Dan Kline, GenEd Director

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ABSTRACT. Metadisciplines are groups of disciplines that hold in common an overarching framework of reasoning/way of knowing that unites them. For example,
Advertisements

Dept. of Computing and Technology (CaT) School of Science and Technology B.S. in Computer Information Systems (CIS) CIP Code: Program Code: 411.
Core Competencies Student Focus Group, Nov. 20, 2008.
Working with Rubrics: Using the Oral Communication, Writing, and Critical Thinking Rubrics VALUE Rubrics Ashley Finley, Ph.D Senior Director of Assessment.
General Education Models General Education Reform Committee Lloyd Duman Carol Lindsay Sherry Simkins Karen Ruppel Bob Vogeler Peter Zao Bob Murray.
Mary Allen Qatar University September Workshop participants will be able to:  draft/revise learning outcomes  develop/analyze curriculum maps.
An Outcomes-based Assessment Model for General Education Amy Driscoll WASC EDUCATIONAL SEMINAR February 1, 2008.
1 General Education Senate discussion scheduled for April 11 and 25 1.Proposal to base General Education on outcomes that can be assessed 2.Proposal for.
NASPAA Accreditation Matching operations with mission: Student Learning Standard 5.1:Universal Required Competencies.
The Value of General Education: UAA and the National Discussion Presentation by the UAA General Education Assessment Task Force for the Faculty Senate.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
CCSS Implementation July 2010: State Board of Education adopts Common Core State Standards for English and Mathematics : Implementation of.
SLOAC Committee Flex Day Working Session Date: Time: 12:45 – 2:15.
Essential Elements of a Workable Assessment Plan Pat Tinsley McGill, Ph.D. Professor, Strategic Management College of Business Faculty Lead, Assessment.
Pierce College CSUN-Pierce Paths Project Outcomes Report 2013.
Assessing Program-Level SLOs November 2010 Mary Pape Antonio Ramirez 1.
Assessing General Education Workshop for College of the Redwoods Fred Trapp August 18, 2008.
Institutional Outcomes and their Implications for Student Learning by John C. Savagian History Department Alverno C O L L E G E.
General Education Learning Outcomes: Campus Discussion on Development & Process Sacramento City College LR 105 – 2:00-3:30 April 4 th, 2006 Facilitators:
Navigating the Shoals of Portfolio Implementation Susan Kahn and Lynn Ward Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis.
Assessment of Student Learning North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture Cia Verschelden June 17, 2009.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
S LOs What is New and Due in the Assessment Process: A focus on continued improvement in academic year NOTE: For reference, hyperlinks to resources.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Assessment 101: What do you (really) need to know? Melinda Jackson, SJSU Assessment Director October
Curriculum Mapping: Academic Faculty & Subject Librarians Working Together By Barbara Tierney, Head Research & Info Services, UCF Libraries With some content.
HOW INSTITUTIONS MAKE MEANINGFUL CHANGE WITH OUTCOME ASSESSMENT MARCH 21, 2014 MIRAMAR COLLEGE: A CULTURE OF IMPROVEMENT.
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
Orange Coast College Office of Institutional Effectiveness ISLO Update to Institutional Effectiveness Committee 4/25/2014 ISLO GE SLO Local AA/AS.
General Education Learning Outcomes Report to Faculty Senate and Office of Academic Affairs.
1 Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
Core Curriculum Workgroup Presentation to UEAC April 16, 2010.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
 Julie Bruno, Sierra College  Roberta Eisel, Citrus College  Fred Hochstaedter, Monterey Peninsula College.
Adding Flame to Kindling: Transforming Campus Culture
Robert P. King Department of Applied Economics April 14, 2017
Institutional Student Learning Outcomes
Report from Curriculum Committee 4/3/2017
Introduction to Curriculum Mapping
WORKSHOP Computer Science Curriculum Development
CAFE 1 - GER & AA Assessment: Curriculum Mapping & Shared SLOs
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Outcomes Assessment Committee
Institutional Student Learning Outcomes
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Academic Affairs Update Monday, April 17, 2017
AACSB’s Standard 9: Curriculum content
General Education Assessment Subcommittee Report
SHEEO Higher Education Policy Conference | August 8–10, 2012 State Agency Workshop Session Learning Outcomes Assessment Development of Statewide Plan.
First-Stage Draft Plans for Gen Ed Revision
Helping students know what they know
Institutional Learning Outcomes Assessment
Continuing to Advance the Culture of Assessment in Massachusetts
Institutional Effectiveness USF System Office of Decision Support
Advanced Program Learning Assessment
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
Program Review Teaching and learning committee Santa ana college
Randy Beach, South Representative Marie Boyd, Chaffey College
Jillian Kinzie, Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research
General Education Redesign Task Force
Shazna Buksh, School of Social Sciences
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
Curriculum Committee Report
UAA Showcase: Results from the Three-Year GER Assessment Pilot
GER Forum 3: Interstate Passport Lower-Division Gen Ed Block Transfer
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH
Student Interpretation of Learning Outcomes
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 3, 2017
Presentation transcript:

Dan Kline, GenEd Director AY18-19 GER Forum 1: What’s the Latest in GenEd? What’s on the Horizon? Dan Kline, GenEd Director Friday, 14 September 2018 LIB 302 | 11:30-12:30

