New Development in Plasma and Coil Configurations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Physics of fusion power Lecture 4: Cylindrical concepts.
Advertisements

LPK NCSX Configuration Optimization Process Long-Poe Ku ARIES Meeting October 2-4, 2002 Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ.
Steps Toward a Compact Stellarator Reactor Hutch Neilson Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES Team Meeting October 3, 2002.
Overview of ARIES Compact Stellarator Power Plant Study: Initial Results from ARIES-CS Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego Japan/US Workshop.
The ARIES Compact Stellarator Study Review Meeting October 5, 2006 PPPL, Princeton, NJ GIT Boeing GA INEL MIT ORNL PPPL RPI U.W. Collaborations FKZ UC.
Progress in Configuration Development for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries Project Meeting, June 16-17,
Recent Progress in Configuration Development for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Presented at Aries Meeting.
Physics Analysis for Equilibrium, Stability, and Divertors ARIES Power Plant Studies Charles Kessel, PPPL DOE Peer Review, UCSD August 17, 2000.
Physics of fusion power
Optimization of Stellarator Power Plant Parameters J. F. Lyon, Oak Ridge National Lab. for the ARIES Team Workshop on Fusion Power Plants Tokyo, January.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 4: Cylindrical concepts.
LPK Recent Progress in Configuration Development for Compact Stellarator Reactors L. P. Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries E-Meeting,
Attractive 2- and 3-FP Plasma and Coil Configurations – Recent Configuration Development Results Long-Poe Ku 1 & Paul Garabedian 2 1 Princeton Plasma Physics.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8: Conserved quantities / mirror / tokamak.
Recent Development in Plasma and Coil Configurations L. P. Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES-CS Project Meeting, June 14, 2006 UCSD, San Diego,
The ARIES Compact Stellarator Study: Introduction & Overview Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego ARIES-CS Review Meeting October 5, 2006.
Assessment of Quasi-Helically Symmetric Configurations as Candidate for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries.
Optimization of a Steady-State Tokamak-Based Power Plant Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA IEA Workshop 59 “Shape and.
Physics Basis for ARIES-CS L. P. Ku, J. Lyon, T. K. Mau, A. Turnbull, M. Zarnstorff, A. Grossman, T. Kaiser & The ARIES Team ARIES-CS Project Review, October.
Overview of ARIES Compact Stellarator Study Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego US/Japan Workshop on Power Plant Studies & Related Advanced.
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
US-Japan Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Advanced Technologies High Temperature Plasma Center, the University of Tokyo Yuichi OGAWA, Takuya.
Exploration of Compact Stellarators as Power Plants: Initial Results from ARIES-CS Study Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego 16 th ANS Topical.
Attractive QAS Configurations for Compact Stellarator Reactors – A Review of Progress and Status L. P. Ku 1 & P. R. Garabedian 2 1 Princeton Plasma Physics.
Overview of the ARIES-CS Compact Stellarator Power Plant Study Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8 : The tokamak continued.
Recent Progress in Configuration Development for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku PPPL Aries Project Meeting, December 3, 2003 Princeton Plasma.
Recent Development of QHS and QAS Configurations Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES Project Meeting, November 4-5, 2004 University of.
Attractive 2- and 3-FP Plasma and Coil Configurations – A Review of Progress and Status L. P. Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES-CS Project Meeting,
Optimization of Compact Stellarator Configuration as Fusion Devices Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego 47 th APS/DPP Annual Meeting
Recent Results of Configuration Studies L. P. Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES-CS Project Meeting, November 17, 2005 UCSD, San Diego, CA.
MCZ Equilibrium and Stability of High-  Plasmas in Wendelstein 7-AS M.C. Zarnstorff 1, A. Weller 2, J. Geiger 2, E. Fredrickson 1, S. Hudson.
Physics of Fusion power Lecture 7: Stellarator / Tokamak.
1 MHD for Fusion Where to Next? Jeff Freidberg MIT.
TITLE RP1.019 : Eliminating islands in high-pressure free- boundary stellarator magnetohydrodynamic equilibrium solutions. S.R.Hudson, D.A.Monticello,
Initial wave-field measurements in the Material Diagnostic Facility (MDF) Introduction : The Plasma Research Laboratory at the Australian National University.
Advanced Tokamak Plasmas and the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Spring APS, Philadelphia, 4/5/2003.
Profile Measurement of HSX Plasma Using Thomson Scattering K. Zhai, F.S.B. Anderson, J. Canik, K. Likin, K. J. Willis, D.T. Anderson, HSX Plasma Laboratory,
J A Snipes, 6 th ITPA MHD Topical Group Meeting, Tarragona, Spain 4 – 6 July 2005 TAE Damping Rates on Alcator C-Mod Compared with Nova-K J A Snipes *,
Stability Properties of Field-Reversed Configurations (FRC) E. V. Belova PPPL 2003 International Sherwood Fusion Theory Conference Corpus Christi, TX,
ARIES-AT Physics Overview presented by S.C. Jardin with input from C. Kessel, T. K. Mau, R. Miller, and the ARIES team US/Japan Workshop on Fusion Power.
1 Modular Coil Design for the Ultra-Low Aspect Ratio Quasi-Axially Symmetric Stellarator MHH2 L. P. Ku and the ARIES Team Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory.
Compact Stellarator Approach to DEMO J.F. Lyon for the US stellarator community FESAC Subcommittee Aug. 7, 2007.
EFDA EUROPEAN FUSION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Task Force S1 J.Ongena 19th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Lyon Towards the realization on JET of an.
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION International Plan for ELM Control Studies Presented by M.R. Wade (for A. Leonard)
TITLE Stuart R.Hudson, D.A.Monticello, A.H.Reiman, D.J.Strickler, S.P.Hirshman, L-P. Ku, E.Lazarus, A.Brooks, M.C.Zarnstorff, A.H.Boozer, G-Y. Fu and G.H.Neilson.
Improved performance in long-pulse ELMy H-mode plasmas with internal transport barrier in JT-60U N. Oyama, A. Isayama, T. Suzuki, Y. Koide, H. Takenaga,
QAS Design of the DEMO Reactor
MCZ Active MHD Control Needs in Helical Configurations M.C. Zarnstorff 1 Presented by E. Fredrickson 1 With thanks to A. Weller 2, J. Geiger 2,
D. A. Spong Oak Ridge National Laboratory collaborations acknowledged with: J. F. Lyon, S. P. Hirshman, L. A. Berry, A. Weller (IPP), R. Sanchez (Univ.
Integrated Simulation of ELM Energy Loss Determined by Pedestal MHD and SOL Transport N. Hayashi, T. Takizuka, T. Ozeki, N. Aiba, N. Oyama JAEA Naka TH/4-2.
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Taming The Physics For Commercial Fusion Power Plants ARIES Team Meeting.
18th International Spherical Torus Workshop, Princeton, November 2015 Magnetic Configurations  Three comparative configurations:  Standard Divertor (+QF)
Development of A New Class of QA Stellarator Reactor Configurations Long-Poe Ku PPPL Aries Project Meeting, March 8-9, 2004 University of California, San.
Plasma Turbulence in the HSX Stellarator Experiment and Probes C. Lechte, W. Guttenfelder, K. Likin, J.N. Talmadge, D.T. Anderson HSX Plasma Laboratory,
Long Pulse High Performance Plasma Scenario Development for NSTX C. Kessel and S. Kaye - providing TRANSP runs of specific discharges S.
Compact Stellarators as Reactors J. F. Lyon, ORNL NCSX PAC meeting June 4, 1999.
Mechanisms for losses during Edge Localised modes (ELMs)
Huishan Cai, Jintao Cao, Ding Li
A.D. Turnbull, R. Buttery, M. Choi, L.L Lao, S. Smith, H. St John
Progress on Systems Code Application to CS Reactors
First Experiments Testing the Working Hypothesis in HSX:
Targeted Physics Optimization in HSX
UPDATE ON  LIMITS FOR ARIES-CS
Influence of energetic ions on neoclassical tearing modes
Compact Stellarator Configuration Development Status and Issues
Long-Poe Ku† and the ARIES Team † Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
New Results for Plasma and Coil Configuration Studies
Stellarator Program Update: Status of NCSX & QPS
No ELM, Small ELM and Large ELM Strawman Scenarios
Presentation transcript:

New Development in Plasma and Coil Configurations L. P. Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES-CS Project Meeting, April 27, 2006 University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI

Re-cap of January discussions The baseline 11/05 configuration, N3ARE, is robust -- Our analysis indicates that essential physics properties are not significantly different using the density and temperature profiles based on either NCSX or the systems code. The confinement of a particles in our configurations depends strongly on the device size, field strength and collisionality with background ions. To maintain a energy loss <10%, high field and high density consistent with the maximum allowable field in the coil and density in the plasma are desirable. LPK-042706

N3ARE, a configuration of the NCSX-class, with a small but non-negligible mirror component introduced in the magnetic spectrum has been demonstrated to have good “all around” physics properties desirable for power producing reactors. B(0,1)/B(0,0)~1.5% <1% LPK-042706

1% N3ARE has very low effective ripples (e-eff), hence good transport properties, while it also maintains favorable MHD stability characteristics. It is “calculated” to be stable at 4-5% b (external kinks, ballooning and Mercier). The loss of a may be limited to < 10%. The configuration is robust to changes in temperature and density profiles as well. 5% b 4% b LPK-042706

Work plans presented in January meeting Continue to examine physics aspects of the baseline design selected by the systems code. Additionally, expand the study to include the A=4 configuration with three periods since there may be advantages to lower the aspect ratio. Optimize internal transforms by varying p and J profiles. Continue the effort of using biased magnetic spectrum to improve configurations. Add iota constraint for surface quality improvement Study coil complexity and plasma aspect ratio Today’s discussion LPK-042706

