Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

How American Elections Work LO 10.1 How American Elections Work Lecture Outline How American Elections Work Some unique American electoral features. Unlike most other democracies, the United States has three kinds of elections: those which select party nominees, those which select officeholders from among the nominees, and those in which voters engage in making or ratifying legislation. Elections held for the purpose of picking party nominees are called primaries. The initiative petition enables voters in 23 states to place proposed legislation on the ballot if they gather the required number of signatures on a petition (usually a number equaling 10 percent of the voters in the previous election). The referendum is a form of direct legislation in which voters are given the chance to approve or disapprove some legislative act (such as school bonds) or constitutional amendment. Three Kinds of Elections Primary elections – Voters select party nominees. General elections – Between the nominees of the parties. Elections on specific policy questions – Voters make (initiative petition) or ratify (referendum) legislation. To Learning Objectives

LO 10.1 To Learning Objectives LO 10.1 Image: One of the most controversial propositions on any state ballot in 2008 was California’s Proposition 8 regarding the state’s definition of marriage. To Learning Objectives Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

A Tale of Three Elections LO 10.2 A Tale of Three Elections Lecture Outline 1800: The First Electoral Transition of Power In 1800, there were no primaries, no nominating conventions, no candidate speeches, and no entourage of reporters. Both incumbent President John Adams and challenger Thomas Jefferson were nominated by their parties’ elected representatives in Congress (caucuses). Once nominated, the candidates did not campaign; they let their state and local organizations promote their causes. The focus of the campaign was on state legislatures (not the voters), which had the responsibility for choosing members of the electoral college. Most newspapers of that time were openly partisan and made no attempt to be objective. The election was thrown into the House of Representatives through an error when all of Jefferson’s electors also voted for Aaron Burr. At that period of history, each elector cast two ballots; the winner would be president and the runner-up would be named vice president. The result in 1800 was a tie vote, and the Federalist-controlled House of Representatives took 36 ballots before electing Thomas Jefferson. The transition from Adams to Jefferson marked the first peaceful transfer of power between parties via the electoral process in the history of the world. 1800: The First Electoral Transition of Power No primaries, conventions, or speeches. Campaigns focused not on voters but on state legislatures who chose electors. After many votes in the House, the presidency was transferred to Jefferson peacefully. To Learning Objectives

A Tale of Three Elections LO 10.2 A Tale of Three Elections Lecture Outline 1896: A Bitter Fight Over Economic Interests By 1896, national nominating conventions had become well established. The election was fought primarily over economics. Bryan broke with tradition and actively campaigned in person, traveling through 26 states. McKinley ran a front-porch campaign from his home in Ohio, and managed to label the Democrats as the party of depression. The Republicans won overwhelmingly in the industrial Northeast and Midwest, and became firmly entrenched as the nation’s majority party for the next several decades. 1896: A Bitter Fight Over Economic Interests Democrats’ main issue was unlimited coinage of silver. Bryan won the Democratic Party nomination with speeches about the virtues of silver. McKinley won the election and the Republicans regained majority status. To Learning Objectives

LO 10.2 To Learning Objectives LO 10.2 Image: William Jennings Bryan was the Democratic Party’s standard bearer at the turn of the century. To Learning Objectives Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

A Tale of Three Elections LO 10.2 A Tale of Three Elections Lecture Outline 2008: An Election About Change As the fall campaign began, the race seemed to be shaping up as a close battle between Obama’s perceived advantages on economic issues and personal intelligence versus McCain’s perceived advantages on foreign policy issues and political experience. But then the nation’s agenda changed dramatically as a credit crisis rocked the financial markets in late September. McCain took an aggressive approach, even suspending his campaign in order to try to stitch together a congressional coalition to address the crisis. The people’s verdict in 2008, just as in 1800 and 1896, was that it was time for a change in Washington. Obama carried 53 percent of the popular vote, compared to 46 percent for McCain and 1 percent for third party candidates. As shown in Figure 10.1, this translated into a 365–173 margin in the Electoral College, with the Democrats winning nine states they had lost in 2004—Florida, Ohio, Indiana, Iowa, New Mexico, Colorado, Nevada, North Carolina, and Virginia. 2008: An Election About Change Obama’s main issue was changing the health care system to extend coverage to everyone. McCain’s main issue was making changes to improve the economy and the financial institutions. Obama won and became the 1st African-American president. To Learning Objectives

