Session 2: Designing M&E for Climate Actions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CAPACITY BUILDING WITHIN THE UNFCCC AND LDCS Richard Muyungi United Republic of Tanzania.
Advertisements

The UNFCCC’s Bali Roadmap: building long-term cooperative action to address climate change Claudio Forner UNFCCC secretariat 8 consultants.
Common recommendations and next steps for improving local delivery of climate finance Bangkok, October 31, 2012.
EVALUATION IN THE GEF Juha Uitto Director
Reporting on Policies and Measures Introductory presentation by the UNFCCC secretariat Workshop on the preparation of fourth national communications from.
Title written in CAPITAL letters, broken into 2 lines, if it fits with the length of the words Optional: Cover this area with photo. Proportions are approx.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
UNDP-GEF Adaptation 0 0 Impact of National Communications on Process of Integrating Climate Change into National Development Policies UNFCCC Workshop on.
MAINSTREAMING MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Can education be effectively managed without an M & E system in place?
SECTION IV: GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF STEPS TAKEN OR ENVISAGED BY NON-ANNEX I PARTY TO IMPLEMENT THE CONVENTION Workshop on the Use of the Guidelines for.
1 International negotiations on post 2012 regime: general framework and the key questions Ruta Bubniene, Programme officer Reporting, Data and Analysis.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Overview of the R-Package Kenn Rapp, Facility Management Team Asia-Pacific Indigenous Peoples Dialogue of the FCPF Chiang.
European capacity building initiativeecbi Adaptation in the Paris Agreement Ambition and Permanence for the Cancun Adaptation Framework Juan P Hoffmaister.
1 Marcela Main S. UNFCCC secretariat Bali Road Map: a new negotiation process.
UNFCCC Workshop on the preparation of national communications from non-Annex I Parties General description of steps taken or envisaged by non-Annex I.
Guidelines for non-Annex I National Communications Implications for Assessment of Impacts of, and Adaptation to Climate Change Asia-Pacific Regional Workshop.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Technology Needs Assessments under GEF Enabling Activities “Top Ups” UNFCCC/UNDP Expert Meeting on Methodologies for Technology Needs Assessments
UNDP Guidance for National Communication Project Proposals UNFCCC Workshop on the Preparation of National Communications from non-Annex I Parties Manila,
Introduction to the NAP process & the NAP Expo NAP-Expo 8– 9 August 2014, Bonn, Germany LEG Thinley Namgyel.
UNGGIM – PRIVATE SECTOR NETWORK. AGENDA > OVERVIEW OF PRIVATE SECTOR >PURPOSE AND VISION OF PRIVATE SECTOR NETWORK > STRUCTURE AND TERMS OF REFERENCE.
European capacity building initiativeecbi Article 6 P ARIS A GREEMENT José Miguez Brazilian Ministry of Environment european capacity building initiative.
Module 8 Guidelines for evaluating the SDGs through an equity focused and gender responsive lens: Overview Technical Assistance on Evaluating SDGs: Leave.
Stages of Research and Development
Presentation title Enhancing synergies towards climate action and sustainable development on the ground GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop Da Nang, Vietnam,
Achieving Sustainable Development with Low Carbon Action Asia Pacific Carbon Forum Rakshya Thapa Regional Technical Specialist, UNDP Global Environment.
Global Coordination Platform
South Africa’s Climate Change M&E System Framework 19 April 2017
Institutional Strengthening Support
ecbi Mitigation Subhi Barakat Legal Response Initiative (LRI)
Presentation title 5. Overview of the process to formulate and implement NAPs: process, 2 objectives, guidelines, the NAP-SDG iFrame, upcoming SBI assessment.
– a personal view Stephen Briggs
THE 22ND SESSION OF THE CONFERENCE OF PARTIES TO THE UNFCCC (COP 22), AND THE 12TH SESSION OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES SERVING AS THE MEETING OF.
Transparency of Action and Support under the Paris Agreement
Global Coordination Platform
ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
The Paris Agreement and CDR/NETs
Capacity-building Initiative for Transparency
COP and CMP negotiations relating to Annex I GHG inventories
Global Coordination Platform
Global Climate Change Alliance: Intra-ACP Programme
9/16/2018 The ACT Government’s commitment to Performance and Accountability – the role of Evaluation Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Thursday,
Presentation title Adaptation Committee and Least Developed Countries Expert Group Agenda item 5 (c-e) Draft recommendations developed by the Adaptation.
Panel Discussion on Supporting NDC Implementation Through Market and Non-Market Based Approaches: Carbon Pricing and More 6 September 2016 Kazuhisa KOAKUTSU.
Vulnerability Assessments and Adaptation to Climate Change
MRV and transparency framework as it relates to developing countries
4.2 CLIMATE SERVICES, ACTION AND RESILIENCE
Implementation of SAPCC:
Key issues in Article 6 negotiations
Enhanced Transparency Framework
ecbi european capacity building initiative
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Asia Pacific Carbon Forum Towards 1
Considerations in Development of the SBSTA Five Year Programme of Work on Adaptation Thank Mr. Chairman. Canada appreciates this opportunity to share.
ecbi Transparency and global stocktake Subhi Barakat
ACP House, 5th and 6th November 2018
Presentation title Adaptation Committee and Least Developed Countries Expert Group Agenda item 5 (c-e) Draft recommendations developed by the Adaptation.
ecbi european capacity building initiative
Efficiency and effectiveness of the GST
Issues of Technology Needs Assessment for Climate Change
Enhanced transparency framework and examples of flexibilities
Article 6 of UNFCCC & The New Delhi Work Programme An overview
Enabling environments for technology transfer under the UNFCCC
Presentation title Global NDC Conference 2019 Berlin, June 2019
City Adaptation Strategy and UPD Policy Framework
© Fresh Thoughts Consulting
ecbi Enhanced Transparency Framework
ecbi european capacity building initiative
Presentation transcript:

Monitoring and Evaluating Climate Change Actions: Overview and Introduction Session 2: Designing M&E for Climate Actions Training for CCC on Monitoring and Evaluation 3-4 April 2019

Results Framework identifies the intended results an intervention aims to achieve and the logical cause-and-effect relationship between the intervention’s inputs and activities and these results (RF is often depicted as a theory of change, logic model, or log frame). A Theory of Change (ToC) framework is increasingly favored for CCA M&E Indicators are markers of progress toward the intended results outlined in the results framework Monitoring generally refers to the systematic and continuous collection of data, quantitative and/or qualitative, about the progress of a project or program over time Reporting, alongside monitoring, often at annual (or more/less frequent) intervals, serve to take stock of progress and support routine management and accountability purposes Evaluation is a separate analysis that draws upon all these components, but also involves additional independent data collection and analysis. The aim is to determine the relevance and fulfillment of objectives, development efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability”. (OECD 2002) M&E: BASIC COMPONENTS Source: STAP (2017). Strengthening Monitoring and Evaluation of Climate Change Adaptation: A STAP Advisory Document. Global Environment Facility, Washington, D.C.,

Global Accord Paris Agreement Article 3: As nationally determined contributions to the global response to climate change, all Parties are to undertake and communicate ambitious efforts as defined in Articles 4, 7, 9, 10, 11 and 13 Article 4.13 Parties shall account for their nationally determined contributions. In accounting for anthropogenic emissions and removals corresponding to their nationally determined contributions, Parties shall promote environmental integrity, transparency, accuracy, completeness, comparability and consistency, and ensure the avoidance of double counting, in accordance with guidance adopted by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this Agreement. Article 7.9d Each Party shall, as appropriate, engage in adaptation planning processes and the implementation of actions, including the development or enhancement of relevant plans, policies and/or contributions, which may include: (d) Monitoring and evaluating and learning from adaptation plans, policies, programmes and actions;

Global Accord Paris Agreement Article 13 of the Paris Agreement established an enhanced transparency framework for action and support, with built-in flexibility which takes into account Parties’ different capacities and builds upon collective experience. Art 13.5 The purpose of the framework for transparency of action is to provide a clear understanding of climate change action in the light of the objective of the Convention as set out in its Article 2, including clarity and tracking of progress towards achieving Parties' individual nationally determined contributions under Article 4, and Parties' adaptation actions under Article 7, including good practices, priorities, needs and gaps, to inform the global stocktake under Article 14. Art 13.6 The purpose of the framework for transparency of support is to provide clarity on support provided and received by relevant individual Parties in the context of climate change actions under Articles 4, 7, 9, 10 and 11, and, to the extent possible, to provide a full overview of aggregate financial support provided, to inform the global stocktake under Article 14.

The modalities, procedures and guidelines for the enhanced transparency framework is currently being negotiated under the Ad hoc Working Group on the Paris Agreement (APA)

M&E: BASIC COMPONENTS Results Framework Indicators Monitoring Reporting Evaluation M&E: BASIC COMPONENTS Source: STAP (2017). Strengthening Monitoring and Evaluation of Climate Change Adaptation: A STAP Advisory Document. Global Environment Facility, Washington, D.C.,

M&E: Mitigation A “must” based on the Paris Agreement Clear Global target; National Targets as per the NDCs Fairly Straightforward -- emission reduction and removals! Uses the MRV tools and processes (with clear and agreed standards) Mitigation has bulk of the current CC financing – MRV importance well discussed, covered, and integral to funding scheme

M&E: Mitigation

M&E: Adaptation Importance of Adaptation M&E There is an urgent need to prepare for and adapt to CC impacts We need to track progress We need to understand what works, where, why so we can learn and go to scale and sustain results over time Facilitates creation, development, and implementation of a more comprehensive approach to climate adaptation Very important for improved decision making (policy, planning, actions) Tool for communications and encouraging participation Helps avoid and or reduce maladaptation

M&E: Adaptation Some Identified Challenges Scope is very broad M&E is broadly used for transparency and accountability but CCA M&E is complex and is in an uncharted path Key concepts ‘vulnerability’, ‘adaptive capacity’ and ‘resilience’ are commonly used or used interchangeably Lack of widely agreed indicators or standardized indicators Has been projectized– good, but is it enough? Have a clear Result Framework Non-linear – TOC; make Learning part of M&E National Policies based on latest science – allow for Select suitable indicators; moderate expectations; quantitative + qualitative information; learning focused evaluation Mainstreaming; KM; linking scales

M&E: Adaptation Some Identified Challenges The lack of predictable comparability, replicability, and scalability of CCA create practical methodological challenges for M&E Results attribution is a challenge given its interrelation with natural, social, economic factors and drivers M&E is a resource-intensive activity and Countries and other entities implementing CCA measures often do not have institutional structures, technical capacity or the resources to carry out M&E activities Inherent uncertainties as CCA is implemented; It can be a moving target M&E across scales; level specific approach; informal synthesis; KM Mainstreaming; develop proxy indicators; Have a clear ToC Invest on M&E; capacity building; build and anchor on existing M&E system; engage more agencies Develop criteria that capture and promote robustness and flexibility

Results (outputs & outcomes), Further Requirements M&E: Adaptation What should be measured in CCA M&E? Progress Effectiveness Learning Process, Results (outputs & outcomes), Further Requirements

Results (outputs & outcomes), Further Requirements M&E: Adaptation Source: IIED Briefing, August 2018 What should be measured in CCA M&E? Progress Effectiveness Learning Process, Results (outputs & outcomes), Further Requirements

Results (outputs & outcomes), Further Requirements M&E: Adaptation What should be measured in CCA M&E? Progress Effectiveness Learning Process, Results (outputs & outcomes), Further Requirements

Nationally Determined Contribution M&E: Adaptation What should be measured in CCA M&E? Progress Effectiveness Learning Nationally Determined Contribution Process, Results (outputs & outcomes), Further Requirements

CCA M&E: add’l points to keep in mind Generally CC M&E should build on and integrate with existing national M&E system Do not get too fixated on just capturing indicators – it doesn’t tell you “the why” and “the how” behind the numbers CCA M&E requires multiple actors – it’s a system-wide effort as it is linked with and cuts across sectors, levels of governance, and various scope. RF, targets, indicators shall be owned by all relevant actors Do not forget what adaptation is: “Adaptation” Defined IPCC AR5: The process of adjustment to actual or expected climate and its effects. In human systems, adaptation seeks to moderate or avoid harm or exploit beneficial opportunities. In some natural systems, human intervention may facilitate adjustment to expected climate and its effects UNFCC: Adaptation refers to adjustments in ecological, social, or economic systems in response to actual or expected climatic stimuli and their effects or impacts. It refers to changes in processes, practices, and structures to moderate potential damages or to benefit from opportunities associated with climate change (IPCC 2001, TAR) Philippines RA 9729: Adaptation refers to adjustments in natural and human systems in response to actual or expected climatic stimuli and their effects which moderates harm or exploits beneficial opportunities

Thank you for your attention! End of Presentation Thank you for your attention!