TEPAC What makes a superior TEPAC chart? Example of an EXCELLENT TEPAC chart Discussion of why TEPAC example is significant Identifying TEPAC

What makes a good TEPAC Chart?

What makes a good TEPAC Chart?

Evidence (Direct quote from text) Ex: “Jack slammed his knife into a trunk and looked around challengingly” (Golding p 29) Analysis Ex: Jack is clearly a savage because it shows how Jack uses physical violence and intimidation to gain control of an audience or in this case, group of boys. A civilized person would calmly and rationally lay out their issues and concerns, but this was not the case with Jack. Concluding statement: Ex: Jack is savage because he uses violence and intimidation to gain control over people. Paraphrase Ex: Jack stabbed a tree trunk with a knife and shared a competitive and intimidating glance Jack is clearly a savage because it shows how Jack uses physical violence and intimidation to gain control of an audience or in this case, group of boys. A civilized person would calmly and rationally lay out their issues and concerns, but this was not the case with Jack. As one can see, Jack is savage because he uses violence and intimidation to gain control over people. In other words, Jack stabbed a tree trunk with a knife and shared a competitive and intimidating glance For instance, Golding states, ““Jack slammed his knife into a trunk and looked around challengingly” (page 29)

TEPAC practice… Directions: In the next examples, identify what part of the TEPAC chart you are viewing. Explain how you know! Also, you must identify if the example uses academic language or not! Ex. 1: In other words, Jack stabbed a tree trunk with a knife and shared a competitive and intimidating glance Answer: “P” Yes, academic language is used! Ex. 2: Jack is clearly a savage because it shows how Jack uses physical violence and intimidation to gain control of an audience or in this case, group of boys. A civilized person would calmly and rationally lay out their issues and concerns, but this was not the case with Jack. Answer: “A” academic language is NOT used!

TEPAC practice… Ex. 3: Jack stabbed a tree trunk with a knife and shared a competitive and intimidating glance Answer: “P” academic language is not used. Ex. 4: As one can see, Jack is savage because he uses violence and intimidation to gain control over people. Answer: “C” academic language is used.

TEPAC practice… Ex. 5: “Jack slammed his knife into a trunk and looked around challengingly” (Golding p 29) Answer: “E” academic language is not being used.

Get into groups, pick a score keeper, lets see who wins!.. For instance, on page 33, Golding states, “Jack was on his feet. We’ll have rules, he cried, excitedly, lots of rules!” E- with academic language Jack is civil because he wants rules C no academic language To sum it up, jack is civil because he wants rules. C with academic language From this I can infer that Jack is civil because he insists there be rules and ways to ensure the group follow rules. Jacks request for rules is civil because it will (hopefully) instill order among the group. A with academic language “Jack was on his feet. We’ll have rules, he cried, excitedly, lots of rules!” E- no academic language

Get into groups, pick a score keeper, lets see who wins!.. We can infer that Jack is being mean to piggy and being mean is savage because it instils unnecessary fear in others and ultimately can lead to disorder. A- with academic language Jack is savage because he is mean to piggy. C no academic language To sum it up, Jack is savage because he is mean to piggy. C with academic language For example, Jack turned fiercely to Piggy and yelled ‘You shut up!’ Piggy wilted” (Golding, 42). E with academic language In other words, Jack told Piggy to shut up and it hurt Piggy’s feelings. P- with academic language

Exit Ticket Share with a partner one new thing you learned today…ready go!