OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is problem-solving? A decision making process that uses data 1. Problem Identification 2. Problem Analysis 3. Plan Development 4. Plan Implementation.
Advertisements

Results Based Monitoring (RBM)
Introduction to Impact Assessment
WASH Cluster – Emergency Training NA NA4 1 NEEDS ASSESSMENT Session 4 Proposal Development.
Evaluation Mary Rowlatt MDR Partners. Definition of project evaluation Evaluation focuses on whether the project was effective, achieved its objectives,
Mywish K. Maredia Michigan State University
Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.
Action Implementation and Evaluation Planning Whist the intervention plan describes how the population nutrition problem for a particular target group.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Pestalozzi Children‘s Foundation emPower 2012 Monitoring & Evaluation Lecturers: Beatrice Schulter.
Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
The County Health Rankings & Roadmaps Take Action Cycle.
What makes a successful development project? Kristin Olsen IOD PARC
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
EVALUATION APPROACHES Heather Aquilina 24 March 2015.
Flanders project application and appraisal How it supports partnership.
Monitoring & Evaluation: The concepts and meaning Day 9 Session 1.
Monitoring and Evaluation of GeSCI’s Activities GeSCI Team Meeting 5-6 Dec 2007.
Let’s Chat About Data Based Decision Making Melissa and Brian.
Professional Certificate in Electoral Processes Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
Monitoring and Evaluating in the PHEA Educational Technology Initiative Patrick Spaven.
111 CINDI PMER Workshop March, 2007 By Simon Opolot © 2007 Office of the Premier, KwaZulu-Natal Province, Private Bag X9037 Telecom House, 2nd Floor,
Support the spread of “good practice” in generating, managing, analysing and communicating spatial information Evaluating and Reflecting on the Map-making.
Fundamentals of Governance: Parliament and Government Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
27/04/2017 Strengthening of the Monitoring and Evaluation system for FTPP/FTTP in FAO /SEC December 2015 FTPP/FTFP Workshop, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
Performance Measurement 101. Performance Measurement Performance Measurement is: –The ongoing monitoring and reporting of program accomplishments and.
What is Good Monitoring? Environmental Evaluator’s Network Ottawa, September 2010.
Analysis and Critical Thinking in Assessment 1. What is the problem? Gathering information Using information to inform decisions/ judgment Synthesising.
Are we there yet? Evaluating your graduation SiMR.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
Funders typically looking for applications to demonstrate: Evidence of need for what you are proposing, and why your project is the right approach to meeting.
Identifying Monitoring Questions from your Program Logic.
Assessment of EPQ What is assessed? AO1 Managing the project AO2 Use resources Where’s the evidence? Production log – aims of project, detailed project.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18 th & 19 th March 2010 Indicators.
Monitoring & Evaluation. What? Campaign monitoring is a step-by-step analysis of how the campaign is progressing against milestones previously defined.
Dublin, 8 March 2017 Maria Emília Galvão
Project monitoring and evaluation
Rebecca McQuaid Evaluation 101 …a focus on Programs Rebecca McQuaid
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 9. Periodic data collection methods.
Managing for Results Capacity in Higher Education Institutions
Chapter 17 Evaluation and Evidence-Based Practice
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF PROJECT MONITORING AND EVALUATION M&E.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
Closing the circle and Reviewing the plan
Introduction to Program Evaluation
UN Support to SDG implementation in Seychelles.
Multi-Sectoral Nutrition Action Planning Training Module
Analysis and Critical Thinking in Assessment
Logical Framework I want to design a project by planning out the logic
Evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of change plans
M&E in Project Cycle Management
Data Literacy Survey results and Data Protocols
Resource 1. Evaluation Planning Template
Session 9 Recap on LFM and IL.
Monitoring &Evaluation in Project Cycle Management
GENERAL INTRODUCTION TO ADVOCACY
Lifelong Learning Planning for Improvement 1st November 2017
WHAT is evaluation and WHY is it important?
MAP-IT: A Model for Implementing Healthy People 2020
Overview of Case Management Process
SUSTAINABLE MICRO-FINANCE for WOMEN’S EMPOWERMENT
Group work on challenges Learning oriented M&E System
OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010
Project intervention logic
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
Data for PRS Monitoring: Institutional and Technical Challenges
Training module on anthropometric data quality
Project intervention logic
Presentation transcript:

OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010 Moments for Review OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010

What are moments for review? Turning data into knowledge… Information Knowledge e.g. “The implementation of our intervention is going as planned but we are not seeing the results we expected”; or “We’re doing really well!” e.g. Statements from beneficiaries; Responses to surveys Learning Analysis e.g. Indicators; Perceptions; Representative anecdotes Data to know whether the changes that we intend to bring about are taking place in the way that we predicted

Points in time where relevant stakeholders come together to: Monitoring Reviews Points in time where relevant stakeholders come together to: Link with campaign plan consider what reliable monitoring data is telling you about the implementation of activities, and progress towards intended outcomes, analyse and reflect on the information being collecting, where appropriate, make informed decisions to stop, adapt, or expand parts of the intervention 3 3

Monitoring Review Questions What should we have achieved by now? What information have we gathered, how, and from whom? What’s working well and why? What problems are there and how can they be solved? What have we learnt about: the context the campaign area e.g. health the monitoring process itself? What are we going to do about it? Who will take action and when? What will we feed into other reports and discussions?

Evaluations more in-depth, objective assessments of our programme’s design, implementation and results at particular points in time – Help us to answer the question ‘why?’. In particular, they ask: ‘Are the right things being done?’ (theory of change), ‘Are things being done right?’ (implementation), ‘Are there better ways?’ (learning).

Next Steps… Ensure clear programme logic Identify output and outcome indicators Plan data collection (who will collect what, when and how) Schedule Moments for Review, including Monitoring Reviews, and, where appropriate, Evaluations Identify capacity gaps and support needs