Doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/0015r2 Submission January 2004 Yang-Seok Choi et al., ViVATOSlide 1 Comments on Ergodic and Outage Capacity Yang-Seok Choi,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /567r1 Submission July 2003 Youngsoo Kim, Samsung/SNU and S. Choi, SNU Slide 1 Throughput Enhancement via Frame Aggregation – A Sequel.
Advertisements

ECSE 6592 Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks Spatial Diversity in Wireless Networks Hsin-Yi Shen Nov 3, 2005.
Outline Transmitters (Chapters 3 and 4, Source Coding and Modulation) (week 1 and 2) Receivers (Chapter 5) (week 3 and 4) Received Signal Synchronization.
نیمسال اوّل افشین همّت یار دانشکده مهندسی کامپیوتر مخابرات سیّار (626-40) ظرفیت انتقال اطلاعات.
Doc.: IEEE /0060r0 Submission January 2004 Christopher Hansen, BroadcomSlide 1 Thoughts on TX Spectral Masks for n Christopher J. Hansen.
Doc.: IEEE /792r1 Submission Slide 1 André Bourdoux (IMEC) July 2004 Transmit processing: a viable scheme for MIMO-OFDM in n André Bourdoux.
Doc.: IEEE /0071r1 Submission January 2004 Aleksandar Purkovic, Nortel NetworksSlide 1 LDPC vs. Convolutional Codes for n Applications:
Interference Cancellation for Downlink MU-MIMO
Submission March 2012 doc.: IEEE Slide 1 SINR and Inter-STA Interference Indication Feedback in DL MU-MIMO Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0612r3 Submission May 2007 H. Zhang., et al.Slide 1 Comment Resolution on TX Beamforming CSI/Steering Feedback Quantization Bitwidth.
Doc.: IEEE /1234r0 Submission November 2009 Sameer Vermani, QualcommSlide 1 Interference Cancellation for Downlink MU-MIMO Date: Authors:
Non-linear pre-coding for next generation WLAN
EE359 – Lecture 8 Outline Capacity of Fading channels Fading Known at TX and RX Optimal Rate and Power Adaptation Channel Inversion with Fixed Rate Capacity.
Doc.: IEEE /1212r0 Submission October Jeng-Hong Chen, Pansop Kim, Winbond ElectronicsSlide 1 Performance of Circulation Transmission (Sub_BC)
Prakshep Mehta ( ) Guided By: Prof. R.K. Shevgaonkar
Doc.: IEEE /1090/r2 Submission September 2013 Submission Zhanji Wu, et. Al. Non-linear pre-coding MIMO scheme for next generation WLAN Date:
Capacity of Wireless Channels
Enhancing Secrecy With Channel Knowledge
Doc.: IEEE / k Submission September 2003 Brian Johnson, Nortel Networks a Performance Over Various Channels 9 September 2003 Presenter:
Semi-Blind Equalization for OFDM using Space-Time Block Coding and Channel Shortening Alvin Leung Yang You EE381K-12 March 04, 2008.
EE359 – Lecture 16 Outline Announcements: HW due Friday MT announcements Rest of term announcements MIMO Diversity/Multiplexing Tradeoffs MIMO Receiver.
Ergodic Capacity of MIMO Relay Channel Bo Wang and Junshan Zhang Dept. of Electrical Engineering Arizona State University Anders Host-Madsen Dept. of Electrical.
APPLICATION OF SPACE-TIME CODING TECHNIQUES IN THIRD GENERATION SYSTEMS - A. G. BURR ADAPTIVE SPACE-TIME SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CODING – A. G. BURR.
ECE 776 Information Theory Capacity of Fading Channels with Channel Side Information Andrea J. Goldsmith and Pravin P. Varaiya, Professor Name: Dr. Osvaldo.
5: Capacity of Wireless Channels Fundamentals of Wireless Communication, Tse&Viswanath 1 5. Capacity of Wireless Channels.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1452r0 November 2014 Leif Wilhelmsson, EricssonSlide 1 Frequency selective scheduling in OFDMA Date: Authors:
Capacity of multi-antenna Gaussian Channels, I. E. Telatar By: Imad Jabbour MIT May 11, 2006.
Muhammad Imadur Rahman1, Klaus Witrisal2,
12- OFDM with Multiple Antennas. Multiple Antenna Systems (MIMO) TX RX Transmit Antennas Receive Antennas Different paths Two cases: 1.Array Gain: if.
