Dalton School.
Australasian Parliamentary English Debate System Johanes Leonardi T., S.Pd, M.Sc English Education Study Program Faculty of Teacher Training & Education.
Rules of Debate We want this! We don’t want this!.
Introduction to University Debate Dylan Williams – Fall 2015 University of Alberta Debate Society 1.
Welcome to Warwick Debating Society!. The plan for today  Short introduction to the British Parliamentary debating format  Split off into groups of.
Role Fulfillment TRAINING SESSION 21 OCT Plan  Announcements  Quick review of last time’s stuff  Positions and their roles  How to prepare for.
EJVED 09. Getting to know debating Debating is a clash of argumentations among the Government team and Opposition team Everything starts from the word.
Introduction to British Parliamentary Debate China Debate Education Network:
Role of Speakers. So, debating is.... Reason-giving, Decision-making Not fighting, not oratory, not English proficiency Persuasion.
debate is all about arguing between affirmative/government team and negative/opposition team upon a motion. Affirmative  support the motion Negative.
Presentation by Jessica Prince March 13, 2010 The Pre-competition for the 14 th FLTRP Cup National English Debating Competition 1.
Welcome to Debating  Introduction  2008 changes  Speaker roles  Types of debates  Coaching tips  Draw announcement for the Senior Competition.
British Parliamentary Debating Course Presented for CPUT by Piet Olivier.
Technical Meeting SADEWA 9. Competition Rule Elimination R1 R2 R3 19 Maret 2 April 16 April 23 April Preliminary Top 4 Rank 1 VS Rank 4 Rank 2 VS Rank.
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Basic Debating Skills.
Public Speaking in Debating
DEBATE SEMINAR: JOVED SURABAYA 2016
World schools debate championships 3 vs 3 format
Thanks to Ionut Stefan and Eliot Pallot
Public Speaking in Debating
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Debate & Adjudication Briefing
Debating Skills
Basic Debating Skills.
Quebec Student Debating Association Judge’s Briefing.
DEBATE SEMINAR CA: Ariefinara Hernawan
Introduction to British Parliamentary Debating Rachmat Nurcahyo,M. A
Sixth Debate of the Semester
Roles In Debating Week 2.
NUDC KOPERTIS BOBY-ANGGI-OMAR
The Debate.
Debating Seminar Universitas Mataram
Presented by : PEPI FIDIA
Public Speaking Contest
Public Speaking in Debating
The British Parliamentary Debate Format
Debates.
Presentation transcript:

Technical Meeting English Debate Competition Mechanical Language Club Wednesday, 20 February 2013

Mechanism of English Debate Total battles is 7, with 30 minutes per battle

Style of debate is british parliamentary debating (3-v-3) Govt Bench Opp Bench Opening Half Prime Minister Leader of the Opposition Deputy Prime Minister Deputy Leader of the Opposition Closing Half Govt Whip Opposition Whip Four Sections : Opening Govrnment Opening Opposition Closing Government Closing Opposition Dividing into two benches : Government (Pro) Opposition (Conta) Dividing into two halves : Opening Half Closing Half

Detail of British Parliamentary Debating Speakers alternate Each speaker speaks once (no replies) Each speech goes for 4 minutes 1 minute ‘protected time’ at beginning 2 minutes in which Points of Information may be asked 1 minute ‘protected time’ at end Topics are almost always normative ‘That this House would/should…’

Conditions During Debate should not get in and get out from the room during debate Knock the table or alarm will be given after 1, 3 and 4 minutes talking finish Each team is trying to win the debate for itself Analogy of coalition partners On the same side of an issue, but have different points of view (because they represent different interests) Must be consistent with your opening team Can ignore parts of their case if strategically burdensome but must avoid directly contradicting opening team (‘knifing’)

Points of Information (PoIs) A PoI is a question asked of the speaker who has the floor PoIs are asked in middle 3 minutes of all speakers’ speeches Can be asked by any speaker of the opposing bench Speaker of opposing bench offers the PoI Points are offered by standing, adopting the appropriate pose, and saying ‘Point of Information’ or ‘On that point’ Speaker who has the floor may decline or accept an offerred PoI If accepted, offering speaker has 15 seconds to ask a question Speaker who has the floor then responds to the PoI Speaker who has the floor may choose how many PoIs to accept, and when to do so Should accept at least one POI and not more than three.

Speaker Roles Prime Minister Contextualises the motion Provides model ‘Semi-divine right of definition’: must be a reasonable definition not a truism consider ‘spirit of the motion’ Provides model Signposts Opening Govt team’s case Signposts own material Presents important arguments (Similar to a First Affirmative speaker)

Speaker Roles Leader of the Opposition Provides counter-model (if strategically desirable) Signposts Opening Opposition team’s case Signposts own material Presents substantive arguments (Similar to a First Negative speaker)

Speaker Roles Deputy Prime Minister Rebut Leader of the Opposition Signpost own substantive material Provide substantive arguments Similar to a Second Affirmative Speaker

Speaker Roles Deputy Leader of the Opposition Rebut Opening Government’s material Signpost own substantive material Provide substantive arguments Similar to a Second Negative Speaker

Speaker Roles Government / Opposition Whip Rebut opposing bench’s material (strategic decision as to who much to rebut Opening and Closing) Strengthen own Extension through rebuttal No new arguments Summarise debate

How to Win – Adjudication Criteria Teams ranked first through to fourth Debate will be decided on two things: 1. Role fulfilment Did you do your job? 2. Power and control Did your team’s material carry weight in the debate? Did your team use PoIs strategically and effectively?

Note: in BP you can win the debate without winning the argument Don’t forget the basics Signposting, rebuttal, argument structure, manner Do your job! Remember role fulfilment Opening Govt: set up a good debate Opening Opp: respond well to opening case Closing teams: have an extension, preferably a strong one Make your material matter Try to be the team bringing the best/most important arguments to the debate

Be in control – own the room Even just offering PoIs (without being accepted) can be useful Offer PoIs wisely Opening teams use PoIs to bring debate back to there material Closing teams use PoIs to (discretely) flag their extension Accept PoIs from both halves of the debate Respond to PoIs effectively

The Motions Alternative motion of preliminary round This house agree that Indonesia should censor the internet This house believes that cigarette company should be banned in Indonesia This house would support the moratorium on remission for convicted corruptors This house believes the boy band and girl band has a positive impact to progress of Indonesian music This house believe that naturalization of foreign players is more effective to progress of the Indonesian national team

The Motions Alternative motion of semifinals and final This house believes that Rhoma Irama is suit to be the next president of Indonesia This house believes that english should be eliminated from the curriculum of elementary school in Indonesia This house believes that RSBI School should be eliminated in Indonesia This house believes that Indonesia’s capital city “Jakarta” should be moved

Performance ; Gesture Pronounciation Expression Attitude