Evaluative practice What is Evaluation? The consideration of:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Scientific enquiry D1.1 You can come up with a testable hypothesis from an observation. D1.2 You can explain a hypothesis using your scientific knowledge.
Advertisements

Experiments and Variables
Science Coursework - ISAs
Errors in Chemical Analyses: Assessing the Quality of Results
How Science Works Glossary AS Level. Accuracy An accurate measurement is one which is close to the true value.
Rate Of Reaction Investigation
Data and Data Collection Quantitative – Numbers, tests, counting, measuring Fundamentally--2 types of data Qualitative – Words, images, observations, conversations,
Assessment Statements  The Internal Assessment (IA) Rubric IS the assessment statement.
Salters-Nuffield Advanced Biology
IB Internal Assessment Design. Designing an Experiment Formulate a research question. Read the background theory. Decide on the equipment you will need.
Unit 1 Accuracy & Precision.  Data (Singular: datum or “a data point”): The information collected in an experiment. Can be numbers (quantitative) or.
IB Biology Topic 2 Internal Assessment
Chapter 5 Errors In Chemical Analyses Mean, arithmetic mean, and average (x) are synonyms for the quantity obtained by dividing the sum of replicate measurements.
Make observations to state the problem *a statement that defines the topic of the experiments and identifies the relationship between the two variables.
Data Collection and Processing (DCP) 1. Key Aspects (1) DCPRecording Raw Data Processing Raw Data Presenting Processed Data CompleteRecords appropriate.
Calibration Involves fixing known points and constructing a scale between these fixed points. Causal Link A change in one variable that results from, or.
Mean: The AVERAGE values of a set of numbers. The mean is found by ADDING all of the values, then DIVIDING by the number of values in the set of data.
RESEARCH & DATA ANALYSIS
How Science Works Precision How small a measurement is. Millimetres are more precise than centimetres because they are smaller.
Quality Control: Analysis Of Data Pawan Angra MS Division of Laboratory Systems Public Health Practice Program Office Centers for Disease Control and.
Physics 2.1 AS Credits Carry out a practical physics investigation that leads to a non- linear mathematical relationship.
GUIDANCE Connecting Science © Hodder Education 2009 Evaluating a practical technique When we evaluate our method and results, we reflect on what we did.
DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTS. DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS Planning an experiment to obtain appropriate data and drawing inference out of the data with.
Controlled Assessment Unit - CAU Investigative Skills Assessment - ISA 7 ISA section 2 exam – Additional / Separate Science Section 2 Exam: Up to 50 minutes.
Topic 11 Measurement and data processing
Topic 1: Measurement and uncertainties 1.2 Uncertainties and errors
GCE AS/A Level Biology Practical Assessment.
Statistics in Management
AP Biology Intro to Statistics
Engineering Measurements
Experiment to determine the value of g
PCB 3043L - General Ecology Data Analysis.
How Science Works Precision Science at SUS
Understanding Results
EVALUATIONS.
Measures of Central Tendency & Range
Research methods Lesson 2.
Part 1 – The Scientific Report Must be presented in the sections listed in your handout Written in past tense Written in third person Presented.
Just What Is Science Anyway???
ISA Glossary of Terms Use this PowerPoint to help you explain the AQA Glossary of Terms in preparation for an ISA for the 2013 course. 20/09/2018.
Learner name:   Assessor name: D Roczniak Issue date: 13/11/17
Preparing a soluble salt
Measurements and Uncertainties
Part 2 – Evaluation of Findings (distinction) Broken down into 5 areas: Evaluation of statistical data Evaluation of conclusions drawn Evaluating.
1.3 Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
INVESTIGATING THE EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON Initial Rate of Linked to global warming ENZYME ACTIVITY Investigating climate change Read the student sheet.
Warm up 8/17-18 What is a hypothesis?.
IB BIOLOGY INTERNAL ASSESSMENT
A –Level Physics: Accuracy + Uncertainty
Practicing Science Table of Contents Math in Science Graphs Brainpop-
Graphing with Uncertainties
Evaluative practice What is Evaluation? The consideration of:
Exam technique and PAGs
PRACTICAL REPORT WRITING
Using a microscope Key points:
Obj. 1 Investigative Techniques State Correlation 1a-1h
Numerical Descriptive Measures
How Science Works Precision Science at Don Valley
Processing the Bubble Tube Investigation
Introduction To Medical Technology
Cell sizes Cells are often too small to be seen with the naked eye
Education Using PowerPoint
Data and Data Collection
Processing the Bubble Tube Investigation
For Senior School Sciences
Quality Assessment The goal of laboratory analysis is to provide the accurate, reliable and timeliness result Quality assurance The overall program that.
Chapter 5: Errors in Chemical Analysis
Evaluating Experiments
Data Processing and Analysis
Working Scientifically
Presentation transcript:

Evaluative practice What is Evaluation? The consideration of: The way the experiment was carried out The quality of the data and also: the processing of that data

The Experiment – Validity (or did it measure what you wanted it to?) Limitations Uncontrolled variables Results Effects of errors (systematic and random) Reliability Repeatability/reproducibility Accuracy Precision

Definitions 1. Accuracy 2. Precision 3. Reliability 4. Validity How close our measurements are to the true value Dp recorded to If the test is repeated and the same results are obtained Does the experiment measure the correct variable The variable that we change or manipulate The variable that is measured to see the response to the change in the independent variable. 1. Accuracy 2. Precision 3. Reliability 4. Validity 5. Independent variable 6. Dependent variable 1E, 2D, 3A, 4B, 5F, 6C

Limitations Limitation How limitation affects method or results Example of how to overcome limitation Insufficient intermediate readings taken e.g. every 60 sec. Could miss changes occurring between intervals measured. Take readings at smaller intervals eg 30 sec instead of 60 sec. Insufficient range of independent variable; e.g. 30-50OC. Lack of results beyond range – makes determining trend difficult. Extend the range, eg 10-80OC. Insufficient number of values for independent variable. Makes determining trend difficult. Include more intermediate values. One measurement or only two replicates. Unable to detect anomalous results, decreases reliability. Perform at least three replicates. Difficulty in judging colours or changes when using ‘by eye’ methods. Lack of consistency in judgement causing less reliable, precise and accurate results. Use colour standards, colorimeter, time movement of ball bearing for coagulation or any standard method for comparing change. Inconsistent stirring of solutions. Inconsistent rate of product formation or separation /non-mixing of components of solution. Standardise method and time of stirring. Samples from different sources. Different age/state may introduce random errors Use same source for samples Method of timing. Used to a greater/lesser level of precision than sensible (e.g 0.01s) Record times to nearest second, 10 seconds or whatever is appropriate. Impossible to start all reactions at same time. Some reactions occurred for longer or shorter times. Use a staggered start, e.g.at 1 minute intervals pH not controlled. pH affects enzyme activity. Use a buffer solution to control pH.

Systematic Errors Errors that are the same throughout the investigation. e.g. A measuring device that is ‘out’ by a certain value, one of the controlled variables is always incorrect by the same quantity. Results may still be precise, but not accurate.

Random Errors Occur when procedure not carried out in the same way each time it is performed. e.g. Reading the apparatus differently every time, using any of the equipment a different way each time or due to variations in biological material used in experiment. Some results will be affected, but not all. May cause one or more anomalous results.

Processing results Calculating mean, median, mode Mean – average of all data collected. (add all values up and divide by number of results) Median – middle value when all collected data listed in order of size. For even number of results, find the mid point of the two middle values. Mode – The most common data value. (often tally or bar chart helps to identify) Range – Difference between the smallest and largest values, or between the replicates of an experiment. Calculating reaction rate (1/t, or depending on size of number, 100/t or 1000/t; t=time taken for reaction) Calculating relative reaction rate (Choosing one reaction (reference) and comparing the other reactions to it – time taken for reference reaction to occur/ time taken for other reaction). Graphs: Use range bars to show range of results around the mean Calculate standard deviation (not till A2) but can use provided SD values for error bars on graph, the SD is plotted above and below the point).

Rate Calculations Relative Rate (different to rate of reaction, see previous slide) If you compare your reaction rate to one of the other reactions.... Say 10mmol is the maximum (reference) in this experiment. You wish to calculate the relative speed of the other reactions to this one. So: 10 (sec) / 20 sec (for 8mmol) = 0.5 relative rate OR, percentage relative activity of enzyme: Enzyme activity is at 100% at 4mmol So for 8mmol percentage relative activity is 40 (sec for 4mmol)/20 (sec for 8mmol) *100 = 200% Enzyme concentration (mmol) Time taken (s) Relative rate 2 60 0.16 4 40 0.25 6 30 0.33 8 20 0.50 10 1.00

Evaluate your experiment (do this sheet at home after your quantitative!) Brief background to experiment What did the experiment intend to show? Could you formulate a hypothesis? What limitations were there? What effect on the results? How could the method be changed to overcome the limitation? Is there some way to process your data to show how significant/reliable it is? What was the data like? Were there any anomalies? Why? What conclusion could you draw from your results? What evidence do you have to support this conclusion?