Pearson Unit 1 Topic 5: Relationships Within Triangles 5-6: Indirect Proof Pearson Texas Geometry ©2016 Holt Geometry Texas ©2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Using Indirect Reasoning
Advertisements

Inverses, Contrapositives, and Indirect Reasoning
Inverses, Contrapositives, and Indirect Reasoning
Types of Triangles Scalene A triangle with no congruent sides
Median ~ Hinge Theorem.
Report by Jennifer Johnson
Write the negation of “ABCD is not a convex polygon.”
Section 5-4: Indirect Reasoning March 7, Warm-up Warm-up: Practice 5-3: p. 58, 1-13.
Chapter 5: Relationships Within Triangles 5.4 Inverses, Contrapositives, and Indirect Reasoning.
Examining Proofs ©Xtreem Geometry TEKS G.6E.
Sara Wunderlich. Describe what a perpendicular bisector is. Explain the perpendicular bisector theorem and its converse. Give 3 examples of each. Perpendicular.
2x 4y 10 2 x + 4y 2x + 4y = 102 x + 4y + 102= 180 2x = y 51 – 2y + 4y = 180 2y = 180 2y = 27 x = y x = 51 – 2(13.5) x = 51 – 27.
ADVANCED GEOMETRY 3.6 Types of Triangles LEARNER OBJECTIVE: Students will classify triangles by sides and by angles and will complete problems and proofs.
5.1 Angle Relationships in a Triangle
Triangles Review.
Defining Triangles During this lesson, you will define triangles and their parts.
Relationships within Triangles Chapter Midsegment Theorem and Coordinate Proof Midsegment of a Triangle- a segment that connects the midpoints.
+ Do Now Take out your compass and a protractor. Look at the new seating chart and find your new seat. Classify this triangle: By angles By side lengths.
Bell Work Conditional: If the car is running, then it has fuel 1) Write the converse 2) Write the “opposite” statement of the conditional 3) Write the.
Geometry Chapter 5 Review. Is the inverse true? If a triangle has three congruent sides, then it is equiangular.
P. 270 #47-49.
5-5 Indirect Proof. Indirect Reasoning In indirect reasoning, all possibilities are considered and then all but one are proved false. – The remaining.
Warm Up # 4 Classify and name each angle. 1 ab c d.
Mr. Joshua Doudt Geometry (H) Pg
5-5 Indirect Proof. Indirect Reasoning: all possibilities are considered and then all but one are proved false. The remaining possibility must be true.
 TEKS Focus:  (6)(D) Verify theorems about the relationships in triangles, including proof of the Pythagorean Theorem, the sum of interior angles, base.
PROJECT Inequalities in Geometry Chapter 6 - beginning on page 202 Student Notes.
8-4 Triangles Objective: Students find unknown angles and line segment lengths in triangles.
Write the if-then form, converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the given statement. 3x – 8 = 22 because x = 10. ANSWER Conditional: If x =
Postulates Lesson 2.5.
3.1 Indirect Proof and Parallel Postulate
Geometry Mathematical Reflection 2C
Pearson Unit 2 Topic 8: Transformational Geometry 8-7: Dilations Pearson Texas Geometry ©2016 Holt Geometry Texas ©2007.
You will learn to use indirect reasoning to write proofs
Pearson Unit 1 Topic 3: Parallel and Perpendicular Lines 3-9: Comparing Spherical and Euclidean Geometry Pearson Texas Geometry ©2016 Holt Geometry.
Geometry 4.1 Triangle and Angles.
5.6 Indirect Proof and Inequalities in Two Triangles
LESSON 5–4 Indirect Proof.
Pearson Unit 1 Topic 4: Congruent Triangles 4-2: Triangle Congruence by SSS and SAS Pearson Texas Geometry ©2016 Holt Geometry Texas ©2007.
Topic 2: Reasoning and Proof
OPENER.
Pearson Unit 1 Topic 2: Reasoning and Proof 2-2: Conditional Statements Pearson Texas Geometry ©2016 Holt Geometry Texas ©2007.
Check It Out! Example 1 Write an indirect proof that a triangle cannot have two right angles. Step 1 Identify the conjecture to be proven. Given: A triangle’s.
Week 13.
Lesson 5 – 4 Indirect Proof
Pearson Unit 2 Topic 8: Transformational Geometry 8-5: Compositions of Rigid Transformations You will need a piece of patty paper for today’s notes.
Pearson Unit 2 Topic 8: Transformational Geometry 8-2: Reflections Pearson Texas Geometry ©2016 Holt Geometry Texas ©2007.
Pearson Unit 1 Topic 6: Polygons and Quadrilaterals 6-3: Proving that a Quadrilateral is a Parallelogram Pearson Texas Geometry ©2016 Holt Geometry.
Topic 2: Reasoning and Proof
Pearson Unit 1 Topic 3: Parallel and Perpendicular Lines 3-4: Parallel and Perpendicular Lines Pearson Texas Geometry ©2016 Holt Geometry Texas ©2007.
Pearson Unit 1 Topic 3: Parallel & Perpendicular Lines 3-3: Proving Lines Parallel Pearson Texas Geometry ©2016 Holt Geometry Texas ©2007.
Pearson Unit 1 Topic 6: Polygons and Quadrilaterals 6-5: Conditions for Rhombuses, Rectangles, and Squares Pearson Texas Geometry ©2016 Holt Geometry.
Pearson Unit 1 Topic 3: Parallel & Perpendicular Lines 3-5: Parallel Lines and Triangles Pearson Texas Geometry ©2016 Holt Geometry Texas ©2007.
Pearson Unit 1 Topic 5: Relationships Within Triangles 5-2: Midsegments of Triangles Pearson Texas Geometry ©2016 Holt Geometry Texas ©2007.
Pearson Unit 1 Topic 3: Parallel and Perpendicular Lines 3-2: Properties of Parallel Lines Pearson Texas Geometry ©2016 Holt Geometry Texas ©2007.
DRILL If A is (2, 5) and B is (-3, 8), show segment AB is parallel to segment CD if C is (-1, 4) and D is (-11, 10). What is the length of AB? Slope Formula.
Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Pearson Unit 1 Topic 5: Relationships Within Triangles 5-7: Inequalities in One Triangle Pearson Texas Geometry ©2016 Holt Geometry Texas ©2007.
Inequalities in Geometry
To Start: 10 Points Explain the difference between a Median of a triangle and an altitude of a triangle?
Pearson Unit 1 Topic 2: Reasoning and Proof 2-3: Biconditionals and Definitions Pearson Texas Geometry ©2016 Holt Geometry Texas ©2007.
Y. Davis Geometry Notes Chapter 5.
3-3 Parallel Lines & the Triangle Angle Sum Theorem
4-1 Vocabulary Acute triangle Equiangular triangle Right triangle
Vocabulary Indirect Proof
Pearson Unit 1 Topic 4: Congruent Triangles 4-7: Congruence in Overlapping Triangles Pearson Texas Geometry ©2016 Holt Geometry Texas ©2007.
Five-Minute Check (over Lesson 5–3) Mathematical Practices Then/Now
Pearson Unit 1 Topic 2: Reasoning and Proof 2-4: Deductive Reasoning Pearson Texas Geometry ©2016 Holt Geometry Texas ©2007.
5.6 Inequalities in Two Triangles and Indirect Proof
Relationships within Triangles
Presentation transcript:

Pearson Unit 1 Topic 5: Relationships Within Triangles 5-6: Indirect Proof Pearson Texas Geometry ©2016 Holt Geometry Texas ©2007

TEKS Focus: (6) Use the process skills with deductive reasoning to prove and apply theorems by using a variety of methods such as coordinate, transformational, and axiomatic and formats such as two-column, paragraph, and flow chart. (1)(D) Communicate mathematical ideas, reasoning, and their implications using multiple representations, including symbols, diagrams, graphs, and language as appropriate. (1)(G) Display, explain, or justify mathematical ideas and arguments using precise mathematical language in written or oral communication.

Vocabulary: Indirect proof—a proof involving indirect reasoning Indirect reasoning—all possibilities are considered and then all but one are proved false. The remaining possibility must be true.

Writing an Indirect Proof: 1. State as a temporary assumption the opposite (negation) of what you want to prove. 2. State facts to show that this temporary assumption leads to a contradiction. 3. Conclude that the temporary assumption must be false and that what you want to prove must be true.

Writing the 1st step of an indirect proof: Suppose you want to write an indirect proof of each statement. As the first step of the proof, what would you assume? A. An integer is divisible by 5. Assume temporarily that an integer is not divisible by 5. B. You do not have soccer practice today. Assume temporarily that you do have soccer practice today.

Identifying contradictions: Which two statements contradict each other? Segments can be parallel and congruent. I and II do not contradict each other. Segments can be congruent and perpendicular. II and III do not contradict each other. Segments cannot be parallel and perpendicular. Statements I and III contradict each other.

Writing an indirect proof Given: ΔABC is scalene. Prove: A, B, and C all have different measures.

Example 1: Identify the two statements that contradict each other: I. ΔPQR is equilateral. II. ΔPQR is a right triangle. III. ΔPQR is isosceles. An isosceles triangle is defined to have at least 2 congruent sides. A triangle could be equilateral and therefore can also be called isosceles. A triangle can be a right triangle and isosceles with angles of 45-45-90. But a triangle cannot be both equilateral and a right triangle. Therefore I and II contradict each other.

Example 2: Identify the two statements that contradict each other: I. m || n. II. m and n do not intersect. III. m and n are skew. Lines cannot be both parallel and skew, so I and III contradict each other.

Example 3: Write the first step of an indirect proof of the given statement: A. At least one angle of the triangle is obtuse. At least one angle of the triangle is not obtuse. B. m2 > 90 m2 < 90

Example 4: Identify the two statements that contradict each other: I. The orthocenter of ΔABC is on the triangle. This is a right triangle. II. The centroid of ΔABC is inside the triangle. This could be any type of triangle. III. ΔABC is an obtuse triangle. I and III contradict each other.

Example 5: Write an indirect proof in paragraph form: A Euclidean triangle cannot have two obtuse angles. Assume a triangle can have two obtuse angles. The 3 angles of a triangle always equals 180. An obtuse angle is > 90. But obtuse angle + obtuse angle + 3rd angle in the triangle would be more than 180. Therefore, a Euclidean triangle cannot have two obtuse angles.