LO 10.2 To Learning Objectives Figure 10.1 The Electoral College Results for 2004 and 2008 To Learning Objectives Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Whether to Vote: A Citizen’s First Choice LO 10.3 Whether to Vote: A Citizen’s First Choice Lecture Outline Whether to Vote: A Citizen’s First Choice Nearly two centuries of American electoral history include greatly expanded suffrage (the right to vote). As the right to vote has been extended, proportionately fewer of those eligible have chosen to exercise that right. The highest turnout of the past 100 years was the 80 percent turnout in 1896; in 2004, 55 percent of the adult population voted for president. Suffrage The legal right to vote, in the United States gradually extended to virtually all citizens over the age of 18. To Learning Objectives

Whether to Vote: A Citizen’s First Choice LO 10.3 Whether to Vote: A Citizen’s First Choice Lecture Outline Deciding Whether to Vote One reason why many people vote is that they have a high sense of political efficacy— the belief that ordinary people can influence the government. Those who vote out of a sense of civic duty are people who vote simply to support democratic government (even if they are indifferent about the outcome). Deciding Whether to Vote Anthony Downs – People who see policy differences between the parties are more likely to vote. Political Efficacy – Belief that one’s vote does matter and can actually make a difference. Civic Duty – Belief that a citizen should vote to support democratic government. To Learning Objectives

LO 10.3 To Learning Objectives LO 10.3 Image: Although civic courses routinely stress that in a democracy every vote matters, elections for public office rarely hinge on a single vote or end up in a tie. To Learning Objectives Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Whether to Vote: A Citizen’s First Choice LO 10.3 Whether to Vote: A Citizen’s First Choice Lecture Outline Registering to Vote States adopted voter registration around the turn of the century, largely to prevent corruption associated with stuffing the ballot boxes. Registration procedures differ greatly from one state to another. States in the upper Great Plains and the Northwest make it easiest to register; there is no registration at all in North Dakota; and four states permit registration on election day. States in the South still face the most difficult forms of registration (and they also record lower voter turnout rates). This changed somewhat when the 1993 Motor Voter Act went into effect in 1996. The act requires states to permit people to register to vote at the same time citizens apply for driver’s licenses. The Motor Voter Act makes voter registration much easier by allowing eligible voters to simply check a box on their driver’s license application or renewal form. Registering to Vote Voter Registration – A system adopted by the states that requires voters to register prior to voting. Motor Voter Act – A 1993 act that requires states to permit people to register to vote when they apply for their driver’s license. To Learning Objectives

Whether to Vote: A Citizen’s First Choice LO 10.3 Whether to Vote: A Citizen’s First Choice Lecture Outline Who Votes? Voting is a class-biased activity. People with higher than average education and income levels have a higher rate of voting. This is the most important factor affecting turnout. Young people have the lowest turnout rate. Whites vote with greater frequency than members of minority groups (but Blacks and other minority groups with high levels of income and education have a higher turnout rate than Whites with comparable socioeconomic status). Who Votes? Education – People with a higher than average education vote more than people with less education. Age – Older people vote more than younger people. Race – Racial minorities are usually underrepresented among voters relative to their share of the citizenry. To Learning Objectives

Whether to Vote: A Citizen’s First Choice LO 10.3 Whether to Vote: A Citizen’s First Choice Lecture Outline Who Votes? Women are slightly more likely than men to vote. Married people are more likely to vote than unmarried people. Government employees have higher than average turnout levels. Who Votes? Gender – Women participate in elections more than men do. Marital status – Married people vote more than unmarried people. Government employment – Workers for the government vote more than people who have jobs in the in private sector. To Learning Objectives

