Evaluation Cycle At-A-Glance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DPAS II Jessica Baker & Cheryl Cresci MED 7701 Dr. Joseph Massare.
Advertisements

BRISTOL WARREN REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Implementation of RI Educator Evaluation System
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
The New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Natick Public Schools.
Alaska Educator Evaluation Overview Yukon Koyukuk School District.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
ComprehensiveFocused  Evidence needs to be collected for all 27 components found in all 8 Criteria  Evidence needs to be collected in one of the 8 Criteria.
The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation: An Orientation for Teachers and Staff October 2014 (updated) Facilitator Note: This presentation was.
TEACHER EVALUATIONS. REVIEW OF POLICY Classroom teaching must be observed using one of the four piloted observation tools: Charlotte Danielson’s.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
The New Massachusetts Principal Evaluation
EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS FACILITATORS SESSION #2 JANUARY 2013 Unpacking Well-Structured Lessons.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 3 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Creating & Implementing Your Plan October 2012.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Professional Growth Through Self-Assessment and Goal Writing September 2012.
Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
My Learning Plan Observation and Appraisal SYStem
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS March 13, 2014 Wifi: EnglishWLan PW:BostonEnglish1821 Leveraging Evaluation to Support School Priorities & Increase.
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS Monday, October 28 Leveraging Evaluation to Support School Priorities & Increase Effectiveness.
Oconee Keys Training September, Oconee Keys is designed to: Evaluate classroom teachers using qualitative rubrics to assess instructional practices.
Candidate Assessment of Performance (CAP): an Overview CAP Practicum Workshop for AIC Teacher Candidates Practicum Workshop Pt.2.
The District Management Council 70 Franklin Street Boston, MA Tel: 877.DMC Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Educator Plans Overview
Evaluation 4.0 Or at least a 3.75.
What it means for New Teachers
Introduction to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model for USD 259
Teacher Evaluation Timeline
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
The New Educator Evaluation System
The New Educator Evaluation System
Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES/OPGES Does NOT Apply LaRue County Schools Opening Day, 2017 Complete.
Teacher Evaluation Performance Categories
Low-Performing Schools Evaluation Requirements
Teacher Evaluation Performance Categories
Teacher Evaluation Process
Appraisal Document Review
The New Educator Evaluation System
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Teacher Evaluation Training
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Leon LEADS Leon Evaluation And Development System
Formative Assessments and Observations on EDFS
KSDE Board Presentation Educator Evaluation Systems Update
and Amended Calendar Proposal(s)
Objectives for today If we have done our job today, you will:
Documenting Your Work Through Artifacts November 2012
State Board of Education Progress Update
Improving student achievement through teacher observation and feedback
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Georgia Department of Education
Creating Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM (PDAS) TEACHER ORIENTATION This orientation provides an overview of the elements of the PDAS system and.
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Pike County Schools Certified Evaluation Annual Training
Assessment Day Strategy
The Administrator’s View of a Staff Profile Page
and Amended Calendar Proposal(s)
Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May
GCSD Revised APPR Forms
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation Cycle At-A-Glance Self-Assessment Educator submits summary of self-assessment Directed Improvement Goals & Action Plans Self-Directed Educator proposes goals Goal Meeting Evaluator request revisions Educator and evaluator may co-create goals Evaluator sets goals based on prescriptions in previous evaluations Plan Implementation Educator implements action plan Educator and evaluator collect evidence through artifacts and observations Formative Assessment* Midway through the cycle, evaluator prepares assessment and makes rating Evaluator and educator meet Rating determines next steps: * Midway through a 2-year plan this step will be a Formative Evaluation Higher Rating Move to a less directed plan Same Rating Plan continues Lower Rating Move to a more directed plan Summative Evaluation At the end of the cycle, evaluator prepares assessment and makes rating Evaluator and educator meet Rating determines next steps: Exemplary or Proficient Move to (or stay on) Self-Directed plan Needs Improvement Directed plan (or Improvement if already on Directed plan) Unsatisfactory Improvement plan (or termination if already on Improvement plan)

Improvement Plan Cycle 30 calendar days – 1 year Self-Assessment Educator and evaluator meet within 10 days of assigning the plan Evaluator directs educator to submits summary of self-assessment within this time Goals & Action Plans Evaluator sets goals based on prescriptions from previous evaluations Plan Implementation Educator and evaluator collect evidence through artifacts and observations Observation requirements:1 announced , 2 unannounced for plans < 6 months 4 unannounced for plans between 6 months and a year Formative Assessment Midway through the cycle, evaluator prepares assessment and makes rating Evaluator and educator meet Rating determines next steps: Proficient or Exemplary Move to a Self- directed plan Needs Improvement Move to a Directed plan Unsatisfactory Plan continues Summative Evaluation At the end of the cycle, evaluator prepares assessment and makes rating Rating determines next steps: Exemplary or Proficient Move to a Self-Directed plan Needs Improvement Move to Directed plan Unsatisfactory termination

