Loss of Scar/WAVE Complex Promotes N-WASP- and FAK-Dependent Invasion

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alpha-Actinin 4 Is Associated with Cancer Cell Motility and Is a Potential Biomarker in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer  Ming-Chuan Wang, PhD, Ying-Hua Chang,
Advertisements

Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1A1 Possesses Stem-Like Properties and Predicts Lung Cancer Patient Outcome  Xiao Li, MD, Liyan Wan, MD, Jian Geng, MD, Chin-Lee.
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Wei Liu, Kun Ma, Sun Hyung Kwon, Ravi Garg, Yoda R
Oncogenic BRAF-Mediated Melanoma Cell Invasion
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Deregulation of SLIT2-Mediated Cdc42 Activity Is Associated with Esophageal Cancer Metastasis and Poor Prognosis  Ruo-Chia Tseng, PhD, Jia-Ming Chang,
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 22, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 23, Issue 21, Pages (November 2013)
Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1A1 Possesses Stem-Like Properties and Predicts Lung Cancer Patient Outcome  Xiao Li, MD, Liyan Wan, MD, Jian Geng, MD, Chin-Lee.
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Alpha-Actinin 4 Is Associated with Cancer Cell Motility and Is a Potential Biomarker in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer  Ming-Chuan Wang, PhD, Ying-Hua Chang,
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
The C-terminus of Hsp70-Interacting Protein Promotes Met Receptor Degradation  Kang Won Jang, PhD, Jeong Eun Lee, MD, Sun Young Kim, MD, Min-Woong Kang,
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (August 2017)
Transdifferentiation of Melanoma Cells by the Reprogramming Factors Attenuates Malignant Nature In Vitro and In Vivo  Mikiro Takaishi, Shigetoshi Sano 
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (November 2012)
Meghal Gandhi, Vérane Achard, Laurent Blanchoin, Bruce L. Goode 
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Spleen Tyrosine Kinase Mediates EGFR Signaling to Regulate Keratinocyte Terminal Differentiation  Nan-Lin Wu, Duen-Yi Huang, Li-Fang Wang, Reiji Kannagi,
Collagen XVII Shedding Suppresses Re-Epithelialization by Directing Keratinocyte Migration and Dampening mTOR Signaling  Joanna Jacków, Stefanie Löffek,
Novel Heparan Sulfate Mimetic Compounds as Antitumor Agents
Pralay Majumder, George Aranjuez, Joseph Amick, Jocelyn A. McDonald 
Volume 152, Issue 1, Pages (January 2019)
Marie-Thérèse Leccia  Journal of Investigative Dermatology 
Volume 18, Issue 19, Pages (October 2008)
Activin-βA Signaling Is Required for Zebrafish Fin Regeneration
Activated Mutant NRasQ61K Drives Aberrant Melanocyte Signaling, Survival, and Invasiveness via a Rac1-Dependent Mechanism  Ang Li, Yafeng Ma, Meng Jin,
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
TWEAK/Fn14 Signals Mediate Burn Wound Repair
Boyd Butler, John A. Cooper  Current Biology 
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (February 2009)
A Molecular Pathway for Myosin II Recruitment to Stress Fibers
The Formin FMNL3 Controls Early Apical Specification in Endothelial Cells by Regulating the Polarized Trafficking of Podocalyxin  Mark Richards, Clare.
Volume 19, Issue 13, Pages (July 2009)
The Timing of Midzone Stabilization during Cytokinesis Depends on Myosin II Activity and an Interaction between INCENP and Actin  Jennifer Landino, Ryoma.
Volume 23, Issue 21, Pages (November 2013)
Li Xu, Anthony Bretscher  Current Biology 
Volume 16, Issue 24, Pages (December 2006)
Septins Regulate Actin Organization and Cell-Cycle Arrest through Nuclear Accumulation of NCK Mediated by SOCS7  Brandon E. Kremer, Laura A. Adang, Ian.
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (November 2014)
Myosin-IXA Regulates Collective Epithelial Cell Migration by Targeting RhoGAP Activity to Cell-Cell Junctions  Tatiana Omelchenko, Alan Hall  Current.
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 16, Issue 14, Pages (July 2006)
Sara K. Donnelly, Ina Weisswange, Markus Zettl, Michael Way 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Integrin-β4–TNS4–Focal Adhesion Kinase Signaling Mediates Keratinocyte Proliferation in Human Skin  Eun Young Seo, Seon-Pil Jin, Yeon Kyung Kim, Hanon.
Kinesin-5 Is Essential for Growth-Cone Turning
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
TAK1 Is Required for Dermal Wound Healing and Homeostasis
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Regulation of LKB1/STRAD Localization and Function by E-Cadherin
Volume 15, Issue 14, Pages (July 2005)
HURP Is Part of a Ran-Dependent Complex Involved in Spindle Formation
Extracellular Matrix Rigidity Promotes Invadopodia Activity
Twist1-Induced Invadopodia Formation Promotes Tumor Metastasis
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (June 2013)
The Angiogenesis Inhibitor Vasostatin does not Impair Wound Healing at Tumor- Inhibiting Doses  Bernhard Lange-Asschenfeldt, Paula Velasco, Michael Streit,
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (June 2010)
MT1-MMP-Dependent Invasion Is Regulated by TI-VAMP/VAMP7
Differential Roles of WAVE1 and WAVE2 in Dorsal and Peripheral Ruffle Formation for Fibroblast Cell Migration  Shiro Suetsugu, Daisuke Yamazaki, Shusaku.
