MOD 565 Standards of Service

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
C. T Calculation Math for Water Technology MTH 082 (pg. 468) Math for Water Technology MTH 082 (pg. 468) “Required by Law”
Advertisements

USRV Incentives Review Chris Warner. USRV Resolution Responsibility and Occurrence  E8.1.1  “…the User shall investigate Reconciliation Values that.
Note: Daily averages are based on Julian day 28,14, and 7-day averages are rolling, to precede the given upwelling date. One day mean minus 28-day mean.
Cost-Volume-Profit Relationships Chapter 6. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 Irwin/McGraw-Hill The Basics of Cost-Volume-Profit (CVP) Analysis.
Microsoft Excel How to do a quick loan using PMT.
Cost-Volume-Profit Relationships
Retirement Planning and Employee Benefits for Financial Planners
Xoserve sense checks & validation Reasonable Endeavours Claims.
Chapter 5. Assumptions of CVP Analysis  Selling price is constant.  Costs are linear.  In multi-product companies, the sales mix is constant.  In.
Cost-Volume-Profit Relationships Chapter 6. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2002 Irwin/McGraw-Hill 2 The Basics of Cost-Volume-Profit (CVP) Analysis.
HFT 2401 Financial Statement Analysis & Presentation Chapter 18.
Cost-Volume-Profit Relationships Chapter 6. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin The Basics of Cost-Volume- Profit (CVP) Analysis.
Module 11 Corporate Tax Calculations. Corporate vs Individual Taxation Key Learning Objectives n n Similarity of (taxable) income n n Differences in income.
1 To re-define the Aggregate Reconciliation Period to reflect the period to which the charge relates.
Gain sharing Schemes which use Financial Measures like costs saved : Scanlan and Ruccar Plans Schemes which use a single factor of Productivity or Improshare.
Billing Operations Forum 24 July 2007 RbD Overview Billing Operations Forum 24 July 2007 RbD Overview Fiona Cottam.
1 v1 iGT CSEP Billing Solution ScottishPower Proposals April 08.
1 Mod Review Group 126 Mar 2007 slides 126 Review Group – Restriction of Invoice Billing Period  The review proposal is primarily concerned with restricting.
1 Mod Review Group 126 Apr 2007 slides 126 Review Group – Restriction of Invoice Billing Period  These slides describe the business rules for the treatment.
Analysis of Cost- Volume Pricing to increase profitability Chapter 3.
Analyzing Credit. Objective: You will use the Daily average method to determine the balance of a credit card, and will calculate the Effective Annual.
1 Modification 0152V Implementation Matters 25 October 2007.
Ratio Analysis Interpretation of Financial Statements.
SoS Report PAC – 13th December 2016.
Aims of the Session Rounding Fractions Percentages Averages Ratios
Cost-Volume-Profit Relationships
Cost-Volume-Profit Relationships
4.5A Credit card statements
UNC Modification Proposal 0202 National Grid Distribution
SACS CRITERIA & STANDARDS
Section 2: Ratios Measuring Financial Strength
Entry Capacity Overrun price calculation
Teens lesson eight credit cards.
Corporation Tax Loss Relief
Internet Traffic Management and Accounting Workshop
AdWords and Generalized On-line Matching
Presentation on Cross Sectional Analysis Between Metro Spinning and Saiham Textile
NG Strawman – Ofgem Response
CALCULATING THE ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE TURNOVER RATIO
Collector Production Metrics
SHIKHAR Q
Weekly Progress Update 3rd Aug 2018
Investment Appraisal A set of tools which allow a company to make an informed decision on whether or not to proceed with a given investment. These tools.
Futures Contracts on commodities
Analyzing Credit.
Chapter 3.
Nexus Meter Read Performance April 2018
Cash Budget analysis.
Incentives 26 September 2018.
Correction of Minor Material Drafting Errors
NG Strawman – Ofgem Response
Weekly Progress Update 13 July 2018
Chapter 18: Foundations of Control
Weekly Progress Update 15 June 2018
Project Nexus Workgroup
Mod 124 Steve Nunnington.
Problems Involving Percents
Project Nexus Workgroup
UK Link Replacement Programme additional supporting UNC modifications
Optimisation of Entry Capacity Modification Proposal
MOD 640 INVOICING VALIDATION RULES
Production Allocations
Meter Read Rejections ..
Planning Your Trade Understanding Reward/Risk Ratios
Mod565 TSL8 - Nominations Referred Calculations
Standards of Performance Scorecard
Serum bicarbonate increased by ≥3, ≥4, and ≥5 mEq/L in 52%, 39%, and 22% of patients, respectively, in the combined TRC101 dose group compared with 6%,
Calculating Credit Card Interest
FIMO Video Presentation
Xoserve Draft UIG Incentives Modifications 20 May 2019
Presentation transcript:

MOD 565 Standards of Service Query Management Performance Shipper Performance Figures contained in this presentation are for example only and in no way reflect Shipper or Industry actual data.

Determination of User Limits The Shadow Log It is presumed that Users submit queries in good faith but there are occasions when the query is deemed to be invalid (No challenge to the data or Shipper data incorrect. For Query Management it has been accepted that queries, which are deemed to be invalid, are to be used as the measure within the Shadow Log. All Invalid queries are deducted from the total population on a 1 for 1 basis. The number of such queries will be classed as “shadow log relevant invalid Queries” for the calculation of any liability payments due. Determination of User Limits For each User an average daily limit is determined, based on the daily average of valid queries received each month. The total number of valid queries will be determined from the total number of queries submitted minus the number of invalid queries cleared in that month. The daily average of any month will be calculated by dividing the total number of valid queries submitted each month per User, by the number of Business Days within the month. The Current month daily limit will be taken to be the highest daily average within the preceding three months +20%. The limit will change month on month against the three month rolling highest figure Month Business Days in month Actual Total Queries Actual Total Valid Queries Valid Daily Average Current Month Daily Limit (rounded up) 1 21 451 406 19.3 - 2 500 450 21.4 3 20 601 541 27.1 4 22 482 434 19.7 33 5 467 421 20.1 6 593 534 26.7 7 397 358 17.1 32 Example - Current Month Daily Limit for month 4 = highest daily average from the preceding 3 months + 20 % 27.1 * 20% = 5.42 valid queries 27.1 + 5.42 = 33 daily limit

* ** MOD 565 SOS Query Management Performance * Excesses are any number of queries > valid daily average amount ** Shadow Log is the Invalid queries Final Achieved Performance (%) = No. of Queries resolved within D Days * 100 A – B – C GT Large – 4 Day Target 80% Final Achieved Performance (%) = 980 * 100 = 98,000 = 460% 1544 – 716 – 615 213 GT Large – 10 Day Target 95% Final Achieved Performance (%) = 1517 * 100 = 151,700 = 925% 1544 – 765 – 615 164 GT Large – 20 Day Target 98% Final Achieved Performance (%) = 1542 * 100 = 975% 1544 – 771 – 615 A = the total number of queries resolved within the month B = the number of Shadow Log Relevant Invalid Queries C = the sum of daily excesses D = 4, 10 or 20 days respectively The volume of Invalid queries and Excesses as a ratio to the number of queries received cause the excessive percentages