Catherine Beswick University of Nottingham April 2019

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Missing Link: adding scholarship to university preparation courses Olwyn Alexander and Sue Argent.
Advertisements

Christopher Graham Garnet Education UK. I dont do rhetorical questions !
The 21st Century Context for
Team Teaching Section 2: Traditional Team Teaching.
Academic Writing and Critical Thinking some ideas for the classroom Christopher Graham Russia, November 2013.
Planning for Continuing Professional Development – A Whole School Approach A step by step guide to planning CPD including a framework for Teacher Induction.
UNIVERSITY OF HUDDERSFIELD SUPPORTING PRE-SERVICE TRAINEES ON PLACEMENT Pre-service Mentor Training 2011.
Alex Ding SCHOLARLY ACTIVITY. Scholarly activity now – Why? What does it mean to teach (EAP) at a (Russell Group) university? (EAP at a private language.
Alessio Peluso 1 Critical evaluation of the module ‘Introduction to Engineering Thermo Fluid Dynamics’ First Steps in Learning and Teaching in Higher Education.
Professional Learning Community at DESC Lead Meet 24 th February 2015.
Addressing quality assurance and professional development for online teachers Kirsteen Donaghy.
Fdtl5 FDTL5 project V-ResORT : A Virtual Resource for Online Research Training.
How to evaluate the impact of CPD? 28 th April 2016.
Footer to be inserted here 1 ASSESSMENT of REFLECTION in Participation Units Theresa Winchester-Seeto & Marina Harvey with Debra Coulson & Jacqueline Mackaway.
Rethinking partnership in initial teacher education – developing professional identities for a new subject specialist team which includes a joint school-university.
Prof. Carol Evans University of Southampton
“Biology Microbial Diversity”
My research questions What are academics’ perceptions of the influences on their curriculum decisions? What are the drivers that support and inhibit.
Delivering outstanding professional development for teaching
Louise Greener Durham University English Language Centre
Skills by stealth Introducing academic culture to low level
How can we facilitate and encourage research in EAP Teaching Centres?
Staff meeting Monday 20th February 2017
Support for English, maths and ESOL Module 12d: Developing functional mathematics with vocational learners - training the trainers.
Integrating an ESAP component into an EGAP course. BALEAP 2017 Bristol
LSRN Discussion Workshop: 24 November 2016
UCL Peer Dialogue Scheme
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
Business Case Analysis
Olwyn Alexander & Sue Argent
Addressing student expectations and building confidence through a pre-arrival activity. Amanda Zacharopoulou Ulster Law School.
Assessment and Feedback – Module 1
The University of the Future: Preparing for Curriculum Refresh
NQT Mentor and Tutor Seminar
“Embracing the Future”
What are the impact of changes to lesson observation and feedback processes on teachers’ attitudes and practice? Why this? The new process. What did we.
Academic writing for researchers
The TEAP Portfolio Award and the EAP Teacher Competencies
Dr Anna Stodter FST Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
TALIF Research Project – University of Essex BALEAP PIM at Edinburgh
Implementing Research-Informed Assessment Feedback Practice
Mentoring: from Teacher Candidate to Successful Intern
Appropriate Use of Formative Assessment in a Lecture-Based Course
Aurora Briefing for participants 2018 to 2019
Deep Dive: Writing Intensive, Service Learning, First Year Experience
I stand at the edge of the fertile soil
The role of a Head of Department
Of 20.
Working Together WORKSHOP 4
Professional Tutor Conference 20th September 2018
Working Together workshop 4
Meeting the challenge of teaching research methods online Findings from the Pedagogy of Methodological Learning study Debbie Collins.
You have been imagining yourself in scenarios in schools
Opportunity Nottingham in partnership with NCVS
Kevan MA Gartland Special Advisor & Professor of Biological Sciences
TEACHNG AWARDS 2019 BRIEFING SESSION
TEACHNG AWARDS 2018 BRIEFING SESSION
Caroline Fletcher Innovations in developing teacher assessment literacy: A scholarship circle model Caroline Fletcher
Improving Feedback to Learners & Reducing Teacher Workload Summary Report February 2019 Project Sponsor ERW Consortia Project Team: Gwyn Pleming GwE.
Preparing for Learning and Teaching at Oxford (PLTO)
How can we teach effectively?
Maximising your progress on your professional placements
Inductions on PS Courses: their role in preparing & developing tutors
Experiencing Principles in Practice
What works to enhance students' transition into HE
RBWM SCITT Mentor Meetings 2017.
Workshop Set-Up: The aim is that at each table we have a variety of disciplines / subjects represented by (ideally) four participants. Ensure a mixture.
High quality CPD for Early Career Teachers
Foundation Degree in Supporting Teaching and Learning – Level 5
Presentation transcript:

Catherine Beswick University of Nottingham April 2019 Information overload to knowledge development: transforming tutor induction on a summer presessional Catherine Beswick University of Nottingham April 2019

Outline CELE Online Tutor Induction (OTI) Feedback from tutors & coordinators Challenges for tutors new to EAP Potential of the Online Tutor Induction Where next?

