Flowing & Cross-Examination

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By Mark Veeder-SCFI How to properly construct an AC and NC -Getting the most out of cross-ex -How to structure a rebuttal.
Advertisements

LD: Lincoln-Douglas Debate History:  Illinois senatorial debates between Abraham Lincoln & Stephen Douglas  Became high school competitive.
POLICY DEBATE An Introduction by Rich Edwards Baylor University.
Lincoln-Douglas Debate An Examination of Values. OBJECTIVES: The student will 1. Demonstrate understanding of the concepts that underlie Lincoln-Douglas.
Lincoln Douglas Value Debate Orientation. Volunteers Make it Happen! 2 We can’t do this without you. You are making an investment. You are performing.
Lincoln Douglas Debate Terminology and Structure.
DEBATE FINAL EXAM STUDY GUIDE Spring Debate Final Exam Study Guide Define terms using the answers here; if the answers aren’t complete, use Google.
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF THE SPEECHES
4 minute Affirmative Constructive This speech is prepared ahead, rehearsed and should be perfectly timed. It is a presentation of the affirmative's position.
Lincoln - Douglas Debate. History… Abraham Lincoln Vs Stephen Douglas Topic: – Slavery Douglas: Citizens should decide for themselves Honest Abe: Slavery.
LINCOLN DOUGLAS DEBATE. Table of Contents  What is it  LD Debate Structure  Terms to Know  Constructive Arguments  Affirmative  Negative  Cross.
Stoa Speech and Debate Lincoln Douglas Value Debate Judge Orientation.
AN INTRODUCTION COMPETITION DEBATES. DEBATE Debate is essentially the art of arguing a point, policy or proposition of value. When participating in a.
WELCOME TO MILESTONES DEBATE TOURNAMENT. Qualifications for Judging RELAX!  You are fully qualified and you are brave!  It's not your job to be a debate.
Individual Policy Debate Orientation. Volunteers Make it Happen! 2 We can’t do this without you. You are making an investment. You are performing a teaching.
Basic Structure of a Round. a) Before the Round Pre-flowed arguments.
Chapter 25 Cross-Examination Techniques. Purposes of Cross-Examination Clarify arguments Clarify arguments Point out misinterpretations Point out misinterpretations.
FILING BASICS Staying organized is crucial.
BASICS OF BEING AFFIRMATIVE
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Affirmative vs. negative
Debate Orientation.
Team Policy Debate Orientation
Introduction to the Negative
Policy Debate Speaker Duties
LD Debate Study Information
What is a Debate? an argument with rules
Lincoln Douglas.
Developed by Jenny Alme, The Harker School
Types of Debate Lincoln/Douglas Public Forum Policy
Debate Chapter 13 Pages
Academic debate.
Team Policy Debate Orientation
Intro to Lincoln Douglas
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Cross Examination in LD
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Debate Judges Orientation
Lincoln Douglas Debate
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF THE SPEECHES
Debate Orientation.
Debate Orientation.
Debate: The Basics.
Public Forum Debate Format
Speaker Responsibilities
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Debate Orientation.
A model for argumentative writing
Beginning Strategies Novice Debate Henrichsen
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Debate Terms 1. Proposition – a statement of the issue to be debated
POLICY DEBATE An Introduction by Rich Edwards Baylor University.
What is a Debate? an argument with rules
Times and Tasks in an LD Round or What Do I Do Now?
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF POLICY SPEECHES
Team Policy Debate Orientation
Team Policy Debate Orientation
Welcome to Debate! Cross-examination
Informative, Persuasive, and Impromptu Speaking all rolled into one!
POLICY DEBATE An Introduction by Rich Edwards Baylor University.
Team Policy Debate Orientation
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
CX Purpose and Strategies
Components of an Argument
Team Policy Debate Orientation
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Team Policy Debate Orientation
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Debate Orientation.
Presentation transcript:

Flowing & Cross-Examination Lincoln-Douglas Debate

Flowing Flowing is simply the process of taking short-hand notes. Flowing is incredibly important in debate for a number of reasons: It is a record of arguments, it is a manner of organization, and it keeps you for dropping/ignoring points that are implied as conceded.

Over time, you will create your own short hand that you will be able to understand Usually note definitions, unless you can use it against them Write down the Value and Value Criterion as V and VC Only need to note what they are, again no definitions unless relevant

You won’t be able to write down everything word for word, so write contention tagline (the first sentence that summarizes their point) Include taglines of sub-contentions, specific stats you think are relevant, examples used, etc. Draw an arrow from what they say to the next column and write down why what they said was wrong with evidence from your own case/rebuttals

Affirmative Flow Sheet Set your paper lengthwise and draw 5 dividers in the following pattern for the affirmative sheet 1AC 1NR 1AR 2NR 2AR Value: Write Aff case here Criterion: Cont1: Cont2: Cont3: What Neg says to undermine Aff value What Neg says to refute Aff contention  What Aff says when they defend their case  What Neg says to refute their case again  

Negative Flow Sheet Set your paper lengthwise and draw 4 dividers in the following pattern for the negative sheet 1NC 1AR 1NR 2AR Value: Write Neg case here Criterion: Cont1: Cont2: Cont3: Write down what Aff says about Neg case Neg’s defense of their own case  

You MUST pre-flow, meaning you fill out the constructive section of whichever side of the debate you’re on. Reminder: You don’t have to flow during CX and it doesn’t count towards who wins the debate! Clarify anything you may have missed, but use CX to move the debate forward.

Cross-Examination Cross-x presents an opportunity to fulfill 3 objectives: Clarify certain aspects of the opponent's case. Expose weaknesses in the opponent's case. Build one's own case.

Cross-Examination Ask questions your opponent's case hasn’t addressed- you don’t want to give them opportunity to extend their case Don’t ask questions directly but guide the opponent into giving the answer you want to hear by asking in an indirect way Don’t focus on a single point A common mistake is to nitpick some point which in the end may prove insignificant, especially if the opponent drops it or kicks out of it.

Cross-Examination Things to Avoid: Don’t be rude or overly aggressive, but don’t allow the opponent to dominate the time by filibustering or over-explaining C-X is not speech time - some opponents will try to extend their cases. Interrupt with "thank-you" and ask your next question If the opponent continues to speak, the opponent will appear rude. Conversely, if you are being questioned, you may want to use the time to build your own case whenever possible

Cross-Examination Things to Avoid: Cross-x is not a good time to introduce new claims, evidence or contentions but this often happens and those claims are argued throughout the rest of the debate Always remember who is supposed to be asking the questions When you are being questioned, if you find time to extend case, do it Never agree with your opponent unless you are absolutely certain your agreement can not be used against you

Cross-Examination

Flowing & Cross-Examination Resolved: Compulsory inclusion of non-felons' DNA in any government database is unjust. (1:40-7:45)

Rebuttals Practice Resolved: Adolescents ought to have the right to make autonomous medical choices. What can the affirmative use in their constructive? How can the negative refute this? What can the negative use in their constructive? How can the affirmative refute this?