UAA GERs: 3 Tiers, 7 Categories, 9 Outcomes Tier I: Basic & Crosscutting Skills (12 cr) Written Comm (6 cr) Oral Comm (3 cr) Quantitative Lit (3 cr) Tier II: Disciplinary Knowledge (22 cr) Natural Sciences (7 cr) Social Sciences (6 cr) Humanities (6 cr) Fine Arts (3 cr) Tier III: Integrative Capstone (3 cr) Meets GER in the major Integration of Tier I in major After completing the GERs, UAA students should be able to: Communicate effectively in a variety of contexts and formats. Reason mathematically and analyze quantitative and qualitative data competently to reach sound conclusions. Relate knowledge to the historical context in which it developed and the human problems it addresses. Interpret different systems of aesthetic representation and understand their historical and cultural contexts. Investigate the complexity of human institutions and behavior to better understand interpersonal, group and cultural dynamics. Identify ways in which science has advanced the understanding of important natural processes. Locate and use relevant information to make appropriate personal and professional decisions. Adopt critical perspectives for understanding the forces of globalization and diversity. Integrate knowledge and employ skills gained to synthesize creative thinking, critical judgment and personal experience in a meaningful and coherent manner.

The Vision Thing: From GERs to GenEd Program “Why do I have to take this stoopid course?” Compliance / Reporting Menu & Checklist Course-based & discipline-focused Category specific Individual responsibility Curricular maze Overly complicated Too many courses Too many outcomes Inconsistent pathways Prerequisite issues “There are good (pedagogically sound and curricularly coherent) reasons for you to take these courses!” Values / Teaching & Learning Shared outcomes & collective understanding Cross-cutting skills & cumulative experience Mutual investment (GenEd ↔ Majors/Progr/Profs) GER-initiated & program-developed “Umbrella” indicators – seeded & mapped “General” education Shared expectations & responsibility Better communication (faculty, students/parents, others) Closing the Loop: pedagogy & assessment

GER Shared-Assessment Principles Because so many of the GER SLOs are “cross-cutting skills” valued across the curriculum, we have built the GER assessment so that it is Shared across all curricula & developed by cross-disciplinary faculty Sampled from a wide variety of student work in all courses Sustainable alongside UAA’s current robust course- and program-level assessment processes GER shared assessment offers a snapshot of collective student achievement across the breadth of UAA programs All indicators are faculty-developed based upon UAA curriculum review materials and coordinated with the AAC&U’s LEAP indicators and VALUE rubrics where possible GenEd is everyone’s business!

Faculty-Developed GER Outcomes & Indicators  Full Cycle Complete AY14-15 – Faculty Senate GER Assessment Committee recommendations (GenEd Director & three outcomes per year) & GELO task force AY15-16 – Rubric 1: Written Communication, Oral Communication, and Information Literacy. GER assessment AY16-17 – Rubric 2: Social Sciences, Humanities, and Fine Arts GER & AA assessment (shared assessment and simplified outcomes) aligned AY17-18 – Rubric 3: Natural Sciences, Quantitative Skills, and Knowledge Integration. GER, AA, AAS (shared assessment and aligned curriculum; all five UAA campuses)

AA Assessment: From Five Separate to One Shared One UAA AA Degree but Five Sets of Outcomes and Five Different Assessment Plans AY16-17: AA Program Review Single Assessment Plan fro all UAA campuses Shared Set of Simplified Outcomes (opposite) AY17-18: Now Coordinated with GER & AAS “related instruction” Shared materials and artifacts Shared rubrics Common team New Shared AA Outcomes Communicate Effectively Think Critically Evaluate Analytically Reason Empirically

Thumbnail View – GenEd Related Discussions AY18-19 Assessment Focus: Critical Thinking Workshops (Fa18 & Spr19): Mapping, SLOs, Scaffolding, Assignments Develop four shared indicators & map to AAC&U’s VALUE Rubric AKNT Refinement Diversity & Inclusion GenEd Initiative Interstate Passport ePortfolios Career Awareness (Equity & Inclusion Awareness) (High-Impact Practices) (Statewide Alignment Discussions)

Big Picture David Marshall: ”Learning Systems” approach Coordinated academic & student services efforts “Assignment Awareness” The whole institution(s) and whole student(s) Student Success Initiatives: Data-informed Decision Making ”Academic Pathways” (meta-majors)  Four categories of student FYA (First Year Advising)  “Safe Scheduling” FYE (First-Year Experience) UNIV courses & “Introduction to …” courses Tier 1 move to CTC “What do we want a UAA student to know and be able to do?”

Movement Toward Programmatic Definition GER Assessment Discussions Critical Thinking E-portfolios Course-level Inconsistencies Integrative Capstone Simplified Outcomes “Work Collaboratively” “Live Responsibly” 100- & 200-level / prereqs? Narrowed Course Offerings Coordinated / Scaffolded Assignments

Key Questions “Never waste a good crisis” What are the key criteria to guide our discussions concerning the next phase of GenEd? What structures & strengths do we already have in place to facilitate those discussions for that next phase? What is the best way to facilitate those discussions efficiently? What would you add?

The Bottom Line With nearly one-third of the baccalaureate degree and one-half of the Associate of Arts degree committed to the General Education Requirements, we must continue to communicate the pedagogical value of the GenEd and its fundamental importance to a college education and to a successful career, and we must continue to do meaningful assessment that furthers student success in all areas of their university experience. A programmatically coherent, pedagogically coordinated, consistently communicated, and curricularly (and extra-curricularly) aligned GER is central to fulfilling UAA’s mission.