LO 10.3 To Learning Objectives Table 10.1 Reported Turnout Rates for Groups of U.S. Citizens in 2008 To Learning Objectives Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Whether to Vote: A Citizen’s First Choice LO 10.3 Whether to Vote: A Citizen’s First Choice Lecture Outline Who Votes? The political consequences of class bias in turnout. Research suggests that some political outcomes would be different if there was no class bias in turnout. Politicians pay attention to groups with high levels of turnout, because their fate may be in their hands at the next election. Who Votes? Possessing several of these traits (being elderly, well educated, and married) adds significantly to one’s likelihood of voting. Conversely, being young, poorly educated, and single is likely to add up to a very low probability of voting. To Learning Objectives

How Americans Vote: Explaining Citizens’ Decisions LO 10.4 How Americans Vote: Explaining Citizens’ Decisions Lecture Outline How Americans Vote: Explaining Citizens’ Decisions Many journalists and politicians believe the winner of an election has a mandate from the people to carry out the policies he or she promised during the campaign. Mandate Theory of Elections The idea that the winning candidate has a mandate from the people to carry out his or her platforms and politics. Politicians like the theory better than political scientists do. Delegate vs. trustee model To Learning Objectives

How Americans Vote: Explaining Citizens’ Decisions LO 10.4 How Americans Vote: Explaining Citizens’ Decisions Lecture Outline Party Identification Because of the importance of party identification in deciding how to vote, the parties tended to rely on groups that lean heavily in their favor to form their basic coalition. With the emergence of television and candidate-centered politics, the hold of the party on the voter eroded substantially during the 1960s and 1970s, and then stabilized at a new and lower level during the 1980s. Scholars singled out party affiliation as the single best predictor of a voter’s decision in the 1950s. Voting along party lines is less common today, particularly in elections for the House of Representatives, where incumbency is now of paramount importance. Party Identification People still generally vote for a party that they agree with. Parties’ hold on voters declined in the 1960s and 1970s with rise of candidate-centered politics. Many floating voters make an individual voting decision and are up for grabs each election. To Learning Objectives

LO 10.4 To Learning Objectives Table 10.2 Changing Patterns in Voting Behavior: 1960 and 2008 Compared To Learning Objectives Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

How Americans Vote: Explaining Citizens’ Decisions LO 10.4 How Americans Vote: Explaining Citizens’ Decisions Lecture Outline Candidate Evaluations: How Americans See the Candidates Political psychologists Shawn Rosenberg and Patrick McCafferty show that it is possible to manipulate a candidate’s appearance in a way that affects voters’ choices (even by substituting a good picture for a bad one). Research by Miller, Wattenberg, and Malanchuk shows that the three most important components of candidate image are integrity, reliability, and competence. In 2000, George W. Bush scored higher than Al Gore in the dimension of integrity. Integrity is not enough; a candidate must also be seen as being reliable, i.e., dependable and decisive. George H. W. Bush’s image of reliability suffered when he broke his “no new taxes” pledge prior to the 1992 campaign. The personal traits most often mentioned by voters involve competence, i.e., experience, which is one of the reasons it is hard to beat an incumbent president. Candidate Evaluations: How Americans See the Candidates 3 most important dimensions of candidate image are integrity, reliability, and competence. Image plays a role in voting when a candidate is perceived to be incompetent or dishonest. To Learning Objectives

