Environment, Safety and Health

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Museum Presentation Intermuseum Conservation Association.

Advertisements

Finally! – A Process that Looks at Environmental Risk Early J. S. Irving Environmental Compliance Idaho National Laboratory.

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Environment, Safety and Health Steve Hoey, ESH Manager NSLS-II Project Advisory Committee Meeting March 29, 2012.

Pieter Rienks, Director Hazard Management Division, WorkSafe Victoria Section 28 Duties of Designers of Buildings and Structures.

Credited Controls at C-AD Photo of the Week E. Lessard Collider-Accelerator Department Take 5 for Safety.

Stanford Linear Accelerator Center September group.slac.stanford.edu/esh/isms/tools.htm ISMS/EMS for Individuals.

FAC 4/20/06 D. Schultz 1 The SAD and ARR for Commissioning The Status of the SAD Being written as a part of the SLAC Linac SAD The Status of the ARR Design.

1 Michael Scharfenstein 1 Environment, Safety and Health CXI Final Instrument Design Review, June Mike Scharfenstein ES&H.

Michael Scharfenstein FAC October LCLS Environment, Safety & Health Michael Scharfenstein ES&H Coordinator.

Safety Oversight for SLAC Accelerator Department Operations

Michael Scharfenstein FAC April 7, 2005 LCLS ES&H Process and Documentation.

SLAC ES&H Overview Craig Ferguson March Operating Model ES&H Mission Critical Issues Challenges Path forward Topics October 2008.

Mike Scharfenstein FAC Review - November 11, 2008 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 1 Environment Safety & Health Status.

Michael Scharfenstein FAC April 16, 2007 LCLS CONSTRUCTION SAFETY Michael Scharfenstein.

1 NOTES This presentation is an outline of some of the most important aspects of DOE O 440.1B For completeness, copies of the Order should accompany this.

Risk Management at a Glance. Terms Hazard Hazard Risk Risk Probability Probability Severity Severity Estimating Estimating Exposure Exposure Risk Assessment.

M. Scharfenstein - ES&H Coordinator 8 June 2009

Malini M. Wileman, PhD, RAC Animal Biotechnology Interdisciplinary Group Center for Veterinary Medicine U.S. Food and Drug Administration Regulation of.

ALPHA Project Safety Assessment Document Vladimir Anferov.

Safety & Project Management by NABEEH JUM’AH. Eye on Safety  Proactive  Reactive.

1 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Integrated Safety Management Systems Review August 8-9, 2006 B erkeley Lab Safety Committee Presentation Paul Blodgett.

Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) RECALLS.  21 CFR 7.40 provides guidance on the policy, procedures, and industry responsibilities for recalls. 

‘OHS - A Survival Kit’ State Library of Victoria Buildings & Facilities Division (OHS) Occupational Health & Safety ‘A Survival Kit’ February 2002 Presenter:

LSST Camera Performance and Safety Assurance Plan and Safety Overview Joe Kenny Camera Safety Manager LSST Safety Council Review 18 August 2015.

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Authorization Basis Plan Steven Hoey, ESH Manager NSLS-II Project Advisory Committee Meeting December 10 – 11, 2009.

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Construction Management Status Steve Sawch Assistant Director for Construction Management NSLS-II Conventional Facilities.

Science What is “Safety” Freedom from danger Safety is the condition of being protected against failure, breakage, error, accidents, or harm. (Protection.

Quality Assurance Program National Enrichment Facility Warren Dorman September 19, National Energy and Environmental Conference.

Risk Management - the process of identifying and controlling hazards to protect the force.  It’s five steps represent a logical thought process from.

Risk Assessment Hazard Identification SAFETY LEARNING LAB Col Alex Kay and Lt Col Eric Shappee.

Safety Induction to the Lift & Escalator Industry

Products to X-ray People for Security Presented to the : Technical Electronic Product Radiation Safety Standards Committee May 22, 2002.

Two of the most important pieces of the health and safety legislation affecting educational establishments across the UK are the Health and Safety at.

Using ISMS Principles and Functions in Developing an ARRA Readiness Review Process Presented by Linda K. Rogers Assessments & Readiness Programs Manager.

DOE Order 413.3A Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets Catherine Santana Deputy Director, Project Management Systems, OECM.

Management of Change ► The health, safety, security, environmental, technical and other impacts of temporary and permanent changes are formally assessed,

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Presentation to PAC R. Casey NSLS-II ESH Program Status May 25, 2007.

Introduction to a Safe Workplace

Software QA Safety Systems at SLAC Enzo Carrone Controls Department – Safety Systems SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.

Parliamentary Portfolio Committee Presentation Annual Report 2012.

January 4, 2007 RHIC II Project Internal Cost Review Ed Lessard ESH D R A F T Project Overview.

Take 5 for Safety E. Lessard January 13, Readiness for High Consequence Risks: Accelerator Operations  Implementing procedures tie responsible.

Independent Oversight Status Report on Workplace Exposure Monitoring ISM Workshop 2007.