Directed Growth Plan Cycle Up to 1 year Self-Assessment Educator submits summary of self-assessment Educator and evaluator meet within 10 days of assigning the plan Evaluator directs educator to submits summary of self-assessment within this time Goals & Action Plans Educator and evaluator may co-create goals, or the evaluator sets goals based on previous prescriptions Plan Implementation Educator implements action plan Educator and evaluator collect evidence through artifacts and observations Evaluator completes at least two unannounced observations Formative Assessment Midway through the cycle, evaluator prepares assessment and makes rating Evaluator and educator meet Rating determines next steps: Proficient or Exemplary Move to a Self- directed plan Needs Improvement Plan continues Unsatisfactory Move to an Improvement plan Summative Evaluation At the end of the cycle, evaluator prepares assessment and makes rating Rating determines next steps: Exemplary or Proficient Move to a Self-Directed plan Needs Improvement Move to an Improvement plan Unsatisfactory

Self-Directed Growth Plan Cycle 1 year Self-Assessment By 10/1, educator submits summary of self-assessment Goals & Action Plans By 10/1, educator proposes a student learning and a professional practice goal in EDFS By 11/1, evaluator completes educator plan by approving goals and action steps Educator proposes goals Goal Meeting Evaluator request revisions Plan Implementation Educator implements steps in action plan Educator and evaluator collect evidence through artifacts and observations Evaluator completes at least one unannounced observation by 11/15 Formative Assessment Midway through the cycle, evaluator prepares assessment and makes rating Rating determines next steps: Proficient or Exemplary Plan continues Needs Improvement Move to a Directed plan Unsatisfactory Move to an Improvement plan Summative Evaluation At the end of the cycle, evaluator prepares assessment and makes rating Rating determines next steps: By 5/15, enter SE in EDFS By 6/1, meet with educators being rated N.I. or Unsat. Exemplary or Proficient Begin next Self-Directed plan Needs Improvement Move to a Directed plan Unsatisfactory Move to an Improvement plan

Self-Directed Growth Plan Cycle 2 years Self-Assessment By 10/1, educator submits summary of self-assessment Goals & Action Plans By 10/1, educator proposes a student learning and a professional practice goal in EDFS By 11/1, evaluator completes educator plan by approving goals and action steps Educator proposes goals Goal Meeting Evaluator request revisions Plan Implementation Educator implements action plan Educator and evaluator collect evidence through artifacts and observations Evaluator completes at least one unannounced observation any time during the cycle Formative Evaluation Midway through the cycle, evaluator prepares assessment and makes rating By 6/1 of the 1st year, evaluator enters FE in EDFS Rating determines next steps: Proficient or Exemplary Plan continues Needs Improvement Move to a Directed plan Unsatisfactory Move to an Improvement plan Summative Evaluation At the end of the cycle, evaluator prepares assessment and makes rating Rating determines next steps: By 5/15 of the 2nd year, enter SE in EDFS By 6/1 of the 2nd year, meet with educators being rated N.I. or Unsat. Exemplary or Proficient Begin next Self-Directed plan Needs Improvement Move to a Directed plan Unsatisfactory Move to an Improvement plan

Developing Educator Plan Cycle 1 year Self-Assessment By 10/1, educator submits summary of self-assessment Goals & Action Plans By 10/1, evaluator meets with 1st year educators to assist with self-assessment and goal-setting By 10/1, educator proposes a student learning and a professional practice goal in EDFS By 11/1, evaluator completes educator plan by approving goals and action steps Educator proposes goals Goal Meeting Evaluator request revisions Plan Implementation Educator and evaluator collect evidence through artifacts and observations Evaluator completes at least 1 announced and 4 unannounced observations in the 1st year and 1 announced and 3 unannounced in the 2nd/3rd years*. By 11/15, evaluator must complete first observation Formative Assessment Midway through the cycle, evaluator prepares assessment and makes rating Evaluator and educator meet Rating determines next steps: Proficient or Exemplary Plan continues Needs Improvement Move to a Directed plan Unsatisfactory Move to an Improvement plan The four unannounced observations applies to a non-PTS teacher in the first year of practice or first year at the school. In the second year and third year of practice or at the school, the educator must have at least three unannounced observations Summative Evaluation At the end of the cycle, evaluator prepares assessment and decides rating Rating determines next steps: By 5/15, enter SE in EDFS By 6/1, meet with educators being rated N.I. or Unsat. Exemplary or Proficient Move to a Self-Directed plan Needs Improvement Directed plan Unsatisfactory Move to an Improvement plan * Unannounced observation requirements apply to either years of practice or years at the school