Specific DNA-RNA Hybrid Recognition by TAL Effectors

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages (October 2007)
Advertisements

Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (July 2002)
Volume 127, Issue 5, Pages (December 2006)
Structure of the Guanidine III Riboswitch
Structural Basis of DNA Recognition by p53 Tetramers
RNA Ligase Structures Reveal the Basis for RNA Specificity and Conformational Changes that Drive Ligation Forward  Jayakrishnan Nandakumar, Stewart Shuman,
Fulvia Bono, Judith Ebert, Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Cell 
Peter A. Meyer, Ping Ye, Mincheng Zhang, Man-Hee Suh, Jianhua Fu 
Volume 3, Issue 9, Pages (September 1995)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages (October 2007)
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Structure of the Replicating Complex of a Pol α Family DNA Polymerase
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Single-Stranded DNA Cleavage by Divergent CRISPR-Cas9 Enzymes
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
Crystal Structure of ARF1•Sec7 Complexed with Brefeldin A and Its Implications for the Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Mechanism  Elena Mossessova, Richard.
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (November 2004)
Structural Basis of DNA Loop Recognition by Endonuclease V
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Ryan C. Wilson, Janice D. Pata  Molecular Cell 
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Crystal Structure of PMM/PGM
Yanhui Xu, Yu Chen, Ping Zhang, Philip D. Jeffrey, Yigong Shi 
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Recognition of a TG Mismatch
Crystal Structure of a DinB Lesion Bypass DNA Polymerase Catalytic Fragment Reveals a Classic Polymerase Catalytic Domain  Bo-Lu Zhou, Janice D. Pata,
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Ryan C. Wilson, Meghan A. Jackson, Janice D. Pata  Structure 
Structural Insights into Ligand Recognition by a Sensing Domain of the Cooperative Glycine Riboswitch  Lili Huang, Alexander Serganov, Dinshaw J. Patel 
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Structural Roles of Monovalent Cations in the HDV Ribozyme
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001)
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Volume 66, Issue 5, Pages e3 (June 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Structure of an RNA Silencing Complex of the CRISPR-Cas Immune System
Crystal Structure of SRP19 in Complex with the S Domain of SRP RNA and Its Implication for the Assembly of the Signal Recognition Particle  Chris Oubridge,
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Structural Basis for Specificity in the Poxvirus Topoisomerase
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 127, Issue 2, Pages (October 2006)
Structure of BamHI Bound to Nonspecific DNA
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Crystal Structure of a Procaspase-7 Zymogen
Structural Basis of 3′ End RNA Recognition and Exoribonucleolytic Cleavage by an Exosome RNase PH Core  Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Molecular Cell 
Structural and Mechanistic Analysis of the Slx1-Slx4 Endonuclease
Crystal Structure of a Smad MH1 Domain Bound to DNA
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Building a Replisome from Interacting Pieces
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 126, Issue 4, Pages (August 2006)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (February 2014)
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Structure of the Mtb CarD/RNAP β-Lobes Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis of Interaction and Presents a Distinct DNA-Binding Domain for Mtb CarD  Gulcin.
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Specific DNA-RNA Hybrid Recognition by TAL Effectors Ping Yin, Dong Deng, Chuangye Yan, Xiaojing Pan, Jianzhong Jeff Xi, Nieng Yan, Yigong Shi  Cell Reports  Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages 707-713 (October 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.09.001 Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2012 2, 707-713DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2012.09.001) Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The TALE Repeats of dHax3 Specifically Recognize a DNA-RNA Hybrid (A) Only the forward DNA strand is in direct contact with the TALE repeats. Shown here is a schematic representation of the dHax3-dsDNA complex (Deng et al., 2012a). The forward and reverse DNA strands are colored gold and gray, respectively. The two residues in each repeat that contact the DNA phosphates are shown as yellow sticks. The RVD loops are colored red. See also Figure S1A. (B) dHax3 exhibits little binding for ssDNA. Details of EMSA are described in the Experimental Procedures. dHax3 concentrations were 0, 0.15, 0.44, 1.33, and 4 μM, respectively, in lanes 1–5 and 6–10. The probe concentration was approximately 4 nM in each lane. The same range of concentrations was applied to the assays in (C). See also Figure S1B. (C) dHax3 specifically recognizes the DNA-RNA hybrid with forward DNA strand (lanes 1–5). f, forward strand; r, reverse strand. dHax3 showed no apparent binding to the DNA-RNA hybrid with reverse DNA strand (lanes 6–10) or dsRNA (lanes 11–15). dHax3 displayed weak binding