Today’s topics Improving alpha loss by further optimizing the baseline configuration, N3ARE. Lowering e-eff even more in the core region. Improving alpha loss by reducing plasma aspect ratio. R ~ Dmin·Ac, Pf  B4b2R3/Ap2, a confinement  B2(R/Ap)2 Gw  PfAp/R2 For given Pf, B, R, lower Ap => better a confinement and lower b, hence better MHD stability, and lower neutron wall load. Improving alpha loss by increasing core transform. Higher transform in core => better a confinement Transform can be modified to further improve surface quality. LPK-042706

I. Improving a confinement by further optimizing N3ARE. N3ARE may be further optimized to improve the a confinement by reducing ripples even more, particularly in the core region. N3ARE N3ARF R=7 m, b=5%, B=6.5 T N3ARE R=10 m, b=5%, B=6.5 T N3ARF LPK-042706

Change in shape of the last closed magnetic surface is insignificant. N3ARF N3ARE LPK-042706

II. Improving a confinement by reducing plasma aspect ratio. A configuration, N3CRE, whose QA and MHD stability properties are similar to those of N3ARE but whose aspect ratio is smaller by ~10%, may be more attractive as a reactor. N3CRE, A~4 N3ARE, A~4.5 LPK-042706

N3CRE has the same feature in its composition of the dominant residues in the magnetic spectrum as N3ARE. The magnitude of the effective ripple is also comparable to that of N3ARE. 0.6% B(0,1)/B(0,0)~2.5% B(2,1) getting bigger CRE ARE B(0,1)/B(0,0)~4% LPK-042706

Under the same conditions the lower aspect ratio N3CRE has better a confinement characteristic than N3ARF, the confinement improved version of N3ARE. N3CRE R=7 m, b=5%, B=6.5 T R=10 m, b=5% B=6.5 T N3ARF LPK-042706

III. Improving a confinement by increasing core transform. A new class of configurations has been developed which combines features of N3ARE and SNS, offering large core transform, very low ripples, good a confinement, excellent flux surface quality, a decent inherent magnetic well and good MHD stability properties. An example, N3ASDE, with Ap~4.5 is used here for illustration. External transform Total transform, 5% b N3ARE 3/6 3/5 3/4 Total transform, 5% b External transform N3ASDE 3/7 LPK-042706

All significant residues in the magnetic spectrum are low order harmonics with B(0,1) and B(1,1) again dominating, just like in N3ARE/N3CRE. The effective ripples are very small (<0.5%), and mostly smaller than those in N3ARF. B(0,1)/B(0,0)~2% near edge, but it is smaller in the core when compared to N3ARE. ≤1% N3ARF N3ASDE LPK-042706

The a confinement of N3ASDE is significantly better than even that of N3CRE under the same conditions. The energy loss fraction <5% may be achievable. N3ASDE N3CRE R=10 m, b=5%, B=6.5 T R=7m, b=5%, B=6.5 T LPK-042706

N3ASDE is expected to be marginally stable to the kink modes at 5% b N3ASDE is expected to be marginally stable to the kink modes at 5% b. It has ~2% inherent magnetic well, making it less susceptible to interchange-types of instability. The calculated infinite-n ballooning is stable at ~3.5% b. Magnetic well Infinite-n ballooning along the a=0, z=0 field line 5% b 5% b 4% b 0% b 3% b LPK-042706

The rotational transform at 5% b skirts all low order resonances The rotational transform at 5% b skirts all low order resonances. Results from PIES calculation indicate that an excellent flux surface quality is expected. Flux surfaces viewed in (x,y) at f=p plane. Flux surfaces viewed in (r, q) at f=0 plane. LPK-042706

Higher core transform requires stronger shaping, resulting in sharper tips and narrower widths in some cross sections. It remains to be seen if the shaping poses insurmountable difficulty in designing coils. R/w=6.5 N3ASDE w R/w=5.5 N3ARE LPK-042706

Summary and Conclusions Further progress has been made to reduce a loss and to improve the overall attractiveness of QAS as power producing reactors. The 11/05 baseline configuration was optimized further to reduce ripples in the core with little sacrifice of other properties. An A=4 configuration with properties similar to the 11/05 baseline was examined. It may be more attractive than the 11/05 baseline as it allows lower wall load and smaller a loss for the same major radius and fusion power. A hybrid of SNS and spectrum-biased configuration was newly developed which offers very high quality QA, MHD stability and flux surface integrity. If the coil design can be sufficiently advanced, this new class of configurations may prove to be the one having all the desirable features for a power producing reactor. LPK-042706

Work Plan Continue the development of the new hybrid in Configuration Physics Coils Cursory design of coils for the A=4 configuration. LPK-042706