Volume 16, Issue 15, Pages (August 2006)
Presentation transcript:

Loss of Scar/WAVE Complex Promotes N-WASP- and FAK-Dependent Invasion Haoran Tang, Ang Li, Jing Bi, Douwe M. Veltman, Tobias Zech, Heather J. Spence, Xinzi Yu, Paul Timpson, Robert H. Insall, Margaret C. Frame, Laura M. Machesky  Current Biology  Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 107-117 (January 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.11.059 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Current Biology 2013 23, 107-117DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.11.059) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 WRC-Depleted A431 Cells Show Loss of WRC and Spreading Defects (A) Blue native PAGE blot probed with anti-HSPC300 showing total WRC. Numbers indicate relative level of remaining complex. (B) Stable knockdown cells in differential interference contrast (DIC) and accompanying total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) images with F-actin (phalloidin). Scale bar represents 30 μm. (C) Cell spreading on collagen-coated glass dishes. Scale bar represents 10 μm. (D) Cell area was measured in four cells from four independent movies per cell line. Relative cell size reflects the size at the indicated time divided by the size at t = 0. (Data points are means ± SD, n = 4. Curves are fitted with nonlinear regression.) See also Figure S1. Current Biology 2013 23, 107-117DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.11.059) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Loss of WRC Components Promotes Invasion of A431 Cells In all panels, shCtl indicates nontargeting control; shNap1 or shSra1 indicates WRC subunit knockdown. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of cells invading into collagen gel in a 3D organotypic assay. Scale bar represents 100 μm. (B) Relative invasion distance from (A). (Data are means ± SEM, n = 24 images, three independent assays, ∗∗p < 0.01.) (C) Relative area of invading cells per field from (A). (Data are means ± SEM, n = 5 images, three independent assays, ∗∗p < 0.01.) (D) Phase-contrast images from 3D collagen-gel invasion assay. Scale bar represents 100 μm. (E and F) Relative invasion distance (E) and the relative area (F) of invading cells per field from (D). (Data are means ± SEM, n = 9 images from three independent assays, ∗∗p < 0.01.) (G) Wound healing assay. Scale bar represents 200 μm. (H) Relative area of wound closure. (Means ± SD, n = 3 independent samples, ∗∗p < 0.01.) (I) Matrigel invasion assay. Scale bar represents 200 μm. (J) Quantification of (I). (Means ± SD, n = 8 independent samples, ∗∗p < 0.01.) (K) Metalloprotease dependence of Matrigel invasion assay (Means ± SD, n = 9 independent samples, ∗∗p < 0.01.) See also Figure S2. Current Biology 2013 23, 107-117DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.11.059) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 WRC Depletion from A431 Cells Enhances Arp2/3 Complex/N-WASP-Dependent Invasion (A), (E), (F), and (H) show thick collagen invasion assay, and (B) and (K) show 3D collagen invasion assay (Experimental Procedures). (A) Control and WRC-depleted invading cells expressing p21-Arc-GFP (Arp2/3, green) and stained with rhodamine phalloidin (actin, red). Scale bar represents 10 μm. (B) Phase-contrast images of Nap1 and Sra1 knockdown cells with nontargeting siRNA (siNT) sip34, p34-Arc Arp2/3 complex. Scale bar represents 100 μm. (C and D) Quantification of invasion. (Means ± SD, n = 12 images from three independent assays, ∗p = not significant, ∗∗p < 0.01.) (E) Confocal images of endogenous N-WASP (blue) and Arp2/3 complex (p21-Arc-GFP, green) and F-actin (rhodamine phalloidin, red). Scale bar represents 10 μm. (F) Confocal images of GFP (green), endogenous N-WASP (blue), and filamentous actin (rhodamine phalloidin, red) in WRC-depleted cells. Scale bar represents 10 μm. (G) Levels of F-actin, Arp2/3, or N-WASP in Nap1- and Sra1-depleted cells from (E). (Means ± SD, n = 10 cells, ∗∗p < 0.01.) (H) Confocal images of Nap1 and Sra1 stable knockdown cells treated with control siRNAs (siNT) and N-WASP siRNA during invasion. Scale bar represents 10 μm. (I and J) Quantification of actin and Arp2/3 in pseudopods from (H). (Means ± SD, n = 5 cells, ∗∗p < 0.01.) (K) Phase-contrast images of invading Nap1 and Sra1 stable knockdown cells after control siRNA or siN-WASP. Scale bar represents 100 μm. (L and M) Relative invasion distance (L) or area (M) of invading cells per field from (K). (Means ± SEM, n = 12 images n = 3 assays, ∗p = not significant, ∗∗p < 0.01.) See also Figures S2 and S3. Current Biology 2013 23, 107-117DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.11.059) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Increased Active FAK Contributes to Invasion of WRC Knockdown A431 Cells (A) shows 3D collagen-gel invasion assay, and (D), (E), and (G) show thick collagen-gel invasion assay (Experimental Procedures). (A) Invading Nap1 and Sra1 stable knockdown cells were treated with FAK siRNA. Scale bar represents 100 μm. (B and C) Relative invasion distance (B) and area of (C) invading cells per field. (Means ± SEM, n = 12 images, three independent assays, ∗p = not significant, ∗∗p < 0.01.) (D) Confocal images of GFP-N-WASP-expressing cells with actin (red, rhodamine phalloidin) and pY397FAK antibody (blue). Scale bar represents 10 μm. (E) Confocal images of p21-Arc-GFP (green)-expressing shNap1 and shSra1 cells with FAK or NT siRNAs with actin (red) and N-WASP antibody (blue). Scale bar represents 10 μm. (F) Relative intensity of filamentous actin, GFP-N-WASP, and pY397FAK from (E). (Means ± SD, n = 6 cells, ∗∗p < 0.01.) (G–I) FAK depletion reduced N-WASP-, Arp2/3 (p21-Arc-GFP)-, and actin-relative fluorescence intensity compared to NT. (Data are shown as means ± SD, n = 6 cells, ∗∗p < 0.01.) See also Figure S4. Current Biology 2013 23, 107-117DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.11.059) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 FAK Kinase Activity Contributes to N-WASP Localization in WRC-Depleted A431 Cells (A)–(D), (I), and (J) show thick collagen-gel invasion assays, and (F) shows 3D collagen invasion assay (Experimental Procedures). (A) Control cells treated with vehicle (DMSO) or 1 μM FAK inhibitor with actin (red) and N-WASP antibody (green). Scale bar represents 10 μm. (B) Cells as in (A) but with control siRNA (siNT) or FAK siRNA (siFAK). Scale bar represents 10 μm. (C and D) Nap1 and Sra1 stable knockdown cells with DMSO or 1 μM FAK inhibitor. Scale bar represents 10 μm. (E) FAK inhibitor reduced N-WASP-relative fluorescence intensity compared to DMSO control. (Means ± SD, n = 5 cells, ∗∗p < 0.01.) (F) Invading Nap1 and Sra1 stable knockdown cells were treated with FAK inhibitor. Scale bar represents 100 μm. (G and H) Relative invasion distance (G) and the relative area (H) of invading cells per field. (Data are means ± SEM, n = 10 images, three independent assays, ∗p = not significant, ∗∗p < 0.01.) (I and J) Control and WRC-depleted cells expressing GFP-Y256F N-WASP (I) (green) or GFP-Y256D N-WASP (J) (green) and stained with rhodamine phalloidin (filamentous actin, red). Scale bar represents 10 μm. See also Figure S5. Current Biology 2013 23, 107-117DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.11.059) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Loss of WRC in hTERT-RPE1 Cells Promotes Matrix Degradation through FAK-Dependent Degradative Focal Adhesions (A and B) Cells were treated with control siRNA (siNT), Nap1 siRNA (siNap1), and Sra1 siRNA (siSra1) (A) or FAK siRNA (siFAK) (B), as indicated, and were subjected to fluorescent gelatin-degradation assay. Confocal images show fluorescent gelatin (green), F-actin (rhodamine phalloidin, red), and α-actinin (anti- α-actinin, blue). Scale bar represents 10 μm. (C) Percentage of cells with degradative focal adhesions. (Means ± SD, n = 3 independent assays, ∗∗p < 0.01.) (D) Relative area of degradation per cell. (Means ± SD, n = 57, ∗∗p < 0.01.) See also Figure S6. Current Biology 2013 23, 107-117DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.11.059) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 WRC Knockdown Enhances A431 Cell Transformation In Vitro and Tumorigenesis In Vivo (A) Colonies formed by shCtl, shNap1, and shSra1 cells in soft agarose assay in the presence of FAK inhibitor (1 μM) or DMSO (vehicle). Scale bars represent 400 μm. (B) Colony size from (A). (Means ± SD, n = 30, ∗∗p < 0.01.) (C) Colony number from (A). (Means ± SD, n = 3, ∗∗p < 0.01.) (D) FAK dependence of colony formation in shCtl, shNap1, and shSra1 cells treated with siNT or siFAK. Scale bar represents 400 μm. (E) Colony size from (D). (Means ± SEM, n = 30, ∗∗p < 0.01.) (F) Growth curves on standard tissue culture dishes, as indicated. (Means ± SD at each time point, n = 3.) (G) Survival (time to tumor reaching 1.4 cm) curve of subcutaneously injected nude mice (p < 0.01, log rank test for trend). (H) Immunohistochemistry of representative tumor sections with pY397FAK antibody, as indicated. Scale bar represents 120 μm. See also Figure S7. Current Biology 2013 23, 107-117DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.11.059) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions