L.O: Misleading information leading questions post-event discussion.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Loftus and Palmer Leading Questions.
Advertisements

Memory. Watch this clip and answer the following questions qaLrc4.
PYA1: Critical Issue Eye Witness Testimony EWT. Eye Witness Testimony EWT The statements provided by witnesses of a crime or situation which help to establish.
BIG 12 - Powerpoint #1 Loftus & Palmer 1974; Bartlett 1932.
Evaluating Loftus (1979) ‘The weapon effect’
LOFTUS & PALMER (1974) Starter: Here is an introduction to Loftus & Palmer (1974)…what information is missing…  Loftus carried out an experiment where.
Cognitive Approach AS Level Psychology The core studies.
Eye Witness Testimony Objectives 1.Be able to appreciate the importance of memory research 2.Be able to describe the key study 3.Be able to evaluate the.
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
Loftus and Palmer Evaluation Cognitive Core Study.
By Dhina, Haneen, Viveka, and Natsuki Elizabeth Loftus.
Loftus & Palmer (1974) - Aim: - To see the effect of leading questions on Eye Witness Testimony.
Eye-witness testimony
LOFTUS AND PALMER CORE STUDY SLIDES Get out your APFC.
Thanks for the Memories! Gabby Feltner and Caroline Vierod.
EWT and Anxiety. How will I know if I am learning? By the end of the lesson… E Will be able to define weapon focus. C Will be able to explain how anxiety.
Contents Cognitive Psychology What is Cognitive Psychology? Assumptions Methods of Investigation Core Studies from Cognitive Psychology - Loftus and Palmer.
Reconstruction of Memories Elizabeth Loftus’ Research.
Yuille and Cutshall (1986) A case study of eyewitness memory of a crime.
Reliability of one cognitive process
AS Level Psychology The core studies Cognitive Approach.
Question Wording and Eyewitness Testimony © POSbase 2005 The study of Loftus & Palmer (1974):Loftus & Palmer (1974): Participants viewed films about a.
Memorise these words, you have until I have finished reading them out. sournicecandy honeysugarsoda bitterchocolategood hearttastecake toothtartpie.
Loftus And Palmer The Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction.
Factors affecting eyewitness testimony. Eyewitness testimony Eye witnesses who have ‘seen with their own eyes’ tend to be believed more by juries than.
Do Now: Relate Chapter 7 terminology to the film Memento. What are some of the main points about memory in the film? Eyewitness Testimony.
Do Now What are some factors that you think could influence eyewitness testimony?
Memory Eyewitness Testimony. Learning objectives Understand what is meant by eyewitness testimony (EWT) Be aware of some of the factors that affect the.
MEMORY IN EVERYDAY LIFE MEMORY IN EVERYDAY LIFE Factors Affecting EWT Anxiety.
NEY T i. Factors affecting eyewitness testimony: misleading information “Factors affecting the accuracy of eyewitness testimony: misleading information.
AS Level Psychology The core studies
Evaluate, including the relative strengths and weaknesses, of Field experiments including their use in criminological psychology with regard to : Evaluate,
Loftus & Palmer Cognitive Psychology The Core Studies.
Eyewitness Testimony Violence and Recall Loftus & Burns: showed participants a filmed bank robbery. One version shots were fired but no one was hurt.
About how fast were the cars going when they hit each other? collided smashed bumped contacted.
Reliability in Memory.  In 1984 Jennifer Thompson, a 22-year-old college student was raped at knifepoint. She testified that during the crime she made.
Memory Bingo! HypothesisIndependent variable Dependent variable Weapon focusDecaySensory store CapacityEncodingPeterson and Peterson LoftusCentral ExecutivePhonological.
Pop Quiz Define the following key terms: Social rolesUnanimity Agentic state Authoritarian personality Locus of Control Minority influence CodingCapacity.
CLOA: Cultural Factors in Cognition. Difference between Social and Cultural Social A factor which you are born without but not necessarily into Cultural.
Eyewitness Testimony Reliability in Memory.
MEMORY: THE EYEWITNESS ON TRIAL
Discussion Loftus and Palmer suggest 2 explanations for the results of Experiment 1: Response Bias: The different speed estimates occurred because the.
Loftus and Palmer Study one Study two Aim Reconstructive memory is….
MEMORY FALLIBLITY OF MEMORY.
Multiple choice questions
Cognitive Psychology PSYA1 Revision.
Loftus and Palmer (1974) (A2) Reconstruction of automobile destruction and example of the interaction between language and memory.
Eye Witness Testimony EWT.
Lesson objectives Starter: Identifing different types of validity
4.3 Classic Evidence: Loftus and Palmer (1974)
Presentation by Jordan Cline, Sarah Swift, and Anita Bainbridge
RECAP what’s the difference between state-dependent forgetting and context dependent forgetting? Outline the research to support context-dependent forgetting.
STM & LTM FEATURE SUPPORTING RESEARCH EVALUATIVE POINTS CAPACITY STM =
Cognitive Psychology Memory
Reliability of Memory Ms. Carmelitano.
Starter: how good is your memory?
Elizabeth Loftus and John Palmer
PSYA1: Cognitive Psychology Memory
4.3 Classic Evidence: Loftus and Palmer (1974)
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
Interviewing witnesses
what have we learned from past two lessons?
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
Sour Nice Candy Honey Pie Toffee Taste Cake Tooth Tart Sugar Pop
The Bugs Bunny Effect
The cognitive area.
Eye Witness Testimony EWT.
Starter Create a mind map with EWT placed in the middle, I would like you to write down all the things you have learned this lesson about EWT.
The effect of Anxiety on Eyewitness Testimony
Presentation transcript:

