1 Reinventing Education Act of 2004 Parent Community Network Center (PCNC) Facilitators.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School District Budgeting
Advertisements

State Literacy Teams An opportunity for IRA state councils to become more involved.

INDIAN RIVER SUCCESSION PLAN GOAL To groom existing teachers and staff members to become administrators at the school and district level.
INTENT OF FUNDS. INTENT OF TITLE I A Title I Director salary and benefits Title I Administrative Assistant/Secretary salary and benefits Teachers Educational.
Act 51, Amended by Act 221 Reinventing Education Act for the Children of Hawaii, REACH Our Goal…Our Children…Our Future.
Mililani Ike Elementary School Community Council October 14, 2004 The crosswalk from SCBM to SCC: Meeting #2.
Presentation on the Department of Education Response to the 2006 Committee on Weights Recommendation for SY Board of Education Committee on Budget.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting West Navarre Primary School Sept. 17, 2013 Sandi Eubanks.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
Strategic Visioning Process Pleasant Valley District #62
Reinventing Education Act of 2004 School Community Councils.
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
 A strategic plan is a guiding document for an organization. It clarifies organizational priorities, goals and desired outcomes.  For the SRCS school.
Reinventing Education Act for the Children of Hawaii REACH Our Goal. Our Children. Our Future. Comparison of the DOE Current Budget with the New Weighted.
The Metro Schools Learning Community LB 641. Learning Community/Timeline 1.September 2007 – Commissioner of Education certifies Learning Community (LC)
School Site Councils Focus on School Improvement and Student Achievement Provided by California Teachers Association Instruction and Professional Development.
Local Control and Accountability Plan: Performance Based Budgeting California Association of School Business Officials.
Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.
A Presentation For Mojave Unified School District.
1 Act 51: The Reinventing Education Act of 2004 What it means for students.
Local Control accountability Plan (LCAP) Parent Meeting.
Managing a Budget Crisis SAI Meeting Presented by: Ogden CSD.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
School Governance for Parents: Advisory Committees How ELAC and SAC Can Help Your School Develop a Better Balanced Scorecard.
LCFF and LCAP Phase II Gathering Input. LCFF and LCAP This is the second in a series of three presentations. Presentation 1 Nov./Dec.
REDWOOD CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT Educating Every Child For Success Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) Presentation Fall
Local Control Accountability Plan. LCAP  The Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) is a document that provides details regarding the District’s services,
April Our Purpose Create and implement recommendations that will provide consistent direction and focus for middle school education that result.
Stabilization, Recovery and Renewal A plan for educating Oakland’s children within, through and beyond financial crisis October 2003.
1 Denver Public Schools Student Based Budgeting (a.k.a. SBB) November 10, 2010.
We believe kids can….. Connecting is key….. Learning unlocks opportunities…..
Title I Annual Parent Meeting Reedy Creek Elementary September 22, 2010 Diane Crook-Nichols Principal.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting Elliott Point September 15, 2015 Janet Norris.
Agenda (5:00-6:30 PM): Introduction to Staff Title I Presentation PTA Information Classroom visits (two 30 minute rotations)
Developing a Coherent Message About School Health: Communicating with Policymakers, Local Officials and the Public Nora L. Howley, MA, CHES Council of.
(c) 2008 The McGraw ‑ Hill Companies 1 School District Budgeting.
1 SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL Academic Improvement & Accountability.
Presented by: Mr. Kurt Madden, Superintendent Mr. Walter J. Con, Asst. Superintendent – Business Services November 12 th,
PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT Advisory Leader’s Role Judy M. Groff Advisory System and Program Development Leader NCCE.
MADISON COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM CHARTER SYSTEM PETITION PUBLIC HEARINGS MONDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 5:00 PM TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 6:00 PM PROFESSIONAL.
Federal Support for World-Class Schools Gwinnett County Public Schools 4/18/13.
1 TIPA Teacher Incentive Performance Award November 4, 2009.
Benvenue Elementary Title I Parent Information Meeting Monday, October 3rd, 2011.
Los Angeles Unified School District Local District G Principals Meeting.
Response to Intervention (RtI) How can we make it work in Wisconsin?
STAKEHOLDER FORUMS NOVEMBER – DECEMBER 2013 Local Control Accountability Plan.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
Categorical Programs rolled into LCFF Marisol Guillen 1.
BY LINA DURAZO AND MARISOL GUILLEN Hueneme Elementary School District.
RUSD’s Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP Stakeholders Meeting #1 April 13, 2015 Initial Overview.
KEEPING THE FOCUS ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Stephanie Benedict Academic Development Institute & Center on Innovations in Learning.
Lilly Dollenmayer DAC Chair 10/12/10. The District Advisory Council, by the very nature of its name, will advise the Board of Education of the Conejo.
Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) & Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) School Board Meeting, March 20,
A System of Instructional Effectiveness: Connecting the Dots The District Accountability Plan (DAP) Bloomfield Public Schools Every Student,
1 SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL. 2 Purpose: School Site Council The organization by which the school community comes together to chart the school’s path to improvement.
Perris Elementary School District Jean Marie Frey Assistant Superintendent, Educational Services LCAP Meeting March 15, 2016.
Transformational Leadership Group of Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools Performance of Disadvantaged Youth November 23, 2010 Brenda Steele, Co-Chair.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP
Local Control Accountability Plan Board of Education June 25, 2015 Alvord Unified School District Students | Teachers | Instructional Content.
Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP
Linden Elementary Title I Parent Night
Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP
Welcome to <School Name> School
The School Site Council
Building a Strategic Plan
Presentation transcript:

1 Reinventing Education Act of 2004 Parent Community Network Center (PCNC) Facilitators

2 Act 51 What is the underlying philosophy? Student achievement will improve if: – the state DOE establishes academic targets that all students should meet. – individual schools decide how best to get their students to meet the targets. – individual schools are held accountable for student results.

3 What does it do at the school level? Allocates money to schools based in part on student characteristics (WSF). Gives principals more discretion on how to spend the money (academic and financial plans) Establishes school community councils to give stakeholders a voice and advise and assist principals. Facilitates parental involvement by providing Parent-Community Networking Center parent facilitators in every school.

4 Weighted Student Formula The theory: How much money a school gets should depend not only on how many students it has, but on how much it costs to bring students with different characteristics to academic proficiency. Student characteristics that receive extra money, or weights, (subject to BOE approval): –Economically disadvantaged (0.10) –Not proficient English speakers (0.23) –Special Ed (0, because SpEd students are already weighted).

5 Weighted Student Formula The reality: there are no additional funds for schools. WSF is a different way of cutting the same sized educational pie. The reality: under WSF, some schools will get more money, some will get less. Still to be determined: –Weights (if any) for gifted/talented, mobile/transient, at risk. –Factors (if any) for school level (elementary, middle, high, combined). –Extra money for small schools.

6 Who decides how the schools spend their money? Now: most resources come to schools as positions, not as dollars. Act 51: schools will get dollars and will decide how to spend them to improve student achievement. Principals, with input from the school community (teachers, other school staff, school community councils, general school community) will prepare academic and financial plans that determine how the schools will spend their money.

7 How are academic and financial plans prepared? Schools analyze student data. Based on student data and research, schools determine what to do differently (with the given level of resources!) to improve student achievement. The result is the academic plan (what the school will do) and the financial plan (what it will cost).

8 What does it mean for principals? Much more work and responsibility: –Must analyze data, prepare academic and financial plans. –Must work with school community councils. –Must review academic and financial results and stay within budget. –Are accountable for improved student achievement. –Must work under performance contracts. –Must work with other principals in the complex to coordinate curricula and personnel, share and implement best practices. –Must be the instructional leaders for their schools.

9 What does it mean for teachers? Act 51 provides money for national certification. Principals may create new positions or terminate existing positions (following procedures) to implement the academic plan. Teachers will be more frequently coached and held more accountable for student achievement.

10 What does it mean for the state DOE office? The state office must assume responsibility for school construction, repair, and maintenance, and civil service employee personnel management. State and district offices will support schools, not tell them what to do. The state office will need to price and sell some of its services to the schools. Schools may go elsewhere if a state office service is not competitive in quality and price.

11 What does it mean for students? Schools will be able to tailor their programs to the needs of their students. Research-based programs and instructional practices will improve student achievement. Students and their parents will be able to choose the schools that best suit their needs (long-term outcome).

12 What does it mean for parents? Act 51 directly provides money for PCNC parent facilitators at every school. Schools know that parent engagement in their childrens learning is crucial for student success; schools will be able to direct resources toward research- proven programs that achieve this. School community councils give parents a voice in what the school does.

13 What is the ultimate intent? All students are proficient learners. All students meet the General Learner Outcomes: –Responsible for their own learning –Involved in complex thinking and problem solving –Recognize and produce quality products –Communicate effectively –Use a variety of technologies ethically –Work well with others