Plantation High SL team 1

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
University of Florida Hybrid Rocket Team’s Mile High Club
Advertisements

University of Florida PDR Presentation. Vehicle Design Diameter: 5.86 Length: 135 Static Stability Margin: 1.4 Total Weight: 23.6 lbs.
Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
Northwestern University Space Technology and Rocketry Society (NUSTARS) NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review March 16, 2015.
P RELIMINARY D ESIGN R EVIEW University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Rockety Team.
Launch Lug – helps to guide the rocket upward until it reaches enough velocity for the fins to engage. Parachute – assists in the safe recovery of the.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA PDR P RESENTATION. O UTLINE Project Organization Vehicle Design Payload Design Recovery System Simulations Future Work.
Project Λscension. Vehicle Dimensions Weight: 19.6 Ib Length: in (9 ft. 4.5 in) Diameter: 6 in Fin Semi-Span: 6 in.
St. Vincent – St. Mary CDR Presentation NASA Student Launch Initiative.
NASA CDR Presentation Spring Grove Area High School.
St. Vincent – St. Mary FRR Presentation NASA Student Launch Initiative.
UAA Rocketry Critical Design Review Presentation.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Flight Readiness Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Flight Readiness Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 47 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude 5203’- RockSim.
Critical Design Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 45 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude RockSim.
Flight Readiness Review Atomic Aggies. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Critical Design Review of “Mach Shock Reduction” Phase II January 2008 Statesville, NC.
Launch Vehicle  Launch Vehicle Summary  The length of the rocked is inches, and the mass is ounces.  We have a dual Deployment Recovery.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Student Launch Project Flight Readiness Review April 21, 2014.
 Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications  Static stability margin  Plan for vehicle safety verification and testing  Baseline motor selection.
Flight Readiness Review Team Hawaii. Vehicle Properties Diameter (in)6 inches Length (in)127 inches Gross Liftoff Weight (lb)50.25 lb Launch Lug/button.
3/19/09. Animal Motor Works (AMW) K475WW High Power Rocket Motor. 54 mm casing, 40.3 cm long, 2.9 seconds burn time, 1394 N-sec total impulse, and
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
Flight Readiness Review Student Launch Initiative SCS Rocket Team Statesville Christian School April 2, 2008.
University of Florida Rocket Team Critical Design Review Presentation.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
Critical Design Review- UCF Jeremy Young Anthony Liauppa Erica Terry, Emily Sachs Kristen Brightwell Gillian Smith 1.
HARDING UNIVERSITY A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude Flying Bison.
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Project Ares University of Central Florida NASA Student Launch 1/28/2015.
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom Body Tube Length-
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB PDR PRESENTATION 1.
HARDING UNIVERSITY FLYING BISONS A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude Flight Readiness Review.
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Critical Design Review 15 Janurary2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
January 14,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6 inches  Mass: oz. / lbs.  Span: 22 inches  Center of Gravity: inches 
Critical Design Review Presentation Project Nova.
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB CDR PRESENTATION 1.
Critical Design Review Presentation Alabama Rocket Engineering Systems (ARES) Team The University of Alabama.
Flight Readiness Review UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA CONNER DENTON, JOHN FAULK, NGHIA HUYNH, KENT LINO, PHILLIP RUSCHMYER, & ANDREW TINDELL MENTOR : RICHARD.
Preliminary Design Review Clear Lake High School Team Rocket.
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
Project Aegis Preliminary Design Review Team Members:
Preliminary Design Review Presentation
College of Engineering
Critical Design Review Presentation
2018 First Nation Launch - Flight Readiness Review
NASA USLI Preliminary Design Review
FLIGHT READINESS REVIEW
Critical Design Review February 2, 2015
CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW
Project Lead: Austin Brenner
Critical Design Review
Sounding Rocket CDR Team Name
LESSON LD02 The Model Rocket
Final Readiness Review
2019 First Nation Launch – FRR Virtual Review
2019 First Nation Launch – PDR Virtual Review
LESSON LD02 The Model Rocket
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
2019 First Nation Launch – CDR Virtual Review
University of Iowa USLI
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
Presentation transcript:

Plantation High SL team 1 Frr presentation

Launch vehicle design

Key design features (launch vehicle) Nosecone   Ogive Fiberglass Length: 20 in. Diameter: 4 in. Shoulder Length: 2 in. Shoulder Diameter: 3.9 in. Decreases the amount of drag the launch vehicle faces during flight; improves stability of launch vehicle during flight.

Key design features (launch vehicle) Upper Airframe   Blue Tube Length: 32 in. OD: 4 in. ID: 3.9 in. Houses Payload system and subsystems Recovery system; Main chute

Key design features (launch vehicle) Lower Airframe   Blue Tube Length: 26 in. OD: 4 in. ID: 3.9 in. Houses Propulsion system and subsystems Recovery subsystem; Main Chute Guidance Subsystem; fins

Key design features (launch vehicle) Bulkheads (3x)   G10 Fiberglass Diameter: 3.9 in. Thickness: 0.125 in. Designates: Recovery subsystem; Altimeter Bay Payload System Recovery System

Key design features (launch vehicle) Coupler   BlueTube Length: 11 in. OD: 3.9 in. ID: 3.8 in. Houses: Recovery subsystem; Altimeter Bay   Serves as a conduit for the upper and lower airframes

Key design features (launch vehicle) Tailcone   Polystyrene Ogive Length: 8 in.   Front Diameter: 4 in. Rear Diameter: 2.2 in. Surrounds and protects the motor mount and motor while decreasing the drag of the launch vehicle.