to ssRNA (lanes 16–20). The free ssRNA contains a major band and a minor band on the gel (lane 16)—most likely a consequence of secondary structure formation (because this ssRNA is homogeneous on denaturing PAGE gel). All structural figures were prepared with PyMol (DeLano, 2002). Cell Reports 2012 2, 707-713DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2012.09.001) Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Crystal Structure of the Complex between dHax3 and the DNA-RNA Hybrid The superhelical assembly of dHax3 (residues 231–720) binds to the major groove of the DNA-RNA hybrid. dHax3 contains 11.5 repeats. The flanking N- and C-terminal helices are shown in cyan. An enlarged view is shown on the right. Note that the 2′-hydroxyl groups of each nucleotide in the RNA strand, shown in red spheres, are located in the minor groove and away from the RVDs of TALE repeats. See also Figure S2, Figure S3, and Table S1. Cell Reports 2012 2, 707-713DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2012.09.001) Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 TALE Repeats Protect Specific DNA-RNA Hybrids from RNase H Degradation (A) The phosphodiester backbone of the RNA strand in the DNA-RNA hybrid is in close proximity to the TALE repeats. Shown are the recognition sequences of the DNA-RNA hybrid by dHax3. The nucleotide numbers in the DNA strand correspond to numbers labeled on the structure in the lower three panels. (B) dHax3 protects a specific DNA-RNA hybrid from RNase H degradation. Shown in the upper panel are sequences of the DNA-RNA hybrid. RNA is 32P-labeled at the 5′ end, indicated by a red asterisk. The final concentrations of dHax3 were 0.004, 0.015, 0.06, 0.25, 1, 4, and 16 μM, respectively, in lanes 4–10. BSA was added at a final concentration of 16 μM (lanes 11 and 12). “ladder T1” and “ladder A” refer to the cleavage of the ssRNA by RNase T1 and RNase A, respectively. (C) A designed TALE protein protects the 24 nt (excluding the base T at position 0) DNA-RNA hybrid from RNase H degradation. The final concentrations of TALE24 were 0.0004, 0.0015, 0.006, 0.025, 0.1, 0.4, and 1.6 μM, respectively, in lanes 4–10. See also Tables S3 and S5. Cell Reports 2012 2, 707-713DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2012.09.001) Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 A Designed TALE Protein Protects an HIV-Specific DNA-RNA Hybrid from RNase H Degradation The TALE protein, designated TALEHIV, contains 22.5 tandem repeats. TALEHIV efficiently protected against RNase H-mediated degradation of a DNA-RNA hybrid that mimics the HIV replication intermediate. The final concentrations of TALEHIV were 0.0004, 0.0015, 0.006, 0.025, 0.1, 0.4, and 1.6 μM, respectively, in lanes 4–10. BSA (lanes 11 and 12) and TALE24 (lanes 13 and 14) were added at a final concentration of 1.6 μM each. See also Tables S4 and S5. Cell Reports 2012 2, 707-713DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2012.09.001) Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure S1 The Designed TALE dHax3 Specifically Recognizes DNA Duplex, Related to Figure 1 (A) Structure of the dHax3-dsDNA complex reveals that the reverse strand has no direct contact with the TALE repeats. For visual clarity, only the backbones of dsDNA are shown. The residues in each TALE repeat that recognize the phosphates of the forward DNA strand are shown in yellow sticks. (B) The designed TALE dHax3 recognizes a specific DNA duplex, not a mutated dsDNA. The two DNA sequences used for EMSA are shown. The final concentrations of dHax3 were 0.008, 0.016, 0.031, 0.063, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 μM, respectively, in lanes 2-11 or lanes 13-22. Details of EMSA are described in Experimental Procedures. Cell Reports 2012 2, 707-713DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2012.09.001) Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure S2 The “OMIT” Electron Density Map Is Contoured at 3σ Level for the 2′-Hydroxyl Groups in RNA. Related to Figure 2 The “omit” electron density is shown as magenta mesh. A close-up view is shown on the right. Cell Reports 2012 2, 707-713DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2012.09.001) Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure S3 Structural Comparison between the dHax3-dsDNA complex and the dHax3-DNA-RNA complex. Related to Figure 2 (A) Comparison of the overall structures. The structure of dsDNA-bound dHax3 is colored gray for both protein and the DNA duplex. The structure of dHax3 bound to the DNA-RNA hybrid is colored blue. The DNA and RNA strands in the hybrid are colored orange and yellow, respectively. The same color scheme is applied to (B–E). (B) Structural comparison of the dsDNA- and DNA-RNA hybrid-bound dHax3. The two protein structures can be superimposed with an RMSD (root mean squared deviation) of 0.77 Å over 441 Cα atoms. (C) Structural comparison of the dHax-3 bound dsDNA and the DNA-RNA hybrid. (D) The forward DNA strands in the two structures adopt very similar conformations except for three nucleotides at the 3′-end. (E) A stereo view of the structural comparison of the reverse DNA and RNA strands in the two structures. Cell Reports 2012 2, 707-713DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2012.09.001) Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions