Task Criteria – Text-based Argument Rubric

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
On-Demand Writing Assessment
Advertisements

TUSD Scoring Extended Writing Using the PARCC Rubric as Framework September 2014.
HIGHLIGHT THE SHIFTS FROM GRADE TO GRADE: WHAT IS NEW? ELA CCSS for Writing W.1 Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics.
PENNSYLVANIA COMMON CORE STANDARDS 1.4 Writing Students write for different purposes and audiences. Students write clear and focused text to convey a well-defined.
Educator’s Guide Using Instructables With Your Students.
FOOTPRINTS OF FREEDOM High School UCI History ProjectSpring 2013.
Standards! What are we writing? What are we practicing?
ELA Common Core Shifts. Shift 1 Balancing Informational & Literary Text.
PENNSYLVANIA COMMON CORE STANDARDS 1.2 Reading Informational Text Students read, understand, and respond to informational text—with emphasis on comprehension,
HOW TO FORM AN ESSAY Mr. Bermudez. HEADING  Name  Course Title  Period  Date  Title.
Lesson Plan Project by Jill Keeve. Goal/Objective Goal : Students will use a reading excerpt to explore alternate background information on conic sections.
AIMS: writing process, research skills Review in class research project Parts of an essay –Lecture/notes –Handouts –Application Homework –Rewrite introduction.
Thesis Statement-Examples
FSA Writing Mirror Lake Elementary. Welcome! Parent Writing Training Greetings! Norms Goals Testing Information FSA Standards for.
Descriptions Concrete Ideas Examples Vivid details Energetic Language Strong Voice Strong Tone Direct Address to Audience Interesting Topic WHAT MAKES.
Writing Informative Grades College and Career Readiness Standards for Writing Text Types and Purposes arguments 1.Write arguments to support a substantive.
©2014 IPDAE. All rights reserved. All content in this presentation is the proprietary property of The Institute for the Professional Development of Adult.
Argumentative Writing Grades College and Career Readiness Standards for Writing Text Types and Purposes arguments 1.Write arguments to support a.
© 2015 The College Board The Redesigned SAT Essay Writing Oakland Schools.
Daily Warm-up: What points would you make if you were presenting an argument against the uniforms to Ms. Rains and Ms. Roach? Homework: Reading Plus due.
Writing – CCSS Style AACRC – October 29, Prior Knowledge 1.I don’t know anything about the ELA CCSS 2.I have some familiarity with the ELA CCSS.
Happy Wednesday! Please take a highlighter from the table. Please get out your bias test from yesterday. You will need a clean sheet of paper. You should.
Argumentative Evaluation and Writing
POW+TIDE.
Reading, Invention and Arrangement
Common Intro. Mistakes A Reader is prepared for my essay and does not need any background information. I can argue both sides of an issue in an argumentative.
Introduction to Argumentative Writing
Narrative Writing Assessment Targets
RHS Writing Guide.
Warm Ups: Writing Week 9/29 -10/8 Quiz on 10/8
Writing Informative and Explanatory Texts
Writing Workshop: Courage & heroism
Text analysis Letter from Birmingham Jail
AP Seminar: irr directions & rubric analysis
Bellringer After reading and breaking down the prompt, what are the next steps in approaching a timed essay?
Enabling Student Learning One Bite at a Time
Bellringer After reading and breaking down the prompt, what are the next steps in approaching a timed essay?
Michigan Reading Standards
Preparation for the American Literature Eoc
Author: dr. Martin Rusnák
Essay 4: Response Essay Responding to Reading.
Creating the First Draft
RHS Writing Guide.
• provides a meaningful thesis that is responsive to the writing task.
Introduction to Argumentative Writing
Your Standards TODAY’S FLOW MORNING: Standards & 1st Unit Curriculum
Waterfall Response Think about the question presented and write a short response. You will have 30 seconds to one minute to write your response into the.
EXPLANATORY WRITING.
Informative Essay.
The “How and Why” of Writing
Steps in writing a DBQ.
Essay.
American Literature Common Core Argumentative Writing Task
Parts of an Essay Ms. Ruttgaizer.
Argumentative Essay Skills
Bellringer Read the quote to the left.
Parts of an Essay.
Unit 2 Read, wRite, and Research
Types of Writing: Expository vs. Narrative vs. Argumentative
AP English Language and Composition
Community Builder Activity 3 min-2 min
Lesson 4 Synthesis Overview & Peer Evaluation
Unit 5 author’s purpose.
INFORMATIVE ESSAY RUBRIC
POW+TIDE.
Informational Text Project
Warm-Up Create a T-chart on p. 25 (take half the page). Brainstorm…..
AXES Paragraph Model English 10 Academic.
9th Literature EOC Review
Presentation transcript:

