John Rawls Theory of Justice.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Justice & Economic Distribution (2)

Advertisements

Rawlsian Contract Approach Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Theory of distributive.

Justice as Fairness by John Rawls.

2 H i g h e r E d u c a t i o n © Oxford University Press, All rights reserved. Chapter 3: Political theory: Social justice and the state Barr: Economics.

Lecture 6 John Rawls. Justifying government Question: How can the power of government be justified?

John Rawls. Most important pol phil of 20 th cent? No ? The most important lib. Represented academic left vs people like Isaiah Berlin and Robert Nozick.

"... reason accepts no authority above itself and is necessarily subversive." - Allan Bloom, The Closing of the American Mind (1987), p. 258.

PHIL 104 (STOLZE) Notes on Heather Widdows, Global Ethics: An Introduction, chapter 4.

Justice as Fairness by John Rawls.

L To distribute goods and services fairly, protecting everyone’s right to equal opportunity and bettering the lives of all members of society (liberalism:

COMP 381. Agenda  TA: Caitlyn Losee  Books and movies nominations  Team presentation signup Beginning of class End of class  Rawls and Moors.

Egalitarians View Egalitarians hold that there are no relevant differences among people that can justify unequal treatment. According to the egalitarian,

Justice as Fairness: A Closer Look by Tom Lupkie James Noonan Brian Rodriguez October 6, 2008 A-115, Professor Charles Willie.

RAWLS 1 JUSTICE IS FAIRNESS. John Rawls Teachers: H. L. A. Hart Isaiah Berlin Students: Thomas Nagel Martha Nussbaum Onara O’Neill.

John Rawls, Who? GETTING TO THE ASSIGNED ARTICLE: A THEORY OF JUSTICE (1971) HOW WERE PEOPLE THINKG ABOUT ETHICS AND JUSTICE? – Utilitarian.

THE PRINCIPLE OF UTILITY: Bentham

Thomas Hobbes ( ) l Fear of others in the state of nature (apart from society) prompts people to form governments through a social contract l State.

Contemporary Liberalism: John Rawls: Justice as Fairness l All citizens should share in a society’s wealth and be given equal economic opportunities l.

Rawls John Rawls ( ): A Theory of Justice (Harvard UP, 1971) -and other books, notably Political Liberalism (1990) -and Justice as Fairness Restated.

THE LIMITS OF CONSTITUTIONAL JUSTICE Dr Murray Wesson.

January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.

What can we do? What should we do? RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE UNITED STATES CITIZEN.

DEMOCRACY and leadership styles

Chapter One: Moral Reasons

 Rawls was influenced by Kant and Aristotle  An American Philosopher  Wrote the Following: A Theory of Justice, Political Liberalism, The Law of Peoples,

BAM321 Business Ethics and Social Responsibility Session 7 Business and Management.

Ethics Theory and Business Practice

“To be able under all circumstances to practise five things constitutes perfect virtue; these five things are gravity, generosity of soul, sincerity, earnestness.

Business Ethics Week 3. Article on: You See, the Ends Don’t Justify the Means: Visual Imagery and Moral Judgment Visual imagery and Moral judgement –

Ethical Theories Presentation LP 5 Melissa Sweet, Tara Guelig, Katherine Norton April 9 th,2009.

Justice & Fairness Approach LP: Ethical Theories Presentation By: Nelita, Brandon Keshia,Jennifer Section: Tuesday 5:30 April 1, 2008.

Rawls II: Another version of the social contract PHIL 2345.

Rawls on justice Michael Lacewing co.uk.

Contractualism and justice (1) Introduction to Rawls’s theory.

Rawls IV: Wrapping-up PHIL Original position, cont. of discussion Exclusion of prejudices while contracting in the OP:  'One excludes the knowledge.

John Rawls A Theory of Justice PULSE – April 16, 2013.

Rawls III: Social justice: an ahistorical account? PHIL 2345.

Chapter One: Moral Reasons Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.

January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.

Distributive Justice John Rawls. Which is better? MusicCheese 65.