L.O: Misleading information leading questions post-event discussion. Eye Witness Testimony L.O: Misleading information leading questions post-event discussion.

Watch the following video clip and answer the question Watch the following video clip and answer the question. Keep the question to yourself. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rg5bBJQOL74

How fast were the cars going when they hit each other? How fast were the cars going when they smashed into each other? How fast were the cars going when they collided with each other? How fast were the cars going when they bumped each other? How fast were the cars going when they contacted with each other?

34.0 40.8 39.3 38.1 31.8 Hit? Smashed? Collided? Bumped? Contacted?

Gathering the estimates...? Drawing a graph of the mean estimates What is the mean? What are the advantages of using the mean? What are the advantages of using mean estimates? Gathering the estimates...?

The Effect of Misleading information on EWT... Loftus 1974: The smash, bump, collide study Loftus 1975: Post event info, the Stop, Yield study

Loftus 1974 Smash, Bump, Collide Study Splat Study

Can EWT always be relied upon…? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubNF9QNEQLA Can EWT always be relied upon…?

Picking out of a line up... Pick the bomber... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7EpYlKaBM8&feature=related

The Bugs Bunny Effect https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZlPzSeUDDw

Discuss research into how leading questions can influence the accuracy of EWT (10 Marks) AO1- Loftus and Palmer 1974 (Smash Study) Aim: Procedure Findings Conclusions AO3 P E L Strength- Supporting Evidence Loftus found that when college students were asked… This is a strength because… This study can be considered to be higher in realism as students has experienced Disneyland and therefore would have been less likely to lead to demand characteristics caused by an artificial situation. Weakness; Low External Validity This is an issue because… On the other hand it could be considered a strength tot use Lab studies because… Strength; Real-life application This has been useful in police interviewing techniques because… This has further positive implications for the economy because…

Loftus Barn Study 1975 Aim: To investigate whether post-event information can alter the accuracy of an EWT Research Design: Independent Groups (control and experimental) Materials: Film of events leading up to a car accident, with a stop sign and no barn IV: The question whether it included the misleading barn info or not DV: % who reported seeing a barn. Procedure: All watched events leading up to a car accident, and were then questioned in 2 groups. Control group: real info; questions about what they saw ; ‘how fast was the white sports car going when is passed the stop sign?’ Experimental Group : misleading info; ‘how fast was the white sports car going when it passed the barn while going along the country road?’ Type of Data: Quantitative Findings: Control group: 3% reported seeing a barn. Experimental Group: 17% reported seeing a barn Conclusion: Those given misleading info post-event had absorbed it with their original memory of the event and believed that they actually saw the barn.

Evaluation points so far...? Validity...? Demand characteristics...? Consequentiality...? Ethics...?

Discuss research into how post-event discussion can influence the accuracy of EWT (10 Marks) AO1- Loftus 1975 (Barn Study) Aim Procedure Findings Conclusions AO3 P E L Strength- Supporting Evidence This is a strength because… This study can be considered to be higher in realism as students has experienced Disneyland and therefore would have been less likely to lead to demand characteristics caused by an artificial situation. Weakness; Low External Validity This is an issue because… On the other hand it could be considered a strength tot use Lab studies because… Strength; Real-life application This has further positive implications for the economy because…

Discuss research into how anxiety can influence the accuracy of EWT (10 Marks) AO1- Johnson and Scott ‘76 (Weapon Effect) & Christianson and Hubinette ‘93 (real life robberies) Aim Procedure Findings Conclusions AO3 P E L Weakness- Contradictory Evidence Loftus found that… whereas Christianson and Hubinette found that… This is an issue because… But, the Yerkes Dodson Law has been put forward to resolve this which explains that… Weakness; Low External Validity On the other hand it could be considered a strength tot use Lab studies because… Strength; Real Life Application This has further positive implications for the economy because…