Task Criteria – Text-based Argument Rubric What is this essay (paragraph) about BUT MUST be related to the prompt or question asked Precise language - ? Descriptive language - ? Authoritative voice - ? Persona - ?   Establishes a Context Must meet standard on this expectation to meet the overall standard Selects and summarizes key ideas to establish context appropriate to audience by using tools such as precise language, descriptive language, authoritative voice and/or persona. W.9-12.1&2  

Task Criteria – Text-based Argument Rubric Interpretative claim/assertion – your position/opinion on the matter – but must be supported Valid thesis – arguable point – not generally accepted knowledge Related to the prompt/question   Establishes a Context Must meet standard on this expectation to meet the overall standard *Establishes an interpretive claim/assertion in the form of a valid thesis when responding to a given prompt. W.9-12.1&2  

Task Criteria – Text-based Argument Rubric Critical Thinking   Must meet standard on this expectation to meet the overall standard *Develops precise and logical claims (and counterclaims when appropriate) by clarifying and analyzing the relationships between claims, reasons, and evidence. W.9-10.1b, c - Your claim (counterclaim) must make sense and be focused Claim - ? Reason - ? Evidence - ? These 3 concepts MUST be connected  analysis must have the how and why of the connection!  

Task Criteria – Text-based Argument Rubric Critical Thinking   Must meet standard on this expectation to meet the overall standard *Interprets text by making valid inferences and drawing credible claims/conclusions based on an accurate reading of the text(s). W.9-10.1a,2a,b; RI9-10.2-6; RL.9-10.1-6,&10 Read text closely for accuracy – this is why annotating and analysis of text is important Tell reader what the text is about Read “between the lines” – what is explicitly said and what is implied  

Task Criteria – Text-based Argument Rubric Critical Thinking   Must meet standard on this expectation to meet the overall standard *Supports interpretation and conclusions by selecting significant, relevant, and sufficient evidence (e.g. facts, extended definitions, concrete details, strong and thorough textual evidence, and prior knowledge) appropriate to the audience’s knowledge of the topic, accurately citing evidence when appropriate. W.9-10.2b,8,9; RI9-10.1; RL.9-10.1-3,&10 Must have evidence to support your claim – we give you examples Significant – evidence must be IMPORTANT to your claim Relevant - evidence must be clearly applicable or connected to your argument Sufficient – enough? Know your audience and cite, if necessary  

Task Criteria – Text-based Argument Rubric Critical Thinking   Must meet standard on this expectation to meet the overall standard Accurately uses general academic and/or domain-specific language that clarifies and supports purpose. L.9-12.6 Does not mean to simply use big words (got that Ross?) Use the language of the discipline  “The early human depicted…” rather than “The guy shown…” “Ethics and morality demand…” rather than “The right thing to do…”  

Task Criteria – Text-based Argument Rubric Produces Clear and Coherent Writing Provides organization appropriate to task, purpose, and audience with a clear and coherent opening, body, transitions, and a conclusion that follows from and supports the argument presented. W.9-12.1-4 Have opening paragraph, body, and closing that logically flows with appropriate transitions between ideas Makes the argument clear, not confusing to reader  

Task Criteria – Text-based Argument Rubric Be the impartial expert AND DO NOT USE FIRST OR SECOND PERSON EVER!!!!!!!! Produces Clear and Coherent Writing Establishes a formal style and objective tone while attending to the discipline-specific writing norms and conventions. W.9-12.1d; 2e  

Task Criteria – Text-based Argument Rubric - What it says! What is the document about Consider the source – is there a bias? what is the author trying to do? what is the author’s agenda? Discipline – specific and task requirements Read, annotate, and analyze ALL documents Identifies the central question(s) or issue(s) in the informational text. NCHS 2C   Addresses the purpose, perspective, and/or point of view of the informational text. NCHS 2F, W-10-3.2