Justice as Fairness John Rawls PHL 110: ETHICS North Central College.

Three Modern Approaches. Introduction Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Have significant new approaches Have significant new approaches.

Justice as Fairness by John Rawls. Rawls looks at justice. Kant’s ethics and Utilitarianism are about right and wrong actions. For example: Is it ethical.

Justice/Fairness Approach Learning Plan #5 Sara Deibert, Sara Roxbury, Allie Forsythe, Robert Phillips March 31,2008.

John Rawls Theory of Justice. John Rawls John Rawls (February 21, 1921 – November 24, 2002) was an American philosopher and a figure in moral and political.

Rationality in Decision Making In Law Nisigandha Bhuyan, IIMC.

DEMOCRATIC BELIEFS AND VALUES

DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS (CH. 2.0) © Wanda Teays. All rights reserved.

Deontological Approaches Consequences of decisions are not always the most important elements as suggested by the consequentialist approach. The way you.

WEEK 2 Justice as Fairness. A Theory of Justice (1971) Political Liberalism (1993)

John Rawls By Othello Jimenez. John Rawls

Law day 2017 May 1.

Introduction to Politics and International Studies Reach Summer School

PHIL 104 (STOLZE) Notes on Heather Widdows, Global Ethics: An Introduction, chapter 4.

History of Philosophy.

Political theory and law

Rawl’s Veil of Ignorance

John Rawls’ theory of justice

Rawls’ Theory of Justice

John rawls -an American moral and political philosopher

Theories of justice.

Chapter 1 Review A Portrait of Americans

Outline of John Rawls from “Justice as Fairness” and A Theory of Justice (1921) pp The Second Article on Rawls.

Three Dimensions of Justice

UNIT 1 A tradition of democracy

Miss Smith Grade 7 Civics *pgs Civics in Practice

Rawls’ Theory of Justice

Professional Ethics (GEN301/PHI200) UNIT 3: JUSTICE AND ECONOMIC DISTRIBUTION Handout #3 CLO#3 Evaluate the relation between justice, ethics and economic.

Social and economic inequalities are arranged so that they are both:

Presentation transcript:

John Rawls Theory of Justice

Presupposition if no one knew their place in the world where you would be born, who your parents were, what education you will receive, what generation you’d be born into if given the option to choose a form of government, everyone would try to create a government that was as fair and equitable as possible to all citizens and future generations.

Original Position a group of people convene to form a government. These people know that they will be subject to the laws of whatever government they form, but they do not know what position they will take in society (the VEIL OF IGNORANCE) Later explanations say that they will form this government, die, and be reincarnated into the society they’ve formed, not knowing when or into what position they will be born.

What is justice for Rawls? Justice = fairness Two principles: "First: each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive basic liberty compatible with a similar liberty for others."[1] The basic liberties of citizens are, the political liberty to vote and run for office, freedom of speech and assembly, liberty of conscience, freedom of personal property and freedom from arbitrary arrest. Social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are to be of the greatest benefit to the least-advantaged members of society offices and positions must be open to everyone under conditions of fair equality of opportunity

Your Task Begin in Rawls’ Original Position behind the Veil of Ignorance Define what JUSTICE means to you. Outline a system of government that achieves the justice you’ve described AND that respects Rawls’ theory. SO – no matter who I might be in your system, I need to feel that there is justice. NO MATTER my position in society

Your task: Go to the class website, my page. Questions 1-5 need to be turned in via email (one from every group) before class on Monday. (5 pts. each) Questions 6-10 need to be presented to your classmates orally and in some sort of written form (poster, PP, Prezi) in the second half of class on Monday. (5 pts. each) Goal: Convince us your definition of justice and system of gov’t are most desirable. At the end we will take a vote. Part of your grade is determined by how well you do in the voting.

Assessment Questions 1-5 (5 pts. each) Questions 6-10 (5 pts. each) Quality of presentation (10 pts) Voting (possible 10 pts.) My assessment of how well you achieve the justice you define. Would ANYONE at any social status want to live in your system? (10 pts.)