ECE 480 Wireless Systems Lecture 14 Problem Session 26 Apr 2006.
Wireless Communication Elec 534 Set IV October 23, 2007
Optimization of adaptive coded modulation schemes for maximum average spectral efficiency H. Holm, G. E. Øien, M.-S. Alouini, D. Gesbert, and K. J. Hole.
Doc.: IEEE /0493r1 Submission May 2010 Changsoon Choi, IHP microelectronicsSlide 1 Beamforming training for IEEE ad Date: Authors:
Transmit Diversity with Channel Feedback Krishna K. Mukkavilli, Ashutosh Sabharwal, Michael Orchard and Behnaam Aazhang Department of Electrical and Computer.
Doc.: IEEE /0075r0 Submission January 2004 H. Sampath, PhD, Marvell SemiconductorSlide 1 Pros and Cons of Circular Delay Diversity Scheme for.
EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Communication Zhu Han Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Class 11 Feb. 19 th, 2014.
EE359 – Lecture 14 Outline Announcements: HW posted tomorrow, due next Thursday Will send project feedback this week Practical Issues in Adaptive Modulation.
Doc.: IEEE /314r0 Submission March 2004 Taehyun Jeon, ETRISlide 1 Adaptive Modulation for MIMO-OFDM Systems Taehyun Jeon, Heejung Yu, and Sok-kyu.
Part 3: Channel Capacity
Doc.: IEEE /0909r0 Submission July 2012 Jong S. Baek, AlereonSlide 1 Analysis, simulation and resultant data from a 6-9GHz OFDM MAC/PHY Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0493r0 Submission May 2010 Changsoon Choi, IHP microelectronicsSlide 1 Beamforming training for IEEE ad Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0016r0 Submission January 2004 Yang-Seok Choi et al., ViVATOSlide 1 Layered Processing for MIMO OFDM Yang-Seok Choi,
Doc.: IEEE /0112r0 Zhanji Wu, et. Al. January 2013 Submission Joint Coding and Modulation Diversity for the Next Generation WLAN Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0161r1 Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r0 January 2010 R. Kudo, K. Ishihara and Y. Takatori (NTT) Slide 1 Measured Channel Variation.
Doc.: IEEE /0075r1 Submission January 2004 H. Sampath, R. Narasimhan, Marvell SemiconductorSlide 1 Advantages and Drawbacks of Circular Delay.
Media-based Modulation
Doc.: IEEE /229r1 Submission March 2004 Alexandre Ribeiro Dias - Motorola LabsSlide 1 Multiple Antenna OFDM solutions for enhanced PHY Presented.
Doc.: IEEE 11-04/0304r0 Submission March 2004 John S. Sadowsky, Intel PER Prediction for n MAC Simulation John S. Sadowsky (
Doc.: IEEE /0213r1 Submission Slide 1 David Tung, et al. (Ralink Technology) March 2005 On the Efficiency of TGnSync Preambles David Tung,
Channel Capacity.
Multiple Antennas.
Performance Analysis of Open Loop SU-MIMO Receivers for IEEE ay
Diversity.
Doc.: IEEE /0632r1 Submission May 2016 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Performance Analysis of Robust Transmission Modes for MIMO in 11ay Date:
EE359 – Lecture 16 Outline ISI Countermeasures Multicarrier Modulation
EE359 – Lecture 14 Outline Practical Issues in Adaptive Modulation
Multiple Antennas: Performance Gains with Channel Measurements
Design of Multiple Antenna Coding Schemes with Channel Feedback
Space Time Coding and Channel Estimation
Wireless Communication Channel Capacity
Layered Processing for MIMO OFDM
Wireless Communication Channel Capacity
Ian C. Wong, Zukang Shen, Jeffrey G. Andrews, and Brian L. Evans
Master Thesis Presentation
Multiple Antennas: Performance Gains with Channel Measurements
EE359 – Lecture 14 Outline Announcements:
Optimal Combining of STBC and Spatial Multiplexing for MIMO-OFDM
Joint Coding and Modulation Diversity for ac
PER Prediction for n MAC Simulation
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0015r2 Submission January 2004 Yang-Seok Choi et al., ViVATOSlide 1 Comments on Ergodic and Outage Capacity Yang-Seok Choi, Siavash M. Alamouti,

