Sixes Elementary Data Overview

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oak Grove Elementary State of the School October 2008.
Advertisements

DRAFT ELP STANDARDS SURVEY RESULTS August Geographic Distribution of Respondents n = 49.
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
Norton Park Elementary Math Data Overview for 3 rd grade By: Amanda Gilbert.
Shannon Kewin EFD The Basics a. Terra Nova (TN) Test Score Results b. Wilson School Annual Report Card 2. Breakdown of scores (Reading) 3. Breakdown.
Center Elementary School February 2009 GAPSS Presentation.
Data Analysis of Sweetwater High School Presented by: LeLycia Henderson & Zorayda Delgado.
2013 CMT RESULTS (Connecticut Mastery Tests) Riverside School, Greenwich, CT.
 PLANNING FOR SUCCESS Real Strategies For Raising Student Achievement CLINTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.
Riverview Gardens Moline Elementary School School Progress Report September 11, 2012.
2008 CRCT Domain Summary Beecher Hills Elementary School Numbers Represent the Average % Correct in Each Domain SRT-1.
A CLOSER LOOK AT PINE LOG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL’S CRCT SCORES OVER THE LAST THREE YEARS A PRESENTATION BY JUDSON SMITH FOR THE FACULTY AND PARENTS OF PINE.
NORTH NEWTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DATA. SIP REVIEW EOY Reading Kindergarten: Goal 40% at end of 1 st Qtr. on TRC; actually ended at 50% at.
J. W. DOBBS ELEMENTARY DATA OVERVIEW FOURTH GRADE TEAM NOVEMBER 21, 2013.
 Any high stakes testing report  AMRT Reports  Science Assessments Today we will go over an ARMT report.
Addition Math Facts = 9. Addition Math Facts = 1 5.
SIP Reading Goal Our Reality: An average of 78% of the students met standard on the state reading assessment in Our SMART Goal: The average.
2009 Grade 3-8 Math Additional Slides 1. Math Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades The percentage of students.
A Closer Look at CRCT Data Comparing LaBelle, Cobb County School District, and State Data LaBelle Elementary (544 students enrolled) Intended use for.
Presented to West Manor Administration and Faculty By: Felicia Belcher April 16, 2014.
EXAMINING ‘THE CHARTER SCHOOL MIRACLE’ What the Data Shows Research conducted and charts below prepared by Boston Public School parent John Lerner, based.
5th Grade Campus Math Bee School Year.
5th Grade Math Bee Practice.
Remediation Report Bixby Middle School
2nd Grade Campus Math Bee.
4th Grade Campus Math Bee
4th Grade Math Bee Practice.
3rd Grade Math Bee Practice.
5th Grade Campus Math Bee
Nelson Elementary I will act in such a way that I will be proud of myself and others will be proud of me too. I came to school to learn and I WILL LEARN!
2nd Grade Campus Math Bee.
Math Facts.
4th Grade Campus Math Bee
State System of the.
3rd Grade Campus Math Bee School Year.
Schoolwide Planning Team Meeting
SPED SLAM Math/Sci.
School-Wide Achievement Mathematics
Hollydale Elementary Data Overview
Essential Skills Update Oregon State Board of Education March 8, 2012
Lauren Kinsella Dr. Wright ITEC 7305
Cross Creek Elementary Data Overview
Created by Jena Parish Austell Intermediate July 2011 School Faculty
SPED SLAM Math/Sci.
East Side Elementary Data Overview
Data overview Brookwood School November 13, 2016
Data Overview Sandtown Middle School
Addition Math Facts (Facts to 10, 15, & 20)
Central City Elementary School
Kindergarten Math Bee Practice.
BAS DATA.
4th Grade Campus Math Bee
Kinder Math Bee Addition Practice.
Kinder Campus Math Bee Skill: Addition Facts School Year.
5th Grade Math Bee Practice.
5th Grade Campus Math Bee School Year.
Willie J. Williams Middle School For Staff Use July 14, 2014
Board of Education Data Presentation
Data Overview Elementary School ~ Marietta, Georgia Michele Lowe
1st Grade Campus Math Bee School Year.
Data Overview April 2014 Sweetwater Elementary
Russell Elementary School By: Bridget Purdy April 2014
Ola High School 11/12/16 Ola High School Data Team
Findley Oaks Elementary Data Overview
Arthur Rann Elementary School Performance Report
Kindergarten Math Bee Practice.
SPED SLAM Math/Sci.
Donald e. cline elementary
Salem Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

Sixes Elementary Data Overview Deborah H. Oakes ITEC 7305 Data Analysis and School Improvement Summer, 2013

What's lurking in your data? Part 1: Demographic Data: Total Enrollment, Race/Ethnicity, & Free/Reduced Meals Part II: Sixes Elementary vs. Charter School CRCT Reading and Math Scores Part III: CRCT Reading and Math Scores Sixes, Cherokee, and State Part IV: Discussion What's lurking in your data? Overview

Part I: Demographic

Grade Levels, Number of Classes, and Student Enrollment Sixes Elementary 2012-2013 Grade Levels, Number of Classes, and Student Enrollment Grade Level Number of Classes Number of Students   Kindergarten 4 103 1st 108 2nd 6 139 3rd 157 4th 5 140 5th 174 Total   31 821

Sixes by Total Enrollment, Gender, & Race/Ethnicity

Total Enrollment: 821 Male: 425 Female: 396

Sixes Elementary School Free/Reduced Meals School Year Total Enrollment Free Reduced Total Meals Percentage 2012-2013 821 77 22 99 12.04% 2011-2012 916 76 18 94 10.60% 2010-2011 1,033 32 126 12.22%

Part II: CRCT Scores Reading & Math Sixes vs Part II: CRCT Scores Reading & Math Sixes vs. Charter 2011-2012 & 2012-2013

Part III: CRCT Scores: Reading and Math 2011-2013

CRCT Reading Scores Grades 3, 4, and 5 Sixes, Cherokee, & State SY 2011-2013

CRCT Math Scores Grades 3, 4, and 5 Sixes, Cherokee, & State SY 2011-2013

Part IV: Discussion Comments When you look at the data you do notice that enrollment has gone down the past three years, free/reduced meals have gone up, and the school is becoming more diversified. One of the reasons enrollment is down because of the Charter school opening in 2012. When comparing Sixes to the Charter School there is not much difference in CRCT scores, it does appear however, that Sixes does exceed in some areas. When comparing Sixes to Cherokee and the State, Sixes seems to be doing extremely well. Overall, I think our strong area is reading even though 5th grade went up in the DNM area. However, they almost met the SIP goal of 50% in exceed which was 49.3 and almost at 50% in met which was 49.1. 3rd and 4th grade reading the exceed goals were met however the met goals were not quite there. If you look at the DNM areas of 3rd and 4th grade we went down. In math, grade 4 did not meet their 60% goal in the exceed area and their 40% goal in the met area. In fact, for the past 3 years 4th grade has been going down. In the DNM area they went up 5.1 % so with this information 4th grade math would be an area that the data team should look at. Questions One question would be “What area of math do we look at?” Another question, “What other type of data can we look at to help locate the problem area(s)?” Part IV: Discussion