Our process: CELE Online Tutor Induction Initial aims: To provide timely support and information for tutors To provide support for course coordinators – information in one place To improve student learning and the student experience (through better preparation and support for staff)

Feedback from tutors & coordinators Key successes Overall feedback was overwhelmingly positive Tasks very useful Sections very useful Impact on the face to face (f2f) induction - discussion, debate, engagement, community building Provided practical suggestions for improvements for 2019 “puts EAP into context” “an early entrance into rethinking as part of a team” “a good flavour of the course which could then be supplemented at the face-to-face induction” “used to ‘ease’ into the programme” “very useful! Great discussion in face to face induction“ “really helpful insights” “led to some productive discussion in the face-to-face induction” “not being overloaded with too much info all at once” “Good- thought provoking” “tutors were prepared to discuss key areas and many questions were already answered”

Feedback from tutors & coordinators Suggested areas for review/development Navigation Navigation and links Content organisation and signposting of tasks Content Clarity of tasks More examples! Content on reflection Develop EAP theory section More explicit links between sections Number of compulsory tasks Timing of tasks Tutors not completing tasks prior to f2f induction Task priority Face to face induction Integration of OTI & f2f inductions Returning tutors Different focus for returning tutors

Tutors new to EAP EAP Practitioners “often enter the field initially by being employed on temporary contracts, such as on the large summer pre-sessional courses in the United Kingdom” (Ding & Bruce 2017:105) 13 out of 38 tutors had 0-2 years EAP experience (8 had no previous EAP experience prior to joining) Most time spent on: aims, outcomes and methodology sample lesson and materials teaching EAP assessment

Key challenges for tutors new to EAP Alexander (2010), Post (2010), and Campion (2016) reported key challenges for new EAP teachers as: Understanding what EAP involves Understanding how EAP and ELT differ Understanding EAP materials Understanding student needs in the disciplines Delivery – making it relevant, authentic and interesting Teaching critical thinking Personal insecurities

Addressing these challenges Information: clearer, more detailed information about what the role might involve Collaboration: talking to other teachers, asking questions, peer observation, sharing practice (but issues of heavy workload) Ongoing development process: “opportunities for longer- term, on-going development initiatives are what teachers find to be most valuable” (Ding & Campion 2016: 552) Campion 2016, Ding and Bruce 2017, Ding and Campion 2016, Alexander 2010, Post 2010

Potential of the Online Tutor Induction CONTENT AND CONTEXT Authentic EAP content and context Video(s) of EAP teaching Materials – video and through task Feedback on written work Assessment – student examples and marking criteria Tutorial scenarios Information Practical Theoretical Tasks – provide opportunity to: Engage more deeply with content Reflect and form questions Learn by doing Prepare for f2f induction ACCESSIBILITY AND TIME Self access – manage own time and time-zone Website Opportunity to revisit, dip in and out Authentic EAP content and context Engagement Control Autonomy REDUCE CHALLENGES FOR NEW EAP TUTORS Understanding what EAP involves Understanding how EAP and ELT differ Understanding EAP materials Understanding student needs in the disciplines Delivery – making it relevant, authentic and interesting Teaching critical thinking Personal insecurities IMPACT on F2F INDUCTION Saves time Resource Creates space for: discussion, debate, sharing practice, community building Collaboration Discussion

Ongoing development of tutors Online Tutor Induction Face to Face induction Professional development sessions Tutor observations Tutor appraisal Peer observations Mentoring Collaboration

Where next? Context – growth of summer presessional courses Investing in and developing our tutors – particularly those entering the field of EAP Development as beyond ‘information-giving’ in a short induction Questions for you What do other institutions provide by way of induction? Is an online tutor induction a positive way forward? What are we missing? Could it work in your institutions? Alternatives? Thoughts, suggestions, critical comments

References Alexander, O. (2010). The Leap into EAP: the role of the BALEAP competency framework in the professional development of new EAP teachers. Retrieved from: http://www.uefap.com/baleap/teap/oa_bilkent.pdf 28/9/18 BALEAP (2008). Competency Framework for Teachers of English for Academic Purposes. Retrieved from http://www.baleap.org.uk/teap/teap­competency­framework.pdf 28/9/18 BALEAP (2014). The BALEAP TEAP Scheme 2014. Retrieved from: https://www.baleap.org/wp- content/uploads/2016/04/TEAP-Scheme-Handbook-2014.pdf 2/4/19 Campion, G. (2016). ‘The learning never ends’: Exploring teachers’ views on the transition from General English to EAP. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, Volume 23, September 2016, P59-70 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.06.003 Ding, A., and Bruce, I. (2017). The English for Academic Purposes Practitioner: Operating on the Edge of Academia. London: Palgrave Macmillan Ding, A., and Campion, G. (2016). EAP Teacher Development in Hyland, K., Shaw, P. (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes. London: Routledge. Post, D. (2010). The transition from teaching General English to English for academic purposes: An investigation into the challenges encountered by teachers. Bath, The University of Bath