Key design features (launch vehicle) Motor Mount   Blue Tube Length: 17 in. OD: 2.25 in. ID: 2.2 in. Retains and secures the motor inside the lower airframe

Key design features (launch vehicle) Centering Rings (2x)   G10 Fiberglass OD: 3.9 in. ID: 2.25 in. Thickness: 0.125 in. Bolster the motor mount within the airframe Motor Mount

Key design features (launch vehicle) Fiberglass • Trapezoidal; Dual Set • Fin Count: 3 • Total Root Chord: 11.5 in. • Height: 4.2 in. • Thickness: 0.1 in. Both the thickness of the G10 fiberglass and the proximity of the lower fin set to the upper fin set reduce the effects of fin flutter on the stability of the rocket.

Motor description Motor choice: K695R Motor Casing: RMS-54/1706 Serial # 0045 03-08 Motor Thrust curve:

Mass STATEMENT Total Mass: 5950g w/o motor Total Mass w/Motor: 6950.58 g

Test plans & procedures -Simulations of flight -System checks of the payload -Static tests to determine the robustness of the material, construction, and design of the rocket -Subscale flight -Full scale test flight

Recovery systems tests -Ground tests: involving verification of shear pin and black powder charge size -Subscale in-flight recovery system test -Full-scale test flight in Bunnell, Florida

Payload design & dimensions Drawings and specifications The main components sled in the payload bay will be 9” x 3” x 0.5”. The rails from the base will be 1.5” x 0.5” x 9.5”, with a 0.25” indentation on the side at 0.5” from each side. The power supply bay is placed beneath the main electrical area in its own section. The power supply bay will be 2.5” x 3.9”.

Payload design Custom made payload bay We chose to custom manufacture our payload frame to fix several technical issues experienced in the past with former designs.   We used a tapered rail design to avoid structural problems in the past which were due to wobbling caused by the oscillations of the rocket in flight. By tapering up to the top of the rails this design feature should allow for much greater structural stability during flight. We changed to a single vertical sled design improve modularity as well as to fix aforementioned structural problems (wobble). This design feature allows us to change component sleds easily which gives the option to easily change experiments which contributes to reusability. The cap design feature was included to minimize wobble and to ensure that the main components sled is properly secured in between our rails. This helps minimize the risk of disconnection between components on the main components sled.  We decided to opt-for a separate power supply bay which is attached to the main components bay separately to improve modularity and reusability. By being able to interchange power supply modules it theoretically gives the ability to extend battery life infinitely. These changes have several benefits apart from fixing previous structural problems. These include : Lower weight in part because of the fully 3d-printed design. Increased modularity and reusability.

Payload integration Integration Plan All the equipment will be mounted on a sled which is then put between 2 rails which are used to keep the sled in place and upright. There is a 1” clearance on the top and bottom of the payload bay to separate it from the rest of the rocket. These rails will have a specially designed cap screwed on top to keep the sled from moving during flight. The main components sled in the payload bay will be 9” x 3” x 0.5”. The rails from the base will be 1.5” x 0.5” x 9.5”, with a 0.25” indentation on the side at 0.5” from each side. The power supply bay is placed beneath the main electrical area in its own section. The power supply bay will be 2.5” x 3.9”.   Interfaces with ground systems The payload communicates with the ground via a wireless Blue tooth connection (xbee). Payload Success Criteria To successfully record and transmit real-time telemetric data (altitude, air pressure, acceleration in all directions, temperature, orientation, compass heading and precise location (GPS)). To successfully then send the data collected to a website which displays it also in real-time. 

Rocket flight stability

Launch thrust – to –weight ratio Current thrust-to-weight ratio: 13/1 kg

descent rates & kinetic energy Section Kinetic Energy (ft-lbs.) Mass (kg.) Velocity at deployment (ft/s) Upper Airframe + Nosecone 998 8.9 -85 Coupler 134 1.2 Lower Airframe 830 7.4 Section Kinetic Energy (ft-lbs.) Mass (kg.) Velocity at Deployment (ft/s) Upper Airframe + Nosecone 73 8.9 -23 Coupler 10 1.2 Lower Airframe 60 7.4

Parachute sizes Giant Leap/TAC 24 : 24 inches

Rail exit velocity

Full scale flight test Plantation High School SLI Team 1 Full-Scale Launch February 13, 2016; 12:45 PM Clegg Sod Farm; Bunnell, Florida Data Actual Flight Data Apogee (ft.) 3509 Time to Landing (s.) 77

Predicted drift Wind (mph) Drift (ff.) 5 247 10 535 15 812 20 1100

Predicted altitude

Educational engagement Open lab nights Freshman open house