Software Update - Type approval related issues -

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status report on the activities of TF-CS/OTA
Advertisements

Suggestion for Summarizing Process of the Principles
Moderator Training – unitised assessment
Jan 2016 Solar Lunar Data.
Outcome TFCS-05 // May OICA, Paris
Status report on the activities of TF-CS/OTA
30-31, August 2017 Den Hague, Netherlands)
Case studies on software update
OICA input on software updates to UN TF CS/OTA
Results of Clinical Trials in EudraCT Sponsor meeting
Concept of ACSF TAN (Type Approval Number)
Outcome TFCS-04 // March ITU, Geneva
Suggestion on software update
Outcome TFCS-07 // August NH Den Haag, NL
Q1 Jan Feb Mar ENTER TEXT HERE Notes
Outcome TFCS-11// February Washington DC
Status report on the activities of TF-CS/OTA
Outcome TFCS-11// February Washington DC
Average Monthly Temperature and Rainfall
Final Report of TF-CS/OTA September The Amba Hotel, London
Outcome of TFCS-12 - summary slides - (detailed meeting minutes will be provided separately) April The Shilla Seoul, ROK.
Summary of software update progress
2017 Jan Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Gantt Chart Enter Year Here Activities Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
Status report on the activities of TF-CS/OTA
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
Outcome TFCS-06 // June TIA, Arlington/VA (USA)
Informal document GRVA nd GRVA, 28 Jan Feb. 2019
Proposed Strategic Planning Process for FY 2013/14 thru FY 2015/16

Jan Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
Status report from UNECE Task Force on Cyber Security &
Japan’s opinion on SWIN
Electricity Cost and Use – FY 2016 and FY 2017
Informal document GRVA st GRVA, September 2018
Work plan and next steps – RDE-LDV working group
Replies by the Task Force to the comments provided by GRVA members
Task Force – Cyber Security, Data Protection and Over-the-Air issues
Status report of TF-CS/OTA
SC SC SC WS SC S HIS Background document Seminar document
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Why a „test phase“? Overview
Improved Register Data Matching and its Impact on Survey Population Estimates Steve Vale Office for National Statistics, UK.
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
XRN Feb 19 Minor Release - Status Update
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Overview of the recommendations on software updates
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Port Back Data Collection & Transition
Input for ad hoc on software update on 7th Dec. from Japan
TIMELINE NAME OF PROJECT Today 2016 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Input for ad hoc on software update on 7th Dec. from Japan
Status report on the activities of TF-CS/OTA
Inputs Regard to “Test Phase” to TFCS
Port Back Data Collection & Transition

Status report of OBD Task Force
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
Summary on initial findings
Access to data requirementS
KPI and KVI Review Approach & Plan
EDR/DSSAD IWG Status Report
Presentation transcript:

Software Update - Type approval related issues - Japan (Security TF of ITS/AD 13-14. March. 2017 @ITU Geneva)

Background Outcome TFCS-03 // 16-17 February 2017 @ OICA Office, Paris Topic „Software updates“ consists of 2 elements: - security issues related to s/w updates => threat analysis - type approval related issues => dedicated discussion => This activity could be a responce to the recommendation(ITS/AD-10-13) in a timely manner. Updating of vehicles on the road (in-use) identified as one key element for future discussion => after 1st registration => OICA propoals based on ITS/AD-10-13: „Retrofit-Approach“

Background Outcome TFCS-03 // 16-17 February 2017 @ OICA Office, Paris General principles for software updates to be differentiated into 3 classes: - non type relevant software changes - type relevant software changes requiring no further testing - type relevant software changes requiring further testing, e.g. for adding new functions Workscope of TF-CS Review relevant existing regulations Develop regulatory proposal to address software updates Need for configuration control (s/w version identification) Process for: - s/w updates for series production - s/w updates on registered vehicles (in-use)

Background Additional Input from European Commission: “Study on the assessment and certification of automated vehicles -Final Report-” by TRL In this report, the idea of recall update for vehicle post delivery is introduced. (The original document is ITS-DOC-7 for ITU by Sena Consulting, 2015(?) .)

Software update cases by the report Possible cases of software update for vehicle post delivery are Case 1 : recall update Case 2 : non-recall operation updates Case 3 : performance improvements updates or security risk correction action updates.

Software update cases by the report An example of processing flow of software update(OTA) for “recall update” is suggested. In the report, processing flows of software update for “non-recall operation updates” are not described.

Working approach on this issue

Identifying possible software update cases for vehicle post delivery Possible working approach on software update issue The following steps can be considered as the working approach. Identifying possible software update cases for vehicle post delivery Identifying functions to be updated by each process of software update cases Building software update process flow for each software update cases Drafting the recommendation

Software update cases General principles for software updates Outcome in TFCS-03 meeting Suggested cases in the EC’s report ① Non type relevant software change Performance improvements updates or security risk correction action updates ② Type relevant software changes requiring no further testing Non-recall operation updates ③ Relevant software changes requiring further testing, e.g. for adding new functions Recall update These suggested cases are identical? => to be confirmed

Discussion points The following software update cases for post vehicle delivery could become the base lines of discussions. “Recall update” including recall OTA update shall be administrated in the same line with the existing recall scheme. “Non-recall” cases regarding critical functions of vehicle controls, such as steering, breaking and accelerating vehicles, should be administrated by authorities appropriately.

Schedule(TBD) 2017 2018 Feb. (2) Mar. (3) Apr. (4) May (5) Jun. (6) Jul. (7) Aug. (8) Sep. (9) Oct. (10) Nov. (11) Dec. (12) Jan. (1) ★2/16-17 TF#3@Paris ★5/10-11 TF#5@Paris ★3/13-14 TF#4@Geneva ★5/31-6/1 TF#6@Washington ★9/27-28 TF#7@Tokyo ★12/x TF#x @xx Identify update cases Identify functions Building Update process Drafting recommendations