The Role of the High Court in interpreting the Constitution

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DP 9: THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ONE HIGH COURT CASE RELATING TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION OF RIGHTS IN AUSTRALIA DP 10: AUSTRALIA’S CONSTITUTIONAL APPROACH.
Advertisements

AREA of STUDY 1 (DP 7) and AOS 2 (DP 1)
Unit 3 AoS 3 Revision DP 5: Strengths and weaknesses of law making through the courts DP 6: The relationship between parliament and the courts in law making.
AoS 2, Unit 3 Legal Studies DP 3, 4: The process of change by referendum under Section 128 of the Commonwealth Constitution and factors affecting its likely.
Revision – AREA OF STUDY 1 PARLIAMENT AND THE CITIZEN
Unit 3 AoS 2 Revision DP 5: The role of the High Court in interpreting the Commonwealth Constitution DP 6: The significance of two High Court cases involving.
DP 7: THE CAPACITY OF THE STATES TO REFER LAW MAKING POWER TO THE COMMONWEALTH PARLIAMENT Unit 3 AoS 2 Legal Studies revision.
Facts of the case: In 1974 Australia ratified (supported) a world wide treaty (with UNESCO) to protect sites for cultural and heritage purposes; to ‘ensuring.
Changing the balance of power Wednesday 18 April.
The role of the High Court in interpreting the Constitution
CHANGING THE CONSTITUTION
The Doctrine of Precedent
The Impact of Landmark Decisions made by the High Court P&L Year 12.
What are the key features of the US political system?
Comparison between Australian and South African Approaches
Unit 3- Outcome 1- Parliament and the Citizen
PROTECTION OF RIGHTS.
The role of the High Court in interpreting the Constitution
Division of Law-making powers Changing The Constitution
A bit of revision.
Evaluation of Law-Making Through Courts. Evaluation The main role of the courts is to resolve disputes. Precedent develops as judges reach decisions in.
THE ROLE OF THE FEDERAL COURTS Introduction to the Judicial Branch of the United States Government.
{ Quiz Time Thursday 11 April  In the Cwlth Parliament, the role of the States’ House is performed by the:  House of Representatives  Senate.
Methods of Judicial Interpretation Legalism and Activism.
UNIT 3: AOS 2 The three main ways (means) in which the Australian Constitution protects human rights.
Preparing for SAC 2B Monday 27 May Focus your revision on…  Restrictions on the power of the Commonwealth and the State Parliaments  The role.
Judges and the judiciary — eg role of judiciary (adjudicating the meaning of law, presiding over the courts, sitting on government bodies). Relationship.
+ High Court & Family Court The Federal Courts. + Federal Courts The Federal courts include; - High Court - Federal Court - Family Court - Federal Magistrates’
 Many laws were “common law” (unwritten and thought to be understood)  Many rights were abused during WWII, so after the War, rights were written down.
High Court Decisions And The Balance of Power. 1. Section 75 of the Constitution gives the Commonwealth the jurisdiction (power) to hear all cases which.
Federalism Legal Studies 3C.
Ability of judges to make law.
Key knowledge: the capacity of the states to refer law-making power to the Commonwealth Parliament Key Skills: explain the methods and processes of changing.
Democracy and Constitutions Texas Constitutions p
Comparative Approaches to Protection of Human Rights.
2013 U3AOS2B SAC responses. Describe how one principle established by the Commonwealth Constitution provides structural protection of rights (2 marks)
Institutional Aspects of the Parliamentary System Presentation by Douglas Millar, formerly Clerk Assistant and Director General of Chamber and Committee.
THE OAKES TEST 1. “….protects rights by ensuring that the government cannot limit rights without justification. Also, the Charter’s rights are not absolute.
THE ROLE OF THE HIGH COURT IN INTERPRETING THE CONSTITUTION AND REFERRAL OF POWERS.
U3O2: PART A LEGAL STUDIES. ROLE OF THE CONSTITUTION  The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution act 1900, which came in to force on 1 January 1901;
STATUTORY INTERPRETATION. STATUTORY INTERPRETATION? What is it?  Process where judges interpret the words or phrases in an act of parliament, in order.
High Court Interpretation of the Constitution The High Court was established through _________ of the Constitution. It obtains its jurisdiction from s.75.
Civics and Citizenship.  Courts deal with different types of disputes depending upon the jurisdiction they are provided with by parliament.  The most.
USA: US Supreme Court and civil rights Key terms
Federation and the Constitution – The Division of Powers
What work you owe me for 5 weekly checks
The Role of the High Court
Commercial & Property Law
Referral of Powers.
The Australian Constitution
Unchallenged Legislation
Decentralization Faculty Of Law- Constitutional Law.
Factors affecting the likely success of referenda
1. What are the two basic categories of laws?
A Comparison of Canadian and United States Democracies
Democracy: Principles of liberalism
The Tasmanian Dams Case
The Three Branches of Government Chap. 3, Sec. 2
The relationship between parliament and the courts
Constitutional Protection of Human Rights
COURTS JUDGE-MADE LAW.
COURTS VS PARLIAMENT.
COURTS JUDGE-MADE LAW.
The Judiciary Branch.
Individual Rights and the Common Good Outcome 14
High Court Interpretation of the Constitution
Evaluation of the courts as law-makers
How the Federal Gov’t Works: The Judicial Branch
The Role of the Courts in Law-Making
Separation of Powers (Balance of powers)
Presentation transcript:

The Role of the High Court in interpreting the Constitution The Constitution sets up the High Court, giving it powers to decide disputes about the meaning of the constitution.

Role of the High Court in interpreting the Constitution S.76 of the constitution states that the High Court is the only court with the power to interpret the wording of the constitution and it can only do this when a dispute or case regarding the constitution is brought before it. In doing so, through its interpretation of the constitution in the adjudication of such disputes it has shifted the balance of power more towards the commonwealth and away from the states.

To act as a guardian of the Constitution Does this by interpreting and giving meaning to the words and applying them to everyday situations.

To keep the constitution up to date Needs to be kept up to date as community values, standards of technology for example, change. The high court needs to interpret words of the constitution in a way that keeps them relevant to society. For example, The Brislan case

To act as a check and balance of injustices Injustices or abuses of power may arise by either State or Commonwealth Parliaments. An individual or group can bring a case to the high court if they believe a law is unconstitutional however, this is very expensive.

To give meaning to the words of the constitution. The high court must apply this meaning to everyday situations to ensure it is kept up to date and people have a higher understanding of the wording. Interpretations are seen in many areas including; the powers of the Commonwealth Parliament in relation to external affairs; the financial relationships between the Commonwealth and state government; and the implied right of political freedom.

High court approaches to the constitution The high court has a greater impact than a referenda when it comes to altering Parliament’s law making capacity. Cases usually arise when Parliament passes a law that is considered outside of its area of law making power (ultra vires) Through its interpretation of the constitution in the adjudication of such disputes, it has become less concerned with preserving the states powers.

Strengths Keeps the constitution relevant to changes in society. High court judge are constitutional experts The High court acts as guardians meaning they protect it, not change it.

Weaknesses High Court tends to favour the Commonwealth Parliament High Court judges tend to be conservative and may not reflect the views of society They cannot change the wording of the Constitution.