Mike Scharfenstein LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 ES&H Overview p. 1 LCLS Ultrafast Science Instruments (LUSI) M. Scharfenstein.

CBIZ RISK & ADVISORY SERVICES BUSINESS CONTINUITY PLANNING Developing a Readiness Strategy that Mitigates Risk and is Actionable and Easy to Implement.

Task Manager Construction Coordinator Training -- EMS-- Fermilab 95% of Asbestos found is either Amosite or Chryosotile95% of Asbestos found is either.

PIP-II Environment, Safety, Health & Quality Assurance Strategy John Anderson Jr. DOE Independent Project Review of PIP-II 16 June 2015.

Overview of FESHCom Subcommittees Don Cossairt, Radiation Protection Manager, ESH&Q Section October 1, 2013.

Train When it Rains: Risk Assessment. What is Risk Assessment? Risk assessment is the process of recognizing possible harm from exposures which could.

Camera PDR/CD1 Planning 19 September 2008

Planning for Succession

Accelerator Readiness Review October 31, 2006

Project Management W. J. Foyt

Accelerator Operations Department Readiness (Part 2)

LCLS Linac Technical Design Review Charge

1 Zoe Van Hoover 1 User Safety: Commissioning and Early Experiments NEH ARR User Safety: LCLS NEH Commissioning and Early Experiments.

Hold Your Breath—Ohio EPA’s TCE Initiative

ECMA-287 Safety of Electronic Equipment Safeguards to reduce harmful exposure to energy sources Ecma TC12 Rue du Rhône CH-1204 Geneva - T: +41.

M. Scharfenstein - ES&H Coordinator 14 May 2009

Thomas Fornek Project Manager July 15, 2009

Ian Evans SSRL Safety Office

Conventional Facilities (WBS 1

Integrated Safety and Environmental Management

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)

Richard Hislop Construction Safety Coordinator

DOE Review of the LCLS Project October 2006

ESHAC #8 Safety Readiness Review Thomas Hansson, ESH

Safety Program for LCLS Experiments

DOE Review of the LCLS Project 7-9 February 2006

PROJECT SAFETY Richard Hislop.

Presentation transcript:

Environment, Safety and Health M. Scharfenstein – ES&H Coordinator

Integrated Safety Management Process DOE O 413.3A / Program and Project Management Hazard Analysis Report Lessons Learned DOE O 420.2A / Accelerator Safety Safety Assessment Document Accelerator Safety Envelope DOE O 450.1 / Safety Management System Integrated Safety and Environmental Management National Environmental Policy Act

ISEMS Process cont’d The Environmental Assessment developed for the LCLS resulted in a Finding of No Significant Impact encompassed the physical space occupied by LUSI and its operations The LUSI Hazard Analysis Report states its instruments are being designed so that they will not pose hazards to people or the environment (413.3A) The most significant potential hazard associated with LUSI instruments is that related to ionizing radiation The LUSI instruments are designed to 10CFR 835 defines radiation protection regulations for the protection of individuals from ionizing radiation Lessons Learned SLAC process driven by Operating Experience Program (210.2) SNS Lessons Learned from Instrument Beamline Construction (413.3A) LUSI instruments will be designed and built within the scope of LCLS Safety Assessment Document (420.2A) The instruments will comply with the DOE and SLAC approved Accelerator Safety Envelope

ISEMS Process cont’d SLAC Integrated Safety and Environmental Management (450.1) SLAC ES&H Manual Safety Oversight Committee Review Process Work Planning and Control Program new! LCLS ES&H management practices LCLS Requirement, Specification and Interface Documents Physics Requirements Documents, Engineering Specification Documents, Preliminary & Final Design Reviews, etc LCLS Work Authorization Preliminary Design Review SOC Reviews Final Design Review Project Management sign-off

Hazards Analysis Process Process to document the hazard analysis of the instrument design Reviewed and Approved by the DOE Stanford Site Office DOE O 413.3A / Program and Project Management Peer Review Hazards Analysis Report R. Hislop SME, Author & Reviewer APS F. O’Neil SME, Author of GLAST HAR Living document subject to an annual review

Hazard Analysis Process The hazard analysis process is a principal factor in the understanding and management of technical risk Hazard severity is an assessment of the worst potential consequence, defined by degree of injury or property damage, which could occur Probability is the likelihood that an identified hazard will result in a mishap, based on an assessment of such factors as location, exposure in terms of cycles or hours of operation, and affected population These levels are derived from MIL-STD-882D, Standard Practices for System Safety Defense Standards are also used by other non-Defense government organizations, technical organizations, and industry

Hazard Consequence Rating

Integrated Safety and Environmental Management Conclusion Integrated Safety and Environmental Management Following SLAC ISEMS Process SLAC ES&H Manual Safety Oversight Committee Lessons Learned SLAC program SLAC Work Planning & Control Process Following LCLS ES&H management practices LCLS Requirement, Specification and Interface Documents Hazard Analysis Report Updated from CD-2 and Approved by DOE Lessons Learned – SNS report CD-2 and XPP FIDR recommended moving forward From an ES&H perspective LUSI is ready for CD-3