How Americans Vote: Explaining Citizens’ Decisions LO 10.4 How Americans Vote: Explaining Citizens’ Decisions Lecture Outline Policy Voting Policy voting occurs when people base their choices in an election on their own issue preferences. True policy voting can take place only when several conditions are met. Voters must have a clear view of their own policy positions. Voters must know where the candidates stand on policy issues. Voters must see a difference between candidates on these issues. Voters must actually cast a vote for the candidate whose policy positions coincide with their own. One recurrent problem is that candidates often decide that the best way to handle a controversial issue is to cloud their positions in rhetoric; both candidates may be deliberately ambiguous. The media also may not be helpful, as they typically focus more on the “horse race” aspects of the campaign than on the policy stands of the candidates. Although it is questionable whether voters are really much more sophisticated now about issues, policy voting has become somewhat easier than in the past. Today’s candidates are compelled to take clear stands to appeal to their own party’s primary voters. Thus, it is the electoral process that has changed rather than the voters. Policy Voting Electoral choices that are made on the basis of the voters’ policy preferences and where the candidates stand on policy issues. To Learning Objectives

The Last Battle: The Electoral College LO 10 The Last Battle: The Electoral College LO 10.5: Evaluate the fairness of the Electoral College system for choosing the president. Lecture Outline The Last Battle: The Electoral College It is the Electoral College vote rather than the popular vote that actually determines the outcome of the presidential election. Because the founders wanted the president to be selected by the nation’s elite—and not directly by the people—they created the electoral college. Political practice since 1828 has been for electors to vote for the candidate who won their state’s popular vote. Electoral College A unique American institution, created by the Constitution, providing for the selection of the president by electors. Less populated states are overrepresented. Winner-take-all concentrates campaigns on close states. To Learning Objectives Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

The Last Battle: The Electoral College LO 10.5 The Last Battle: The Electoral College Lecture Outline The Last Battle: The Electoral College Each state, according to the Constitution, has as many electoral votes as it has U.S. senators and representatives. Forty-eight out of the fifty states employ a winner-take-all system in which all their electors are awarded to the presidential candidate who wins the most votes statewide. In Maine and Nebraska, an elector is allocated for every congressional district won, and whoever wins the state as a whole wins the two electors allotted to the state for its senators. In 2008, Obama won the congressional district around Omaha, Nebraska, whereas McCain won the other two districts and the overall state vote. Therefore, Nebraska’s electoral vote ended up being split with four for McCain and one for Obama. Electors meet in their states in December, following the November election, and then mail their votes to the vice president (who is also president of the Senate). The vote is counted when the new congressional session opens in January and is reported by the vice president. If no candidate receives an Electoral College majority, then the election is thrown into the House of Representatives (1800 and 1824 elections), which must choose from among the top three electoral vote winners. How Electoral College Works Electoral votes for each state equals its members in Congress. 48 states use winner-take-all system (not Maine and Nebraska). State electors vote in December following the November election. January – Congress counts votes. House of Representatives picks president if no majority vote. To Learning Objectives

LO 10.5 To Learning Objectives LO 10.5 Image: Every four years, members of the Electoral College meet in their respective state capitols to cast the ballots that actually determine who will be president. To Learning Objectives Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

LO 10.5 To Learning Objectives Table 10.3 Presidential Vote in 2008 by State Representation in Electoral College To Learning Objectives Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

LO 10.5 To Learning Objectives LO 10.5 Image: The 2008 Battlegrounds Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

The Last Battle: The Electoral College LO 10.5 The Last Battle: The Electoral College Lecture Outline The Last Battle: The Electoral College The Electoral College is important to the presidential election for two reasons. First, it introduces a bias into the campaign and electoral process. Because each state gets two electors for its senators regardless of population, the less populated states are overrepresented. One of the key reasons that George W. Bush won the Electoral College vote in 2000 without winning the popular vote was that he did better in the less-populated states, as shown in Table 10.3. A second reason for the importance of the Electoral College is that the winner-take-all norm means candidates will necessarily focus on winning the states where the polls show that there appears to be a close contest. Important Electoral College The less populated states are overrepresented because states get 2 electors for the senators regardless of population. Winner-take-all means candidates will focus on winning the states where the polls show that there appears to be a close contest. To Learning Objectives