doc.: IEEE /0015r2 Submission January 2004 Yang-Seok Choi et al., ViVATOSlide 2 Questions? From IEEE /940r1, TGn-channel-models –Can we achieve 10 b/s/Hz at 10 dB SNR? –If not, how much spectral efficiency can we get at 10 dB SNR? –Model B provides better capacity than C? Model (NLOS)Mean capacity in b/s/Hz % of iid mean capacity A (optional)9.183 B8.981 C8.678 D E9.385 F iid Table III: 4x4 MIMO channel mean capacity for the NLOS conditions at 10 dB SNR.

doc.: IEEE /0015r2 Submission January 2004 Yang-Seok Choi et al., ViVATOSlide 3 Comments The table may mislead n participants regarding practical interpretation of capacity. –The numbers are neither a lower nor an upper bound for n performance criteria (FER as a function of SNR for a given bandwidth efficiency) –Relative theoretical performance for the different channels (compared to iid) does not correspond to the relative practical difference for known techniques. Outage Capacity is a more useful metric than Ergodic Average Capacity.

doc.: IEEE /0015r2 Submission January 2004 Yang-Seok Choi et al., ViVATOSlide 4 Assumptions Block Fading Channel –Channel is invariant over a frame –Channel is independent from frame to frame CSI is available to Rx only –Perfect CSI at RX –No feedback channel Gaussian codebook

doc.: IEEE /0015r2 Submission January 2004 Yang-Seok Choi et al., ViVATOSlide 5 System Models where

doc.: IEEE /0015r2 Submission January 2004 Yang-Seok Choi et al., ViVATOSlide 6 Instantaneous Capacity Capacity under given realization of channel matrix with perfect knowledge of channel at Rx If transmitted frames have spectral efficiency less than above capacity, with arbitrarily large codeword, FER will be arbitrarily small If transmitted frames have spectral efficiency greater than above capacity, with arbitrarily large codeword, FER will approach 100%.

doc.: IEEE /0015r2 Submission January 2004 Yang-Seok Choi et al., ViVATOSlide 7 Ergodic Capacity Ergodic Capacity : Ensemble average of instantaneous capacity over all possible channel matrices If, does this mean that in average we achieve 10 b/s/Hz spectral efficiency? –No in the sense of practical implementation! –But if CSI is available at Tx, by using adaptive modulation it can be true when the adaptive modulation can handle spectral efficiency from 0 to infinity. But if CSI is known to Tx, you can achieve better capacity. Is it possible to achieve Ergodic Capacity?

doc.: IEEE /0015r2 Submission January 2004 Yang-Seok Choi et al., ViVATOSlide 8 Ergodic Capacity (contd) How to achieve Ergodic capacity when CSI is not available to Tx? –At least, Your codeword should be spanned over all possible channel matrices. Otherwise there is no way to achieve Ergodic Capacity. –The codeword may have to be spread over all possible locations. –Or the frame duration should be much longer than coherence time. –And your coding structure should be able to achieve Ergodic capacity. Ergodic capacity is not a useful metric

doc.: IEEE /0015r2 Submission January 2004 Yang-Seok Choi et al., ViVATOSlide 9 Outage Capacity In fading channel, the capacity is a random variable. Due to delay limitation, outage capacity is more meaningful than ergodic capacity Outage capacity at outage probability When –The above does not mean that in average we achieve 10 bps/Hz spectral efficiency –But it means that FER is 0.5 even with ideal code if your frame has 10 b/s/Hz spectral efficiency

doc.: IEEE /0015r2 Submission January 2004 Yang-Seok Choi et al., ViVATOSlide 10 Outage Capacity (contd) CDF in Log scale : Low outage probability is of interest (some consider zero-outage probability) –Recall definition of Capacity – Maximum rate without error –Linear scale may not reveal behaviors at low outage probabilities Outage Probability –With ideal code, outage probability is equal to FER of which spectral efficiency is C 0 –With non-ideal code, outage probability is lower bound of FER –Slope of Log outage probability vs. Log SNR plot : Diversity Order –Slope of non-ideal code FER Diversity order

doc.: IEEE /0015r2 Submission January 2004 Yang-Seok Choi et al., ViVATOSlide 11 Outage Capacity (contd) 100Mbps MAC SAP –150 Mbps PHY SAP : required spectral efficiency for OFDM systems = (PHY Overhead such as Preamble is excluded) Capacity in 11n –SNR=Received Signal Power per Rx antenna/Noise Power (at each subcarrier) where is a channel matrix at subcarrier k assuming and Max delay<GI

doc.: IEEE /0015r2 Submission January 2004 Yang-Seok Choi et al., ViVATOSlide 12 Outage Capacity (contd) Outage Prob. 4-by-4 MIMO OFDM(NLOS, No shadow fading) – 0.5 spacing – 1 spacing

doc.: IEEE /0015r2 Submission January 2004 Yang-Seok Choi et al., ViVATOSlide 13 Outage Capacity (contd) Loss due to –Non-Ideal code (Space and Frequency diversity) –Non-Ideal Channel Estimation –Implementation Loss –NF

doc.: IEEE /0015r2 Submission January 2004 Yang-Seok Choi et al., ViVATOSlide 14 Comparison Table (4x4) Required SNR at 10% FER for 12.5 b/s/Hz with ideal coding Model (NLOS) 0.5 spacing1 spacing B15.6 dB13.6 dB C15.4 dB13.4 dB D13.2 dB12.2 dB E14 dB13.1 dB iid (flat)13.4 dB iid (200 nsec rms)12.1 dB

doc.: IEEE /0015r2 Submission January 2004 Yang-Seok Choi et al., ViVATOSlide 15 Comparison at PHY Compare Proposals with ideal coding case –Slope –Required SNR at 10% FER

doc.: IEEE /0015r2 Submission January 2004 Yang-Seok Choi et al., ViVATOSlide 16 Thank you for your attention!! Questions?

doc.: IEEE /0015r2 Submission January 2004 Yang-Seok Choi et al., ViVATOSlide 17 Back-up 100Mbps MAC SAP –150 Mbps PHY SAP : required spectral efficiency = (PHY Overhead such as Preamble is excluded) Capacity in 11n –SNR=Total Received Signal Power per Rx antenna/Noise Power (at each subcarrier) where is a channel matrix at subcarrier k assuming and Max delay<GI Capacity in OFDM